Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jayne Fillon
513
|
Posted - 2015.01.08 17:11:59 -
[61] - Quote
To help round out page three on a high note, I was recently asked a lot of tough questions by Marc Scaurus of TheMittani.com and his new er project JustForCrits.com. Although the questionnaire focused on my opinions regarding lowsec, there were a lot of other topic covered that would be of interest who wanted a more indepth look into my opinions in other areas of the game. You can read the answered questionairre here: http://justforcrits.com/csmx-jayne-fillon/
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Luna Pales
LoL Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.09 20:28:48 -
[62] - Quote
You've got my vote! |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect
506
|
Posted - 2015.01.10 05:37:38 -
[63] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:To help round out page three on a high note, I was recently asked a lot of tough questions by Marc Scaurus of TheMittani.com and his newer project JustForCrits.com. Although the questionnaire focused on my opinions regarding lowsec, there were a lot of other topic covered that would be of interest to those who wanted a more indepth look into my opinions in other areas of the game. You can read the answered questionairre here: http://justforcrits.com/csmx-jayne-fillon/
It's nice that you at least told the truth somewhat. Last year you flat out denied it when confronted in your Spectre Fleet channel and were so insecure about being found out you actually had me banned. (I was crushed.) Your crappy reputation aside, you haven't shown any shred of a single platform. You're entire op is summed up as "I like Eve, NPSI is fun, since Mangala isn't running can I haz ur votes plz?" coupled with some half baked non ideas concerning some vague concept you've failed to yet define on any meaningful level.
Hades Effect
|
Zaph Kavees
LoL Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.12 14:49:49 -
[64] - Quote
Flown with ya in spectre, best FC ive flown under, got my vote as well, |
Isk Processor
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.13 20:57:48 -
[65] - Quote
While thinking about things to ask you I thought about more tools for npsi communities and how they could also help other types of groups as well. I thought of a tool with the same structure as a corp but for a profession or hobby that you do in game with people that aren't necessarily in your own corp. You could join it just like a corp, but perhaps it's a little more limited in its benefits so it's not just a repetition of corporations we have today. My thoughts were a chat channel, group bookmarks, some roles such as comm officer, and maybe station offices. With those tools people that fly npsi, suicide gank, haul, incursions etc. could enjoy the ability to stay in their main Pvp/pve/whatever else corp and also be connected with those that they do their other part time hobbies with in a more structured and useful way. I feel like this is exactly or close to what you are suggesting, but I wanted to hear more on it from you if possible. Thanks! |
Jayne Fillon
528
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 01:13:50 -
[66] - Quote
Isk Processor wrote:While thinking about things to ask you I thought about more tools for npsi communities and how they could also help other types of groups as well. I thought of a tool with the same structure as a corp but for a profession or hobby that you do in game with people that aren't necessarily in your own corp. You could join it just like a corp, but perhaps it's a little more limited in its benefits so it's not just a repetition of corporations we have today. My thoughts were a chat channel, group bookmarks, some roles such as comm officer, and maybe station offices. With those tools people that fly npsi, suicide gank, haul, incursions etc. could enjoy the ability to stay in their main Pvp/pve/whatever else corp and also be connected with those that they do their other part time hobbies with in a more structured and useful way. I feel like this is exactly or close to what you are suggesting, but I wanted to hear more on it from you if possible. Thanks! Sounds like you're certainly on the right path.
When you say....
Quote:With those tools, people [...] could enjoy the ability to stay in their main [...] and also be connected with those that they do their other part time hobbies with in a more structured and useful way That is the exact intent of the proposed change, and precisely where the current mechanics fall short.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Sven Viko VIkolander
Friends and Feminists
320
|
Posted - 2015.01.14 22:39:18 -
[67] - Quote
Besides the fact that Jayne has created a huge amount of content for the game and community already, with the upcoming corp mechanics revision there's probably no one more needed on the CSM than him. |
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1760
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 09:19:54 -
[68] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:In game, I probably abide by different a code of ethics than you, and that's fine - but just because you don't play by the same rules or like the way that I play my game, doesn't make my playstyle immoral or invalid. For example, I don't agree with what CODE does by extorting highsec miners, but that doesn't mean I don't support their freedom to play Eve the way that they have chosen to play it. That's the beauty of the Sandbox. Good to hear this. So this means you fully support The Marmite Collective in the way they play their game too. You know with all the wars and not nerfing Eve to death
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Jayne Fillon
535
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 12:35:09 -
[69] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:In game, I probably abide by different a code of ethics than you, and that's fine - but just because you don't play by the same rules or like the way that I play my game, doesn't make my playstyle immoral or invalid. For example, I don't agree with what CODE does by extorting highsec miners, but that doesn't mean I don't support their freedom to play Eve the way that they have chosen to play it. That's the beauty of the Sandbox. Good to hear this. So this means you fully support The Marmite Collective in the way they play their game too. You know with all the wars and not nerfing Eve to death You will be the last one I would vote for. I think you are a Trojan Nerf Horse in disguise. Trojan Nerf Horse? That's one I haven't heard before... and I rather like it. Thanks.
To the point tho, I'm not hiding my dislike for the current wardec mechanics - I've always openly disliked them. There are many many things you could do to the mechanic in order to make it more targeted instead of encouraging blanket wardecs, as well as just camping in both trade hubs and pipeline systems. Currently, wars serve to both discourage new players from joining a corporation, discourages those corporations from ever forming in the first place, and doesn't provide enough options for a defending group to fight back in a meaningful way.
Wars are great for hunting down specific individuals or groups, preventing a group from operating in a specific area, removing structures such as POSs and POCOs, and allowing for large fights between groups such as mercs and RvB etc.
These are the facets that should be improved and focused upon.
In context of your original quote, I do support your way to play the game, but from a moral or ethical standpoint only. I do not support your playstyle in the same way that I couldn't support the DecShield initiative, for one example of many. Sure, it was possible for that "playstyle" to occur under the old wardec mechanics, but I'm sure you of all people will agree that using the game's mechanics in such a way was broken and needed to be fixed. Thankfully it was.
Quote:The CSM isn't just about you or your NPSI fleets, it's about what the community wants. Heh. So true.... and I never once claimed that I was interested in the CSM for a singular purpose.
.... buuuuuuuuut since we're **** slinging anyway, I like your statement when it reads like this instead:
Quote:The CSM isn't just about you or your wars, it's about what the community wants. Ahh... much better.
That's the beautiful thing about democracy, isn't it? If you represent the minority, you get a minority say, no matter how loud you say it - and you are the minority here, make no mistake. I will make no concessions in order to appease you.
We'll just have to wait for election day to see what the community truly wants.
EDIT: ...and if the side effect of using the nerf bat here is a better NPE, the emergence of more player based groups, and encouraging meaningful conflict between highsec entities, then all I have to say is swing baby swing.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1762
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 13:03:26 -
[70] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:To the point tho, I'm not hiding my dislike for the current wardec mechanics - I've always openly disliked them. There are many many things you could do to the mechanic in order to make it more targeted instead of encouraging blanket wardecs, as well as just camping in both trade hubs and pipeline systems. Currently, wars serve to both discourage new players from joining a corporation, discourages those corporations from ever forming in the first place, and doesn't provide enough options for a defending group to fight back in a meaningful way. HTFU Eve is real.
Jayne Fillon wrote:Wars are great for hunting down specific individuals or groups, preventing a group from operating in a specific area, removing structures such as POSs and POCOs, and allowing for large fights between groups such as mercs and RvB etc. These are the facets that should be improved and focused upon. Great, that's exactly what we do.
Jayne Fillon wrote:In context of your original quote, I do support your way to play the game, but from a moral or ethical standpoint only. I do not support your playstyle in the same way that I couldn't support the DecShield initiative, for one example of many. Sure, it was possible for that "playstyle" to occur under the old wardec mechanics, but I'm sure you of all people will agree that using the game's mechanics in such a way was broken and needed to be fixed. Thankfully it was. Make up your mind, you agree or you don't. You're giving mixed feelings here to your readers.
Jayne Fillon wrote:EDIT: ...and if the side effect of using the nerf bat here is a better NPE, the emergence of more player based groups, and encouraging meaningful conflict between highsec entities, then all I have to say is swing baby swing. Let me guess, you play WOW ? Might want to exchange flowers too.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
|
ashurman
Sanctuary of Shadows
31
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 14:34:23 -
[71] - Quote
Tora your aware bringing more new guys in and creating content for them to be excited about actualy gives you more people to pad your kb with right? and everyone likes flowers.. cept jayne.. as he is a wooden horse of legend..
Anywho a few actual questions for the fearless leader, The Bowtie master,The leader of the CultofSash, Mr Jayne.
You get on the panel *yay go you*, what would be the FIRST thing you try and push forward to ccp and why?
What is your main reason for wanting to be on the CSM.
Which ship type OR Module requires the most urgent overhaul in your mind and why?
and a fun one.
Which player made EvE Video in your mind shows off the game best.
Ashurman Long live Npsi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOQ5m4btECM
|
Koz Katral
Sanctuary of Shadows
83
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 16:13:20 -
[72] - Quote
After reading your post Tora, it seems that you are playing Devil's advocate unnecessarily - both you and Jayne share the goal of encouraging players out of NPC corps and into player created ones.
Considering you both come from such vastly different backgrounds within the game (low sec fleet/capital pvp as opposed to high sec camping) it seems strange that you would look for an adversary in Jayne, rather than someone you can communicate ideas with.
Your combined perspectives would likely only lead to positive outcomes - no one person can have all the answers on any issue, which is exactly why the CSM needs diversity.
If I was being a cynic, I would say that your concerns seem based around the idea that the player groups Jayne proposes could be used as a way to dodge the current war dec mechanics, in which you obviously have a vested interest.
So, my question to Jayne is thus How would you ensure that the player groups you propose would be subject to the harsh realities of EVE, and not make gentleman like Tora's position on the Jita undock obsolete. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect
513
|
Posted - 2015.01.15 17:57:42 -
[73] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote: Trojan Nerf Horse? That's one I haven't heard before... and I rather like it. Thanks.
Not doughboy?
Jayne Fillon wrote: To the point tho, I'm not hiding my dislike for the current wardec mechanics - I've always openly disliked them. There are many many things you could do to the mechanic in order to make it more targeted instead of encouraging blanket wardecs, as well as just camping in both trade hubs and pipeline systems.
Such as? Once again you vaguely address a position and then you propose a non-answer even more vague. All your points sum up to "Something must be done!" Without ever really giving any detail on your idea.
Jayne Fillon wrote: Currently, wars serve to both discourage new players from joining a corporation, discourages those corporations from ever forming in the first place, and doesn't provide enough options for a defending group to fight back in a meaningful way.
What do you base this on? Do you have any experience as far as the mercenary world goes? I've made it my business for a number of years either directly or indirectly and i'm sure Tora (as well as others) can confirm that wardecs occur based on the number of targets presented. Nobody is really going to wardec the 1 week old 3 man corp because they don't provide good killmails, nor do they have isk to pay a ransom. Also want an option to defend yourself in a wardec? Get good at the game. Form a doctrine, get an FC, and actually fight. Use your smarts, form political alliances and counter attack. I have to say even I am surprised by your replies to Tora. I don't know if it comes from having an actual platform for CSM X or if you're actually just that uninformed.
Jayne Fillon wrote: These are the facets that should be improved and focused upon.
How? Can you provide an actual design or just more "something should be done! Please vote for me!"
Jayne Fillon wrote: In context of your original quote, I do support your way to play the game, but from a moral or ethical standpoint only. I do not support your playstyle in the same way that I couldn't support the DecShield initiative, for one example of many.
Of many such as?
Hades Effect
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1787
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 08:16:11 -
[74] - Quote
ashurman wrote:Tora your aware bringing more new guys in and creating content for them to be excited about actualy gives you more people to pad your kb with right? I agree more players sounds like a good thing, but not while you are killing Eve. It's like saying : If cars would just drive half their speed we would have less accidents. This is true, but you also just ****** up the entire fun of driving one. This is what a lot of CSM do not see yet. They want to nerf Eve to death and make this some flower exchange program. Happy thoughts \o/. BORING !
What I also do not like about people, is when they say two things at the same time. That makes you untrustworthy. I rather have a CSM who says A, because he believes in A. Even if I hate A, I at least know where I stand. People like Jayne will say anything to make you happy and do anything they feel like.
Koz Katral wrote:After reading your post Tora, it seems that you are playing Devil's advocate unnecessarily - both you and Jayne share the goal of encouraging players out of NPC corps and into player created ones. True, but the way I want it, will cause less damage to the roots of Eve.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Jayne Fillon
537
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 08:22:20 -
[75] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:People like Jayne will say anything to make you happy and do anything they feel like. And yet you being unhappy with my opinions flies in direct opposition to what you just said. I'm not going to sugar coat my opinions, and never have. I'm going to do whatever I feel is right regardless of whether or not it makes you happy, promise.
To the others who asked me questions, I haven't ignored you - just haven't had the time to properly respond yet.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1787
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 08:30:22 -
[76] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:And yet you being unhappy with my opinion flies in direct opposition to what you just said. No, it doesn't. You just don't like to get caught with your pants down My advice, have an opinion, tell the community and stick with it.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
Jayne Fillon
537
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 08:43:22 -
[77] - Quote
Tora Bushido wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:And yet you being unhappy with my opinion flies in direct opposition to what you just said. No, it doesn't. You just don't like to get caught with your pants down My advice, have an opinion, tell the community and stick with it. Honestly, I don't even know what you're trying to say anymore.
Anyway... if you don't have another question for me, then I'm going to ask you to stick to your own thread.
You don't like me, fine. You're not going to vote for me, that's cool too. Good luck on your campaign.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Jayne Fillon
538
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 13:53:55 -
[78] - Quote
ashurman wrote:what would be the FIRST thing you try and push forward to ccp and why? That's a tough one to answer, because I won't know what the CSM and CCP are currently working on until I am elected. It's not my place to demand specific changes that aren't in CCP's roadmap, but to advise on whatever they are trying to design or iterate. However, the one thing I'd want to push first and foremost is a "little things" update to channels and mailing lists.
Quote:What is your main reason for wanting to be on the CSM. Simple. To make sure the NPSI communities actually have a voice on the CSM that represents them. Mangala did a great job, but he's not running for re-election and these is still work to be done. Lots more work to be done.
Quote:Which ship type OR Module requires the most urgent overhaul in your mind and why? CCP is going a great job with the module tiericide so far, and I'd be in favour of them simply carrying on with the direction they are currently travelling. Specifically, I'd like to see the redundant or simply useless modules removed, while the meta levels of modules standardized. No more M4 > T2 nonsense.
Quote:Which player made EvE Video in your mind shows off the game best. I have a lot of favorite videos, and I actually compiled my list into a video showcase a while ago. It can be found here.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Jayne Fillon
541
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 14:30:43 -
[79] - Quote
Koz Katral wrote:How would you ensure that the player groups you propose would be subject to the harsh realities of EVE, and not make gentleman like Tora's position on the Jita undock obsolete. There are quite a few ways that this could be done, but the way I envision it is rather simple: These "social groups" or "societies" shouldn't be able own anything as a collective. No POCOs, no POSs, no Offices, no Taxes, etc etc. The activities to be encouraged should be purely event and social based, and have nothing to do with building an empire, or competing with other established "real" corporations.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Garbage Man Forever
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 15:37:07 -
[80] - Quote
Would you ever support an idea for an npsi community to take sov if it was only possible in specific systems designated by ccp? I ask because I remember bombers bar jokingly (or maybe not) trying to take sov in hed-gp. Perhaps spectre did this as well... Not trying to leave them out. |
|
Jayne Fillon
541
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 15:46:07 -
[81] - Quote
Garbage Man Forever wrote:Would you ever support an idea for an npsi community to take sov if it was only possible in specific systems designated by ccp? I ask because I remember bombers bar jokingly (or maybe not) trying to take sov in hed-gp. Perhaps spectre did this as well... Not trying to leave them out. We have tried to take sov before as an NPSI group, once seriously, and since then only in playful wargames. I was involved (the instigator, actually) of the HED-GP attempt back in my Bombers Bar days, as well as the more recent wargames against Providence with Spectre Fleet.
In both cases we had zero plan with what we'd do with the system other than freeport it if we actually succeeded.
If this were ever to be the case, it would have to involve an Alliance holding sov in Proxy for an NPSI community... I just don't think there is any place in the mechanics for sov to be blended with non-corporate entities. That's not to say I wouldn't love to see an NPSI-esque freeport regions such as The Big Blue or Phoebe Freeport Republic's more recent efforts, but I wouldn't support the ability for NPSI groups to take sov, no.
That's not to say those communities wouldn't be in favour of helping groups that desire to freeport sov nullsec, as that has already happened and is something that the community is almost universally in support of. Which is great, but nothing more official than that is needed imho. Some people (usually those on the receiving end of these fleets) have decried the ability for NPSI groups to form a full 250 man fleet as being "overpowered," and in a sense, they're correct. If you want to build an empire, join a corp.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect
518
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 18:56:26 -
[82] - Quote
Obviously you're avoiding my questions which is fine. Your silence is still a form of reply. In any case, we all know you're trying to cash in on Mangala's bloc but why would anyone vote for you over Khador Vess? He's a much better representation and successor to Mangala.
Hades Effect
|
Kalyri
Sanctuary of Shadows
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.16 19:06:33 -
[83] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Obviously you're avoiding my questions which is fine. Your silence is still a form of reply. In any case, we all know you're trying to cash in on Mangala's bloc but why would anyone vote for you over Khador Vess? He's a much better representation and successor to Mangala.
Pretty sure you were told he was only responding to you once, which he did. |
Citricioni
Stille Gewalt Dead Terrorists
196
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 18:14:08 -
[84] - Quote
Awesome guy, awesome NPSI presentation and +1 because NPSI represents a large scale of the EVE Community.
Deutschsprachige Publicfleets
Channel: Stille Gewalt
|
ashurman
Sanctuary of Shadows
33
|
Posted - 2015.01.18 23:53:46 -
[85] - Quote
One last question for you.
How will you respond to the reports of open rebellion in your own channel " spectre fleet " requiring you to reset all those who had operator rights and to essentialy control the channel with a iron fist? |
Gorski Car
Verge of Collapse
468
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 11:06:13 -
[86] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Lex Arson wrote:are you going to betray all of us like you did to Doom? Assuming that was a serious question, no. In game politics and personas have no place on CSM - a la Gorski Car acting like an idiot or Mynnna acting only in the interest of the CFC, instead of serving the playerbase as a whole..
That's some pretty big callouts there bruh.
Collect this post
|
Jayne Fillon
546
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 12:31:45 -
[87] - Quote
Gorski Car wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Lex Arson wrote:are you going to betray all of us like you did to Doom? Assuming that was a serious question, no. In game politics and personas have no place on CSM - a la Gorski Car acting like an idiot or Mynnna acting only in the interest of the CFC, instead of serving the playerbase as a whole.. That's some pretty big callouts there bruh. Believe it or not, that was a compliment.
Just using your reddit profile as a crude example: You seem to switch between shitposting wildly and dropping wisdom bombs. One of these doesn't belongs on the CSM or in any official interaction with CCP.
Just sayin'
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Gorski Car
Verge of Collapse
468
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 13:23:16 -
[88] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Gorski Car wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Lex Arson wrote:are you going to betray all of us like you did to Doom? Assuming that was a serious question, no. In game politics and personas have no place on CSM - a la Gorski Car acting like an idiot or Mynnna acting only in the interest of the CFC, instead of serving the playerbase as a whole.. That's some pretty big callouts there bruh. Believe it or not, that was a compliment. Just using your reddit profile as a crude example: You seem to switch between shitposting wildly and dropping wisdom bombs. One of these doesn't belongs on the CSM or in any official interaction with CCP. Just sayin'
I dont see how my Reddit posts are official interactions with CCP. The **** I post on Reddit I mostly post to amuse myself and others for upvotes. It's not how I speak on the CSM in any official channel.
Collect this post
|
Jayne Fillon
546
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 13:30:38 -
[89] - Quote
Gorski Car wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Gorski Car wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Lex Arson wrote:are you going to betray all of us like you did to Doom? Assuming that was a serious question, no. In game politics and personas have no place on CSM - a la Gorski Car acting like an idiot or Mynnna acting only in the interest of the CFC, instead of serving the playerbase as a whole.. That's some pretty big callouts there bruh. Believe it or not, that was a compliment. Just using your reddit profile as a crude example: You seem to switch between shitposting wildly and dropping wisdom bombs. One of these doesn't belongs on the CSM or in any official interaction with CCP. Just sayin' I dont see how my Reddit posts are official interactions with CCP. The **** I post on Reddit I mostly post to amuse myself and others for upvotes. It's not how I speak on the CSM in any official channel. That was exactly was the point I was trying to make originally, but you took the initial quote out of context. Essentially, even tho you act that way on reddit - a persona, if you will - doesn't mean that you're going to act that way on the CSM or when talking to CCP about important matters. You know what you're talking about, and you know when you need to be serious.
This is essentially what I was being accused of: being unable to separate my in game persona and conduct myself professionally if I were to be elected to the CSM.
It wasn't even remotely intended as a slight against you. The mynnna analogy was meant in the same way - just because he's a part of the CFC doesn't mean that he's unable to speak for players outside of his own coalition, or that he'll use his position on the CSM to forward his coalition's goals in game and nothing more. They're two completely different things, full stop.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1815
|
Posted - 2015.01.19 15:52:58 -
[90] - Quote
Kalyri wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Obviously you're avoiding my questions which is fine. Your silence is still a form of reply. In any case, we all know you're trying to cash in on Mangala's bloc but why would anyone vote for you over Khador Vess? He's a much better representation and successor to Mangala. Pretty sure you were told he was only responding to you once, which he did. A good CSM will also talk to people who do not agree with him. Not only the ones who kiss his butt.
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |