Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Asia Leigh
Beyond New Frontier
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:21:00 -
[901] - Quote
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:Thank you CCP. The threadnaught is dead (I wish i could of liked your lock post falcon) And We now know without a doubt where CCP stands.
Thank you, thank you thank you.
Who said the threadnaught is dead? Its just been moved here and we are already up to page 40 something, When I goto bed and wake up later I won't be shocked to see this one well over 100 pages also.
Where does CCP stand? The OP just sounds like a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo that says nothing.
us: Is the bonus round allowed?
normal answer: yes/no
Their answer: irrelevant stuff not answering the question |
Kaius Fero
15
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:21:00 -
[902] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:So if you've clearly defined the lines, is it against the rules to ransom for a song, and if a "victim" of the ransom were to feel harassed, would that mean it's over the line? How many songs are "too many"?
If it's so clear, it will be pretty straightforward to answer right? Do you think you're capable of detecting when you're pushing another human being over the line? You re not human, you are a politician. You should be .... |
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2877
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:21:00 -
[903] - Quote
Moja Hinken wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Malcanis wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:Malcanis wrote:No I'm tired and I've had enough. If what I've already posted hasn't made the reality clear, then anything I post after this won't do it either.
I've earned my free holiday to Iceland, and you can all **** off and act like sensible human beings. I believe I have not misbehaved. I was merely asking a question because I am genuinely interested in knowing the answer. You should have asked sooner then. Too bad. Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the CSM. How people that act like this voted against the long held HTFU nature of EVE and in favour of crying players with no self control I have no idea. It is hilarious how butt hurt you are. I mean REALLY hilarious. He was elected CSM because he is a man of morality. He is mature enough to decide what is right and what is wrong, this has showed in his responses. The majority of the player base were able to see this and in turn voted for him. I wouldn't expect a fellow sociopath of Erotica 1 to understand this, it is clear in your posts you are just that. Nothing in the game has changed, only the same rules that have been here forever have been reinforced. So why are you so mad, really? Is it because you realize you are on the wrong side of this and are hopeless flailing around grasping at anything that may help prove your sadistic points? I think so. How exactly am I butthurt? Just because I wan't clarification on the rules? I couldn't care less if they rule that we must spread love and peace throughout the game and drew pictures of rainbows, conversely I couldn't care less if they opted for complete anarchy, but people should be given a chance to make decisions based on rules, not just take chances at being banned any time people have a rageout.
And of course the rules have changed, Erotica 1 has been doing this for a long time, as have other scammers. To suggest nothing has changes is ludicrous. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
Prince Kobol
1580
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:22:00 -
[904] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Sentamon wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Agreed. Sokhar is a racist! That doesn't mean he doesn't deserve the same protection as everybody else, usually laws and policies apply to everyone. On what planet? Quite a lot of it actually. You walk down any street in a lot of countries and just punch somebody in the face and give the excuse he is a racist, you will still be charged with a crime. Congratulations on starting the original thread Kobol - not many people can say they kicked off that kind of shitfest!
Lol tell me about it. Never thought in a millions this would happen.
Truth is if didn't pretty damn sure somebody else would of done, I just got there first |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
4003
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:22:00 -
[905] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: A few people who seem to completely lack the faculty of comprehending what might entail "clear and extraordinary levels of real life harassment against players in the outside world." Bullshit. I once had someone completely flip his lid at me in local, after I bumped him once. Do I need to be banned for that? He got equally upset as the example given here. Far more, in fact, he was using capslock and everything. And that's the problem with subjectivity. tl;dr: no you don't.
I am aware of that.
The guy I bumped isn't. It only takes one randomly slung petition to stick. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
373
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:22:00 -
[906] - Quote
Coffee Rocks wrote:Malcanis wrote:Coffee Rocks wrote:... *swivels in his chair* ... *sips his coffee* ... *reads your comments* ... *sips his coffee*
...
*smiles*
Well now. It appears those in this game that encourage treating other players with respect, having fun, and staying classy CAN still extract tears simply by espousing those same tenements.
*looks out the window*
My, it is a bright, sunny day today.
*sighs contentedly* Before you relax, the word you meant to use is "tenets". Well, balls.
http://youtu.be/ir_9CX2B228
First person I thought of http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Kinis Deren
House Of Serenity. Disband.
390
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:23:00 -
[907] - Quote
Danalee wrote:stay well clear of that line by not ransomming, scamming, awoxing, ganking or otherwise doing anything EVE is about? D. Oh goodness, how wrong you are. It has been repeatedly reported in this thread that those have been, and will continue to be, completetly acceptable in game activities.
Are you reduced to just trolling now? |
Toshiro Ozuwara
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
545
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:23:00 -
[908] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:And that's the problem with subjectivity. Where humans, their senses, and their values are involved, everything is subjective. You better get used to that.
They thought they could get away.-áNot today, it's not the way that this kid plays. |
Prince Kobol
1580
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:23:00 -
[909] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:So what it all comes down to is that I can no longer gank people in WH space, because I might gank a thin skinned cry baby who goes all berserk on me and reports me to CCP... is that what's happening here now ? Malcanis put it on about 15 pages in. Apparently there are going to be some more unwritten and unsubstantiated rules to prevent people from using this to meta people into getting banned. This despite their firm affirmation to subjectivity in "the line" being crossed when someone gets upset.
Not at all, well if you lack any kind of comprehension of the English written language and are a total psychopath yeah maybe you will have some issues. |
Vance Armistice
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
56
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:23:00 -
[910] - Quote
Tyrant Scorn wrote:So what it all comes down to is that I can no longer gank people in WH space, because I might gank a thin skinned cry baby who goes all berserk on me and reports me to CCP... is that what's happening here now ?
I heard that too...I think they are going to make it a thing in the next patch. No,not really I'm just messing with you.
Take a breath...in..now...out... Repeat after me: "Unless I go completely outside the bounds of acceptable human behavior I will still be able to do all the things I currently enjoy doing in this game" That help?
If you want examples of unacceptable human behavior listen to some E1 recordings. |
|
Toshiro Ozuwara
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
545
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:24:00 -
[911] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:The guy I bumped isn't. It only takes one randomly slung petition to stick. Then you can come on the forum with all your buddies and have your own threadnought.
They thought they could get away.-áNot today, it's not the way that this kid plays. |
Salvos Rhoska
859
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:24:00 -
[912] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: A few people who seem to completely lack the faculty of comprehending what might entail "clear and extraordinary levels of real life harassment against players in the outside world." Bullshit.
Its a quote from the CCP statement
Apparently you are one of those who cannot comprehend it that I refer to.
You could have just put your hand up, you know.
Sorry if not treating people with clear and extraordinary levels of real life harassment is difficult for you to adjust to. ------------ |
Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
795
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:24:00 -
[913] - Quote
Myriad Blaze wrote:Danalee wrote:No linky than... Thought so, you are like your peers full of it. D. Considering that I said that I wrote such a post myself you could - for example - left click on my name under my avatar picture to the left of my post, select "View posts" in the pop-up window and go look for the link yourself. And if you continue looking through my posts you'll even find a post from November last year which was about another case that happended in the bonus room and had me saying that "I wouldn't draw that much attention to myself, if I were involved with the bonus room". But it's easier to act silly, isn't it?
Oh, wait, you want me to go treasure hunting for something that isn't there? Where, since it was you who found the hidden shrine of clarity and could just re-provide it? I am being silly right... haha, what am I thinking.... Someone said I wouldn't draw that much attention to myself that must be an excerpt from the EULA of EVE online. I'll say something silly: No rules have been broken and I have the EULA, the TOS and international law to back it up.
D.
|
Coffee Rocks
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
118
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:25:00 -
[914] - Quote
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:stuff
Pls refer to my last post, especially the part that is all slanty like this. thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com Twitter: @thecoffeerocks |-áSteam: CoffeeRocks | thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=327221 |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4583
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:26:00 -
[915] - Quote
Stockholm syndrome is rampant in here. How long will Erotica 1 need to be banned before all these New Order/CODE/bonus room disciples return to normal?
Will they wake up a month from now and look back at their hero worship of a raving lunatic with embarrassment and shame? Or will it take a year or longer and some therapy? Therapy perhaps delivered EVE style if any of them ever undock.
I know it's hard to believe right now, little doves, but you'll get over it. You really will.
Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Vance Armistice
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:27:00 -
[916] - Quote
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jebediah Phoenix wrote:To me that's finding out someones personal information or bombarding someone with abusive posts. It isn't asking someone to sing after they've been scammed in a game famous for its scamming. I would agree. And that has not changed :) Except it has since that's exactly what Erotica 1 has been banned for.
Please explain in detail the thought process behind asking another player to dribble mayo on their mouth and take a picture. Then explain why E1 got so upset when people found personal details about his purchasing habits from info he left in public. Then tell us about his peanutbutter fetish. Explain why he was too extreme to remain in GS and was kicked. Why does he get his kicks from humiliating others. Then tell us all why we should give a rat's ass about another random weirdo that got caught out there fapping to other's misery.
You can't ,can you? You have to stick to the talking points you were issued. |
Salvos Rhoska
862
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:27:00 -
[917] - Quote
Jebediah Phoenix wrote:Except it has since that's exactly what Erotica 1 has been banned for.
How do you know what Erotica1 was banned for?
Cite your source please. ------------ |
Ssieth
Tenebras Exteriores Dominatus Atrum Mortis
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:27:00 -
[918] - Quote
Danalee wrote:I give up on all you sheeple.
We need something akin to Godwin's Law that states, "In any internet debate, where one side can't be convinced of a conspiracy theory, someone will refer to them as sheeple".
W-Spacer.-á Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff. |
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2880
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:27:00 -
[919] - Quote
Ssieth wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Yes, because asking a representative of the people for clarification on an arbitrary ruling is just too much. And him trolling people is clearly what he was appointed to do right?
Without knowing where the lines are being drawn, CCP are leaving it open so they can selectively decide to ban people who have no possible way of knowing where they stand. It would be better to just ban it entirely and explicitly, since people would then know where they stand. Repeatedly asking for clarification you've been told that someone cannot and will not provide, however, is pretty dumb and that kind of dumb wares anyone down eventually. Yes, the line is a broad grey one rather than a nice neat one dividing black and white. As a result you'll need to exercise judgement and accept the consequences if you want to dance too close to the border of what is and isn't allowed. If you aren't prepared to accept those consequences then simply stay well clear of that line. So we can get banned when someone has a sad, based purely off of the decision of the GM and the way the teary eyed "victim" making a strong case, and you think that's a good thing for the game?
You better damn well hope you never upset the wrong person, since we know how fairly the grey rules have been enforced in the past. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
Tyrant Scorn
161
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:27:00 -
[920] - Quote
Vance Armistice wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:So what it all comes down to is that I can no longer gank people in WH space, because I might gank a thin skinned cry baby who goes all berserk on me and reports me to CCP... is that what's happening here now ? I heard that too...I think they are going to make it a thing in the next patch. No,not really I'm just messing with you. Take a breath...in..now...out... Repeat after me: "Unless I go completely outside the bounds of acceptable human behavior I will still be able to do all the things I currently enjoy doing in this game" That help? If you want examples of unacceptable human behavior listen to some E1 recordings.
Who was unacceptable in that recording ? All I heard from the victim is N words, gutting peoples mother, threatening people... Who was crossing the line in that recording... you tell me... please, because I don't have a switch where I twist my morals around and allow myself to feel sorry for the victim. Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast www.legacyofacapsuleer.com |
|
Coffee Rocks
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
122
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:28:00 -
[921] - Quote
To all the folks here worried about this because they can't understand what is "gameplay" and what is "sadistic", let me sum it up for you:
CCP:
Ahem.
"Just have faith in the process."
Thank you.
thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com Twitter: @thecoffeerocks |-áSteam: CoffeeRocks | thecoffeerocks.blogspot.com https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=327221 |
Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
795
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:28:00 -
[922] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:Danalee wrote:stay well clear of that line by not ransomming, scamming, awoxing, ganking or otherwise doing anything EVE is about? D. Oh goodness, how wrong you are. It has been repeatedly reported in this thread that those have been, and will continue to be, completetly acceptable in game activities. Are you reduced to just trolling now?
Nope. It has been reported that we can do all that and than some. BUT If your "victim" "feels" "threatened" you should "back off" or be "banned". So how far from which line should I be to prevent someone from having feelings over stuff?
D.
|
Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2880
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:29:00 -
[923] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:As it should be otherwise players would be constantly rule lawyering. Exercise some common sense and you'll be peachy. Like people aren't going to rule lawyer anyway? I'm more worried that through convincing petitions, people are going to get banned for things that other people get away with.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. |
Vance Armistice
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:29:00 -
[924] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Ssieth wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Yes, because asking a representative of the people for clarification on an arbitrary ruling is just too much. And him trolling people is clearly what he was appointed to do right?
Without knowing where the lines are being drawn, CCP are leaving it open so they can selectively decide to ban people who have no possible way of knowing where they stand. It would be better to just ban it entirely and explicitly, since people would then know where they stand. Repeatedly asking for clarification you've been told that someone cannot and will not provide, however, is pretty dumb and that kind of dumb wares anyone down eventually. Yes, the line is a broad grey one rather than a nice neat one dividing black and white. As a result you'll need to exercise judgement and accept the consequences if you want to dance too close to the border of what is and isn't allowed. If you aren't prepared to accept those consequences then simply stay well clear of that line. So we can get banned when someone has a sad, based purely off of the decision of the GM and the way the teary eyed "victim" making a strong case, and you think that's a good thing for the game? You better damn well hope you never upset the wrong person, since we know how fairly the grey rules have been enforced in the past.
Take a breath...in..now...out... Repeat after me: "Unless I go completely outside the bounds of acceptable human behavior I will still be able to do all the things I currently enjoy doing in this game" That help?
If you want examples of unacceptable human behavior listen to some E1 recordings.
|
Jebediah Phoenix
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:30:00 -
[925] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jebediah Phoenix wrote:Except it has since that's exactly what Erotica 1 has been banned for. How do you know what Erotica1 was banned for? Cite your source please.
He was banned for the bonus room, that should be pretty clear. I would hardly call what went on there the equivalent of finding out someones personal information. |
Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1749
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:30:00 -
[926] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:hero worship of a raving lunatic with embarrassment and shame
The man is banned.
Why keep insulting him but to rub salt in the wound? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2503
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:30:00 -
[927] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:Danalee wrote:stay well clear of that line by not ransomming, scamming, awoxing, ganking or otherwise doing anything EVE is about? D. Oh goodness, how wrong you are. It has been repeatedly reported in this thread that those have been, and will continue to be, completetly acceptable in game activities. Are you reduced to just trolling now? Nope. It has been reported that we can do all that and than some. BUT If your "victim" "feels" "threatened" you should "back off" or be "banned". So how far from which line should I be to prevent someone from having feelings over stuff? D.
Figure it out for yourself. Then come back and report to us if you are still able to log in. Aaaaaaand relax. |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
375
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:30:00 -
[928] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:So what it all comes down to is that I can no longer gank people in WH space, because I might gank a thin skinned cry baby who goes all berserk on me and reports me to CCP... is that what's happening here now ? Malcanis put it on about 15 pages in. Apparently there are going to be some more unwritten and unsubstantiated rules to prevent people from using this to meta people into getting banned. This despite their firm affirmation to subjectivity in "the line" being crossed when someone gets upset. Not at all, well if you lack any kind of comprehension of the English written language and are a total psychopath yeah maybe you will have some issues.
lol I got called a psychopath earlier today for "liking to win" on mechwartrior online http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Genseric Tollaris
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
185
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:30:00 -
[929] - Quote
Can someone give me a quick TL;DR of the thread please? |
Kinis Deren
House Of Serenity. Disband.
391
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:31:00 -
[930] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:As it should be otherwise players would be constantly rule lawyering. Exercise some common sense and you'll be peachy. Like people aren't going to rule lawyer anyway? I'm more worried that through convincing petitions, people are going to get banned for things that other people get away with.
Let the fools try to rule lawyer and we'll leave the rest to the GM's shall we? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |