| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 56 post(s) |
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
172
   |
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:Allow Starbases to be anchored anywhere in high-security space and without standing requirements (minus some protected solar systems, like Jita or new player starting systems of course).
A) Could you explain please what the philosophy / lore behind this is when no more faction standing requirements are needed ?
It seems reasonable for all those engineers out there, to see their hard work grinding faction standing to pick the fruits of that.
This way it just copies losec, please consider faction standing to be involved when it concerns Starbase Charters requirements for hisec.
B) And the obvious question has to be asked ofc, will the industry changes be tied into CREST ?
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
172
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 17:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Xaniff wrote:
2. I predict there will be even more abandoned POSes out hogging all the spaces next to the moons. There needs to be some mechanic for these to be abandoned and destroyed in a reasonable amount of time after running out of fuel and failing to be maintained (like the secure containers that are lost, whether they hold goods or not).
Yeah, that's a good point, we'll note that one down.
If you can do this, you will make a lot of wormholers very happy to 
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
178
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 22:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:'Allow Starbases to be anchored anywhere in high-security space and without standing requirements (minus some protected solar systems, like Jita or new player starting systems of course).'
This will cause a possible land rush to get to systems by people who did not grind for faction standings in the past.
I would like to suggest to CCP for a transition period to mitigate the two issues.
- Give the capsuleers that put in the effort to grind faction standings a timeframe of a few weeks to setup pos based on their faction standing in those faction systems, 8.0+ standing for 8.0 systems, 9.0+ for 9.0 systems and 10.0 for 10.0 systems.
- Then after the transition periode allow everybody to setup their pos anywhere in hisec.
This will be fair to the both group of players (with and with the faction standings) and mitigate the land rush.
Also incase one day hisec is full of inactive unfueled pos, maybe allow them to be shot at by anyone without concord interference.
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
179
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 16:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Freelancer117 wrote:
A) Could you explain please what the philosophy / lore behind this is when no more faction standing requirements are needed ?
It seems reasonable for all those engineers out there, to see their hard work grinding faction standing to pick the fruits of that.
This way it just copies losec, please consider faction standing to be involved when it concerns Starbase Charters requirements for hisec.
B) And the obvious question has to be asked ofc, will the industry changes be tied into CREST ?
B ) was answered by CCP Nullarbor (source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4474947#post4474947);
"We will at the very least be updating the static export with new blueprint data, and I'll try and get this out to devs before the release."
A) is answered by CSM 8 vice-chairman Ripard Teg ;
"And here's the simple fact of the matter: guys, they do understand this. Hell, they haven't said so -- if they had, it would be NDA -- but I suspect that's the goal of the exercise.
CCP Greyscale (source: http://jestertrek.blogspot.nl/2014/04/traitor.html)
in particular has for years been the champion of the philosophy that doing some activities in some areas of space should completely suck and you would be dumb to do those activities there. In the past, the goal has been to make living full-time in null-sec directly correlate with higher player income than living in high-sec. I can easily see industry warping off in that direction come summer.
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
185
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 15:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
How will your (modified) personal standing with a npc station be tight into future refining ?
At the moment npc corporations will stop taxing your refinery use entirely at 6.67+ standings
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|
| |
|