Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
503
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 06:29:00 -
[181] - Quote
Lyra Jedran wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Lyra Jedran wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:
At Fanfest 2013, I spoke to a CCP Developer during a low sec discussion and presented my idea to introduce 1/10 and 2/10 DED sites into the low sec exploration site list. These sites had been static sites and were removed in December 2012 with Retribution. The complexes were introduced into low sec as exploration sites with the release of Rubicon. My goal was to create more content for lower level players. It was also about breaking some of the theme park rails that Eve has under much of itGÇÖs older content. if a new player is to live in low sec and go outlaw early they need to be able to sustain their losses.
..
Ah so you're the one to blame for those crappy sites clogging up the signatures in lowsec. Yes. On the other hand I am now enjoying myself reading your blog so we will call it an even trade and I'll be following your CSM campaign with interest.
If it helps the entire scope of my proposal for the sites was to gain up to 7/10's. :)
Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2891
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 12:31:00 -
[182] - Quote
So... What do you say to the accusation that on a hotel wifi based connection, you sound like Ali Aras? Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
503
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:25:00 -
[183] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:So... What do you say to the accusation that on a hotel wifi based connection, you sound like Ali Aras?
I can only blame my husband's choice of hotels on my sudden ability to impersonate others and not maintain a stable connection. It may be a hint he is trying to give me but I'll let it pass over my head. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Fereval Kondur
Exploration Frontier inc Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 14:11:00 -
[184] - Quote
I have been reading Sugar blog for quite sometime now, before even starting my own pilot journey.
It has effectively inspired some aspects of my personal EVE carrier, or more generally, the way I tend to grasp or approach New Eden.
The blog attest itself for her expertise and passion in what she does and more importantly the willingness to comprehend what she does not. On the communication department, her writing skills are excellent. She has not hesitated to already shares her views with CCP, with great success.
Even if you're not that dedicated to low-sec, I encourages you to check her blog, it demonstrate quite well why she could be a candidate of quality.
Sugar Kyle has my full support for CSM 9.
"Meanwhile Star Citizen devs announce collectible fish for aquarium in hangars"... General signs of turmoils have been reported amongst New Eden's veteran capsulers masses. Bring the Jukebox back ! |
Janus Clegli
S.e.V.e.N Armada General Tso's Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 17:34:00 -
[185] - Quote
Sugar Kyle will have my full support. |
Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
432
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 18:30:00 -
[186] - Quote
What do you think of flipping Moon and Planet materials between lowsec and nullsec? |
Lanctharus Onzo
Alea Iacta Est Universal Brave Collective
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 01:03:00 -
[187] - Quote
CSM9 Candidate Interview: Sugar Kyle http://www.capstable.net/2014/03/20/csm9sugarkyle/ Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast Twitter: @Lanctharus |
Tonni Prokshin
DeLait Kelts Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 11:42:00 -
[188] - Quote
my vote goes to Sugar Kyle |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
503
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 02:45:00 -
[189] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:What do you think of flipping Moon and Planet materials between lowsec and nullsec?
I do not think that that this idea would improve low sec.
To expand:
Currently, low sec has moons of all types. With Odyssey more moons were added to low sec. Low sec currently does not lack moons and acquiring null secs moons would simply give it more of what it currently has. I have written before that the problem is not moons or the proliferation of moons but the current POS situation. Currently, a POS is reinforced from 1-2 days. During that time a response fleet can form and arrive for the timer to take the POS down. This means that any moon worth holding are currently held by large originations. These are normally null sec alliances although some low sec alliances are large and powerful enough to maintain ownership of valuable moons. This will come into play with changes to Sov, power projection, and structure grinding. I do not see that putting even more moons out there will change it before all of the other issues are addressed.
Until then, moons will be a local resource that the locals will not often have access to. The rebalance of moon goo did decrease the value of the moons. This decreased some of their importance which caused less interest in those large organizations holding onto the moons in their decreased state of profit. I maintain a Platinum moon. It does not pay the bills but it bites into the cost of fuel for my POS which I maintain to manufacture boosters.
When it comes to planetary materials it makes sense that planets further away from empire populations are going to have more resources to harvest. It does not make as much sense for the planets closest to high sec to have more resources to harvest than the planets in null sec.
When it comes to deciding on the amount of resources a planet has based on its security status I think that it could be more complex. Right now the lower the sec the better the resources. Yet, .4 and .5 systems are very different in how much they are used. There is a bit more complexity in planetary resources due to current player installations installed on the planet. I think that a greater differentiation between low sec and high sec is an appropriate solution. Although we may ignore the actual video game aspects of Eve, low sec is still empire space. This is going to cause a greater planetary population which would decrease the available resources of a planet.
With low sec being empire, but not having all of the laws of empire, I can see the import side of low sec PI having some type of bonus. This would also be a way to create more lure for PI outside of high security space. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Destitute Tehol Beddict
ROC Incorporated The ROC
9
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:19:00 -
[190] - Quote
Sugar Kyle has my vote.
|
|
Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
495
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 03:25:00 -
[191] - Quote
Thanks for your reply Sugar! |
okoolos rimmer
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:59:00 -
[192] - Quote
Sugar where do you stand on the whole Erotica situation? do you think he went over the line and if so should he be punished? |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
512
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 17:53:00 -
[193] - Quote
okoolos rimmer wrote:Sugar where do you stand on the whole Erotica situation? do you think he went over the line and if so should he be punished?
I only knew of Eroticia as a random Jita ISK doubler. He is not anyone that was ever on my radar and I am glad of it. It also means I have spent a large part of the last few days catching up on the topic. From what I have learned of his GÇÿbonusGÇÖ room I find it disgusting. I do not understand the pleasure of cruel manipulation.
It seems that Erotica used Eve to find the person to play his game and used their interactions in Eve to keep him playing this GÇÿtrustGÇÖ game. Erotica does not even define what he did as a scam. He knows that it has caused volatile emotional responses before. He uses examples of people who have become incredibly upset.
There is precedent for CCP taking action against a player who has the potential to disrupt or harm other players or the reputation of Eve and by extension the potential to harm the viability of CCP in the marketplace. The decision to not allow Fon Revedhort to run for CSM8 is an example. Erotica 1 has already stated that he will withdraw from the CSM election, so there is no longer a strict relationship between the two cases. I think that it is still a valid example of CCP stepping into a situation that needs attention due to its potential and current effect on the community.
CCP tries to give players as much freedom as they can because most of us have the ability to make reasonable decisions when interacting with others. We keep things in game. I do not believe that Erotica is an example of the overall Eve community. This topic deserves a response from CCP. IGÇÖm sure they are looking at this case to see if it rises to the level of a EULA violation that could result in a ban or other sanction. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Kinis Deren
House Of Serenity. Disband.
362
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:26:00 -
[194] - Quote
I was contemplating not voting this year. However, I think you will make an excellent CSM member and therefore I pledge my vote accordingly. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
14579
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:35:00 -
[195] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:I was contemplating not voting this year. However, I think you will make an excellent CSM member and therefore I pledge my vote accordingly.
Please encourage all the lo-sec focused players you know to vote.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Tran Tuyen
Amadio Family Enterprises
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 15:12:00 -
[196] - Quote
What I like most about lowsec is that it's far more fun and interesting than highsec but still very accessible to new and casual players. It's not just in lowseccers' interest to have a stong, articulate lowsec voice on the CSM; any highsec bear who thinks there should be more to life than rescuing the bleeping Damsel again should be in favor of a vibrant, dynamic lowsec ecosystem. From what I've read in this thread and on her blog, Sugar Kyle is that lowsec voice. She has my support. |
Jake Rivers
Senex Legio
207
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 18:40:00 -
[197] - Quote
Sounds like a good candidate, +1 Senex Legio |
Liese Shardani
Hedion University Amarr Empire
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:49:00 -
[198] - Quote
I like what you've said here. You've got my vote, and I'll encourage my friends to vote for you, too. |
Gostina Mishina
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 16:07:00 -
[199] - Quote
I believe that Sugar Kyle will counsel the heck out of those stellar managers, and she will have votes from all my accounts. |
dexter xio
TURN LEFT
23
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:23:00 -
[200] - Quote
Lowsec4lyfe +1 Dexter xio - That cool guy |
|
Bayonnefrog
Hedion University Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 17:16:00 -
[201] - Quote
Sugar Kyle has had the most impressive interviews of all the candidates so far. She brings new ideas to the table and a different perspective from the other candidates. She has my vote. |
Matthew Dust
Planetary Strike Force Caps and Mercs
10
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 01:11:00 -
[202] - Quote
As a resident of Molden Heath and often a victim of the corporation she's in, I can honestly say she's an excellent candidate, she has seen my struggle as a solo pilot and the thing I am trying to do in MH. She listens and she cares, and isn't pushing some sort of agenda for personal gain.
+1,000,000,000 for Sugar Kyle You have my vote. |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
183
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 15:34:00 -
[203] - Quote
Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
523
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 18:32:00 -
[204] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
I believe that it is the responsibility of CCP to follow up on incidents reported to them. Each, potential TOS or EULA breaking incident should involve CCP looking at the incident to decide what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
203
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 18:39:00 -
[205] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
I believe that it is the responsibility of CCP to follow up on incidents reported to them. Each, potential TOS or EULA breaking incident should involve CCP looking at the incident to decide what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken.
I agree. That wasn't my question.
Do you feel the CCP can hold me accountable in game for something I do outside of the game?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
523
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 18:46:00 -
[206] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
I believe that it is the responsibility of CCP to follow up on incidents reported to them. Each, potential TOS or EULA breaking incident should involve CCP looking at the incident to decide what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken. I agree. That wasn't my question. Do you feel the CCP can hold me accountable in game for something I do outside of the game?
If that action violates the TOS or EULA after CCP investigates the incident. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
203
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 18:52:00 -
[207] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
I believe that it is the responsibility of CCP to follow up on incidents reported to them. Each, potential TOS or EULA breaking incident should involve CCP looking at the incident to decide what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken. I agree. That wasn't my question. Do you feel the CCP can hold me accountable in game for something I do outside of the game? If that action violates the TOS or EULA after CCP investigates the incident.
OK, just so I understand your position, CCP's TOS extends outside of the game and into my personal life as well?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
523
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 19:17:00 -
[208] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Sugar Kyle,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
I believe that it is the responsibility of CCP to follow up on incidents reported to them. Each, potential TOS or EULA breaking incident should involve CCP looking at the incident to decide what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken. I agree. That wasn't my question. Do you feel the CCP can hold me accountable in game for something I do outside of the game? If that action violates the TOS or EULA after CCP investigates the incident. OK, just so I understand your position, CCP's TOS extends outside of the game and into my personal life as well?
I cannot comment on whether what youGÇÖre doing out of game relates to the Eve TOS or EULA. The TOS and EULA are related to your Eve accounts. If a player performs an action outside of the game that violates the TOS and EULA inside of the game CCP will be responsible for deciding whether they want to take action.
Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Viceorvirtue
The Hatchery Team Liquid
45
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 19:36:00 -
[209] - Quote
Currently lowsec anomalies are in a strange place. The majority of anomalies require more than just a simple t1 cruiser but still ultimately give less than belt ratting does. The higher end lowsec anomalies such as hubs tend to require a bc and still don't give anything notable, its not as consistant as belt ratting and you actually make more doing missions/exploration using the same ship.
Do you feel there are any problems with lowsec anomalies and if so what do you feelpotential ways of fixing them would there be? |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
203
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 20:03:00 -
[210] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:[quote=Ssabat Thraxx]
OK, just so I understand your position, CCP's TOS extends outside of the game and into my personal life as well?
Quote: I cannot comment on whether what youGÇÖre doing out of game relates to the Eve TOS or EULA. The TOS and EULA are related to your Eve accounts. If a player performs an action outside of the game that violates the TOS and EULA inside of the game CCP will be responsible for deciding whether they want to take action.
OK, I don't want to be accused of trolling, so I'm going to just give up on trying to get a straight answer from you. Ive tried 3 times now and all you've given me is doublespeak. I mean seriously, look at your last reply.
I'm asking this question of all the candidates I'm considering voting for because it's an issue of utmost importance to me. I feel so strongly about it that this year I am one of those proverbial "single issue voters." I've heard a lot of good things about you from people I respect (I must admit that prior to that I had been unaware of your blog,) so I wanted to get your take on the issue in the hopes of finding 1 more candidate to vote for.
Really, though, your refusal to answer IS an answer, and it's not the one I was looking for.
Best of luck.
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |