| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
148
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 11:18:49 -
[151] - Quote
The OP has been amended and calls for an unspecified decrease in mining yield of the Skiff to compensate for its other capabilities to balance it compared to the other mining vessels.
I call on the CCP devs to give their viewpoint on this proposal yet again. |

Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation Ineluctable.
1014
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 12:25:32 -
[152] - Quote
I use my Skiff solo without an Orca/hauler/freighter/MTU to put in my ores/ice. Many people in the ice belts I frequent use their skiffs solo or with an Orca that just offers boost but no access to the FH. Furthermore, you fill your Skiff's ore hold with proper boosts in around 7 minutes. This allows for nearly no afk at all as you constantly need to empty your hold and watch the clock. For me, this is neither a positive nor a negative factor, it is a factor that balances out the tank this ship has.
Your mining yield is very inaccurate: I have to go to station 2 as often to unload my ice. In the same 15 minutes where I mine 30 ice blocks, a Mackinaw goes to station once and has mined 35 ice blocks. Furthermore, comparing Exhumers with Barges and Mining Frigates is a questionable way of proving your point. Barges are by definition less efficient than T2 hulls. If you want to compare, you have to compare the Proc with other Barges and Skiffs with other Exhumers to give a credible picture. |

Yolandar
Estrogen Industrial Enterprises
28
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 15:34:19 -
[153] - Quote
^^this^^
Unboosted, takes me 12m to fill and unload my skiff. I dock twice as often as the mack in my belt.
afk in the skiff? Nah, I'd be sportin the mack.
Drone bonus is nice but means nothing in hisec, unless you wanna be on ganker killmails. Proc has a drone bonus, this is the t2.
The yield is stll in 3rd place. If somebody got a legit fleet (after Jan 1), then more power to them for being smart. And like your last attempt at nerfing this ship, a fleet can be nullified by bumpin the orca outta the belt.
Agree with these mates, you cannot use the fleet argument.
|

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
148
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 16:54:27 -
[154] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:I use my Skiff solo without an Orca/hauler/freighter/MTU to put in my ores/ice. Many people in the ice belts I frequent use their skiffs solo or with an Orca that just offers boost but no access to the FH. Furthermore, you fill your Skiff's ore hold with proper boosts in around 7 minutes. This allows for nearly no afk at all as you constantly need to empty your hold and watch the clock. For me, this is neither a positive nor a negative factor, it is a factor that balances out the tank this ship has.
Your mining yield is very inaccurate: I have to go to station 2 as often to unload my ice as a Mackinaw. In the same 15 minutes where I mine 30 ice blocks, a Mackinaw goes to station once and has mined 35 ice blocks. Furthermore, comparing Exhumers with Barges and Mining Frigates is a questionable way of proving your point. Barges are by definition less efficient than T2 hulls. If you want to compare, you have to compare the Proc with other Barges and Skiffs with other Exhumers to give a credible picture.
You're in the minority then and not being as economical as you could be. You are within your right to use a fleet mining vessel as a solo mining vessel of course. The customer is always right even when he wants to plant the rose bush upside-down with the flowers in the soil. |

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
148
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 16:56:12 -
[155] - Quote
Yolandar wrote:^^this^^ Unboosted, takes me 12m to fill and unload my skiff. I dock twice as often as the mack in my belt. afk in the skiff? Nah, I'd be sportin the mack. And not with the gankers around, they made that choice for me. Drone bonus is nice but means nothing in hisec, unless you wanna be on ganker killmails. Proc has a drone bonus, this is the t2. The yield is stll in 3rd place. If somebody got a legit fleet (after Jan 1), then more power to them for being smart. And like your last attempt at nerfing this ship, a fleet can be nullified by bumpin the orca outta the belt. Agree with these mates, you cannot use the fleet argument. Bethan Le Troix wrote:
I defy you to find many Skiffs being used as solo mining vessels. You won't find many if any at all.
Onus is on you to prove that. Citation required
I don't need to. You can come and watch this ISBoxer eleven skiff with Orca & Freighter support mining fleet with me if you like. |

Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation Ineluctable.
1016
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 16:57:13 -
[156] - Quote
Who has defined the Skiff as a Fleet Mining Vessel? The Hulk clearly is, but the Skiff? Where's that definition documented?
That's really far fetched. Moreover, I am more economical with the Skiff than with the Mackinaw because gankers do not want to invest the necessary effort and capital for ganking me whenever I poke my hull out of a station. |

Gadget Helmsdottir
Gadget's Workshop
83
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 17:01:09 -
[157] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:Yolandar wrote:^^this^^ Unboosted, takes me 12m to fill and unload my skiff. I dock twice as often as the mack in my belt. afk in the skiff? Nah, I'd be sportin the mack. And not with the gankers around, they made that choice for me. Drone bonus is nice but means nothing in hisec, unless you wanna be on ganker killmails. Proc has a drone bonus, this is the t2. The yield is stll in 3rd place. If somebody got a legit fleet (after Jan 1), then more power to them for being smart. And like your last attempt at nerfing this ship, a fleet can be nullified by bumpin the orca outta the belt. Agree with these mates, you cannot use the fleet argument. Bethan Le Troix wrote:
I defy you to find many Skiffs being used as solo mining vessels. You won't find many if any at all.
Onus is on you to prove that. Citation required I don't need to. You can come and watch this ISBoxer eleven skiff with Orca & Freighter support mining fleet with me if you like.
My area's resident ISBoxer uses mostly Rets with the occasional Mack mixed in.
You must have an area that's frequented by CODE. or something. 
--Gadget
Work smarter, not harder. --Scrooge McDuck
|

Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
2013
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 17:13:26 -
[158] - Quote
So someone told me there was a leaked mail where CODE said they were changing tactics to counter the proliferation of Skiff and Procs.
Apparently their new tactics are to whine on the forums...
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided" "So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time"
|

Hopelesshobo
Tactical Nuclear Penguin's
362
|
Posted - 2014.11.30 17:17:25 -
[159] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:For Hopelesshobo & Max Deveron:
Re Ore hold use. You HAVE to look how the Skiff is used in the real world/EVE based on it's statistics. If you TRY to use it as a solo mining vessel you will have to use jet cans which most people won't want to do. Or use an MTU which again can be destroyed fairly quickly so that isn't much better than jet can use. I defy you to find many Skiffs being used as solo mining vessels. You won't find many if any at all. It is a positive factor because it enables some 'afk' use or easier multi account 'atk' use as the hold can store several cycles worth of ore.
So because you have to use jetcans because the cargohold is too small, that isn't a negative factor? The Mackinaw doesn't need to do this, so it's a positive factor for the Mackinaw, and a negative factor for both the Hulk and the Skiff. If you don't like that, then the fact that you can more effectively use the Mackinaw for solo work as well as fleet work, while the Skiff and the Hulk are more dependent on having dedicated haulers.
Bethan Le Troix wrote: Re Drone Damage. The original OP and the previous discussion post which cam before this OP both mentioned null sec use as well as riskier sec status environments. I never stated I was only concerned about high sec use nor is this OP about ganking of Skiffs. It is about role based balancing of ships which is CCP's policy. Hopelesshobo says one Skiff can destroy one Catalyst. Where the Skiff is primarily used in fleet scenarios the available DPS can therefore be multiplied many times over. Again this is a positive factor.
You specifically mentioned in the quote from before jet can theft, and I don't know of any jet can theft that happens outside of highsec, because the person would just kill your Exhumer. Keep in mind with the Catalyst killing capabilities, that each person would only have about 4 seconds to get their drones applying their DPS onto a separate Catalyst before Concord shows up. But, how often do ganks actually take 16 seconds to accomplish? From there, I have heard that Hulks have enough tank to mine in nulsec and defend themselves against nulsec rats if tanked properly, so it's not like Skiffs are exclusive to nul.
Bethan Le Troix wrote: Re Mining yield. Currently the Skiff is not in last place in terms of mining yield. It is in second place with the Mackinaw. The Covetor, Procurer, Retriever, Prospect, & Venture are all below it in yield.
Your joking right? That's like complaining that my Cerberus does more DPS and has more tank then my Caracal. If you want to complain about Exhumer balance, you need to compare it to other Exhumers, not mining barges. So yes, when you only compare it to other Exhumers, it is tied for last place.
Bethan Le Troix wrote: I am calling for a drop in mining yield on the Skiff to balance the ship out given the other statistics of the ship.
I will amend the OP now to call for an unspecified reduction in mining yield. Maybe that will placate you.
No it doesn't, CCP recently buffed the Skiff because according to their server data, almost nobody was using them. Now, I would be curious after they rebalanced it what kind of increase in use it has seen compared to the other Exhumers, but unless the majority of players have decided to use the skiff and nobody else is using any of the other Exhumers, then it is indeed balanced.
Lowering the average to make you look better since 2012.
|

Yolandar
Estrogen Industrial Enterprises
28
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 00:51:50 -
[160] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:Yolandar wrote:^^this^^ Unboosted, takes me 12m to fill and unload my skiff. I dock twice as often as the mack in my belt. afk in the skiff? Nah, I'd be sportin the mack. And not with the gankers around, they made that choice for me. Drone bonus is nice but means nothing in hisec, unless you wanna be on ganker killmails. Proc has a drone bonus, this is the t2. The yield is stll in 3rd place. If somebody got a legit fleet (after Jan 1), then more power to them for being smart. And like your last attempt at nerfing this ship, a fleet can be nullified by bumpin the orca outta the belt. Agree with these mates, you cannot use the fleet argument. Bethan Le Troix wrote:
I defy you to find many Skiffs being used as solo mining vessels. You won't find many if any at all.
Onus is on you to prove that. Citation required I don't need to. You can come and watch this ISBoxer eleven skiff with Orca & Freighter support mining fleet with me if you like.
So then nerf isboxer.
Oh wait...  |

Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
108
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 06:20:01 -
[161] - Quote
Bethan.........
I am truly sorry but you just need to lay off the crash. This is starting to turn into simply a stealth whine thread to force an agenda.
Your theories, or at least how you came up with them have so many holes in them I could drive several Titans...one for each hole through them.
I use my skiff solo even....and seen plenty of others also do this when i tour the betls....
Solo Skiffs in highsec are used like that for thing....long term Finicial Durability. They have the tank and the DPS to thwart gankers by making them think twice to attempt a gank. The decreased ore hold definitely makes the ON PAPER yield comparison to the Mackinaw less so.
Quit talking about fleet mechanics, haulers, jet caning....because this just makes you sound....well uneducated. |

J'Poll
Green Skull LLC
5234
|
Posted - 2014.12.29 12:55:48 -
[162] - Quote
Mehrune Khan wrote:Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Mehrune Khan wrote:
If you are mining in a fleet it's more lucrative to use a Covetor or a Hulk. In a fleet you have haulers and people providing protection. You don't need to mine in a Skiff at that point - Covetors and Hulks are just better for fleet mining, plain and simple. The Skiff just doesn't compare.
Until you get ganked. I love covetors and hulks in fleet mining ops, easy targets :) Quote:When asteroid belts span 30, 40, or more kilometers long you would need half a dozen bookmarks per belt, and know beforehand which specific bookmark is closest to the rock you want to mine. It doesn't work. But you would know that if you actually mined for your ISK.  Well, I started out as a miner. Even without Orca boosting your strip miner range, you have 15km range. You don't need to be right beside the rock to start mining, you just need to be in range. A few bookmarks per belt are enough. If you have decent Orca support you can clear out entire belts without moving. Belts are static too, mine out an asteroid and it will respawn in the exact same place the next day. You're bookmarks will last you till the day they change that. I can't believe I'm actually teaching miners how to mine, the shame!  I think you are illustrating the real problem here - the Skiff isn't OP, it's just that gankers are making everyone pick it by default. That's not a problem with the Skiff, it's a problem with the gankers. Also you must have never been a very good miner. Ore respawns aren't as static as you think. In-depth article on rock spawningWhen ore gets mined out, it will eventually respawn in the same belt, but not necessarily at the same location. It could all spawn on the part of the belt opposite one of your bookmarks. Which means when you warp to belt 1 - bookmark 1 you end up farther away than if you had warped to 0. What do you do then? Warp back to station and then warp to your other bookmark? Slowboat it to the rocks? This all takes more time, and this is why juggling bookmarks for each belt is stupid. Even if the ore spawned in the same location every single time, the rocks closest to your bookmark could get mined out before you get there, which creates the same problem as above. Really making multiple bookmarks per belt isn't a sensible thing to do, and just clutters up the people & places menu. It's also not a valid argument against the Skiff's smaller ore hold. Travel time does impact the solo miner's ability to mine, and it's a problem only exaggerated by the smaller hold of the Skiff. Give it up already. You're grasping at straws here to nerf a ship that is already fairly well balanced. Really why did I just spend all that time and effort explaining why an idea is stupid, when any player who actually mines rocks would know it's stupid and never do it? It's amazing how disconnected from reality a forum troll can get just to validate a single argument.
Or you learn how to make tacs...and use them for fast relocation within an asteroid belt.
And learn to use folders in you P&P to prevent clutter.
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded
Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club
|

Cassius Invictus
Thou shalt not kill A Nest of Vipers
112
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 12:52:00 -
[163] - Quote
Guys come one... I can't talk from miners perspective, but I've ganked several mining barrages (not too many - I donGÇÖt like targets that don't shoot back ) and honestly they die all the same to a proper gank squad. If anything maybe Skiff should have more EPH and less mining yield? but then again it still won't have a chance against a properly fitted and flown combat ship..,. |

Gabriel Elarik
Celestiel Rams
1
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 13:18:57 -
[164] - Quote
My viewpoint as a miner
Its true that the skiff is more or less the ship of choice if someone thinks he isnt safe and has no fleet as support
with fleet as support the ship of choice would be the hulk but only in empire space i did see many times hulks exploding because they die way to fast even to rats in 0.0 space because if someone is there for the rats until the rat is dead the hulk is spacedust
the mack is a good solo ship but dies also way to fast compared to the skiff |

Rhadnan Yvormes
The Blackfeather Syndicate
5
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 19:49:02 -
[165] - Quote
Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Let me say it again: this GAME is about KILLING stuff. It is the single most important aspect of EVE. Would you call ppl that play mmo FPS sociopaths for shooting each other? 
Right here is the heart of the fallacy of your argument, Meilandra. (And most I've seen from suicide gankers, for that matter.) First of all, no most people wouldn't call FPS players sociopaths for shooting each other, but then an FPS generally actually IS entirely about killing each other. THIS GAME, however, is about killing stuff, mining stuff, building stuff, selling stuff, transporting stuff, researching stuff, exploring stuff, inventing stuff, etc. It's about whatever you want to make it about for yourself. That's the point of a sandbox. Notice that nowhere in there did I say it's about whatever YOU want to make it about FOR ME.
That killing stuff is the single most important aspect of the game TO YOU does not make it so for everyone else, yet people who think like you DO in fact shape the game for EVERYONE else, and that's why so may players hate suicide gankers. It's fine if you want to focus on combat, but you force the rest of us who are focused on things like building the ships, rigs, modules and ammo you use to kill stuff and the stuff you kill, for example, into sacrificing efficiency at what we actually are trying to do so that we can have a better chance of surviving what you are trying to do. And unlike pirates camping in low or null, you're cowardly attacking the people who are most defenseless and the least interested in combat. And you're actually complaining that we don't have to sacrifice enough of what we choose to focus on to defend ourselves against what you choose to focus on. It's not enough that you get to dictate our gameplay experience while exploiting the game mechanics? Do you honestly not see the issue there?
Imagine for a moment if we could force you to engage in mining or industry at will, at your cost and our profit? Might you perhaps think differently about that? Is that perhaps not what you pay to play subscription fees to do?
You may very well be a genuinely decent and well-adjusted person in real life, but your online profession of suicide ganking is without question violent, devoid of social conscience and criminal, and does without question therefore qualify as sociopathic behavior. That's the actual definition. And on top of that, suicide ganking, especially of vastly outmatched targets, is inherently cowardly. No amount of justification is ever going to change either of these indisputable facts.
You can keep right on suicide ganking, of course, and probably have a lot of fun doing it, but it WILL expose you as a coward and a bully exhibiting sociopathic behavior, and you WILL be called out on it.
Don't like that? Try not earning it.
|

Altirius Saldiaro
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 19:59:31 -
[166] - Quote
Skiff is fine as it is now. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
2207
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 20:16:59 -
[167] - Quote
Rhadnan Yvormes wrote:Meilandra Vanderganken wrote:Let me say it again: this GAME is about KILLING stuff. It is the single most important aspect of EVE. Would you call ppl that play mmo FPS sociopaths for shooting each other?  Imagine for a moment if we could force you to engage in mining or industry at will, at your cost and our profit? Might you perhaps think differently about that? Is that perhaps not what you pay to play subscription fees to do?
http://jestertrek.blogspot.ca/2014/05/recycling-day-peace-dec.html
old post but relevant. And yes, when mining I always preferred a skiff . . . but then I also used a skiff in a race against interceptors in Rixxs Death Race. I am odd
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|

Haywoud Jablomi
The Circus Corp Alternate Allegiance
3
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 21:42:07 -
[168] - Quote
So read the OP.
So nerf a ship that doesnt need nerfing? Honestly like many of the other posters have said. This is nothing but a tears thread about how the Skiff is hard to gank in high sec.
Your idea ot changing it seems less about the game and more about making it so people use other ships like the Mach and Hulk and thus you can gank them more often.
Simply put.
No. |

Ersahi Kir
Froosh INC. SpaceMonkey's Alliance
402
|
Posted - 2014.12.30 23:06:37 -
[169] - Quote
I think what the OP is missing is that people stopped using the mack because of all the miner ganking bandwagon jumpers. If yield actually mattered people would be mining in a hulk, but they don't because it's just giving away a kill mail. Even the moderately tanked mack is easy pickings.
The skiff is itself easily gankable, it just requires a few more pilots. If skiffs are the most used mining ship it may not be because it's OP, it could just as easily be because the others are just terrible choices. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |