| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
180
   |
Posted - 2014.07.09 07:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
My Cerberus would KILL for 'only' 560@130 and as for your 'lacklustre' application.....well....no.
It would also like these 60k EHP whilst retaining the ability to get damage onto something other than stationary ships, or BC+ hulls. |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
180
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 10:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Is there another cruiser sized hull out there that can pull just shy of 800 DPS up close, 700 out to 47ish and 600 out to 80+. Caveat: Must be the same fit. Oh and have 3 neuts.
?
Seriously? Because I'd love to fly it. |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
180
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 10:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
No, we need less cruisers with battleship DPS, not more. |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
185
|
Posted - 2014.07.09 18:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:@ Kagura
i'd rather see one HAC toned down than increases across both HACs and battleships.
I think HACs are in a good spot, mostly - minus the ishtar. Get that dialled back a bit and things like Eagles might see more use.
The cerb is just knackered until they sort out heavy missiles. Sacrelige is hard to make work too. Again, #missileuserproblems. |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
185
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 11:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:afkalt wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:@ Kagura
i'd rather see one HAC toned down than increases across both HACs and battleships. I think HACs are in a good spot, mostly - minus the ishtar. Get that dialled back a bit and things like Eagles might see more use. The cerb is just knackered until they sort out heavy missiles. Sacrelige is hard to make work too. Again, #missileuserproblems. The Cerberus was great, until CCP realized that it being good was making people use Caldari again. Then they "fixed" rapid light launchers, because Caldari being used is unacceptable. The Sacrilege on the other hand is a pwnmobile. That thing can sustain a 800 dps active tank for like five minutes, while putting out 450 itself at close range, or 375 out to 40 km, while carrying a medium neut. There is not a damn thing wrong with that ship aside from it's hilariously high skill requirements. Now granted it's pretty much the ONLY ship I can recommend HAMs for that isn't a T3 (which to me, means that the entire Medium class of missiles needs reworked. But then look what they did to capital missiles, ugh) but that's besides the point. The Sacrilege is a fine ship.
I must revisit the sac, the cerb seemed better for my needs at the time. food for though, thanks 
It may have been my own needs though, that limited it due to the type of engagement I was after. |
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
185
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 12:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:afkalt wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:@ Kagura
i'd rather see one HAC toned down than increases across both HACs and battleships. I think HACs are in a good spot, mostly - minus the ishtar. Get that dialled back a bit and things like Eagles might see more use. The cerb is just knackered until they sort out heavy missiles. Sacrelige is hard to make work too. Again, #missileuserproblems. The Cerberus was great, until CCP realized that it being good was making people use Caldari again. Then they "fixed" rapid light launchers, because Caldari being used is unacceptable. The old RLM Cerb was almost as bad as the Ishtar, to be honest. Before the RLM fitting nerf you could run it with dual XLASBs, now that was broken.
Yeah but now it does THIS, which whilst cool to watch (much like the missile effects) is pretty inneffective at causing actual harm to much in a meaningful timeframe.
But like I say, missile hull problems sit in the system, not the hulls and it's a bit off topic - but I'd still trade the range and application of sentries to HML any day of the week. |
| |
|