Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
852
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:42:33 -
[1921] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote: Not bannable atm, and i Control my charaters mutch themself too, like activating Shield booster(s) , (where it's needed, dragging in drones if some take damge. So, Yeah.
why are you then here? You are not affected by this policy change then at all, right? If you are not using input broadcast feature of isbotter, you're perfectly fine and in legal area.
|
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:44:04 -
[1922] - Quote
Posted - 2010.04.23 15:51:00
Hello there,
To make a long story short, automation of gameplay is not permitted; players must be manually issuing the commands to control their character(s) at all times.
Our stance on programs such as Synergy and hardware/software combination such as the G15 keyboard is that they can be legitimately used as long as gameplay isn't automated. Synergy allows you to move your mouse cursor to multiple different monitors which are hooked up to different computers and we do not have any qualms with players using the program for this purpose. If Synergy was used in some way to control your accounts for you without a need for you to be at your keyboard, then that would not be allowed, but I am not aware of such a functionality with this program. If Synergy is used in conjunction with some other program to automate gameplay, it would not be permitted. G15 "macros" which allow you to group different commands into one keypress are allowed. For example, setting your G1 key to press F1, F2, F3 and so on for you with one key press is allowed (although this specific command is not as useful as it was before now that we have weapon grouping).
An exceedingly complex G15 macro which would effectively automate gameplay, such as mining, without a need for the player to be present at his keyboard would be against the EULA, regardless of whether the player utilizing said macro is sitting at his keyboard at the time!
Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA.
I hope this clears up this matter.
Best regards,
Senior GM Lelouch
EVE Online Customer Support
from: https://sites.google.com/site/khromtor/oldrigs |
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6028
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:46:17 -
[1923] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Sal Landry wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote: Isboxer*
No, isbotter. You are a botter. You are controlling 1 account, the other 10 are controlled by your isbotter software The fact that you aren't afk doesn't make controlling accounts via 3rd party software ok. If a player is legitimately playing Eve on one account it doesn't mean he's suddenly allowed to run 20 botting mission runners in the background. omg, its not botting. And and i only have 3 accounts , amd im not controlling any other 10. Actually, this is the correct argument to be made against the use of isboxer. If you are firing three ships worth of bombs with the click of a single button, you are indeed using input automation, which is the definition of botting. I never really cared one way or the other myself, because three guys using one ship each will always be superior to one guy using three. However, if you were being honest with yourself instead of trying to justify your lies, you would understand what is wrong with input automation. Bottom line, if you're one guy, taking on one guy, then why should you be allowed to have more than one ship to take him on with? This is an MMO, and make some friends if you wanna upgrade your numbers against your opponents. And even if we're talking about PVE, we're still talking about PVP to an extent, because everything you do impacts the game for someone else to some degree or another. and its still the player who click to make it happend tho,
You click ONCE to make something happen on multiple ships.
What you need to be doing is clicking once for EACH ship.
Capiche?
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
853
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:47:52 -
[1924] - Quote
so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid. |
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:48:51 -
[1925] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid.
They explain what means what there, read it please.
|
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6028
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:49:27 -
[1926] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote: Posted - 2010.04.23 15:51:00
Quote of old rulings
Yeah, cuz CCP have never changed the rules before based on data. You've got us there bruh, you win.
Actually, I was being sarcastic. Read the OP. Out with the old, in with the new.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6028
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:50:14 -
[1927] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid. They explain what means what there, read it please.
No, they didn't explain botting at all, they explained what was against the rules AT THE TIME. The rules are changing.
Hope that clears things up for you.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
633
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:51:53 -
[1928] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:
Show me where in the definition of Input Automation it mentions "multiple instances"
Oh that's right it doesn't...
Hence the problem.
I couldn't give a damn about ISBoxer but I would still like to know if using keyboard / mouse software to map multiple keyboard commands to 1 key is still allowed.
I even raised a petition asking for clarification and the reply I got was basically, if you are unsure, stop.
I do not see why it is so difficult to give a simple yes and no to a easy question.
CCP Falcon wrote: Input Automation remains strictly prohibited, and is policed under our suspension and ban policy.
Input Automation has always been against the rules. How many "instances" doesn't matter.
Its Input Broadcasting & Input Multiplexing that (as of 01/01/15) will also be against the rules.
CCP Falcon wrote: Input Broadcasting & Input Multiplexing
Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing refer to the multiplication of inputs, actions and events to multiple instances of the game.
As to using a keyboard/mouse to map multiple keyboards commands to one key. As long as the commands go to one client you will be ok.
|
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
853
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:57:22 -
[1929] - Quote
why cant people play the f****ing game as is?? Clicking or mashing butans seems to be too hard for them so they want to automate, macro or remap all things constantly. goddamn. |
Chris Winter
Winters Are Coming
558
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:58:18 -
[1930] - Quote
What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it? |
|
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
853
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 09:59:39 -
[1931] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it?
because I knew its wrong and gonna get banned at some point in the future. |
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:00:20 -
[1932] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid. They explain what means what there, read it please. No, they didn't explain botting at all, they explained what was against the rules AT THE TIME. The rules are changing. Hope that clears things up for you.
It explains that its not botting if an player is at the keyboard doing the commands. Automation without an player at the keyboard doing a **** = booting. even if it's through synergy or whatever. if an player send the inputs its not botting. That was my point to him. Even if it's going to be banned or not, its still not botting. just against the upcoming eula changes. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
853
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:04:39 -
[1933] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote: It explains that its not botting if an player is at the keyboard doing the commands. Automation without an player at the keyboard doing a **** = booting.
it is their stance now, they just dont call it that way. We here in forums express our opinions like everyone else and mine is that isbotter is basically botting, I explained a million of times already, why.
kraken11 jensen wrote: even if it's through synergy or whatever. if an player send the inputs its not botting. That was my point to him. Even if it's going to be banned or not, its still not botting. just against the upcoming eula changes.
in your opinion its not botting, in mine it is, because there are eve clients played by 3rd party tool, basically you got 10 software controlled chars running after you doing same things as you do. |
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:05:48 -
[1934] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it? because I knew its wrong and gonna get banned at some point in the future.
There are that people who just starting to complain about something, Even if they are not directly affected or not. some peopel dont have anything better to do (i dont talk about everyone) But there're some people like that... |
leiutenant George
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:05:59 -
[1935] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote:Posted - 2010.04.23 15:51:00 Hello there, To make a long story short, automation of gameplay is not permitted; players must be manually issuing the commands to control their character(s) at all times. Our stance on programs such as Synergy and hardware/software combination such as the G15 keyboard is that they can be legitimately used as long as gameplay isn't automated. Synergy allows you to move your mouse cursor to multiple different monitors which are hooked up to different computers and we do not have any qualms with players using the program for this purpose. If Synergy was used in some way to control your accounts for you without a need for you to be at your keyboard, then that would not be allowed, but I am not aware of such a functionality with this program. If Synergy is used in conjunction with some other program to automate gameplay, it would not be permitted. G15 "macros" which allow you to group different commands into one keypress are allowed. For example, setting your G1 key to press F1, F2, F3 and so on for you with one key press is allowed (although this specific command is not as useful as it was before now that we have weapon grouping). An exceedingly complex G15 macro which would effectively automate gameplay, such as mining, without a need for the player to be present at his keyboard would be against the EULA, regardless of whether the player utilizing said macro is sitting at his keyboard at the time! Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA. I hope this clears up this matter. Best regards, Senior GM Lelouch EVE Online Customer Support from: https://sites.google.com/site/khromtor/oldrigs
As you have qutoed, "Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA."
Therefore you are issuing commands and the automation is done by the multiboxing software through broadcasting, effectively automating those commands through "X" clients, and, to be perfectly honest, you will have plenty of time to argue that point after Jan 1st, while waiting to hear back from your petition to get you accounts unbanned.
I hope I have cleared that up :) |
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6030
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:07:47 -
[1936] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid. They explain what means what there, read it please. No, they didn't explain botting at all, they explained what was against the rules AT THE TIME. The rules are changing. Hope that clears things up for you. It explains that its not botting if an player is at the keyboard doing the commands. Automation without an player at the keyboard doing a **** = booting. even if it's through synergy or whatever. if an player send the inputs its not botting. That was my point to him. Even if it's going to be banned or not, its still not botting. just against the upcoming eula changes.
No it doesn't explain that at all. Now pay attention and stop making excuses - if a player sends one command, and a script replicates that command to be carried out across other clients, that is botting. CCP didn't define botting, they defined what they were and weren't going to allow in the game at the time. Nowhere in what you posted did CCP say "Botting is...". What they said was, "here is a clarification of the EULA". Are you high or something? How are you not getting this? Is it wilful ignorance or are you just huffing glue today?
Let me simplify this for you.
Pushing a button to send a command to one ship = not botting.
Manually pushing that button five times to send commands to five ships = not botting.
Pushing one button to send five commands to five ships = botting.
Botting is defined by input automation. The third item on that list is input automation. What you are doing, if you do this, is botting. Previously, this kind of botting has been allowed by CCP. Now, no longer.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Chris Winter
Winters Are Coming
558
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:08:07 -
[1937] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it? because I knew its wrong and gonna get banned at some point in the future. Bull. It wasn't "wrong." It was explicitly allowed. Also, this is EVE. People playing EVE do everything they can to get ahead.
The only possible explanation for why people who claim ISBoxer is overpowered weren't using it is because they were too lazy to learn how to set it up and how to use it. Which I guess disproves the "it makes things easy" argument since it was too hard for you. |
Archibald Thistlewaite III
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Miners
633
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:09:08 -
[1938] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:why cant people play the f****ing game as is?? Clicking or mashing butans seems to be too hard for them so they want to automate, macro or remap all things constantly. goddamn.
Some people have disabilities. Do you think people with only one functioning hand should be allowed to play Eve?
There are many reasons why control interfaces need to be changed to allow individuals to use them. Don't tar them all with the same brush please. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
854
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:10:06 -
[1939] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote: Even if they are not directly affected or not. some peopel dont have anything better to do (i dont talk about everyone) But there're some people like that...
Oh, I wasnt doing it myself but I never denied I wasnt affected by them. One of my freighters got ganked by a fleet of isbotted catalysts, not holding grudges or anything, I was carrying little too much but still I think it shouldnt be possible for 1 person, if you multibox then please do all of the work required by yourself.
Then, there are lots of guys do bomber wings on their own, alone, basically negating entire fleet doctrines of being flown in null. Here again, I think it shouldnt be possible in that easy way.
Now CCP finally realized how gamebreaking isbotter acually, and took actions and changed policies. For good. |
Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
1461
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:10:55 -
[1940] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it?
It was allowed by CCP WITH the caveat that their policies on the matter may/could change in the future. Guess what they did, you where warned.
Damn these inbox users sound like drug users going cold turkey.
And why I didn't use it, simple didn't need it I can steer 3 accounts all by myself no bot software needed.
Now go play the game as it was designed to be played. Why is that so hard? |
|
Chris Winter
Winters Are Coming
558
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:11:56 -
[1941] - Quote
leiutenant George wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Posted - 2010.04.23 15:51:00 Hello there, To make a long story short, automation of gameplay is not permitted; players must be manually issuing the commands to control their character(s) at all times. Our stance on programs such as Synergy and hardware/software combination such as the G15 keyboard is that they can be legitimately used as long as gameplay isn't automated. Synergy allows you to move your mouse cursor to multiple different monitors which are hooked up to different computers and we do not have any qualms with players using the program for this purpose. If Synergy was used in some way to control your accounts for you without a need for you to be at your keyboard, then that would not be allowed, but I am not aware of such a functionality with this program. If Synergy is used in conjunction with some other program to automate gameplay, it would not be permitted. G15 "macros" which allow you to group different commands into one keypress are allowed. For example, setting your G1 key to press F1, F2, F3 and so on for you with one key press is allowed (although this specific command is not as useful as it was before now that we have weapon grouping). An exceedingly complex G15 macro which would effectively automate gameplay, such as mining, without a need for the player to be present at his keyboard would be against the EULA, regardless of whether the player utilizing said macro is sitting at his keyboard at the time! Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA. I hope this clears up this matter. Best regards, Senior GM Lelouch EVE Online Customer Support from: https://sites.google.com/site/khromtor/oldrigs As you have qutoed, "Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA." Therefore you are issuing commands and the automation is done by the multiboxing software through broadcasting, effectively automating those commands through "X" clients, and, to be perfectly honest, you will have plenty of time to argue that point after Jan 1st, while waiting to hear back from your petition to get you accounts unbanned. I hope I have cleared that up :) Can you even read? The quote you pasted says explicitly that programs which let you "issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed." AKA, broadcasting. |
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:13:30 -
[1942] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:kraken11 jensen wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:so what? CCP changed their stance, after isbotter abuse was about getting out of hand. Why do you quote old statements, they are by now invalid. They explain what means what there, read it please. No, they didn't explain botting at all, they explained what was against the rules AT THE TIME. The rules are changing. Hope that clears things up for you. It explains that its not botting if an player is at the keyboard doing the commands. Automation without an player at the keyboard doing a **** = booting. even if it's through synergy or whatever. if an player send the inputs its not botting. That was my point to him. Even if it's going to be banned or not, its still not botting. just against the upcoming eula changes. No it doesn't explain that at all. Now pay attention and stop making excuses - if a player sends one command, and a script replicates that command to be carried out across other clients, that is botting. CCP didn't define botting, they defined what they were and weren't going to allow in the game at the time. Nowhere in what you posted did CCP say "Botting is...". What they said was, "here is a clarification of the EULA". Are you high or something? How are you not getting this? Is it wilful ignorance or are you just huffing glue today? Let me simplify this for you. Pushing a button to send a command to one ship = not botting. Manually pushing that button five times to send commands to five ships = not botting. Pushing one button to send five commands to five ships = botting. Botting is defined by input automation. The third item on that list is input automation. What you are doing, if you do this, is botting. Previously, this kind of botting has been allowed by CCP. Now, no longer.
Input Broadcasting & Input Multiplexing
Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing refer to the multiplication of inputs, actions and events to multiple instances of the game.
It dont state that it's botting. And it dont happend automated without an player. It's not botting. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
855
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:13:47 -
[1943] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote: Bull. It wasn't "wrong." It was explicitly allowed. Also, this is EVE. People playing EVE do everything they can to get ahead.
in my personal opinion it was and still is wrong. You cant deny me my attitude toward certain things. Happily, CCP sees it same way by now.
|
Heckar Ottig
Star Frontiers Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:14:27 -
[1944] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:why cant people play the f****ing game as is?? Clicking or mashing butans seems to be too hard for them so they want to automate, macro or remap all things constantly. goddamn.
Sorry for not being hardcore enough. Also sorry for ccp being to illuminati on macro keys matter now after they were pretty straightforward with it being ok back in the day. |
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6031
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:14:33 -
[1945] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it?
For one, I'm not some silly whelp that thinks I need multiple accounts to enjoy a video game. For another, EVE isn't a second job so I'm not gonna treat it like one by working 8 hours a week multiboxing mining barges just to plex my PVP account because I'm not a cheap schlub that can't afford the very low cost of a subscription.
For another, if I'm pvp'ing against one person, why does that one person get to fight me with multiple ships using a single command relayed across all of them with a script? I don't care if he wants to try to multibox a logi or two, but I'll be damned if I'll be beat by some script-kiddie with 20 stealth bombers all slaved to one keypress.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
6031
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:16:05 -
[1946] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it? because I knew its wrong and gonna get banned at some point in the future. People playing EVE do everything they can to get ahead.
Everything WITHIN THE RULES, and no, some people don't do that at all. Some of us actually just enjoy a video game, whether we're 'ahead' or not. Ahead of what exactly? Oh you have more pixels than me? Who gives a ****, I'm having fun while you're slaving over a second job.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
kraken11 jensen
Californian CottonPickers
13
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:17:08 -
[1947] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Chris Winter wrote:What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription.
So if it was so powerful in your minds...why weren't you using it? For one, I'm not some silly whelp that thinks I need multiple accounts to enjoy a video game. For another, EVE isn't a second job so I'm not gonna treat it like one by working 8 hours a week multiboxing mining barges just to plex my PVP account because I'm not a cheap schlub that can't afford the very low cost of a subscription. For another, if I'm pvp'ing against one person, why does that one person get to fight me with multiple ships using a single command relayed across all of them with a script? I don't care if he wants to try to multibox a logi or two, but I'll be damned if I'll be beat by some script-kiddie with 20 stealth bombers all slaved to one keypress.
lol, 11 accounts, + drones = assist 50 drones + the person who drones was assisted to = 55 drones. = you die <3. With 2 click, f1 for civ gun, and f for main charater drones <3 |
leiutenant George
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:17:57 -
[1948] - Quote
[/quote] Can you even read? The quote you pasted says explicitly that programs which let you "issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed." AKA, broadcasting.[/quote]
Can you even read?
Have you read the original post?
"Input Broadcasting & Input Multiplexing
Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing refer to the multiplication of inputs, actions and events to multiple instances of the game.
Going Forward
As of 15th of March 2013 we have been policing input automation based on a two-strike policy
GÇó 1st strike for input automation is a 30 day ban GÇó 2nd strike for input automation is a permanent ban
Input Automation remains strictly prohibited, and is policed under our suspension and ban policy.
Based on the discussion in this area and our will to be more clear and concise with the community regarding this part of our rules, we have decided to also apply this two-strike policy to prohibited forms of Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing as of January 1st 2015."
good luck with any future petitions :)
|
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
855
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:19:18 -
[1949] - Quote
kraken11 jensen wrote:
lol, 11 accounts, + drones = assist 50 drones + the person who drones was assisted to = 55 drones. = you die <3. With 2 click, f1 for civ gun, and f for main charater drones <3
yeah then feel free to use drones and stop crying. I'm fine with drones, they are part of the game, if I wasnt I would complain by myself in forums and you could come flame my thread. But I don't. |
Chris Winter
Winters Are Coming
559
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 10:20:36 -
[1950] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: For another, if I'm pvp'ing against one person, why does that one person get to fight me with multiple ships using a single command relayed across all of them with a script? I don't care if he wants to try to multibox a logi or two, but I'll be damned if I'll be beat by some script-kiddie with 20 stealth bombers all slaved to one keypress.
Because you were allowed to do the exact same thing. It's not the isboxer's fault that you choose to gimp yourself with only one account despite repeated CCP promotions encouraging multiboxing. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |