Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Capt Tadamitsu
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 13:29:00 -
[1]
A week ago someone who was a long time player and a Dir of the corp after a 6 month break logged on and robbed Storm Industries.
This robbery included four T2 bpo's, and alot more. All attempts to contact this person have been fruitless. I do not know if the accounts where sold, hacked, or if our friend ripped us off. I write this as a warning to others.
kingros kingross lordros lordross
two of these characters are in a different corp and I have spoken to the CEO and he is also looking into this, he also confirmed he had not seen the player for quite some time, and found it hard to believe this person would do that, so I am thinking our friend was not playing the account.
Capt Tadamitsu Storm Industries
(not sure if this is the right place move it if not ty)
|
Metal Dude
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 14:35:00 -
[2]
Another scum bag strikes again. Sorry to hear about your loss. A reminder to others to checks roles regularly and remove access from inactive players. As for Tech II BPO, never, ever give access to ANYBODY except CEO. If others donĘt like it, thatĘs too bad. If they need something build, they can wait few days for the CEO to build it for them. If they are asking for access to the BPO, then you should start worrying about them. Sorry, but thatĘs how it is with CCP condoning corp. theft.
The truth will set you free
|
Dark Shikari
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 14:38:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Metal Dude Another scum bag strikes again. Sorry to hear about your loss. A reminder to others to checks roles regularly and remove access from inactive players. As for Tech II BPO, never, ever give access to ANYBODY except CEO. If others donĘt like it, thatĘs too bad. If they need something build, they can wait few days for the CEO to build it for them. If they are asking for access to the BPO, then you should start worrying about them. Sorry, but thatĘs how it is with CCP condoning corp. theft.
You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
--Proud member of the [23]--
-WTB Platinum Technite, WTS Nanotransistors, Heavy Electron II, 100mn AB II- |
BoinKlasik
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 14:56:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Originally by: Metal Dude Another scum bag strikes again. Sorry to hear about your loss. A reminder to others to checks roles regularly and remove access from inactive players. As for Tech II BPO, never, ever give access to ANYBODY except CEO. If others donĘt like it, thatĘs too bad. If they need something build, they can wait few days for the CEO to build it for them. If they are asking for access to the BPO, then you should start worrying about them. Sorry, but thatĘs how it is with CCP condoning corp. theft.
You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
spread the shares so that you need everybody in the corp (including the over half the corp that doesnt play) to unlock one) problem solved, better yet, dont even invite anybody into the corp. The whole problem is stupid tbh...
*doh, I broke my edited sig :/* *cries* this signature was lacking pink, I'll provide it for you. There. Looks better doesn't it? -Eris Fixed it for you. Oh, btw, yarr! ~kieron Didn't I tell you? The damsel moved in with me, we're having a great time. - Wrangler The damsel may not be distressed any more, but how many times does the informant have to be silenced before he gets the message? - Cortes
|
Burlock Ironfist
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 15:01:00 -
[5]
I agree lock them down - you can still rersearch / copy / use the BPO just not move it from the station or the corp hanger.... you dont have to spread it over the entire corp just over 8-10 poeple at least you can then see who initiates the vote
"opinions our my own thank you very much" |
Mr Happ
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 15:20:00 -
[6]
We run a team of 5 directors all clsoe friends, you cant get any higher than member in our corp
We list all bpos and say we can build and they have to mail us
My advice, dont give out roles
LDT Recruitment |
Shopping FTW
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 11:33:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Shopping FTW on 07/07/2006 11:35:07
|
Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 11:35:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Seleene on 07/07/2006 11:35:30
Why in the hell did someone who was gone for six months still have access to BPOs?
-
History of the MC movie! |
Sergeant Spot
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 11:39:00 -
[9]
Someone disappears from game, even for a couple of weeks,
STRIP THEIR RIGHTS
If they are idiots, they will feel insulted. If they feel insulted, ridicule them for their stupidity.
If they leave the corp, good ridance. You are better off without the idiots.
On security:
If you play Eve in a Group, you risk spies and Corp thieves. You "risk" being a victim. The risk can be minimized, but never zero in group play.
If you let concern for player's feeling override security, you make it 100% certain that you will be victimized.
You can Risk being a victim or You can guarentee you will be a victim
Choose one. If you let concern for feelings override security, you must choose 100% victimhood.
Also, good security is ALWAYS a pain in ass. While good security should not make action impossible, if it is not a pain in the ass, it is WORTHLESS security.
|
cordy
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 12:10:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Seleene Edited by: Seleene on 07/07/2006 11:35:30
Why in the hell did someone who was gone for six months still have access to BPOs?
He didnt warn anyone that he was going inactive, he was someone that gotten looked over after the new leaders of that corp got in place.
Why did God create man before women? There's always a rough draft before the masterpiece
|
|
Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 12:36:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Dark Shikari You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
I take another approach - all shares are held by me. You either trust your CEO or you don't. If something happened to me, there are plans in place to deal with that as well. -
History of the MC movie! |
BoinKlasik
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 15:23:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Seleene
Originally by: Dark Shikari You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
I take another approach - all shares are held by me. You either trust your CEO or you don't. If something happened to me, there are plans in place to deal with that as well.
knife in the dark?
*doh, I broke my edited sig :/* *cries* this signature was lacking pink, I'll provide it for you. There. Looks better doesn't it? -Eris Fixed it for you. Oh, btw, yarr! ~kieron Didn't I tell you? The damsel moved in with me, we're having a great time. - Wrangler The damsel may not be distressed any more, but how many times does the informant have to be silenced before he gets the message? - Cortes
|
Corb
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 18:11:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Corb on 07/07/2006 18:11:58 CHEE CHee chee...AH...Ah..ah......ah |
cordy
|
Posted - 2006.07.08 05:38:00 -
[14]
Originally by: BoinKlasik
Originally by: Seleene
Originally by: Dark Shikari You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
I take another approach - all shares are held by me. You either trust your CEO or you don't. If something happened to me, there are plans in place to deal with that as well.
knife in the dark?
sel wants us to have a catfight then *bows to her mistress*
Why did God create man before women? There's always a rough draft before the masterpiece
|
Capt Tadamitsu
|
Posted - 2006.07.11 21:30:00 -
[15]
Wow we get ripped off and Cordy starts a cat fight. whip me baby I have been a bad bad boy
almost makes it worth it.
The purge is complete, rejustification for all access has been done and the roster is much smaller, thank goodness I have great corp mates. You only know the quality of people when times are bad.
adapt overcome perservere
the petion confirms it was not a hack or a sold account. Hire these people at your own risk.
|
Miss Overlord
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 00:11:00 -
[16]
if they are gone for longer than 2 months u should have stripped out his director access - thats why we need ingame details available on "days since player last logged in" available perhaps to CEOs will allow us to combat alts - CCP response to such suggestion - ignored
|
Roddic
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 02:29:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Roddic on 12/07/2006 02:29:43 you know there are ways to keep records other than eve, their call journals, some are even made of paper. write down relavent info where you can, and if your not sure remove their roles.
each director should have an independant source of corp member information relervent to the division that they are in charge of. ie, one ceo, and seven director for seven divisions, with each director assigned 2 officers.
work out a clear communication tree within the corp. know who the greviences officer is, so if you have a complaint they can forward it onto the relevent division, or if serious enough the ceo.
have players that specialise in HR, Accounting, Trade, Minning, etc...... give them roles.
set up a role call within a corp, say 1 week timer, everyone that responds within a week, keeps their roles. those that dont....thats up to you.
i could talk about this alot....
if you made a mistake, it can be fixed. if you didn't make a mistake, it's been fixed.
|
Audrea
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 09:34:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Originally by: Metal Dude Another scum bag strikes again. Sorry to hear about your loss. A reminder to others to checks roles regularly and remove access from inactive players. As for Tech II BPO, never, ever give access to ANYBODY except CEO. If others donĘt like it, thatĘs too bad. If they need something build, they can wait few days for the CEO to build it for them. If they are asking for access to the BPO, then you should start worrying about them. Sorry, but thatĘs how it is with CCP condoning corp. theft.
You shouldn't even give BPO access to the CEO. Just lock everything down, and spread out the shares so that you'd need a majority of directors/CEOs to get one out.
But there is still the risk of theft in the time it takes to initiate vote, and the time after unlocking vote was approved, right? takes just few secs before the ceo or the agreed director can remove it. ------------------ If you are tired of fleet combat lag, post HERE
All posts are my personal opinions. |
Audrea
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 09:46:00 -
[19]
Oh and also unfortunately its impossible to lock bpos at a POS Dont ask why would someone want to, but its important to have that option as well I think. ------------------ If you are tired of fleet combat lag, post HERE
All posts are my personal opinions. |
Gunstar Zero
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 10:10:00 -
[20]
What were the 4 T2 BPOs?
|
|
End Yourself
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 10:15:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Gunstar Zero What were the 4 T2 BPOs?
cpr, cocd, hulk.... j/k well if they were i'd prolly end myself
then again i'd prolly be soooooo ****in rich allready that i wouldnt care
--- Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity.
|
Bluestealth
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 13:54:00 -
[22]
I am used to people stripping my roles when I am out of game for a while, I usually don't get them back until I talk to people on teamspeak and confirm its still me :)
|
Shino Tu
|
Posted - 2006.07.12 15:17:00 -
[23]
Id like to see this on all prints..
An "ownership flag" which must be transfered to another person before they can use/sell/research/trash a print.
When the print is orginally bought off market(NPC) that flag is automatticaly attached to the purchaser.
When It is escrowed, the flag is attached to the named player recieving the print OR waived if no "to" field is filled out.
If you have no flag with the print you can't use/sell/research/trash/escrow or trade it..
Problem solved.
|
Tsun Lao
|
Posted - 2006.07.13 07:20:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Shino Tu
Id like to see this on all prints..
An "ownership flag" which must be transfered to another person before they can use/sell/research/trash a print.
When the print is orginally bought off market(NPC) that flag is automatticaly attached to the purchaser.
When It is escrowed, the flag is attached to the named player recieving the print OR waived if no "to" field is filled out.
If you have no flag with the print you can't use/sell/research/trash/escrow or trade it..
Problem solved.
What a silly idea. Do you want this to apply for items that you looted from someone you just killed also?
|
Tsun Lao
|
Posted - 2006.07.13 07:20:00 -
[25]
Was it a hac bpo?
If so I hope this will mean cheaper hacs
|
Capt Tadamitsu
|
Posted - 2006.07.17 16:14:00 -
[26]
After contact was re-estalished with the person, and After "intense" negotiations.
He was convinced to return the T2 BPO's and most of the material assets taken, because of this I have upgraded him from KOS to please stay away from me and I won't pod you.
Thank you this mater is closed, with a much happier ending then I was prepared for.
Clicky please.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |