Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Azami Nevinyrall
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1740
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 19:23:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Linavin wrote:What is your opinion on off-grid Ganglink support in the context of small scale and solo combat? Would you change the mechanic? If so, in what way generally? I greatly despise this mechanics, and was incredibly pleased when they were prevented from activating links while in a POS, although I think that it should have extended to Rorqual and mining links as well. Further more, I have always been a firm believer that links should only work while on grid. Eve's risk-reward system works wonders, and even in fitting a ship you have to make sacrifices in order to gain different or additional functionality. Currently, links can provide pilots with a capability on an order of magnitude greater than anything else, all while being exposed to minimal risk. I personally fly my command ships proudly in fleet fights, and take the necessary steps to ensure that it has the best hope of surviving the engagement. The practice of moving cloaky-dictor nearly-unprobable link ships along with a gang is both cowardly, and heavily favors those with alts. Sure, formed fleets should have an advantage over a ragtag gaggle of ships, but they need to be put at risk. TL;DR on-grid linking only, both for combat and industrial links I REALLY support this view on links! The only downside is broken grids... New player experience, more highsec PvE missions, casual play, balance, counters to AFK cloaking, expanding the NEX store, and Power Projection.
Azami Nevinyrall for CSM9! |
Jayne Fillon
308
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 19:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:You sound like the kinda person who plays his way and if people don't play by your rules you outright ignore them. How can you serve on the CSM if you'll ignore the PVE player base being PVP orientated?
Also on your comment on eve radio you claimed that the Rattlesnake will be balanced in a certain way. Then continued to state it as fact and will happen as you said it would. Seeing how nothing public was made about it. You might as well have said "Someone broke the NDA and told me" I'm impressed that no one else pointed this out.
The CSM is council, not a solo job - just as I explained earlier I would be absolutely terrible representing those with an Industrial focus, there are probably better candidates if you would like a PvE representative on the council. However, my platform is firmly planted in two areas: the community, and the mechanics. Mechanics do not discriminate between how you intend to use them, whether there is a red cross of a player on the other side of your weapons.
As for my Eve-Radio comments, I don't have a recording so I can't review my exact wording, but IIRC I stated that the Rattlesnake would not continue with the same trend that has been announced for the worm and would likely carry over onto the Gilas. This is speculation on my part, and comes from two sources.
First, the recently introduced 50 drone assist cap would be completely negated if rattlesnakes were to be given 400% strength sentry drones. Nulli Secunda has already used rattlesnakes as a mainline doctrine, so it takes no great leap of faith to predict that it would happen again and be horrendously broken. Secondly, there is this quote from CCP Rise himself:
Quote:I understand that you will need specifics on the other two Guristas ships to make final opinions on the theme, but for now just look at the Worm and let us know if it seems fun and we'll go from there.
It's pretty obvious what CCP Rise is trying to say here, and I interpret it as follows: "We like this idea and think it will work well on a frigate like the worm, but this model may not scale to the cruiser of battleship variants." This is the same prediction I have for the Nightmare, as who really wants a Afterburner bonus on a battleships? It's certainly not for the signature radius.
Yes, I probably did "state this as fact" simply because I am completely confident that the Rattlesnake will not be getting the same size and type of bonus that the Worm received. I'll reiterate that one from the CSM has ever broken the NDA by giving me privileged information, much to my disappointment. Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Jayne Fillon
308
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 19:30:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:Cydelle Abraham wrote:So far you really impressed me with your way of answering questions, providing well-laid out answers and showing how dedicated you are to EVE.
You have my vote :)
PS: I'm interested in your responses to the last few questions... Jayne constantly says he talks to other CSM members on a daily basis who is also writers for Mittensdotcom. Then jokes about getting on the CSM would allow him to openly talk about NDA stuff with said members.
I'll clarify this one just for fun -
I mean "openly" as in between each other, not openly from the perspective of an outside source.
I would have really liked to have known what CCP's plans for drones were when I wrote my set of articles on sentry drones and slowcats, but unfortunately I was granted no such opportunity despite my editor being an active CSM member. You can indeed keep those things separate while working for TMC, just as you can indeed keep yourself separated from alliance politics.
:tinfoil:
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
142
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 20:06:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:Cydelle Abraham wrote:So far you really impressed me with your way of answering questions, providing well-laid out answers and showing how dedicated you are to EVE.
You have my vote :)
PS: I'm interested in your responses to the last few questions... Jayne constantly says he talks to other CSM members on a daily basis who is also writers for Mittensdotcom. Then jokes about getting on the CSM would allow him to openly talk about NDA stuff with said members.
I think you misinterpreted the meaning of "openly discussing" NDA material with a fellow CSM member Jayne was using.
It means he and his fellow CSM members can discuss items that the NDA prohibits him from discussing with non-CSM members. LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Dominic Fentia
Engineering Evolutions Limited Gatekeepers Universe
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.23 21:57:00 -
[65] - Quote
Spectre Fleet is amazing, Jayne Fillon FC of my heart! |
Lanctharus Onzo
Alea Iacta Est Universal Brave Collective
25
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 01:07:00 -
[66] - Quote
CSM9 Candidate Interview: Jayne Fillon http://capstable.net/2014/03/14/csm9jaynefillon Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast Twitter: @Lanctharus |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
113
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 16:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Dominic Fentia wrote:Spectre Fleet is amazing, Jayne Fillon FC of my heart!
Spectre Fleet IS amazing. Jayne has already given A LOT to the community via his creation of Spectre and how it is run.
Jayne is my #1 vote.
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
116
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
I have several questions surrounding the recent Erotica 1 events but not directly about this specific event.
context: First the original threadnought stats: http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/332182-1 and the thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=332182
Now this is very heated discussion and the response thread has now descended to a similar level. But if we look at the stats, its only 488 unique authors. Considering more than 30 000 people are logged in right now (and alts ratio of forum posts being the same as in game) and that not everyone is logged in at once. This is a tiny portion of the eve community. Even worse is that the vast majority of posts are from a much smaller subset than the 488 people. Yet this has appeared to have real consequences.
Do you think this discussion reflects the opinions of the wider eve community? And do you think the forums in general reflect the eve communities feelings?
If not, how as a CSM can you get a feel for the wider eve community opinion?
Much of this flamewar was sparked by a CSM members blog. I really don't want to be drawn into the specifics of this case, since there more than enough discussion on that elsewhere.
Do you think that raising potentially controversial issues, or any issue for that matter via a blog is appropriate for a CSM members? What about if you feel its important and don't get traction directly as a CSM member? |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
190
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 16:25:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jayne,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 13:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
Hello Jayne Fillon,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
|
Jayne Fillon
320
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 15:25:00 -
[71] - Quote
CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Jayne Fillon,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? Unfortunately, this question is extremely far from black and white, at least to me. Describing the situation in certainties and generalization simply doesn't do the discussion justice. That aside, here is what I think about the Erotica 1 issue, put as simple as possible:
CCP has the right to do whatever they want within the confines of the game - They own your character, your ISK, your corp logo, etc.
Should they do whatever they want without justification? No, obviously not, but they can.
If you are using an out of game method to bypass the in game rules, such as the EULA and TOS, you should be banned. If you are torturing/abusing/harassing people in game or out, CCP has the both ability and the obligation to discipline you.
This wasn't the first time CCP has taken disciplinary action against a player for their real life views or actions. Last year, a neo-**** attempted to run for CSM8, but CCP stepped in and halted the process. That decision was based entirely on his real life views and actions. Sure, you can argue semantics, but at some point the exchange between Erotica 1 and the bonus room participants stopped being about Eve - but it originated there. If CCP ever needed any justification for banning a player, that would be more than enough for me.
So to oblige your request, yes, I suppose the banning of Erotica 1.
Quote:Do you think the forums in general reflect the eve communities feelings? No. The ability to have multiple faceless alts, and create more with zero effort means that meaningful conversation and discussion is impossible. The vocal majority could simply be one person trying really hard, as I suspect has been the case on multiple occasions. On these forums, I only trust posts from accounts that I recognize.
Quote:Do you think that raising potentially controversial issues, or any issue for that matter via a blog is appropriate for a CSM members? Yes. Hell, they even have the CSM8 multiblog setup to share their thoughts on various topics. Anyway, Ripard Teg didn't intend for this one post to start such a massive scandal - he had written this post as one in a series of ten discussing the shifting culture in Eve. The players themselves were the ones that decided this was relevant to their interests, and important to the community as a whole.
If I publicize an issue and it doesn't get traction with the players, obviously it's not an issue to them.
As a CSM members I would be able to talk to both CCP and CSM if I still thought it an issue, without needing to enrage the community as a whole. They could provide insight on whether or not I was crazy, or was presenting a real and legitimate concern. Hope that answers your question. Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 17:07:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Jayne Fillon,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? Unfortunately, this question is extremely far from black and white, at least to me. Describing the situation in certainties and generalization simply doesn't do the discussion justice. That aside, here is what I think about the Erotica 1 issue, put as simple as possible: CCP has the right to do whatever they want within the confines of the game - They own your character, your ISK, your corp logo, etc. Should they do whatever they want without justification? No, obviously not, but they can. If you are using an out of game method to bypass the in game rules, such as the EULA and TOS, you should be banned. If you are torturing/abusing/harassing people in game or out, CCP has the both ability and the obligation to discipline you. This wasn't the first time CCP has taken disciplinary action against a player for their real life views or actions. Last year, a neo-**** attempted to run for CSM8, but CCP stepped in and halted the process. That decision was based entirely on his real life views and actions. Sure, you can argue semantics, but at some point the exchange between Erotica 1 and the bonus room participants stopped being about Eve - but it originated there. If CCP ever needed any justification for banning a player, that would be more than enough for me. So to oblige your request, yes, I suppose the banning of Erotica 1. Quote:Do you think the forums in general reflect the eve communities feelings? No. The ability to have multiple faceless alts, and create more with zero effort means that meaningful conversation and discussion is impossible. The vocal majority could simply be one person trying really hard, as I suspect has been the case on multiple occasions. On these forums, I only trust posts from accounts that I recognize. Quote:Do you think that raising potentially controversial issues, or any issue for that matter via a blog is appropriate for a CSM members? Yes. Hell, they even have the CSM8 multiblog setup to share their thoughts on various topics. Anyway, Ripard Teg didn't intend for this one post to start such a massive scandal - he had written this post as one in a series of ten discussing the shifting culture in Eve. The players themselves were the ones that decided this was relevant to their interests, and important to the community as a whole. If I publicize an issue and it doesn't get traction with the players, obviously it's not an issue to them. As a CSM members I would be able to talk to both CCP and CSM if I still thought it an issue, without needing to enrage the community as a whole. They could provide insight on whether or not I was crazy, or was presenting a real and legitimate concern. Hope that answers your question.
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
|
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1090
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 21:07:00 -
[73] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them.
The Rules: 10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything. Clockwork Pineapple
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:24:00 -
[74] - Quote
Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? |
Jayne Fillon
322
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:39:00 -
[75] - Quote
Elmnt80 wrote:Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? An odd question. As a member of the CSM I could always suggest things to CCP, but in terms of priorities for game development, I don't think this is something that I would push with any urgency. Changing PvE in nullsec to encourage co-operation between players instead of solo/afk grinding is something I'd be much more more interested in - a change that would benefit a lot more than just Syndicate. Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything. Clockwork Pineapple
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Elmnt80 wrote:Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? An odd question. As a member of the CSM I could always suggest things to CCP, but in terms of priorities for game development, I don't think this is something that I would push with any urgency. Changing PvE in nullsec to encourage co-operation between players instead of solo/afk grinding is something I'd be much more more interested in - a change that would benefit a lot more than just Syndicate.
So what you're saying is everyone who lives in an area of space with serpentis rats should accept that they'll have an inferior selection of sites and deadspace loot available to them compared to a different area of space with a different flavor of rat? So we should wait for some mystical nullsec PVE fix before having space infested with serpentis rats even on par with the rest of nullsec? |
Jayne Fillon
323
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 03:02:00 -
[77] - Quote
Elmnt80 wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Elmnt80 wrote:Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? An odd question. As a member of the CSM I could always suggest things to CCP, but in terms of priorities for game development, I don't think this is something that I would push with any urgency. Changing PvE in nullsec to encourage co-operation between players instead of solo/afk grinding is something I'd be much more more interested in - a change that would benefit a lot more than just Syndicate. So what you're saying is everyone who lives in an area of space with serpentis rats should accept that they'll have an inferior selection of sites and deadspace loot available to them compared to a different area of space with a different flavor of rat? So we should wait for some mystical nullsec PVE fix before having space infested with serpentis rats even on par with the rest of nullsec? A homogenous Eve is a boring Eve, and I have nothing wrong with differences and discrepancies existing between regions, or factions. Nothing is forcing you to live in these regions of space, nor is there anything forcing you to rat serpentis rats exclusively. This isn't to say that I'm opposed to your proposal, nor would I discourage CCP from adding these complexes to the game, but of all the things that CCP and CSM could be working on improving the game, this is not something I would call a priority.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Abla Tive
Serpent.Sisters.of.Eve
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:13:00 -
[78] - Quote
Question about mining activity to all candidates |
Nonnak Severin
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
21
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 16:33:00 -
[79] - Quote
While I do not always agree with everything Jayne says, he makes points that are backed up with a solid mixture of experience and theoryhammering. He is equally comfortable leading corporations as he is leading fleets, a rare trait in EVE, and knows enough to say when he is wrong or may not have all the information about a topic - an even rarer trait in EVE.
+1 vote. |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3437
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:06:00 -
[80] - Quote
I am happy to endorse Jayne for election to the 9th Council of Stellar Management! Good luck at the polls!
Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
|
Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
994
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:38:00 -
[81] - Quote
I previously endorsed Jayne in an earlier thread that I now cannot locate, so since I published my recommendations today, let me just say that my earlier endorsement stands and Jayne very much deserves a seat on the 9th CSM.
However for this interested here is what I said today:
Quote:Jayne is amazingly knowledgeable about the game, especially when it comes to pvp. I feel that he would do a great job on the CSM on that basis alone, however his work with the social communities within EVE including Spectre Fleet and Ganked has demonstrated excellent abilities as an enabler and CCP needs the input of such individuals when it comes to future content additions. RvB Ganked: EVE's Number One Public Roam |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15029
|
Posted - 2014.04.08 17:32:00 -
[82] - Quote
Vote for Jayne Fillion! Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|
the teddybear
Teddy's Tax Evasion Company
36
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 19:23:00 -
[83] - Quote
i'll vote for jayne, and what teddy says, teddy does. My post anger you? too bad, suck it up and move along. |
Jayne Fillon
331
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:41:00 -
[84] - Quote
Thank you everyone for your support, I'll see you on CSM10 Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3157
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:32:00 -
[85] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Thank you everyone for your support, I'll see you on CSM10
Sorry to not see you on.
What I will say:
Keep on trying. make sure your name is out there and in people's mouths. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |