EVE Search - GÖ¢GÖ¢ Bobmon, CSM 10 GÖ¢GÖ¢

All Channels

CSM Campaigns

GÖ¢GÖ¢ Bobmon, CSM 10 GÖ¢GÖ¢

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.08 07:56:02 - [91] - Quote Kiko Stij wrote: weboide wrote: Kiko Stij wrote: Are you of the eligible age to run for CSM? I recall hearing you're under the minimum age of 21. Bobby has the mental age of Stephen Hawking, thus superior to yours. This is an adorable attempt at trolling and ad hominem, but please let Bobmon answer the question for himself. It is a rather large issue for his campaign if he is ineligible automatically due to the CSM White Pages list of minimum criteria. As soo as I can, I will GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
weboide The Cult of Personality DARKNESS. 13	Posted - 2014.12.08 08:42:40 - [92] - Quote Kiko Stij wrote: weboide wrote: Kiko Stij wrote: Are you of the eligible age to run for CSM? I recall hearing you're under the minimum age of 21. Bobby has the mental age of Stephen Hawking, thus superior to yours. This is an adorable attempt at trolling and ad hominem, but please let Bobmon answer the question for himself. It is a rather large issue for his campaign if he is ineligible automatically due to the CSM White Pages list of minimum criteria. Bobmon seems like a decent fellow, but if he's ineligible then he's ineligible plain and simple. No amount of pedantic posts by you can really change that. Your question was: Are you too young for this? He is a legal adult in pretty much every country in the world I don't see why he can't. If 21 is the limit its obviously outdated and should be changed to accommodate the future of the gaming community. Is it fair to say that your opinion is only valid if you're at least 21? At eighteen years of age most/if not all (a part from weird little cesspools of dictatorships in Africa and South America) are legally allowed to vote in elections. How does it make sense that we can trust an eighteen year old to select the future leader of a country but we can't trust them to vote on issues in EvE? Sure this is something Bobmon should be discussing, but don't you think it affects the gaming community at large? To say somebody is ineligible to vote on issues that concern the community solely because they're underage is an outrage especially when the game is aimed towards that age demographic. You can't go Bob-wrong with Bobmon BOBMON FOR CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=388887
Tappits North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion 71	Posted - 2014.12.08 09:52:37 - [93] - Quote weboide wrote: If 21 is the limit its obviously outdated and should be changed to accommodate the future of the gaming community. Yes letGÇÖs Change Icelandic law to suit the needs of some spaceship nerd that would like to be a rep to the community for a few months.GÇª If the Icelandic government says you have to be a certain age to do things (Drink, Sign NDAGÇÖs) in their country then thatGÇÖs the age you have to be.
BadAssMcKill ElitistOps 925	Posted - 2014.12.08 10:08:06 - [94] - Quote weboide wrote: Kiko Stij wrote: weboide wrote: Kiko Stij wrote: Are you of the eligible age to run for CSM? I recall hearing you're under the minimum age of 21. Bobby has the mental age of Stephen Hawking, thus superior to yours. This is an adorable attempt at trolling and ad hominem, but please let Bobmon answer the question for himself. It is a rather large issue for his campaign if he is ineligible automatically due to the CSM White Pages list of minimum criteria. Bobmon seems like a decent fellow, but if he's ineligible then he's ineligible plain and simple. No amount of pedantic posts by you can really change that. Your question was: Are you too young for this? He is a legal adult in pretty much every country in the world I don't see why he can't. If 21 is the limit its obviously outdated and should be changed to accommodate the future of the gaming community. Is it fair to say that your opinion is only valid if you're at least 21? At eighteen years of age most/if not all (a part from weird little cesspools of dictatorships in Africa and South America) are legally allowed to vote in elections. How does it make sense that we can trust an eighteen year old to select the future leader of a country but we can't trust them to vote on issues in EvE? Sure this is something Bobmon should be discussing, but don't you think it affects the gaming community at large? To say somebody is ineligible to vote on issues that concern the community solely because they're underage is an outrage especially when the game is aimed towards that age demographic. His question wasn't if he was too young for "this". It was if he could actually run based on CCPs longstanding rule, which our dear friend bob has yet to answer
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.08 10:16:00 - [95] - Quote As soo as I can, I will GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Hedliner Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 42	Posted - 2014.12.08 10:51:51 - [96] - Quote Good to see you're not giving up even after 99% of your own alliance rejecting you as a legitimate candidate bobmong.
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.08 11:27:06 - [97] - Quote Hedliner wrote: Good to see you're not giving up even after 99% of your own alliance rejecting you as a legitimate candidate bobmong. people have the right to choose who ever they want! Thankfully there are others (even in PL) who gave me a +1 so we will see how this goes GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Hedliner Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 42	Posted - 2014.12.08 13:33:19 - [98] - Quote Bobmon wrote: Hedliner wrote: Good to see you're not giving up even after 99% of your own alliance rejecting you as a legitimate candidate bobmong. people have the right to choose who ever they want! Thankfully there are others (even in PL) who gave me a +1 so we will see how this goes I wouldn't hold your breath. Your contributions to eve are hardly extensive, even if you do try and count your iliterate attempts at writing articles for a second rate news site. Serious question, how damaging do you think your bad penmanship will be to your "campaign"?
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.08 13:59:52 - [99] - Quote Hedliner wrote: Bobmon wrote: Hedliner wrote: Good to see you're not giving up even after 99% of your own alliance rejecting you as a legitimate candidate bobmong. people have the right to choose who ever they want! Thankfully there are others (even in PL) who gave me a +1 so we will see how this goes I wouldn't hold your breath. Your contributions to eve are hardly extensive, even if you do try and count your iliterate attempts at writing articles for a second rate news site. Serious question, how damaging do you think your bad penmanship will be to your "campaign"? not very hedliner, I do my best and as long as I get my message across I'm happy. GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Dirk Action Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 268	Posted - 2014.12.08 16:48:26 - [100] - Quote except your message doesn't get across because you mangle the English language like you're a starving abused dog finally thrown a steak
Hendrick Tallardar Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 303	Posted - 2014.12.08 17:49:54 - [101] - Quote Bobmon wrote: As soo as I can, I will Do you not know your own age and need to consult with the local hospital to find your birth certificate or are you simply stalling until you can confirm if CCP will change the age requirements? It's a rather straight forward question. If you're 21+ then you're good. If you're 20 years old and under then you're not eligible per the CSM White Pages (unless those change this year). EVE 101 Tutorial Series \| Monthly Nullsec Recap \| EVE Online Weekly
ISD Ezwal ISD Community Communications Liaisons 2850	Posted - 2014.12.08 18:42:20 - [102] - Quote I have removed a rule breaking post. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil! The Rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated. ISD Ezwal Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department
Hendrick Tallardar Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 303	Posted - 2014.12.08 19:03:42 - [103] - Quote Who knew asking someone, who has avoided a question about his age, if they didn't know their birthday or if they were consulting with CCP to change the rules was considered a "personal attack" to ISD Ezwal? EVE 101 Tutorial Series \| Monthly Nullsec Recap \| EVE Online Weekly
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.08 20:32:14 - [104] - Quote Not avoiding them hendrick, I said that as soon as I know more I will post it. GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Hendrick Tallardar Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 304	Posted - 2014.12.08 20:49:23 - [105] - Quote So it's safe to assume that you're awaiting CCP to confirm or deny any appeal to change the age requirements from the CSM White Pages then? Again, it's a rather straight forward question you stalling to answer. EVE 101 Tutorial Series \| Monthly Nullsec Recap \| EVE Online Weekly
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 107	Posted - 2014.12.10 19:31:48 - [106] - Quote http://evenews24.com/2014/12/05/en24-podcast-pilot-episdoe-ft-bobmon-mail-lite-and-slevin-kelevra/ GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 15848	Posted - 2014.12.10 22:06:14 - [107] - Quote Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Who knew asking someone, who has avoided a question about his age and the eligibility pertaining to it, if they didn't know their birthday or if they were consulting with CCP to potentially change the rules was considered a "personal attack" to ISD Ezwal? But why bother; either he'll qualify in which this line of questioning is moot, or he won't, in which case any questions at all are moot. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 109	Posted - 2014.12.12 21:53:55 - [108] - Quote Tora created this: http://www.jibjab.com/view/3oAebKchTkaqPK8-S75MPw (Corebexx -> core -> tora -> manny and me) GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1552	Posted - 2014.12.12 23:22:06 - [109] - Quote I claim being drunk ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 110	Posted - 2014.12.15 18:05:45 - [110] - Quote Updated the list of things to fix. GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 114	Posted - 2014.12.21 11:56:45 - [111] - Quote http://youtu.be/DTJy4BKrbm0 GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
corbexx eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred 1135	Posted - 2014.12.21 12:28:48 - [112] - Quote Whats your thoughts on fighter assign. I both small scale a couple supers assigning fighters to fight roaming gangs. And on large scale say assiging hundreds of fighters to a fleet to massively increase its dps, and also to big interceptor fleets to kill structures (in all cases with tiny risk to the super caps themselves) Corbexx for CSM X - Wormholes still deserve better
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 114	Posted - 2014.12.21 15:02:24 - [113] - Quote corbexx wrote: Whats your thoughts on fighter assign. I both small scale a couple supers assigning fighters to fight roaming gangs. And on large scale say assiging hundreds of fighters to a fleet to massively increase its dps, and also to big interceptor fleets to kill structures (in all cases with tiny risk to the super caps themselves) I feel that assigning fighters is a bit to powerful because you can simply slow boat inside of the pos shields with your (super)carrier, and you are safe. The only thing that you might risk is your fighters, which if would cost you around 200mil if you lose all 10 of them. Therefore, I don't agree with the fact that (super) carriers should be able to assign fighters to people off grid. I don't think removing the ability to assign is the only right option so I came up with some other possible solutions: 1) Lowering tracking of supercarrier fighters because they are way to powerful, especially when compared to all other capital. Example: a titan has 0% chance of surviving when he gets pointed down while a super can just launch his fighters and clear hics/dics without a problem, Bit strange, yeah I think so! Lowering their tracking will also result in less usage. 2) Make it so that fighters are affected by warp bubbles, just like normal ships. Doing this would make it riskier for super capital pilots to use these tactic's and opponents will have a better chance at eliminating the fighter thread. GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve

CCP Leeloo C C P C C P Alliance 522	Posted - 2014.12.30 01:27:33 - [114] - Quote Hendrick Tallardar wrote: So it's safe to assume that you're awaiting CCP to confirm or deny any appeal to change the age requirements from the CSM White Pages then? Again, it's a rather straight forward question you stalling to answer. We are indeed looking into changing the age requirements for the CSM. More information about this and other changes will be included in the candidacy opening blog, which will be published on January 30th as I mentioned here. At this point I can assure you that Bobmon will not have any age related issues with his CSMX campaign. CCP Leeloo \| CSM Coordinator \| @ccp_leeloo

Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 116	Posted - 2014.12.30 01:36:10 - [115] - Quote CCP Leeloo wrote: Hendrick Tallardar wrote: So it's safe to assume that you're awaiting CCP to confirm or deny any appeal to change the age requirements from the CSM White Pages then? Again, it's a rather straight forward question you stalling to answer. We are indeed looking into changing the age requirements for the CSM. More information about this and other changes will be included in the candidacy opening blog, which will be published on January 30th as I mentioned here. At this point I can assure you that Bobmon will not have any age related issues with his CSMX campaign. BIg thanks for the help, Leeloo! GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Arronicus Fusion Enterprises Ltd Shadow of xXDEATHXx 1435	Posted - 2014.12.30 08:56:49 - [116] - Quote Bobmon wrote: corbexx wrote: Whats your thoughts on fighter assign. I both small scale a couple supers assigning fighters to fight roaming gangs. And on large scale say assiging hundreds of fighters to a fleet to massively increase its dps, and also to big interceptor fleets to kill structures (in all cases with tiny risk to the super caps themselves) I feel that assigning fighters is a bit to powerful because you can simply slow boat inside of the pos shields with your (super)carrier, and you are safe. The only thing that you might risk is your fighters, which if would cost you around 200mil if you lose all 10 of them. Therefore, I don't agree with the fact that (super) carriers should be able to assign fighters to people off grid. I don't think removing the ability to assign is the only right option so I came up with some other possible solutions: 1) Lowering tracking of supercarrier fighters because they are way to powerful, especially when compared to all other capital. Example: a titan has 0% chance of surviving when he gets pointed down while a super can just launch his fighters and clear hics/dics without a problem, Bit strange, yeah I think so! Lowering their tracking will also result in less usage. 2) Make it so that fighters are affected by warp bubbles, just like normal ships. Doing this would make it riskier for super capital pilots to use these tactic's and opponents will have a better chance at eliminating the fighter thread. See, it's this sort of stuff that makes me feel like you don't actually know what you are talking about. When you sit out-side of a pos shield, your ship itself is at risk, you can be bumped, or even another ship can wedge between you, giving enough time for a sufficient group to get into system to kill you. A sensible titan pilot can neut out a hictor that doesn't sit outside 30km, and warp off or jump, or more importantly, he can not throw himself into situations that he is wide open to be caught on his own. Like any other ship, his best defence is common sense. Just like how all it takes to permanently pin down any supercarrier is 2 hictors. They can't clear them 'no problem' if there is more than 1, because you can't directly ecm burst a hictor (it tries to jam everyone except the target you fire at), and you assign your fighters to one? he warps a short distance, then comes back, and your fighters are off in that stupid warp schenanigans for ages meanwhile the other hictor has you pointed, which you cannot ecm burst. Or you could split 5 fighters on each, and not take either one down quickly. The reason that carriers and supercarriers get used so much is the way that their capital remote assistance modules make the fleet exponentially more powerful. By attempting to defang supers by lowering their drone tracking, etc, you ignore the real issue, leaving them as giant triage units that create invincible tanks. Not to mention tracking is meaningless. When fleets have lokis or rapiers on grid, stuff is webbed and painted, to where titan guns can hit a battleship with ease. But you know this right? You're in PL, afterall. As for making fighters affected by warp bubbles, it would be interesting, but I wonder how difficult it would be for ccp to code it. Every once in a while there is someone asking for fighters and FB to be affected by warp disruptors/scramblers. As for CSM accessibility, why not follow Sugar Kyle and Corbexx's lead, and actually do so? Make yourself available and accessible to hear the views of others, to help put forward what the community wants, by listening to the community. Have a public chat channel where people can reach you. Most of the playerbase hates the forums, or hates posting on them/avoids them/treats them like they don't exist, but ingame people will mail you, or hop into a channel and talk. Really, at this point, your campaign comes across as "We need to force players to care about the CSM, so that I can make these changes that I want happen". As for the whole age schenanigans, it'll be interesting to see how CCP rules, though I think eve has a lot less potential for voting in 14 year olds that would turn the CSM into a farce that quickly loses any of the respect that they have been working hard to gain over the past couple years. Going back to the supercarriers issue for a moment, I think that looking at the resists of supers would be a far more sensible solution. Supers should have a TON of hp, yes, but they should not have exponential tanks with the presence of more and more supers on grid. How do we address this, nerfing super blobs but not individual supers? Kill their resists. I can't remember his name, 'that guy with the solo phoenix pvp videos' made an excellent post talking about how if supercapital ehp was all shifted into actual armor and shield (or structure) hitpoints, with their resists being nuked, they would still take just as long to kill in small gangs, but wouldn't become nearly unkillable in giant super/slowcat gangs. All the negativity aside, I wish you luck with your campaign. The CSM is a huge time investment for those who take the job seriously, and it's admirable that you show the interest to do so.
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1635	Posted - 2014.12.30 09:32:32 - [117] - Quote CCP Leeloo wrote: We are indeed looking into changing the age requirements for the CSM. Good to hear, as being older doesn't make you any better then a younger someone. In my opinion 18+ should do fine. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 116	Posted - 2014.12.30 12:09:36 - [118] - Quote Arronicus wrote: [quote=Bobmon][quote=corbexx]. Everybody will have their own way to fix issues, In the end I just answerd to the question with my opinion, which remains that assigning fighters (whos tracking is horrific OP atm) is just to safe atm. Yes, you can be bumped off but even ''me being in PL"' will admit saying that if something on a pos shield then it becomes 100 times harder to succesfully kill. Also why should a ship being able to fight without being on field itself? The reason why Capital RR and such is to powerfull is become its so much better then the other ''logi'' ships. A solution would by my idea for the role of logistics. have it so that every ship size (frigates t/m Battleships) have a t2 logistics variant, that support their ship size so: Cruiser logi for cruiser fleets and bs logi for bs fleets. Doing this will make a ladder system and so the capital mods will be less outsized then it is now. I'm currently still on vacation, will sit down and look at your EHP thing when I get home! I will be writing a full Idea list on EN24 later, and then I will find the best way to get in touch with people (create a ingame channel or so). Everybody is welcome ofcourse to send me a mail at: [email protected] - Bobmon (ingame) - Twitter and ofcourse you can convo me! GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve
Jayne Fillon 480	Posted - 2015.01.02 06:11:11 - [119] - Quote Simple question: Why should voters choose you over your fellow alliance member and CSM candidate Manfred Sideous? Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
Bobmon Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion 116	Posted - 2015.01.02 12:04:37 - [120] - Quote Jayne Fillon wrote: Simple question: Why should voters choose you over your fellow alliance member and CSM candidate Manfred Sideous? I fully support Manfred Sideous, even though his views sometimes may be different than mine! Manfred is probably one of the best players, currently in game to come up with solutions related to pvp and alliance warfare. This is a big advantage for him, but it can also make him a bit more ''scarier'' to contact players. This is where I can come in play; I'm used to contact/talk to all kinds of players, and so I believe this could benefit me and the hopefully the future CSM 10 team. TD;LR = Vote for us both to make the CSM 10 team as strong as possible GÖ¢GÖ¢Bobmon for CSM10 GÖ¢GÖ¢ #Third Party And #Loan Service GÖ¢GÖ¢ @BobmonEve

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20250915/1200
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.