There never was any reason in the first place, it's an incredibly annoying penalty for the ships. It essentially prevents you from AFKing around highsec on AP because of the danger from being ganked. It's the worst thought-out "bonus" on any ship I've seen. The active tank ones may be worthless, but at least they're not active damaging to you.

Just a suggestion based on the whole unscannable thing some people sayin they'd like to see it removed, could we not have a toggle option, similarily to in real life, a lorry driver will leave the doors on his trailer open if he's empty to remove the risk of someone hijacking him. Could we not have an option similarily to the option to open fleet hangars in the inventory tree, that allows you to effectively "open your cargohold for all to see" so people can choose if they wish to be scannable or not. This could also bring a new edge, where people may get ganked because they loaded up 5bn in whatever, and forgot to make themselves unscannable again and suddenly, pop.

Just a suggestion based on the whole unscannable thing some people sayin they'd like to see it removed, could we not have a toggle option, similarily to in real life, a lorry driver will leave the doors on his trailer open if he's empty to remove the risk of someone hijacking him. Could we not have an option similarily to the option to open fleet hangars in the inventory tree, that allows you to effectively "open your cargohold for all to see" so people can choose if they wish to be scannable or not. This could also bring a new edge, where people may get ganked because they loaded up 5bn in whatever, and forgot to make themselves unscannable again and suddenly, pop.

Make the cargo scanner able to detect the total size of the objects in the BR, but not the actual objects themselves. You won't be able to see exactly what is being carried, but a total size = 0 will tell you it's empty.

Can you tell us what the thought process is behind the mass and agility nerf on the prowler? As it stands there doesnt seem to be much of a reason to use one over a viator.

More mass, slightly slower align time, smaller cargo same slot layout...

It seems to be better in all the ways that dont really matter: resist profile, shield HP, speed

If I calculated correctly, the Prowler gets a very slight reduction in base align time (7.62 sec down to 7.57 sec). The big change is the Viator going from 8.5 seconds down to 7.49 seconds.

Will the new difference in signature radius (Prowler = 105, Viator = 120) make a measurable difference in the speed the ships will get locked up?

seems excessive .. inty speed almost on a cruiser hull?? .. i suggest a look at the angel ships for a more reasonable figure

When a ship doesn't really use damage or tank, distinguishing the different races is tough. While these balance changes are looking good, we basically have 4 copies of the same ship.

To better individualise them, how about a small dedicated special bay for each ship, just like the old Iteron variants got? Something like 2-4k space for PI materials, ammo, ice, fuel blocks, etc differing per race...

How many people do you think will train Transport Ships 5 to get that? Most will only have it to 3 or 4.

i still don't get why every cloaky ship needs too have cyno's????

i still don't get why every cloaky ship needs too have cyno's????

i still don't get why every cloaky ship needs too have cyno's????

Could we get rid of that cargo scanner immunity?

Its a rather pointless thing to have on a ship that is always cloaked (and thus, unscannable anyway)

Another nerf to the minmatar, brought to you by CCP Fozzie.

The Mammoth DST also aligns slower now than its' galliente counterpart, either someone's been transposing stats or they really don't want Minmatar ships to be the quickest at aligning.

Cargohold too puny. Allow them to be able to fit enough to launch and upgrade a customs office ~8000m3, if you won't let the deep space transports do it.

Could we get rid of that cargo scanner immunity?

Its a rather pointless thing to have on a ship that is always cloaked (and thus, unscannable anyway)