EVE Search - Star Kingdom of Manticore (RMN) vs Chimaera Pact Alliance (CHIMP)

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Star Kingdom of Manticore (RMN) vs Chimaera Pact Alliance (CHIMP)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
MoeStyles Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.15 00:14:00 - [61] Originally by: Jozef Meurtrier .snip. First off I don't need to ask Galde about anything but considering the fact that I've had this conversation with him already let me clarify for you. IAC POS was to be removed and IAC gone from CHIMP space by the 13th. This means that on the 13th there should be no sign of IAC POS' in Immensea. Period. According to one of your diplomats and the log posted you are friendly with Red Assault Brigade. Stop sending conflicting signals here. We have seen IAC moving through systems with Red Assault. When we asked we have been given the same response. IAC is friendly with... blah blah blah.. I don't give a rip if RAIDS has good guys in their corp. That's all well and good. I say the same thing about a previous corp I was in. There are some good guys in the corp but the corp overall I still consider hostile and would shoot at all of them. Friends or not. They are enemies to CHIMP. That's all I need to know. Don't tell me when we removed the NAP. I know when the NAP was removed. I'm the one that removed it. I removed it when I was informed that IAC was to be war dec'd by LV. So don't tell me about the internal chain of events in CHIMP. I'm perfectly well aware of the events and at what time of the morning prior to my leaving for work that I removed the NAP. Galde called me and asked me if we would be removing to the NAP to which I responded, Yes. Now on to the simplest way you can resolve this so called exploit issue. File a petition with CCP as an exploit petition so that you can have it tossed out by the GM's as a junk petition. POS' are working as designed. Please take the time to learn how to properly set them up before you make false and slanderous remarks that CHIMP violated CCP terms of use policy and did so knowningly exploit a bug in the game. This was not the case and you are incorrect in your assumptions since you didn't take the time to educate yourself on the proper setup of a POS prior to deployment. --
Orochimaru Infinity Enterprises Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.07.15 00:27:00 - [62] Just an FYI for those of you who are throwing IAC name here and there. RMN is in IAC yes but what most of you don't know is RMN for the most part keeps to themselves with their business except for a handful who interact with main IAC fleet. Hell I never knew they had a pos in or near chimp space, what happened to them regardless of who's fault it is or was is still a crappy situation. I guess they were also in same space with enemies of chimp but weren't enemies to RMN doesn't mean they are allies of so called enemies or some conspiracy more likely they just stuck to being neutral. I don't think we keep a list of who are enemies with chimp and it's allies since we have to keep one for ourselves. This other route people are taking with the "situation" that happened with some lv pilots unless you or I were there to see what happened don't jump on the bandwagon and neither will I. I don't know what diplomacy or what internal chat is going on with the higher ups about all this but sometimes when stuff like this goes to hell in a handbasket it takes time to resolve. You itchy triggered people will just have to wait and keep reading or maybe you will never see a post from diplomats since it's probably being done ingame. "place blah blah not formal iac message yarr yarr disclaimer here" Orochimaru BAKA !!!
Murukan Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.15 00:30:00 - [63] lol back track more?? Sure looks like they had to be out by the 14th. Going back on your word is a pretty shoddy thing. Atleast when you killed our pos you waited till the deadline was past =P In rust we trust!!!
Dyanmo	Posted - 2006.07.15 01:10:00 - [64] Quote: Lastly, as I understand this, you're claming that there was no POS password. If you or anyone else is foolish enough to deploy a POS anywhere in the universe and you lose assets as a result, you deserve what you get. This includes Terradoct who lost his carrier which I might add is rather funny. It's not an exploit and no GM confirmed that it was CHIMP that was responsible for that action so stop spreading your BS Terradoct. That's a punch below the belt... nothing fair about that.. Chimp robbing... I don't see any honor there...
Lord Spidey Hmmzor.	Posted - 2006.07.15 01:47:00 - [65] Originally by: Kerushi Edited by: Kerushi on 14/07/2006 19:23:17 Originally by: Lord Spidey Originally by: MoeStyles snip So did you take their ships from their pos or not? This is still unclear. p.s. was it "no later than the 13th?" or "by the 13th" out of idle curiosity? Quote: IAC was supposed to be gone by the 13th from Immensea. Not during or after.. By the 13th. That means no assets should have remained in Immensea by the end of the 12th and on the 13th IAC should have been gone. im pretty sure that evemail says JULY 14TH. Your riposte?
MoeStyles Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.15 03:17:00 - [66] To be honest the dates don't matter either way regardless if it's a day before or later than the 13th. The NAP was already removed due to the fact that IAC made a bad choice with regards to how they handled LV. RMN and their active role in IAC or lack there of play no part in this debate. IAC is considered hostile by LV, so they are hostile to CHIMP. Moving on.. --
Abn Matar Minmatar	Posted - 2006.07.15 05:23:00 - [67] Originally by: MoeStyles Also, not that I care about the implications, but you might want to be prepared to explain to coalition forces why Curse is in IAC's space at the moment. Is it in IAC's best interest to be taking up with folks that IAC is painfully aware are not friends towards coaltion forces? Ill try to answer this, since about 1 month back we have had CC forces in JZV constellation cloaked and trying to be a disturbance. I think the time your thinking of is when we have a CC force trapped in JZV, we hear incomming of CHIMP and we trap them too. Its not our fault if you come to our space and shoot at our defense. Im really sad that i have to shoot at CHIMP and LV, however, it seems that our first 'negotiations' with LV after the killing and podding of their members was screwed up on our side, i sincerly appologize for that. However it seems to be no problem for LV too shoot at us and camp the station in OUR home system and killing one of our guys 4 days prior to this, together with CC forces i might add too. I hope i dont sound like im ****ing in any direction when im just stating the facts that so many times seem to be 'subjective' instead of objective. I wish that there would be more real info than just these fire-posts that i sadly see many make. [Insert jabber about me not being official in this deal, yadda yadda, end]
chromer one FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.07.15 05:43:00 - [68] What a cry babies. IAC shot blue = Betrayal. IAC changed intel with hostiles of a owner of a area they were renting = Betrayal. IAC was assosiating with enemy of coalition any ways = Stupidity. (and asking "can u bonk me plz") IAC betrays LV (coalition) by shooting against standings. (LV was shooting neutral in 0.0) and after that colition members revoke thei standings and nap with IAC? gee i wonder why. Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? Well i guess not all corps can have a good diplomats and directors. -btw non official statement... blah blah blah Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 bytes, ty - Cortes
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:01:00 - [69] Edited by: Nastro Azzura on 15/07/2006 06:03:06 Wow. That CLEARLY says that they had until the 14th, or perhaps even during the 14th to move. "IAC hostile to LV1!" You said that you would give them 48 hours to get POSes out of Immensea, or you would do it, correct? And they would only be shot if they were with Coalition enemies, IIRC, too. Well stealing from their POS, before either of those deadlines, is a pretty low thing to do. Could I be missing something? Yeah. But it looks like you guys ****** up, and don't want to admit it. EDIT " IAC was given 10 hours ago from this message being posted a final 48 hour time frame to remove their POS' from Immensea else they will be removed for you. Any IAC seen with enemies of CHIMP and coalition forces will result in IAC being shot on sight. This is not negociable." Well, I would assume removing their POSes would include the assets inside. And not taking the stuff from the POS inside. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:07:00 - [70] Originally by: chromer one Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? And it looks like the deadline was probably 24-ish(Guess, but I'm 95% certain the deadline wasn't up yet) hours away. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Aramova	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:31:00 - [71] Edited by: Aramova on 15/07/2006 06:32:12 I'm pretty sure if you bomb London, you'd best have your country's assets out of the US first, cause the government in power is not going to be very happy with you attacking an ally. Can you picture mass-arrests, siezed funds, and the likes? I sure could... With that said, IAC attacked an ally. If you think that you being stupid and not putting a POS password up is an exploit, file a god damn petition and get an offical word, so they can tell you to shutup like I am. Otherwise, go find another corner to cry in after playing the big bully and ****ing off Chimaera's Ally. -- Save a Penguin!
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:33:00 - [72] CHIMP removed the NAP without informing IAC at all btw, i don't particularly think a placeholder joke post on page three of a joke thread counts for anything. So kinda sounds to me like CHIMP backstabbed IAC because IAC backstabbed LV, it's still backstabbing. And from what I hear LV didn't even want CHIMP to get involved. IAC's NAP was with CHIMP, not with the coalition.
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:40:00 - [73] Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: chromer one Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? And it looks like the deadline was probably 24-ish(Guess, but I'm 95% certain the deadline wasn't up yet) hours away. Looks like you forgot to read up... Deadline was voided after removal of NAP after IAC fired upon LV (allies) Let me spell it out for you... I will even break it down in itemized format for your simple mind. 1) IAC voided NAP when firing on friendlies... 2) Fraternizing with known sworn enemies. Does there need to be any other reason? I am suprised we didnt bubble up the systems and shoot any IAC that came into Immensea to retreive any other items deadline or no deadline. Don't annoy me by posting noobish posts... grrrr Go away random noobish person..... Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:46:00 - [74] Originally by: Jade Ro Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: chromer one Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? And it looks like the deadline was probably 24-ish(Guess, but I'm 95% certain the deadline wasn't up yet) hours away. Looks like you forgot to read up... Deadline was voided after removal of NAP after IAC fired upon LV (allies) Let me spell it out for you... I will even break it down in itemized format for your simple mind. 1) IAC voided NAP when firing on friendlies... 2) Fraternizing with known sworn enemies. Does there need to be any other reason? I am suprised we didnt bubble up the systems and shoot any IAC that came into Immensea to retreive any other items deadline or no deadline. Don't annoy me by posting noobish posts... grrrr Go away random noobish person..... This is what I understand. IAC attacked LV. CHIMP says to IAC, NAP up, 48 hours to remove POS, before deadline is over, they steal from the OP's corp's POS. Oh, nice job at smacking too. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:50:00 - [75] Oh, btw, Jade Ro. "IAC was given 10 hours ago from this message being posted a final 48 hour time frame to remove their POS' from Immensea else they will be removed for you. Any IAC seen with enemies of CHIMP and coalition forces will result in IAC being shot on sight. This is not negociable." Now, I assume that this is for the attacking IAC part. Notice the 48 hour time to remove their POSes. Which like I said, I'm 95% certain that the time was not up yet. Also, from what I can gather, they had even paid to stay atleast till the 14th, so CHIMP cannot claim that said contract being up was the reason for shooting, when it obviously wasn't/shouldn't have been, and it looks like, from the part I quoted, that they had given a deadline to IAC to remove POSes, and then stole stuff from the POS before the deadline was up. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Theoraden Dark Cartel	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:53:00 - [76] Man you guys gotta stop getting robbed! I though after me and Res0nance fleeced you, you wouldn have stopped filling those POS's to be treasure chests --- I have a Biatch called res0
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 06:54:00 - [77] Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk CHIMP removed the NAP without informing IAC at all btw, i don't particularly think a placeholder joke post on page three of a joke thread counts for anything. So kinda sounds to me like CHIMP backstabbed IAC because IAC backstabbed LV, it's still backstabbing. And from what I hear LV didn't even want CHIMP to get involved. IAC's NAP was with CHIMP, not with the coalition. grrrrr Another post with little or no use of rational thinking ability... Obviously you are oblivious of the rather simple workings of Coalition politics. Allies protect Allies. Apparently you think its more like "oh.. that’s ok you can shoot our allies we will still be buds, oh that’s right we have a NAP.. nahh its ok man.. you can shoot our allies... your totally safe with us! sure its ok.. You can shoot LV I am pretty sure you can even stay in our space too!... that’s fine don’t worry about it!" I am pretty sure this is not how this works... I will use a simple analogy for you... LV is a brother... You are an acquaintance I invite you to my home... In front of my face you decide to assault said brother.. You'd be lucky to leave my house in a stretcher and eating out of a straw for the rest of your life... I don't know if it can get any simpler. Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:02:00 - [78] No I understand perfectly why CHIMP would attack IAC, but you were still attacking people who had you blue, same situation as with LV pretty much. By not informing IAC of the NAP being null before going on a stealing spree, CHIMP backstabbed IAC and thus CHIMP's actions are no better than IAC's. Oh and your patronizing attitude is rather weak, might want to work on that. http://eve.klaki.net/
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:02:00 - [79] Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: Jade Ro Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: chromer one Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? And it looks like the deadline was probably 24-ish(Guess, but I'm 95% certain the deadline wasn't up yet) hours away. Looks like you forgot to read up... Deadline was voided after removal of NAP after IAC fired upon LV (allies) Let me spell it out for you... I will even break it down in itemized format for your simple mind. 1) IAC voided NAP when firing on friendlies... 2) Fraternizing with known sworn enemies. Does there need to be any other reason? I am suprised we didnt bubble up the systems and shoot any IAC that came into Immensea to retreive any other items deadline or no deadline. Don't annoy me by posting noobish posts... grrrr Go away random noobish person..... This is what I understand. IAC attacked LV. CHIMP says to IAC, NAP up, 48 hours to remove POS, before deadline is over, they steal from the OP's corp's POS. Oh, nice job at smacking too. Ah you do understand!!!!!!!!! You said it exactly! "CHIMP says to IAC, NAP up, 48 hours to remove POS" You spelled it out perfectly "NAP up" as in... over.. gone.. poof... no longer... NAP OVER I'm imagining if there was a POS still there... Dreads would be visiting to remove them... and they would lose the chance to recover the towers. The 48 hours at very least gave them the oppurtunity to recover what assets they could manage to get out despite now being a neutral target. (for those not understanding CHIMP policy, we operate under NBSI other wise known as Not Blue Shoot It) NAP is up.. means.. NO NAP As in your neutral.. as in NOT friends.. NOT allies.. NOT protected.. NOT welcome. I am again amazed at your incredible density... Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Ituralde Viziam	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:04:00 - [80] Frankly I simply fail to see how CHIMP thinks they have any right to tell IAC who to and who not to shoot. If CHIMP is hostile to someone, it is their own deal. If their friends want to help them, so much the better, but why should they be obligated to fight a war someone else started? I don't think I need to point out where people have fought the wars of others with disastrous results. I don't see at all why this is a big deal. If its such a trouble that a friend is not shooting someone you are at war with, then maybe it would be wise to rethink your choice of enemies, not your choice of allies. From a stance of objective logic, angering your allies because of another enemy seems incredibly counterproductive. Fear is the mind-killer.
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:04:00 - [81] Originally by: Jade Ro Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: Jade Ro Originally by: Nastro Azzura Originally by: chromer one Chimp gives a time line to remove belongings is in my opinnion a fair deal. IAC fails to remove their assets. What were you expecting? And it looks like the deadline was probably 24-ish(Guess, but I'm 95% certain the deadline wasn't up yet) hours away. Looks like you forgot to read up... Deadline was voided after removal of NAP after IAC fired upon LV (allies) Let me spell it out for you... I will even break it down in itemized format for your simple mind. 1) IAC voided NAP when firing on friendlies... 2) Fraternizing with known sworn enemies. Does there need to be any other reason? I am suprised we didnt bubble up the systems and shoot any IAC that came into Immensea to retreive any other items deadline or no deadline. Don't annoy me by posting noobish posts... grrrr Go away random noobish person..... This is what I understand. IAC attacked LV. CHIMP says to IAC, NAP up, 48 hours to remove POS, before deadline is over, they steal from the OP's corp's POS. Oh, nice job at smacking too. Ah you do understand!!!!!!!!! You said it exactly! "CHIMP says to IAC, NAP up, 48 hours to remove POS" You spelled it out perfectly "NAP up" as in... over.. gone.. poof... no longer... NAP OVER I'm imagining if there was a POS still there... Dreads would be visiting to remove them... and they would lose the chance to recover the towers. The 48 hours at very least gave them the oppurtunity to recover what assets they could manage to get out despite now being a neutral target. (for those not understanding CHIMP policy, we operate under NBSI other wise known as Not Blue Shoot It) NAP is up.. means.. NO NAP As in your neutral.. as in NOT friends.. NOT allies.. NOT protected.. NOT welcome. I am again amazed at your incredible density... I'm not sure if you're serious here, because you don't seem to understand a word I am saying, and yet are calling me dense, as you totally misinterpret what I am saying. I'll just point to my last post, and hope that gets through. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:07:00 - [82] Um, the 48 hour deadline is entirely seperate from the LV incident and had nothing to do with the NAP. CHIMP did not contact IAC about the NAP being removed at all before the theft. What are you smoking ? http://eve.klaki.net/
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:09:00 - [83] Originally by: Ituralde Frankly I simply fail to see how CHIMP thinks they have any right to tell IAC who to and who not to shoot. If CHIMP is hostile to someone, it is their own deal. If their friends want to help them, so much the better, but why should they be obligated to fight a war someone else started? I don't think I need to point out where people have fought the wars of others with disastrous results. I don't see at all why this is a big deal. If its such a trouble that a friend is not shooting someone you are at war with, then maybe it would be wise to rethink your choice of enemies, not your choice of allies. From a stance of objective logic, angering your allies because of another enemy seems incredibly counterproductive. Umm.. IAC was living in our space.. our rules.. Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
deadEd Catalyst Reaction Chimaera Pact	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:11:00 - [84] Originally by: Ituralde I don't see at all why this is a big deal. If its such a trouble that a friend is not shooting someone you are at war with, then maybe it would be wise to rethink your choice of enemies, not your choice of allies. From a stance of objective logic, angering your allies because of another enemy seems incredibly counterproductive. There's a big difference between 'friends' and 'tenants'.
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:29:00 - [85] Originally by: deadEd Originally by: Ituralde I don't see at all why this is a big deal. If its such a trouble that a friend is not shooting someone you are at war with, then maybe it would be wise to rethink your choice of enemies, not your choice of allies. From a stance of objective logic, angering your allies because of another enemy seems incredibly counterproductive. There's a big difference between 'friends' and 'tenants'. It seems a lot of people don't understand... simply read up it helps to get the big picture.. I will sum it up one more time 1) IAC is renting space from CHIMP 2) IAC shoots CHIMP allies before moving assets out of rented space... violating any NAP agreement 3) IAC admits to befreinding enemies (RAID enemies living in CHIMP space) WHILE themselves renting in CHIMP space even the very same systems that hostiles are attacking CHIMP assets. Now do tell me where is the logic and reasoning behind us offering any immunity or protection after such violations? Are you saying that IAC shoots CHIMP allies, befriends hostiles living in our space while living in our space.. and expects NAP to miraculously to still be in place? The 48 hour term was a warning to get your crap out of our space before we blow it up for you. oh you left 100's of millions of assets un-attended after stupidly wrecking any positive standings with us and voiding any right to inhabit our space rent or no rent? I am sorry looks like you need to learn to set up a POS correctly and you wont get looted... and be happy we didn't burn that POS to the ground in that very night. grrrr Man am I going to get grilled for posting tonight. I am sorry but I have no mercy or pity for any IAC whining any further on this post. You should be ashamed for complaining about it and embarrased you had the audacity to whine about the unfairness of all that CHIMP did to you after you crapped all over the place where you lived. You gain no respect nor pity from me. Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Nastro Azzura Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:31:00 - [86] Originally by: Jade Ro Originally by: deadEd Originally by: Ituralde I don't see at all why this is a big deal. If its such a trouble that a friend is not shooting someone you are at war with, then maybe it would be wise to rethink your choice of enemies, not your choice of allies. From a stance of objective logic, angering your allies because of another enemy seems incredibly counterproductive. There's a big difference between 'friends' and 'tenants'. It seems a lot of people don't understand... simply read up it helps to get the big picture.. I will sum it up one more time 1) IAC is renting space from CHIMP 2) IAC shoots CHIMP allies before moving assets out of rented space... violating any NAP agreement 3) IAC admits to befreinding enemies (RAID enemies living in CHIMP space) WHILE themselves renting in CHIMP space even the very same systems that hostiles are attacking CHIMP assets. Now do tell me where is the logic and reasoning behind us offering any immunity or protection after such violations? Are you saying that IAC shoots CHIMP allies, befriends hostiles living in our space while living in our space.. and expects NAP to miraculously to still be in place? The 48 hour term was a warning to get your crap out of our space before we blow it up for you. oh you left 100's of millions of assets un-attended after stupidly wrecking any positive standings with us and voiding any right to inhabit our space rent or no rent? I am sorry looks like you need to learn to set up a POS correctly and you wont get looted... and be happy we didn't burn that POS to the ground in that very night. grrrr Man am I going to get grilled for posting tonight. I am sorry but I have no mercy or pity for any IAC whining any further on this post. You should be ashamed for complaining about it and embarrased you had the audacity to whine about the unfairness of all that CHIMP did to you after you crapped all over the place where you lived. You gain no respect nor pity from me. Right. You offered a 48 hour truce. "The 48 hour term was a warning to get your crap out of our space before we blow it up for you. " And IIRC, IT WAS NOT OVER, before the stuff was stolen. -------------------- Looking to join a pirate corp. Contact me for info.
Nebuli Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:35:00 - [87] This post is funny... POS in an alliances territory, alliance asks for POS to be moved by a set date, in the mean time the alliance who owns the POS shoots and starts a war with one of its allies. Then even though now effectively at war with CHIMP (as stated earlier enemy of one is an enemy of all) and hasnt moved the POS like they should have has ships taken from it because it hasnt got it setting set up correctly wonders why it happened? Honestly, WTF? CEO - Art of War
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:38:00 - [88] Edited by: Jade Ro on 15/07/2006 07:39:43 Post with your main... for all I know your a noob in a noob corp who knows nothing of the internal workings of CHIMP. How do you know when the NAP was withdrawn within CHIMP? Not sure how ridiculous you look posting in this forum with nothing to back anything your saying up with while posting with a noob alt. Hmmmmm? This was ment for Nastro.. sorry Mr "directly above posting person" lol Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:53:00 - [89] Originally by: deadEd Originally by: Nebuli Also out of interest all these goody two shoes in this thread claiming this wasnt honorable yadda yadda BS, can you truthfully tell me that an enemy POS in your region, without proper settings that allowed you entry to it, and with billions of isk worth of ships inside, and you wouldnt take them? if you tell me you wouldnt you are either very stupid or not telling the truth Haha, truth for sure. Anyone complaining about actions in war not being honourable or very nice probably doesn't "get" Eve. I think the correct terminology is as I like to call it "tactical relocation of assets". Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction
Jade Ro Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.15 07:55:00 - [90] Edited by: Jade Ro on 15/07/2006 07:56:42 Originally by: Selma Dark Originally by: Jade Ro Umm.. IAC was living in our space.. our rules.. Hmm, i think ... yes your space, your rules, but after NAP with IAC gone, you have rights to destroy pos ... not stole ships from their POS using expilot! I think, this maybe breaking rules in EULA, because you consciously using bugs. And who cares about politics, if you using bugs ... aliance politics is irelevant in this case. (sry for my english :) ) - Blowing up POS to get the ships (takes to long) - No password set on Force Field (much easier and faster to get ships! ) Not a bug... totaly working within game mechanics. Petition it if your not certain. Navy Fleet Director - Catalyst Reaction

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.