| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
76
   |
Posted - 2015.02.09 16:00:47 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Dominique Vasilkovsky wrote:So by default will the safety be on or off come Fab 17th? Existing corps will default to friendly fire being legal, since that's the way it works pre-patch. New corps will have to choose which option they prefer at corp creation.
You left out that for new corps that "choose", the defaulted option is FF Off... |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
76
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 16:14:06 -
[2] - Quote
It says in the corp search, you can filter out all the evil FF-ON corps.
Will you be giving us the option to filter out the risk-adverse FF-OFF corps? And only search for FF Enabled corps??
If not, why the disparity? |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
76
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 16:19:31 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Lebowski wrote: I'm no expert on the subject but I'm fairly sure our hiring process would mitigate this concern, maybe yours should too? Lol
Lol if bears were capable of doing so, this change wouldnt be necessary. Dont we all wish their corps could have standards to hiring but come on man, we dont live in Neverland. This is eve where ceos just randomly click Accept and need to be protected from their actions by you devs |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
76
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 16:30:07 -
[4] - Quote
Seriously why cant we search only for corps with FF Enabled (legal)??? |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
76
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 18:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Lebowski wrote:War Kitten wrote:The default status of any setting says a lot about the developers' intentions - and Eve was originally developed with that setting on. Saying that suggests that we also intend you to name your corporation after yourself & have a 0% tax rate!  In all seriousness though I do take your point regarding this, it's just that extrapolating developer intent from the default option is a dangerous game. We expect that many corps will take advantage of the option of concord intervention, whereas many others will want to have the convenience of legal friendly fire. Either option is fine with us, as long as we're sure the consequences of either option are clear. Ned Thomas wrote:Two notices, if I read correctly: one when the 24 hour period begins and one when it ends. Correct!
Whats the consequence of turning FF off???
I get you guys dont want a tax, what about a wardec-esque fee? Say 50mill a month?
Give ANY consequence for turning it off please.
Any.
Also which one are you alluding to in your post? What consequences for turning it OFF? |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
82
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 21:22:04 -
[6] - Quote
Currently- If a corp is at war and an out-of-corp dude uses logi to rep, they get a suspect flag.
What if FF is off now, corp is at war and even an in corpmate uses logi? Suspect?
Also, if im in a risk-adverse FF-Illegal corp and convince a guy to start repping my frigate. I then shoot him (causing concords wrath) does this also concord him for repping a criminal? This is how it currently works, so guess it can still happen cuz now shooting him is a criminal act? This sounds cool |
Shailagh
WTB Somalians
86
|
Posted - 2015.02.10 04:07:34 -
[7] - Quote
Ned Thomas wrote:Basil Pupkin wrote:Thank you CCPeeps for not giving in to risk-averse AWOXer tears and giving us this change as it were announced.
My FF would never be legal again. So you'll be recruiting brand new players left and right after the 17th, correct?
Lmao god its so funny ccp thinks this is gonna make corps recruit noobs therefor increasing retention== money
Wardecs are the broken mechanic you are looking for devs.
FIX WARS |
| |
|