|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
139
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:Z'zauoe Euopaeqorua wrote:J3ssica Alba wrote:What about we make everything low sec, heck no, null sec, we wouldn't want gate guns to interfere with our freighter ganking right? Yup ! sounds good .. but wait what's that sound I hear? Oh, that's just Eve's economy grinding to a halt, nothing important. So you seriously do believe that economy in EVE online depends on having one single large continent of highsec space? I believe that the majority of indy people are risk averse and prefer to live all their lives in hi sec, building ships and mods and whatever else they build. They would rather quit than move through low to different trade hubs. IDK how I would feel about this.
Yes, it would increase risk, however, it would also decrease competition.
If CCP threw it up on Sisi, I'd give it a try to see what all choke points, loopholes and regional pinches there were. It couldn't hurt anything there and if well received, they could then migrate it to TQ. MCRMI Now Recruiting for Minmatar FW and General Merc Work |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
139
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 21:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Helia Tranquilis wrote:This would hardly change the current reality. Uedama, Niarja and Deltole are already the 3 most dangerous systems in "hisec" in terms of freighter pinatas being "catalyzed". Making each a lowsec would at least encourage everyone to treat said systems like they already should. ^^Good Point MCRMI Now Recruiting for Minmatar FW and General Merc Work |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
139
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 22:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Arcticblue2 wrote:Z'zauoe Euopaeqorua wrote:Arcticblue2 wrote:
I used to do missions in low sec and honestly I like the "thrill" of doing stuff in low sec, but I gave it up ... why ? because people did not let me do what I like to do, they liked to kill me off, I did not like to be killed off so often and quite honestly it made me do what I like to do less and less fun. !
By breaking up these connections between empires would not change your mission running in any way. I would not go into Low-Sec either if I was forced to do so by trade.. I rather just quit than being forced to do something I don't like to do... if EVE-Online would not want my money then no problem :-) (BTW been playing since 2004 so seen abit on the way). Basically unless you solve the problem with blobbing that ganking have become ... then don't bother to try and change.
Unless you're in something small, high-sec ganks are blobs just like in low. How can you use that for your justification since the same behavior can be found in high-sec? MCRMI Now Recruiting for Minmatar FW and General Merc Work |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
139
|
Posted - 2014.02.09 16:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:9) SOE Epic arc introducing newbies to all four empires is ruined. Not entirely, it would introduce new players to low-sec firsthand. Give the high-sec adjacent gate grids in those systems, minor, minor protections to help dissuade gate campers (similar to the protections granted in Arnon). MCRMI Now Recruiting for Minmatar FW and General Merc Work |
|
|
|