Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
524
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 20:11:00 -
[211] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
I'm asking this question of all the candidates I'm considering voting for because it's an issue of utmost importance to me. I feel so strongly about it that this year I am one of those proverbial "single issue voters." I've heard a lot of good things about you from people I respect (I must admit that prior to that I had been unaware of your blog,) so I wanted to get your take on the issue in the hopes of finding 1 more candidate to vote for.
Really, though, your refusal to answer IS an answer, and it's not the one I was looking for.
Best of luck.
Thank you for your questions. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
524
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 12:48:00 -
[212] - Quote
Viceorvirtue wrote:Currently lowsec anomalies are in a strange place. The majority of anomalies require more than just a simple t1 cruiser but still ultimately give less than belt ratting does. The higher end lowsec anomalies such as hubs tend to require a bc and still don't give anything notable, its not as consistant as belt ratting and you actually make more doing missions/exploration using the same ship.
Do you feel there are any problems with lowsec anomalies and if so what do you feel potential ways of fixing them would there be?
The current state of low sec anomalies reflects that the PvE system in Eve has not caught up with the changes in the game. Low sec anomalies are not worth doing because the time investment vs the potential reward are not in balance. There are plenty of anomalies for a player to complete and a bit of attention will go far.
Some ideas:
-Anomalies can give more ISK through having more NPC ships to kill -Better quality NPCs instead of more NPCs semi-overseers specific to the anomalies or some type of tag rat -Improve the spawning inside of them. Having two ships spawn 100k from the last two ships while you chase them down to have another two ships spawn 70k off in a third direction is ridiculous. -Improve the rate players receive escalations. We will chase content all through space for a potential drop. More escalations get us out chasing the end of the rainbow more. More ships moving through space are ships that can engage in PvP. -LP tokens redeemable for small amounts of Concord LP
Drone anomalies need a complete reworking and something added to them to make them worth doing. With the tweaks to the integrated and augmented drones a small amount of drones with the proper components could spawn in the drone anomalies outside of the drone regions. Alternatively, they could escalate into the drone regions giving more players reason to venture into this space.
Also, the drone DED complexes that spawn are crying out for faction items specific to drones such as faction Drone Damage Amplifiers and faction Omnidirectional Tracking Links and everything else drone related which would help them them to become as attractive as the other faction sites. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 13:15:00 -
[213] - Quote
Hello Sugar Kyle,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
525
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 13:37:00 -
[214] - Quote
CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Sugar Kyle,
I only have 1 short pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ?
If CCP has deemed those actions to be EULA and/or TOS violations. Every incident is going to be a unique situation for CCP to decide on a course of action. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 16:22:00 -
[215] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Sugar Kyle,
I only have 1 short pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? If CCP has deemed those actions to be EULA and/or TOS violations. Every incident is going to be a unique situation for CCP to decide on a course of action.
I didn't ask if you agree with CCP's decision. I didn't ask if you agree with the TOS or EULA. I did specifically say "Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why". You seem to "beat around the bush" on a few of the harder questions asked on this forum. I want to know what YOUR personal opinion is. I ask again.....
I only have 1 short pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1090
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 00:15:00 -
[216] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting it. Please keep it civil people!
The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Sephira Galamore
Inner Beard Society Affirmative.
329
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 14:58:00 -
[217] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers? I'd like to point out that an account ban is _not_ an ingame disciplinary action. It is CCPs decision to restrict/deny their service to a customer.
An ingame disciplinary action would be taking ISK or items, as they do with ISK buyers, or overly emergent players that find and use exploits. |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 15:50:00 -
[218] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers? I'd like to point out that an account ban is _not_ an ingame disciplinary action. It is CCPs decision to restrict/deny their service to a customer. An ingame disciplinary action would be taking ISK or items, as they do with ISK buyers, or overly emergent players that find and use exploits.
Well, to put it perhaps more clearly, what I'm interested in is if the candidates believe the TOS and EULA apply to things said or done outside of the game in private.
That said, I believe I understand Sugar Kyle's position, so let's not derail the thread
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Abla Tive
Serpent.Sisters.of.Eve
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:19:00 -
[219] - Quote
Question about mining activity to all candidates |
Rykki Atruin
IPC Logistics
230
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 16:09:00 -
[220] - Quote
I've learned quite a bit about this game we all enjoy from Sugar's blog. From the minute she announced her candidacy I knew she would be at the top of my list. She is articulate (just read her replies here), intelligent, and charismatic. :-) Looking for new and experienced carebears |
|
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
533
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 14:31:00 -
[221] - Quote
Abla Tive wrote:I invite all CSM 9 candidates to tell me the number of hours they spent in the last month leaning on a mining laser F1 button. Also, some indication of the percentage of their time spent mining.
In the last month since running for CSM? Two hours picking up some minerals to finish off a flight of fighters I was cooking. Another three when I went to review the tutorials.
I gas mine booster gas in the available region my corporation is deployed to. I always have a gas mining venture in my deployment stack.
Last year I mined and built an Orca just because I wanted to. However, since ore anomalies no longer need to be scanned down I tend only to mine in low sec in snatch and grab situations. I used to do those ore anomalies in a Mackinaw. I still have several low sec Mackinaws and Retrievers from that time. My main industrial alt can fly Rorquals but I have no need to buy one.
Currently, it is more effective for me to buy minerals in high sec and ship them to low to build hulls or do compression for my capitals than it is for me to mine in low sec for the quantity of Ore I need for my production lines. That type of situation is one IGÇÖd like to change and why IGÇÖm thinking up ways to increase viability of tasks such as mining in low sec. Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Phantomite
Snuff Box
6
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:08:00 -
[222] - Quote
Snuff Box endorses Sugar Kyle for the Council of Stellar Management
After examining the candidates who have identified themselves as low sec supporters, Snuff Box has concluded that the one candidate who best represents the interests of all low sec residents is Sugar Kyle. She blends a significant PvP skill set with an ability to build thriving communities as evidenced by her successful public market in Bosena. She also is a POS owner, a booster manufacturer, and occasionally a Faction Warrior and low sec PvE player.
Her Bosena market deserves special recognition. Not only does it serve the needs of an entire region of low sec, eliminating the need for low sec citizens to shop in high sec, it has fostered the growth of a population that could not live in low sec full time without her market. Her business model, which she has named "The Cult of Reasonable Prices," brings Jita prices to pilots who live far from Jita, and it has resulted in the local high sec markets having to drop their prices, so she's done good work for the high sec pilots as well.
No other candidate captures the spirit of low sec space as well as she does. Beyond all that, she has significant experience in various high sec vocations.
Snuff Box heartily endorses Sugar Kyle's campaign for a seat on CSM 9, and we recommend that you give her candidacy serious consideration. |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3436
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:02:00 -
[223] - Quote
I am happy to endorse you for election to the 9th Council of Stellar Management! Good luck at the polls!
Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
KIllerJon
Snuff Box
5
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:46:00 -
[224] - Quote
Confirming Snuff Box's intention to fully support and vote for Sugar. As a newly converted follower of " The Cult Of Reasonable Prices" myself and having talked with Sugar on comms i cant think of anyone better in the candidate list to represent our little area of space
KJ |
Phantomite
Snuff Box
8
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:59:00 -
[225] - Quote
If you care about lowsec, don't waste your vote and let goons win it all. Put all your effort into sugar kyle and tell your corpmates to do the same |
Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
994
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:56:00 -
[226] - Quote
I published my recommendations for CSM9 today and Sugar deservedly earned my recommendation due to her depth of knowledge and much needed lowsec focus.
Vote for Sugar for CSM 9 if you care about lowsec at all. RvB Ganked: EVE's Number One Public Roam |
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
46
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:16:00 -
[227] - Quote
Or even if you don't care about low-sec, as I don't.
Sugar Kyle demonstrates coherence of thought and diligence as she describes her EVE fun. I think she'll communicate well with CCP and with the player base. Sugar Kyle for CSM9! |
Lex Arson
Adversity. Psychotic Tendencies.
360
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 02:20:00 -
[228] - Quote
Psychotic Tendencies will be endorsing Sugar Kyle for this election o7 There's no use crying after every mistake, you just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake. |
NightShift Darthbobo
Adversity. Psychotic Tendencies.
24
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 04:16:00 -
[229] - Quote
I support this Sugar Kyle for CSM9 |
Rhavas
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
273
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 06:19:00 -
[230] - Quote
I posted my endorsements this evening.
http://interstellarprivateer.wordpress.com/2014/04/07/csm9-endorsements/
Sugar Kyle is one of six candidates (along with Ali Aras, Corbexx, James Arget, Mike Azariah and Mynnna) to get a First Tier endorsement from me. Here's what I said about her:
Rhavas wrote:Sugar Kyle: The CSM desperately needs a voice from lowsec. Sugar Kyle is the perfect lowsec candidate, in my opinion. She is not just a lowsec small-gang PVPer, although that is her core. She is also a lowsec hauler. A lowsec mission-runner. The founder and maintainer of a full-blown lowsec market that she created simply because she saw a need. A person who sits in E-UNI and Rookie chat and voice channels for fun to help people out. A lowsec manufacturer, with POS experience making boosters. And most recently, a Faction Warrior. In short, she is lowsec embodied. It is critical that you put her on your ballot for the good of the game.
Good luck Sugar! Author of Interstellar Privateer Shattered Planets, Wormholes and Game Commentary |
|
Balshem Rozenzweig
Akademia Milicyjna The North is Coming
40
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 07:26:00 -
[231] - Quote
hello,
I've been looking for information regarding your standing on links as they currently are. Sadly I found nothing and as I'm trying to choose my candidates it's quite a lot of reading to get thru all the posts.
Could you clarify for me what you think about boosting as it stands now? Singature Radius 48 m |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15025
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 13:08:00 -
[232] - Quote
Vote for Sugar Kyle! Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
580
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 15:46:00 -
[233] - Quote
Balshem Rozenzweig wrote:hello,
I've been looking for information regarding your standing on links as they currently are. Sadly I found nothing and as I'm trying to choose my candidates it's quite a lot of reading to get thru all the posts.
Could you clarify for me what you think about boosting as it stands now?
Boosts are a ***** to aply , also the use of a shitton of qualified squadleaders and wingcommanders to trickle it down sucks even more. Revoking fleet booster and re aply it, so u can put your prober in warp spot sucks and is often bugged. A simpler aply method would be nice |
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
3013
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 18:15:00 -
[234] - Quote
A bump for truth, justice, and future of New Eden! |
U 96
Animatar Foundation
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 15:04:00 -
[235] - Quote
+4 votes from me for clearly the best candidate for lowsec. |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2562
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 17:01:00 -
[236] - Quote
You've had a vote from me. Having perused my options this year, your thread and interview were enough to convince me.
Good luck in the election. +1 Aaaaaaand relax. |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
537
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 20:22:00 -
[237] - Quote
Balshem Rozenzweig wrote:hello,
Could you clarify for me what you think about boosting as it stands now?
Hello Balshem. I have a response about links earlier in this thread that I will requote. I believe it answers your question.
Sugar Kyle wrote:Linavin wrote:What are your opinions on the current off-grid Ganglink support mechanics? Do you believe that a character should be able to give said bonuses while sitting on a station or gate with no aggression timer? At this time there are both pros and cons to off grid links. Positives are things such as being able to drop them into a safe where they have to be scanned down or hug them to a station where they can hopefully dock before they are alphaed. Negatives are that they have to be probed down and caught or alphaed before they dock or tuck back into shields. Link pilots at this time tend to be an alt character and those moments of inattention cause them to be lost when the other side is on the ball. IGÇÖd have no problem with links gaining aggression timers as long as it was similar to logistics ships. They will take the flags that their fleetmates have. When they shut down their links their flags will count down. I do not think that activation of links should automatically give a timer. Links are currently used outside of PvP. Incursion runners for instance use links to support their fleets. So do link Orcas. Both are cases where links are used and there is no reason to automatically gain an aggression timer. It would put them in the same position logistics ships used to be in when they repped an outlaw character, even if that character was in their corporation and had no criminal flags.
I'm also quite interested to see what would happen if the link alts appeared on kill mails.
Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Sugar Kyle
Calamitous-Intent Feign Disorder
537
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 20:23:00 -
[238] - Quote
Thank you for all the support and well wishes! This is a very exciting time! Low Sec Lifestyle : An Eve Online Blog Candidate for CSM9 |
Rex Witsel
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 03:39:00 -
[239] - Quote
After listening to both interviews I feel i'm convinced.
You have my vote! |
Mynxee
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 00:40:00 -
[240] - Quote
You got top spot on my slate! Best of luck for a landslide victory...your interviews and blog posts give me every confidence you will be an excellent voice for low sec and also a superb CSM member. ====== My Blog: Outlaw Insouciant-áhttp://outlawinsouciant.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |