|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |
Steijn
Quay Industries
477
|
Posted - 2014.05.17 16:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
sorry, but that is nothing more than a massive nerf. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
481
|
Posted - 2014.05.17 18:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Adrien Crosse wrote:So, what's the point of all this? so that you can choose to make 1 aspect of your freighter better than it currently is, at the cost of all the other aspects. that whole "player choice" thing people have been wanting for so long.
no, to do that you would leave everything as it is and then the rigs let you make it better than it currently is. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
481
|
Posted - 2014.05.17 18:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Steijn wrote:no, to do that you would leave everything as it is and then the rigs let you make it better than it currently is. That was never going to happen without a counter-balancing that made them proportionally worse. Hell, some of the GÇ£player choiceGÇ¥ advocates even said that nerfs would be fine because choice trumps all. So here we are: the player choice asked for is here, and to make it fit and still retain any sense of balance, nerfs will have to happen. Ask and ye shall receive.
I know.
btw, if anyone cant fly your Nomad and wants an Ark instead, send them to me |
Steijn
Quay Industries
496
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 07:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
any chance that you could follow some of the others and leave for Riot? its obvious that you are completely out of touch and out of your depth with this game. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
498
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 10:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Batolemaeus wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:I hate ganking, but If this idiocy will hit TQ I will start bumping day and night every freighter that will pass Uedama and Niarja until people will stop hauling and all industry will go to hell. i like that you're ambitious, but i think bumping freighters in 1 high sec system isn't likely to cause a shutdown of industry. I have to test this on SISI, but I'm pretty sure that I can bounce on 4-5 freighters at once preventing them to warp away. If more than 2-3 people do this, they could completely shut down a choke point as Uedama. It would be hilarious to do the bumping with a Prospect. Bannable offense mate.
whats bannable? bumping? |
Steijn
Quay Industries
498
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 10:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kaius Fero wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:I hate ganking, but If this idiocy will hit TQ I will start bumping day and night every freighter that will pass Uedama and Niarja until people will stop hauling and all industry will go to hell. i like that you're ambitious, but i think bumping freighters in 1 high sec system isn't likely to cause a shutdown of industry. I have to test this on SISI, but I'm pretty sure that I can bounce on 4-5 freighters at once preventing them to warp away. If more than 2-3 people do this, they could completely shut down a choke point as Uedama. It would be hilarious to do the bumping with a Prospect.
uedama/sivala/niarja, wouldnt take much. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
500
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 10:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cyrek Ohaya wrote:My experience with JFs is that they jump from HS to LS and then to Null without any risk whatsoever, they don't even need align time to do it, what's the trouble then, use an ordinary freighter for highsec.
then why do they die in LS and Null? |
Steijn
Quay Industries
502
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 10:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Loki Feiht wrote:Steijn wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Kaius Fero wrote:I hate ganking, but If this idiocy will hit TQ I will start bumping day and night every freighter that will pass Uedama and Niarja until people will stop hauling and all industry will go to hell. i like that you're ambitious, but i think bumping freighters in 1 high sec system isn't likely to cause a shutdown of industry. I have to test this on SISI, but I'm pretty sure that I can bounce on 4-5 freighters at once preventing them to warp away. If more than 2-3 people do this, they could completely shut down a choke point as Uedama. It would be hilarious to do the bumping with a Prospect. uedama/sivala/niarja, wouldnt take much. How about starting an initiative to start suicide ganking any type of freighter that passes, especially jf's? that should mess with things quite nicely if you get enough people.
er, im not a ganker, i was just pointing out that it wouldnt take much to stop freighters going from Jita to Amarr/Dixie/Hek etc |
Steijn
Quay Industries
509
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 20:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tippia wrote:handige harrie wrote:This is CCP saying people with one account are not wanted in EVE. It's cheaper to haul with 2x freighters now than it is with 1x with Rigs. So your freighters cost less than 300M ISK? Can I a buy one five?
with all the crossed out text in your posts, you should change your name to Tippex. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
509
|
Posted - 2014.05.18 21:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:lombodo wrote:Just out of curiosity....
I fly a Freighter, I should not carry more than a bil worth in cargo to make it worth while for gankers (probably pre-talos rule)
With the current changes, I buy the HP rigs and which cost around 1-15b so technically gankers no longer need any cargo value to make any gank cost effective?
If I am wrong please let me know but it seems like I really shouldn't bother hauling anything due to risk vs reward. Rigs don't drop. In case people are wondering where we are, we're talking with Fozzie, and keeping an eye on the thread, to pick out good posts.
Leave freighters as they currently are. There, thats a good post imo. |
|
Steijn
Quay Industries
511
|
Posted - 2014.05.19 07:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
I must be 1 step away from the funny farm when a Goons ideas for how to make freighters configurable, is far better than what CCP suggest..
Now you just need to get CCP to listen Myanna. |
|
|
|