Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Nicolai Serkanner
Jebediah Kerman's Junkyard and Spaceship Parts Co. Brave Collective
175
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:04:00 -
[751] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:Could the need of occupying sov space to claim ownership not simply be avoided by multiboxing? And it'll be lost just as easily due to how horribly you can multibox in PvP.
Using "multibox" was perhaps not the correct word. Using multiple characters is what I mean. Most players have numerous characters and can easily afford many more. Spreading them out over the area you need to "occupy" might make it very easy to keep the area occupied.
|
Sally Hermoine
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:05:00 -
[752] - Quote
No disrespect but Gevlon is a bumbling idiot every idea/post he has is just an extension of the mad mans imagination.
I like the changes, not sure about NPC Nullsec being in place everywhere, they would just allow power projection with the major coalitions who will simply select certain ones as lilly pad Cyno zones.
Also the occupation idea is great everyone wins Blocs get nerfed in size renters can still rent but dont need multiple systems and new forces can try and take some space , assuming they don't get blobbed out which will probably happen but lifes not meant to be easy right? BUT i would not like a one system to become Uber amazing in its farming ability just because there a gazillion people working the farms, that would not be good for nullsec.
Also can we have player built stargate Turrets that would be so cool
|
Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
7
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:19:00 -
[753] - Quote
If I may have one stupid question...
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
1. No alliance signed below will create coalition consisting of more than 3 alliances. Nor will it maintain blue standings with more than these 2 alliances. This doesn't apply to alt corps/small groups up to 200members.
2. In case that another coalition larger than mentioned is forming, all the signed groups will create temporary alliance to take this group down.
This is ofcourse just hard sketch, numbers can different, it can be longer. This is just proof that CCP isn't only one who can save null sec. If these so called leaders would really want to save null, they could be able to do it. But this is something they would never sign for. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6290
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:35:00 -
[754] - Quote
Regatto wrote:If I may have one stupid question...
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
1. No alliance signed below will create coalition consisting of more than 3 alliances. Nor will it maintain blue standings with more than these 2 alliances. This doesn't apply to alt corps/small groups up to 200members.
2. In case that another coalition larger than mentioned is forming, all the signed groups will create temporary alliance to take this group down.
This is ofcourse just hard sketch, numbers can different, it can be longer. This is just proof that CCP isn't only one who can save null sec. If these so called leaders would really want to save null, they could be able to do it. But this is something they would never sign for.
Because that does nothing to address the issue of grinding through ten of millions of ehp & how it currently takes 7 days of winning every single timer fight. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
|
KatanTharkay
V I R I I Ineluctable.
32
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:35:00 -
[755] - Quote
Regatto wrote:If I may have one stupid question...
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
1. No alliance signed below will create coalition consisting of more than 3 alliances. Nor will it maintain blue standings with more than these 2 alliances. This doesn't apply to alt corps/small groups up to 200members.
2. In case that another coalition larger than mentioned is forming, all the signed groups will create temporary alliance to take this group down.
This is ofcourse just hard sketch, numbers can different, it can be longer. This is just proof that CCP isn't only one who can save null sec. If these so called leaders would really want to save null, they could be able to do it. But this is something they would never sign for. Hahahaha, well said! Add 3. None of the signatares will agree on non-aggression BOTLORD accords. We strongly believe that 0.0 should be a place of conflict not a safe heaven for ISK generation and supercap accumulation. If another coalition does it, see point 2. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6290
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 10:38:00 -
[756] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:Could the need of occupying sov space to claim ownership not simply be avoided by multiboxing? And it'll be lost just as easily due to how horribly you can multibox in PvP. Using "multibox" was perhaps not the correct word. Using multiple characters is what I mean. Most players have numerous characters and can easily afford many more. Spreading them out over the area you need to "occupy" might make it very easy to keep the area occupied.
The idea is that sitting afk in space or docked won't stop sov from decaying. You will have to actually do thing. What those things are is what CCP needs to work out. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
|
Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
6
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:00:00 -
[757] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Regatto wrote:If I may have one stupid question...
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
1. No alliance signed below will create coalition consisting of more than 3 alliances. Nor will it maintain blue standings with more than these 2 alliances. This doesn't apply to alt corps/small groups up to 200members.
2. In case that another coalition larger than mentioned is forming, all the signed groups will create temporary alliance to take this group down.
This is ofcourse just hard sketch, numbers can different, it can be longer. This is just proof that CCP isn't only one who can save null sec. If these so called leaders would really want to save null, they could be able to do it. But this is something they would never sign for. Because that does nothing to address the issue of grinding through ten of millions of ehp & how it currently takes 7 days of winning every single timer fight.
Ofcourse not, but it would still bring life back to null while ccp figures out new sov mechanics that work. It would create fights on every corner. Fights that are fun between smaller groups, with couple of hundred pilots and without 10% tidi. Anyone in null sec warfare can agree that fight between 500 dudes is more fun than 2500.
Honestly I know this won't happen, cause its obvious that ppl like Vince are egomaniacs that just want to hoard power and isk(lets wonder why). So basically, even though they have power, they won't do anything about it. They will rather have their members run around eve and dunk on some hopeless groups like provi to keep their pilots "entertained" and quiet. |
Anthar Thebess
715
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:03:00 -
[758] - Quote
What CCP must , is to stop working of stuff that is not related to fixing nullsec. Putting some stuff to game is nice , but att the same time those are work hours spent on stuff that will not persuade people to login again.
What is more important : - i will not login and undock , as i cannot name clones. - i will not login and undock , as nothing is happening and eve is boring.
Recent changes are nice , but again they do not bring us any closer to solving current player retention issues.
The same goes for the module re balance.
Who think that putting dozens or hundreds of work hours in a project that will reduce number of modules , while changing almost nothing will make more players to login?
This time will be simply wasted at this point. Right now we loose 1000 accounts per month , owners of those accounts just don't care to login any more. How many of "still active" people just login to update skills or update some passive operations , like PL.
Support Needed : Jump Fuel Consumption Support Needed : Faction Crystal Changes |
Azami Nevinyrall
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
2030
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:05:00 -
[759] - Quote
Regatto wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Regatto wrote:If I may have one stupid question...
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
1. No alliance signed below will create coalition consisting of more than 3 alliances. Nor will it maintain blue standings with more than these 2 alliances. This doesn't apply to alt corps/small groups up to 200members.
2. In case that another coalition larger than mentioned is forming, all the signed groups will create temporary alliance to take this group down.
This is ofcourse just hard sketch, numbers can different, it can be longer. This is just proof that CCP isn't only one who can save null sec. If these so called leaders would really want to save null, they could be able to do it. But this is something they would never sign for. Because that does nothing to address the issue of grinding through ten of millions of ehp & how it currently takes 7 days of winning every single timer fight. Ofcourse not, but it would still bring life back to null while ccp figures out new sov mechanics that work. It would create fights on every corner. Fights that are fun between smaller groups, with couple of hundred pilots and without 10% tidi. Anyone in null sec warfare can agree that fight between 500 dudes is more fun than 2500. Honestly I know this won't happen, cause its obvious that ppl like Vince are egomaniacs that just want to hoard power and isk(lets wonder why). So basically, even though they have power, they won't do anything about it. They will rather have their members run around eve and dunk on some hopeless groups like provi to keep their pilots "entertained" and quiet. If CCP keeps their word on serious nerfs to Power Projection within the coming weeks.
We will see a serious shift in Nullsec power...
EVE needs more Pssshhhh |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
755
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:05:00 -
[760] - Quote
Regatto wrote:All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient:
because noone of them will weaken his own position. This is like you would ask to not bring as many people to the fight to make it fair. |
|
Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
7
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:14:00 -
[761] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:Regatto wrote:All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Something like this would be sufficient: because noone of them will weaken his own position. This is like you would ask to not bring as many people to the fight to make it fair.
yeah or asking them to play this game for fun instead of politics, power and money.
as I said, I dont believe this would happened :P ALthought if I remember correctly something similiar occured once, when DRF formed pretty much just to take down old NC, but that was for slightly different reasons. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13434
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:15:00 -
[762] - Quote
Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
KatanTharkay
V I R I I Ineluctable.
33
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:21:00 -
[763] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet. Why not give it a try, discuss this among yourselves and see what can be done. You guys already have 2 agreements, BOTLORD and NullSec Manifesto. It has more chances to do something good for EVE rather than asking CCP to do it. It's a sandbox, it's up to the players to make the game fun or boring. |
Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
7
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:24:00 -
[764] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet.
Mechanics? what I just said would bypass these mechanics. But then again, third time, for this to happen they would need to want make this game fun, and voluntarily give up big of their power. Although they would still remain dominant parts of null sec probably. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
755
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:28:00 -
[765] - Quote
one of biggest appeals of this game was originally the cut throat universe, exploiting everything to your advantage and taking any little chance to stab your enemy in the back and take his land. What you're asking for is a complete change of mentality of the game, where people are responsible to make it fair all of the sudden because mechanics lead them into a dead end. That wouldn't be eve-like anymore, I wonder who would want to play this for any longer time once CCP refuses to fix their game and bring back a dark cut throat universe upon players. |
JIeoH Mocc
brotherhood of desman Southern Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:29:00 -
[766] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet.
Bull*excrement*. You keep blaming that on the mechanics, as if there's ANY set of applicable rules that can simultaneously discourage your kind from bunching up and carebearing in peace forever (all the while whining about no content) AND keep the game a sandbox. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13434
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:31:00 -
[767] - Quote
JIeoH Mocc wrote:baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet. Bull*excrement*. You keep blaming that on the mechanics, as if there's ANY set of applicable rules that can simultaneously discourage your kind from bunching up and carebearing in peace forever (all the while whining about no content) AND keep the game a sandbox.
Tell me, if you had access to a fleet that is impossible for anyone else to kill would you not use it? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
JIeoH Mocc
brotherhood of desman Southern Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:38:00 -
[768] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:JIeoH Mocc wrote:baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet. Bull*excrement*. You keep blaming that on the mechanics, as if there's ANY set of applicable rules that can simultaneously discourage your kind from bunching up and carebearing in peace forever (all the while whining about no content) AND keep the game a sandbox. Tell me, if you had access to a fleet that is impossible for anyone else to kill would you not use it?
If I would, I'd be having another corp/alliance ticker right now, don't you think? What does the mechanics have to do with you wanting an easy life-style? At least don't be a hypocrite. Any set of enforceable rules will succumb to that desire of yours to bunch up and "winwinwin", be it by dropping the node with a "thousand of megathrons(c)", having b0tl0rds of this kind or another, blobbing with titans and what not.
That's not something CCP CAN possibly fix. They can stir the pot a bit, but once everything settles into a steady state - that attitude of "If you had access to ..." will prevail. Always.
I hope they recognize it, and I hope that it settles in your head as well. |
KatanTharkay
V I R I I Ineluctable.
33
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:42:00 -
[769] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:KatanTharkay wrote:baltec1 wrote:Regatto wrote:
All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and diversity back to eve
Because they didn't break the game, they simply did what the mechanics dictated. Nobody is going to shoot themselves in both feet. Why not give it a try, discuss this among yourselves and see what can be done. You guys already have 2 agreements, BOTLORD and NullSec Manifesto. It has more chances to do something good for EVE rather than asking CCP to do it. It's a sandbox, it's up to the players to make the game fun or boring. We would wind up defeated and you would be bitching at a new empire to do the same. You don't fix the game by asking people to not use all of the tools at their disposal. So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring (hello BOTLRD accord). Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal sure doesn't do that. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13434
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:46:00 -
[770] - Quote
KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that.
We are literally asking CCP to nerf our empires and our capabilities to wage war and you think we want to be safe...
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13434
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:50:00 -
[771] - Quote
JIeoH Mocc wrote:
If I would, I'd be having another corp/alliance ticker right now, don't you think? What does the mechanics have to do with you wanting an easy life-style? At least don't be a hypocrite. Any set of enforceable rules will succumb to that desire of yours to bunch up and "winwinwin", be it by dropping the node with a "thousand of megathrons(c)", having b0tl0rds of this kind or another, blobbing with titans and what not.
That's not something CCP CAN possibly fix. They can stir the pot a bit, but once everything settles into a steady state - that attitude of "If you had access to ..." will prevail. Always.
I hope they recognize it, and I hope that it settles in your head as well.
Given that I am also calling for our fleets to stop being unkillable I would say I understand. We are trying to get CCP to make changes that we cannot abuse. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
JIeoH Mocc
brotherhood of desman Southern Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:54:00 -
[772] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that.
We are literally asking CCP to nerf our empires and our capabilities to wage war and you think we want to be safe...
You see, you either drink that cool-aid willingly, or troll, or ... not the sharpest pencil in the pencil box. Because having them indestructible NPC stations in every sov. region is "literally asking CCP for a nerf". Right. While it probably will cause some small PvP groups to jump in and farm you/your renters, it actually amplifies the ability of the powerblocks to wage war, specially if you consider the possibly incoming power projection changes. Nothing like having an invulnerable staging system in every region, so that events like B-R5 will never happen again. So yeah, that proposal is something along the lines of - secure our the holdings currently held by the blue doughnut against future changes (destructible stations, power projection, cap nerfs) - Add some non-intimidating PvP content in the form of small groups who harass the holders/renters without presenting a real risk - Please CCP, we will keep bluing each other and crying out of boredom - you got to help us overcome us!
GJ, high five o/ |
Anthar Thebess
715
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:54:00 -
[773] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: If CCP keeps their word on serious nerfs to Power Projection within the coming weeks.
We will see a serious shift in Nullsec power...
What nerfs? Only statement i got is that you cannot move so easily in capital feets around the eve.
Yes this is good , but without other changes it is worthless. As long as you can move capitals and fleets between regions using JB , Titan bridges or jump drives this is pointless.
Currently big blocks earn Trilions of isk.
1 fitted carrier cost around 2bil - this give us around 7 baltecs?
So simple "fix" to this "nerf" Spend some of those ISK to make ship catches in some remote locations around eve space.
If something is going on there - put people in ceptors , and reship there to proper doctrine.
Until fleets will have to travel by gates again (to the battle) , nothing will change.
Even those 5 jumps by gates makes every thing very complicated , as even with smaller force you can camp and wipe out much bigger fleet. Just bubble this gate and put 3 bomber wings in proper spots.
Support Needed : Jump Fuel Consumption Support Needed : Faction Crystal Changes |
KatanTharkay
V I R I I Ineluctable.
34
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 11:56:00 -
[774] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that.
We are literally asking CCP to nerf our empires and our capabilities to wage war and you think we want to be safe...
this:
baltec1 wrote:We would wind up defeated ...
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13435
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:06:00 -
[775] - Quote
KatanTharkay wrote:baltec1 wrote:KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that.
We are literally asking CCP to nerf our empires and our capabilities to wage war and you think we want to be safe... this: baltec1 wrote:We would wind up defeated ... You might consider it a nerf, but still safe.
Context, it helps.
Under the current mechanics yes, if we give up our unkillable fleets and dump most of our sov someone else will take it all and we will get crushed and we will be back to where we are today.
Take the unbeatable fleets away from everyone and put in mechanics that makes taking and holding half of EVE impossible and you fix the problem. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
JIeoH Mocc
brotherhood of desman Southern Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:09:00 -
[776] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Take the unbeatable fleets away from everyone and put in mechanics that makes taking and holding half of EVE impossible and you fix the problem.
How's that related to the "letter" at hand, signed by all the stars of our blue doughnut and then some? |
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
217
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:09:00 -
[777] - Quote
Sally Hermoine wrote:No disrespect but Gevlon is a bumbling idiot every idea/post he has is just an extension of the mad mans imagination.
I like the changes, not sure about NPC Nullsec being in place everywhere, they would just allow power projection with the major coalitions who will simply select certain ones as lilly pad Cyno zones.
Also the occupation idea is great everyone wins Blocs get nerfed in size renters can still rent but dont need multiple systems and new forces can try and take some space , assuming they don't get blobbed out which will probably happen but lifes not meant to be easy right? BUT i would not like a one system to become Uber amazing in its farming ability just because there a gazillion people working the farms, that would not be good for nullsec.
Also can we have player built stargate Turrets that would be so cool
NPC null points in every region would also give jump clone points. They only need to stage equipment.
With all the capitals they have been sitting back amassing being the biggest carebear organizations in the game, there is likely little you can do at this point.
Since everyone is content with being sheep, this is the game. |
Anthar Thebess
715
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:10:00 -
[778] - Quote
Simply - new rules will be for all the same. Support Needed : Jump Fuel Consumption Support Needed : Faction Crystal Changes |
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
217
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:11:00 -
[779] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that.
We are literally asking CCP to nerf our empires and our capabilities to wage war and you think we want to be safe...
Yea, like we believe that, but you keep up with the propaganda stream. That is what you're here for, spamming the forums.
|
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
217
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 12:20:00 -
[780] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:Gevlon Goblin wrote:[quote=baltec1] They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us. 70% of the CFC losses come from non-sov holders, so owning sov isn't a pre-requisite of fighting. My question is, can you point at an organization that isn't killing CFC now and with this suggestion will start killing CFC? Where are they? *Snip* Removed reply to an edited out part of the quoted post. ISD Ezwal.The point of fixing sovereignty is not conformity for your Grr Goons narrative, nobody is going to hand you out a magic bullet or do your work for you, especially not CCP. You should not expect CCP to change the game according to what you want, just because you personally cannot reach that point in game. Why should CCP personally bail you out? 'Little guys' do not hate it, they are behind this initiative. 90% of null, not just sov empires, have found a common ground, and came up with this. Anyone else objecting are hard to take seriously because of the tinfoil on their heads and their hilarious inability to represent a viable alternative suggestion. *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
Well, 99% of null is blue, so who else is going to attack you.
Pretty simple. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |