Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:27:00 -
[1]
When flying my hulk I get the following resists:
38%EM 75%EX 63%KIN 50%THERM
Which are basic resists for all exhumers, except the Hulk should get 7.5% for each barge level to shield resists across the board, so its bugged. I thought this was fixed already???
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
FFGR
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:46:00 -
[2]
Also see the ALL the Assault Frigates. As well as the Transport Ships. Notice anything ? Then see the HACs and the Recons. Notice anything else ? _____________________________
siggy v. 0.1, bare with my Photoshop n00bness |
smallgreenblur
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:48:00 -
[3]
I think what he's trying to say in the above post is, the bonuses are already applied.
sgb
|
FFGR
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:49:00 -
[4]
Originally by: smallgreenblur I think what he's trying to say in the above post is, the bonuses are already applied.
sgb
yup _____________________________
siggy v. 0.1, bare with my Photoshop n00bness |
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:50:00 -
[5]
Originally by: FFGR Also see the ALL the Assault Frigates. As well as the Transport Ships. Notice anything ? Then see the HACs and the Recons. Notice anything else ?
no, this is different.
differnt ships in THE SAME CLASS (exhumers) are exhibiting different behaviour resists wise...
all the exhumers have the 37.5 base resists. the hulk bonus should apply on top of this (like the sacrelidge bonus)
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:51:00 -
[6]
Edited by: keepiru on 04/04/2006 15:53:17 No, its actually a bug. Because its not in the description of the other 2, therefore it should be applied on top of the base resists like for the sacrilege/eagle.
So it should either be applied, or it should be removed from the description. ----------------
Official ISD cake & bree reserve thief. Barricades a speciality! Last stands on request. |
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 15:58:00 -
[7]
It took three posts before someone actually read my post. If you did, you would see that these resists are THE SAME for all exhumers, and the 7.5% to resists per barge level appears only in the hulk's description, which means the Hulk should have bigger resists than the Skiff or Mackinaw.
So FFGR, notice anything else there my man?
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
FFGR
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 16:11:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Halada It took three posts before someone actually read my post. If you did, you would see that these resists are THE SAME for all exhumers, and the 7.5% to resists per barge level appears only in the hulk's description, which means the Hulk should have bigger resists than the Skiff or Mackinaw.
So FFGR, notice anything else there my man?
I had always assumed that they forgot the description on the ships Not the first time they would had done so _____________________________
siggy v. 0.1, bare with my Photoshop n00bness |
Tulia
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 16:24:00 -
[9]
I believe all exhumers are supposed to have this. the hulk DID get a bonus after the patch, it went from 25 to 37.5 on EM and the others had risen accordingly. My skiff also gained resists. Basically, I think that the other two exhumers just have the resist bonus unlisted.
Either way, I get 45/91/85/55 on that ship. You want more?
oh wait...
Yes gimme more resists please, it's broken. I believe 10% per level would be best
|
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 16:29:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Halada on 04/04/2006 16:29:33
Originally by: Tulia I believe all exhumers are supposed to have this. the hulk DID get a bonus after the patch, it went from 25 to 37.5 on EM and the others had risen accordingly. My skiff also gained resists. Basically, I think that the other two exhumers just have the resist bonus unlisted.
Either way, I get 45/91/85/55 on that ship. You want more?
oh wait...
Yes gimme more resists please, it's broken. I believe 10% per level would be best
Either fix the description or the resists. Edit: Extra EM wouldnt hurt on the Hulk you know
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
|
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 19:24:00 -
[11]
So which is it ? Description error in skiff and mackinaw or bugged Hulk?
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
keepiru
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 20:40:00 -
[12]
slice of cake says its a bug.
make a nice bug report either way mate :) ----------------
Official ISD cake & bree reserve thief. Barricades a speciality! Last stands on request. |
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 20:48:00 -
[13]
Originally by: keepiru slice of cake says its a bug.
make a nice bug report either way mate :)
I did, Ill see if it was nice a report enought :)
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
|
Tuxford
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 21:59:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Halada So which is it ? Description error in skiff and mackinaw or bugged Hulk?
Error in description of Skiff and Mackinaw, I'll try to remember to fix it tomorrow. _______________ |
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 22:41:00 -
[15]
You know tux, this would be easyer if you guys had a set policy about listing/not listing pre-applied resistance bonuses.
And it would make explainign to new people much less tedious also. ----------------
Official ISD cake & bree reserve thief. Barricades a speciality! Last stands on request. |
Hllaxiu
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 22:43:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Tuxford
Originally by: Halada So which is it ? Description error in skiff and mackinaw or bugged Hulk?
Error in description of Skiff and Mackinaw, I'll try to remember to fix it tomorrow.
Could you just kill all ship description "bonuses" of this sort? Its rather confusing to newer people looking at assault frigates for instance, and then doubly confusing to everyone when looking at assault frigates and then looking at an Eagle or Sacriledge. --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 22:55:00 -
[17]
Originally by: keepiru You know tux, this would be easyer if you guys had a set policy about listing/not listing pre-applied resistance bonuses.
And it would make explainign to new people much less tedious also.
yeah, i don't think ANY innate bonuses should be shown included. give the transports and AFs a fourth bonus, and give the exhumers 37.5% base resist and the hulk a 5%/lvl bonus
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
FFGR
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 01:03:00 -
[18]
Originally by: HippoKing
Originally by: keepiru You know tux, this would be easyer if you guys had a set policy about listing/not listing pre-applied resistance bonuses.
And it would make explainign to new people much less tedious also.
yeah, i don't think ANY innate bonuses should be shown included. give the transports and AFs a fourth bonus, and give the exhumers 37.5% base resist and the hulk a 5%/lvl bonus
Transports got already 4 bonuses, as they have speed, cargohold, the resists and 2 tanking bonuses (5 listed in total)
It's the AF that got only 3 bonuses and Tux would be working on that after the next patch that is the Blasters fix, the buff of some ships and bonuses and the possible EW changes, am I right ? _____________________________
siggy v. 0.1, bare with my Photoshop n00bness |
Halada
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 16:55:00 -
[19]
Well thanks for the response Tux :)
(not fixed btw)
My ''All you want to know about mining'' Guide |
Suvereign
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 17:15:00 -
[20]
Kss
delete bonus allready applied, it's too confused...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |