| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
R i s e
   |
Posted - 2006.09.26 14:25:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Nyack on 26/09/2006 14:28:38
to stop the speculations abit about nas.
nas we set to positive when rise moved into CR aswell as any other entity that were living in in CR. such as youwhat..
youwhat abused their docking rights to prepare assault on us with repeated claim they were to assist us in defense in CR. they had full mining, ratting, refine, docking etc. they abused that by filling up their wallets and gathering intel. any claim that YW didnt use it to stage assault is obviously false, cause they knew we would block docking rights as soon as tehy started to invade. so no chivalry there.
NAS were not set -10 by RISE, they were however not allowed to dock. which is truly just a natural action any alliance would take under attack. if you truly wanted to stay neutral u could just have waited abit longer until the dust had settled and your docking rights would have been returned to you..
u taking YW side in the conflict proves that removing your docking rights were infact the correct action.
removing docking rights for corps outside alliance during war time is obvious action for any alliance..
so plz stop claiming we treated you badly..
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
R i s e
|
Posted - 2006.09.26 14:30:00 -
[2]
got to stop voices in head.. fast i need my tinfoil hat back.. boldyn give it back now!
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 21:46:00 -
[3]
not to be rude or anything like that.. nice to read something that is actually pretty much a convo not thread material..
i think YW should get more respect then this to let a good thread derailed..
both boldyn and dan cant u just get in a chat channel or a ts or 1vs1 and slugg it out instead?
why not start a new thread about the issue instead?
as i see it RISE claims that toxins are contridicting them selfs since they claim they are anti alliance corp and in it for the phew phew.
and dan is basicly dragging the whole alliance down by "not speaking for his alliance"
i looked at the toxin killboard prior to yw declaring war on rise. toxin had the same ratio and isk damage on YW as they had on rise. so naturally to have as much phew phew as possible shouldnt it mean you should be shooting at both.. it would maximize your targets for sure?
all entities involved in the fight knows toxins tip the scale here. your claim to not be interested in politics and alliance is somewhat (no pun intended) condridicting... noo?
i think you dont miss the internal affairs and the boredom and pos warfare about alliance life but still like and miss the drama.. since being a pvp corp without some eve-o drama is rather boring..
but as i said mayeb this thread isnt the place to discuss it in.. lol now i have contradicted my self ... lol
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 11:38:00 -
[4]
hi outbreak..
well my post got lost abit in the flames here but still.. outbreak has every right to choose who they fire upon and who they ally themselfs with. however u must admit it looks abit strange that you ally ur self with yw since prior to the rise assault you killed smae or even more yw in isk damage so they should be as nice juicy target as rise. shooting at them both would give you most phew phew for ur isk right?
if i woudl have been you i would actually been ****ed at yw since you paved teh road for the assualt and prior to the yw bac.. sta... foul word.. i can remember very decent fleet fights back around OR.. when yw arrived the dull sitting at pos game started. i know i had alot more fun with fighting toxin OR then i had for the last month or so in xzh.. so i hope u will get something decent from yw as thanks for the help..
i also understand why BOB has the forum mentality they have with we do what we like every oen else can chuw it.. time after time toxins answers post by people when they coudl simply say "no comments we do as we please" but time again you seem to contridict ur selfs..
i can remember posts like prior to yw attack.."we dont ally our self with any alliance" "we dont have any pos" "have u seen any of our capital ships?" etc etc..
why not jsut say "our tactic and who we choose to ally with is our business - no comments"?
but as i said before i guess not beign in an alliance you miss the eve-o drama abit.. hell that is why i am here.. lmao
btw i am not speaking for my alliance!! since i am not in any 
NORAD R.I.P
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 13:28:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Nyack on 02/10/2006 13:29:25
Edited by: Nyack on 02/10/2006 13:29:08
yep it is in there over and over and over again..
but time and time adn time again you grab to flame baits..
why not jsut leave it as it is.. have one outbreak answer eve-o with no comments and let oppponents maek themselfs jerks..
but yet again u answer to them with comments like i describes above.. contridicting your self tiem after time..
i think boldyn usually dont grab flame baits and often uses a cool head why not make him a spokesperson and dont dig ur selfs deeper and deeper down?
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 13:31:00 -
[6]
jstu a food for thoughts nothing hostile in my post btw..
|
Nyack
GREY COUNCIL
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 13:35:00 -
[7]
but it guess it comes down to what makes me browse eve-o at this minute you guys not being in an alliance u still want abit of eve-o drama to read while at work.. then to motivate u when u get home to log in and kill that "smacker"
|
| |
|