Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1435
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:54:44 -
[1] - Quote
Just noticed the campaigns have already started. Will write a nice long post this weekend who I am, why vote for me, what I can do for you and what not.
In the mean time, read the great player profile Feyd made :
http://evedarklord.blogspot.nl/2014/11/tora-bushido-player-profile.html
DISCLAIMER : All of the above replies are not meant as any form of harassment. It's all SciFi.
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1435
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 13:55:01 -
[2] - Quote
Reserved
DISCLAIMER : All of the above replies are not meant as any form of harassment. It's all SciFi.
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Lorelei Ierendi
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 14:40:18 -
[3] - Quote
As you are someone that has had some stuff to do with wardecs, I'd be very interested in hearing your opinions on how War in Eve can be transformed into something that is fulfilling for all participants... especially those of us languishing in High Sec!
Hello, world!
Lorelei for CSM!
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=386664
|
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
The Conference Elite CODE.
1145
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 15:28:36 -
[4] - Quote
Hm, this came out of nowhere. I will definitely be voting for you though!
New player resources:
http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information
http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP
http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á
|
Tyr Sigmundr
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
12
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 17:37:09 -
[5] - Quote
You've got my votes! |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1926
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 19:34:56 -
[6] - Quote
And my rifter.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | Sabriz for CSM
New Order diplomat
"no one hates you, none of us care enough for that
|
Chitsa Jason
Revenge of the Liquidators The Marmite Collective
1288
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 22:25:33 -
[7] - Quote
Tora is practically a brand name in merc business. He knows his stuff. If you care at all for war decs or general merc game-play you should vote for him.
Burn the land and boil the sea
You can't take the sky from me
|
Sabriz Adoudel
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
3844
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 22:53:17 -
[8] - Quote
In game Tora and I are at war right now.
Out of game - he's absolutely, positively someone the CSM needs, and will probably receive second (maybe third) place on my recommended how to vote list.
Tora will be a voice for the people that keep highsec chaotic and interesting.
Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Vote #1 Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
& Vote #2 Tora Bushido
|
Tengu Grib
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
706
|
Posted - 2014.12.01 23:25:31 -
[9] - Quote
Hi Tora,
A serious question that I would love to hear your perspective on:
Do you have any specific ideas you would be willing to share on how to improve the current war dec dodging method? Or perhaps, do you see it as an issue that should be addressed? If not why?
Thanks for you time!
-Tengu
Sabriz for CSMX!
Tora for CSMX!
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1446
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 00:10:06 -
[10] - Quote
Thanks Sabriz.
Tengu : Right now I am collecting questions on high-sec and on the user interface. As they will be my prio's. This weekend I'll start writing a long post with questions and answers. Including yours.
@All : As CSM my Engrish will stay the same. This is to support the rest of the non native English speakers.
I want to find solutions for the entire high-sec community. Not just the "bad" or "Good" guys.
TORA FOR CSM X
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
|
Bobmon
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
92
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 00:15:22 -
[11] - Quote
Got my vote mate
Chief Editor of Evenews24.com
GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢
@BobmonEve
|
Tengu Grib
Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE.
707
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 00:52:09 -
[12] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Thanks Sabriz. Tengu : Right now I am collecting questions on high-sec and on the user interface. As they will be my prio's. This weekend I'll start writing a long post with questions and answers. Including yours. @All : As CSM my Engrish will stay the same. This is to support the rest of the non native English speakers. I want to find solutions for the entire high-sec community. Not just the "bad" or "Good" guys.
Thanks Tora! In that case, would it be easier for you if I posted another thing here, or send you a mail?
Sabriz for CSMX!
Tora for CSMX!
|
Theronth Valarax
V0LTA Triumvirate.
82
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 02:26:21 -
[13] - Quote
Lol
Now waiting for Gevlon's thread.
Check out my Youtube channel
|
Lanctharus Onzo
Alea Iacta Est Universal Brave Collective
45
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 04:44:21 -
[14] - Quote
Well hello there!
My name is Lanctharus Onzo and I an one of the co-host and writers of the Cap Stable Podcast.
In early 2014 our podcast interviewed a great majority of the candidates for CSM9 and we will be doing the same for CSM10.
Here is our announcement: http://capstable.net/2014/12/01/council-of-stellar-management-x-call-for-candidate-interviews/
As we stated in the announcement, you can contact us to schedule your one on one interview via any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected] Twitter: @CapStable Or via our contact form
We look forward to speaking to you about your particular skill set and expertise in EVE Online and we hope you success in your candidacy.
Sincerely,
Lanctharus Onzo Co-host & Writer of the Cap Stable Podcast Military Director, Alea Iacta Est Universal
Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast
Twitter: @Lanctharus
|
Valkin Mordirc
409
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 07:45:13 -
[15] - Quote
Hey Tora Good luck running!
A few questions I have to ask.
Will you be making a push to flush out the Wardeccing system? Such as giving defending corps more reason to fight, so on and so forth? A lot of EVE players (More so new ones) seem to think the Wardec's are imbalanced, do you agree? What are your current idea's on this topic?
Will you work on making Highsec corps, more than social club as they are for the most part now? If so how?
What are your opinions on NPE and if you could make changes what would you change?
EDIT: Another question, with the recent CSM Summit there was a scare about CCP taking about the ability to commit AWOX. How do you feel about the subject? Would you change it, Remove it, or keep it as it currently is?
#DeleteTheWeak
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1449
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 07:52:42 -
[16] - Quote
Tengu Grib wrote:[quote=Tora Bushido]Thanks Tora! In that case, would it be easier for you if I posted another thing here, or send you a mail? Both would work. I have made myself a list with questions people have and suggestions how they think we can improve it.
@Lanctharus Onzo : That would be nice, but give me a week or so. I need top get things properly on paper first. I always think before I speak. And I listen to your podcast all the time, so I knew you were
TORA FOR CSM X
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2793
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 10:16:09 -
[17] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post.
The Rules: 5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
ISD Ezwal
Vice Admiral
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
Fybs
Somalian Coast Guard Authority The Marmite Collective
205
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 14:04:45 -
[18] - Quote
My experience with Tora is probably a better than most here.
When he told us he was running for CSM I was abit surprised but in both a good and bad way.
The bad: Marmite would suffer when Tora is busy doing CSM stuffz. (you could consider me being abit selfish here)
The good: I couldn't think of hand on heart a better person to help change HS.
He is 100% the best man for the job.
Good luck buddy you get my vote
Don't confuse kindness with weakness.
|
Arvenja
Jammins Friends
0
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 17:48:40 -
[19] - Quote
Hi Tora,
you have my vote too......
|
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
The Conference Elite CODE.
1152
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 18:45:18 -
[20] - Quote
We should see how many of your wardec targets we can get to vote for you! I think you already have all of code.
New player resources:
Uni Wiki - General Info
Eve Altruist - PvP
Belligerent Undesirables - High Sec Pvp
|
|
Tear Jar
Emolgranlan Code Enforcement Branch
171
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 19:58:50 -
[21] - Quote
It seems a lot of people join corps even when it isn't in their best interest.
What is your opinion on a "social only" corp being implemented into eve(no pocos, hangers or poses, but can't be wardecced)? |
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1464
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 14:10:22 -
[22] - Quote
Tear Jar wrote:It seems a lot of people join corps even when it isn't in their best interest.
What is your opinion on a "social only" corp being implemented into eve(no pocos, hangers or poses, but can't be wardecced)? EDIT : I used your idea and added some changes. See main post.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
218
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 15:57:40 -
[23] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote: Ganking in high-sec I think ganking is a part of Eve and I want it to stay, but not as we have it now. Right now itGÇÖs to easy to warp out of a station, gank something, warp your pod back to station and wait till the timer runs out. This needs to be balanced more. I would like to see people still able to gank, but only when you arenGÇÖt in an NPC corp and when you do, you will not be able to dock / logoff for at least 30 minutes. If you get podded and wake up in station, the station auto kicks you out till the 30m timer runs out. I also want the ganked ship, not to drop more then 25% of the loot. This way the GÇÿgoodGÇÖ guys at least have some way to get revenge and ganking for profit is reduced.
Well, several of these are just straight up nerfs to ganking - something that is already pretty much unprofitable in all case except for overloaded haulers or bling-fit missioner/miners - I would like to ask more about this station lockout. While I don't think it is feasible (or fair) as there is no precedent for a game mechanic where players are auto-ejected into space, I am curious about your intentions here. In your view would such a lockout/eject system replace the 15 minute criminal timer, or be in addition? If I were an industrious ganker and had a Bowhead full of gank ships in a safe spot, could I keep ganking?
Otherwise, a 30 minute lockout where I all I can do is just sit in space in a pod is not very compelling gameplay.
I can think of several ideas that would actually make ganking more risky, but all these suggestions do is make ganking less profitable and more tedious, while doing nothing to give players a chance to actually "get revenge" on a ganker other than repeatedly blowing up an empty pod (which come Rhea pod-loss will have no penalty).
Finally, ganking is at an all time low yet suppose to be in the game. Do you really, really think that more nerfs are in order?
Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10 is a good idea.
|
Dersen Lowery
Drinking in Station
1306
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 16:21:31 -
[24] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Ganking in high-sec I think ganking is a part of Eve and I want it to stay, but not as we have it now. Right now itGÇÖs to easy to warp out of a station, gank something, warp your pod back to station and wait till the timer runs out. This needs to be balanced more. I would like to see people still able to gank, but only when you arenGÇÖt in an NPC corp and when you do, you will not be able to dock / logoff for at least 30 minutes. If you get podded and wake up in station, the station auto kicks you out till the 30m timer runs out. I also want the ganked ship, not to drop more then 25% of the loot. This way the GÇÿgoodGÇÖ guys at least have some way to get revenge and ganking for profit is reduced.
I'd say that the problem is that it's too easy to mitigate risk with insta-warps, tacs, docking, and CONCORD manipulation. Right now, anyone who goes to the (admittedly not insignificant) trouble of prepping their active area and staying in fast-aligning ships is essentially uncatchable. Oh, sure, a dedicated camp will catch them, but not the randoms warping around in PVE ships and indies, nor (generally) the targets.
Tora Bushido wrote:AFK for a long time If youGÇÖre logged in, I think you should also be active behind the keyboard. AFK cloakers and miners should press a notification button every 20 minutes, which appears randomly on the screen.
Sorry, this is terrible. Five minutes after this comes out, anyone who cares will have a script running that detects that thing and triggers a keypress to dismiss it. Yeah, that's a EULA violation, but that just means that you're encouraging people to violate the EULA. Carrots, not sticks. How would you feel if you had to go AFK because one of your kids acted up/got hurt/whatever, and you came back to find yourself under attack, tried to defend yourself/warp off, only to die because your keystroke(s) were consumed by a stupid modal dialog? It would actually be better to do what some other games do, and either publicly flag people as AFK (Star Trek Online) or just warn them a few minutes before logging them off (Elder Scrolls Online).
Also, if you go AFK in high sec in your barge, you're going to come back to a barge sitting idly in a belt doing nothing--if you're lucky. The sort of huge rocks you can chew on for 20 minutes tend to be in lower security space.
I'd strongly suggest finding and talking to miners before making assumptions about how they must want to play the game.
Tora Bushido wrote:Incursions and PvE Not sure if there are current issues. If so, mail me.
Yeah, there are issues, like the entire ancient rat AI system that's tangled up in the POS and drone code, and the lack of any toolset for creating PVE content (which I understand is being fixed). Talk to Sugar and Mike if you want to get a better idea.
Re: different ways of supporting social communities in EVE, have you read any of Mangala Solaris' suggestions along those lines? e.g., http://crossingzebras.com/social-change/
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1473
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 17:45:58 -
[25] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Well, several of these are just straight up nerfs to ganking........ Otherwise, a 30 minute lockout where I all I can do is just sit in space in a pod is not very compelling gameplay. Finally, ganking is at an all time low yet suppose to be in the game. Do you really, really think that more nerfs are in order?
Yes, they are. But that's much better then no ganking at all in high-sec You need to see this not only from a ganker point, but also from the ganked player. It doesn't really matter how you call the timer, as long as you are killable without the easy dockup option. 30 minutes might be a bit to much. 15-20min or so might be better.
Quote:How would you feel if you had to go AFK because one of your kids acted up/got hurt/whatever, and you came back to find yourself under attack, tried to defend yourself/warp off, only to die because your keystroke(s) were consumed by a stupid modal dialog? You should have docked up and ban the people who script.
Quote:It would actually be better to do what some other games do, and either publicly flag people as AFK (Star Trek Online) or just warn them a few minutes before logging them off (Elder Scrolls Online). I dont agree. Flagging is something different then what I want. I want people to be behind their pc when they are logged in. A notification a few minutes before you return to the login screen, of course that should be there. I haven't, but will do.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Gevlon Goblin
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
314
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 18:18:33 -
[26] - Quote
Tora has been my business partner as a merc for almost a year. He never screw me over "fine print", despite hundreds of billions changed hands and trillions went boom.
Whatever he promises you, he'll deliver.
My blog: greedygoblin.blogspot.com
|
Dersen Lowery
Drinking in Station
1306
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 18:24:48 -
[27] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Quote:How would you feel if you had to go AFK because one of your kids acted up/got hurt/whatever, and you came back to find yourself under attack, tried to defend yourself/warp off, only to die because your keystroke(s) were consumed by a stupid modal dialog? You should have docked up and ban the people who script.
Wow. OK.
Sorry, but if my kid's in trouble, I'm not going to do a damn thing in the game first, and I'm not going to limit myself to those systems with stations, either. The issue isn't that OMG I might lose space pixels. The issue is that if I go AFK I generally have a reason to, and I have accepted that going AFK in a PVP game means that I might well come back to a fresh clone in my medical station, and I don't want to be nannied and babysat by some stupid modal dialog. I would rather be logged out.
People go AFK because a rational cost/benefit analysis makes it a sensible choice.
Quote:I dont agree. Flagging is something different then what I want. I want people to be behind their pc when they are logged in. A notification a few minutes before you return to the login screen, of course that should be there.
If you want it, what incentive do you provide to encourage them to do that? I mean, if you did an honest assessment of exactly how much AFK gameplay there is all over New Eden, it would be staggering, and that's largely because of assumptions built into the core of the game. You want people to be at their keyboards while sitting on a titan waiting for a bridge? You want someone to ATK pilot a freighter when the cost of sitting there glassy-eyed for 45 minutes watching glacial aligns and slow-motion warp tunnels is not worth the smidgen of time saved and a tiny bit of extra safety?
If you wanted to, you could get rid of most AFK gameplay easily: remove autopilot, the "aggressive" option for drones, and module auto-repeat. Remove Orbit and Keep at Range, and have Approach turn off when your ship comes within 1km of the destination. Done.
Do you want to play that game?
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1474
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 18:42:46 -
[28] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:Sorry, but if my kid's in trouble, I'm not going to do a damn thing in the game first. Same here, but then again, I wouldn't cry about a lose or any game mechanic when I get shot when that happens. You already have the same 'problem' now in Eve. Some click-able button won't make a difference.
Quote:Do I want to play that game ? Yes. To long AFK while logged on in Eve is bad. We all have small things while we do while we play (bio, wife agro, need a beer, door bells, phones, etc), but if they take to much time >>> Auto Log Off.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15838
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 19:04:33 -
[29] - Quote
A couple of years ago I wrote a post urging a new perspective on the way we look at hi-sec here - I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on how this meshes with your own ideas.
fakeedite: huh that was actually almost 3 years ago. Sic transit gloria mundi...
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
|
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
219
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 19:04:50 -
[30] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Black Pedro wrote:Well, several of these are just straight up nerfs to ganking........ Otherwise, a 30 minute lockout where I all I can do is just sit in space in a pod is not very compelling gameplay. Finally, ganking is at an all time low yet suppose to be in the game. Do you really, really think that more nerfs are in order? Yes, they are. But that's much better then no ganking at all in high-sec You need to see this not only from a ganker point, but also from the ganked player. It doesn't really matter how you call the timer, as long as you are killable without the easy dockup option. 30 minutes might be a bit to much. 15-20min or so might be better. Nah, I actually don't. There is no reason why game play that has been designed into the game (that is highsec ganking) should be made unplayable for no apparent reason.
Gankers are suppose to exist. The whole Crimewatch/security status/CONCORD mechanism is designed so highsec criminals can operate there.
Untanked, overloaded and unprotected ships are suppose to explode. That is part of the risk vs. reward design of the game (see CCP Falcon's comments).
If you have some suggestions that make this game play more interesting - that is more challenging for gankers or more interesting (in terms of revenge or whatever) for gank targets, I am more than eager to hear them. Or if you have some specific type of ganking you think is overpowered - perhaps you think freighters are too weak still and need a buff - then I will consider your arguments. But if you are just going to say ganking = bad so we need less of it, then at least propose a more "fun" mechanism than 30 minute lockouts. Something like turning off offensive modules in highsec so gankers can at least do something else then float helpless in a pod for 30 minutes.
Aim higer Tora! Try to make the game better!
Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10 is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |