Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Leandro Salazar
Aeon Industries
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 15:55:00 -
[61]
Would giving the Sac a 4th (or even 5th) launcher hardpoint and changing the laser optimal bonus to missile RoF or missile damage (all not just EM) be too much to ask for?
--------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
|
Ather Ialeas
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:09:00 -
[62]
OMG, you're going to...
BOOST AMARR?
|
Kyguard
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:16:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Ather Ialeas OMG, you're going to...
BOOST AMARR?
Wow.. it's a miracle! Thanks tux, great changes! ===
God is on the side with the best artillery. |
without
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:20:00 -
[64]
nighthawk ftwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
wonder if it will hit 800dps woth assault missiles
|
Kirov VIII
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:26:00 -
[65]
After tachyon and sacrilege you can attack the change of ALL OTHERSSS amarr ships !!!
|
Tehyarec
Silverleaf Foundation
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:29:00 -
[66]
Some nice changes indeed.
Since everyone's making this their personal wishlist, I guess I could jump in on the bandwagon this time around.
Personally I wish the interceptors with just two midslots (I myself can fly Ares and Claw) would receive a third midslot, to make them more viable. Wouldn't hurt Wolf & Enyo either. Even if it means sacrificing a lowslot in each case. Frigs often need midslots more anyway (I just love Stiletto's 4 midslots!). Face it, especially interceptors with two midslots just don't really work that well Many people also seem to pick Jaguar over Wolf these days, probably in large part for the extra midslots.
Wolf would need more CPU if given a midslot, though it wouldn't hurt even as it is, it seems to run out of CPU faster than most other ships.
Grid-wise Ares and Stealth Bombers could-use a boost, as others have also said.
While even the agility boost for BCs is excellent and way late in coming, I still there was a sig radius decrease as well, for their size parameters compared to cruisers and BSs the sig radius is just too high.
|
Farjung
Gallente TAOSP Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:38:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Tuxford
CPU of Anathema, Helios and Cheetah increased to 280tf, 290tf and 275tf respectively
Cheetah love \o/
Quote: bonus of covert ops ships changed so it reduces cpu need of covert ops cloaking device from 98% to 100%
What's this mean? With covert ops 5 you already get a 100% cpu reduction, not sure what this change will do ¼_¼
---
Wave of Mutilation 2 |
OrangeAfroMan
Suffoco Noctis Atrocitas
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:43:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Farjung
Originally by: Tuxford
CPU of Anathema, Helios and Cheetah increased to 280tf, 290tf and 275tf respectively
Cheetah love \o/
Quote: bonus of covert ops ships changed so it reduces cpu need of covert ops cloaking device from 98% to 100%
What's this mean? With covert ops 5 you already get a 100% cpu reduction, not sure what this change will do ¼_¼
Make it not require anyone who dreams of flying cov ops to get cov ops 4 before undocking :)
Gronsak is Tux's angry alt. |
Shirazz
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:48:00 -
[69]
Where does it say they will boost amarr?
|
Crellion
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:48:00 -
[70]
hehe I just cant help myself replying too...
1) HACs: Deimos needed love, Sacri needed some love, Munnin needed love? I d say give the Deimos a bit of agility as well and the changes are fair.
2) BC and BCII changes... what can I say? Bravo!!!! especially with tier Iis coming through and Nightmare being so useless... again hear me say it: Bravo!!!!!!!!!
|
|
SavageThrash
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:49:00 -
[71]
Well tux if your read back this far:
I want to say thanks to tux (and all the other devs that help and havent shown there faces :) ) for putting up with all the whining from me and many others on the forums about some of these now addressed issues.
It is greatly appreciated and sorry for all the flack i have given you guys, you really do read all the posts in those 20 page long threads *cough*nighthawkthread*cough* and you still listen to the players :) its nice to see that. Thats the one thing thats made me stay with eve so long.
Keep up the great work guys.
Savage
*snip* Please do not discuss moderation in your signature -Eldo
Woah^^^
|
Deros
Minmatar Black Omega Security The OSS
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:50:00 -
[72]
muninn really needed that pg increase, hopefully now it will rock more
<3
D
|
Selim
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:53:00 -
[73]
Yay!
More stuff to fix, though, like the autocannon tempest.
|
Jim McGregor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 16:56:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Selim Yay!
More stuff to fix, though, like the autocannon tempest.
Also please consider giving 500-1000 more grid to the typhoon. Completely redesign the Maelstrom. --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |
MECTO
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:02:00 -
[75]
first. BC agility is freaking great. second. Nighthawk now inline with Astarte/Eos/Absolution/Sleipnir IMO
w8g for more info!!
|
Idara
Caldari Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:03:00 -
[76]
Everyone saying "boost Deimos agility"...aren't all HACs the same agility wise? Or does the Deimos actually have a different value?
|
Ather Ialeas
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:08:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Shirazz Where does it say they will boost amarr?
Sacrilege = T2 Maller, Maller is Amarrian, thus boosting Sacrilege = boosting Amarr. Granted that it's just a small part of entire line of Amarr problems but hey, it's a start! I guess we're about 1/5th way there now with the ~90 pages in that one thread to get what we really want.
|
Ilmonstre
Minmatar 0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:11:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Idara Everyone saying "boost Deimos agility"...aren't all HACs the same agility wise? Or does the Deimos actually have a different value?
the mass is not the same so mroe mass is less agility
|
Zixxa
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:12:00 -
[79]
Originally by: MECTO first. BC agility is freaking great. second. Nighthawk now inline with Astarte/Eos/Absolution/Sleipnir IMO
w8g for more info!!
Are you joking? With one damage bonus? Now Nighthawk is inline with Cerberus.
|
Shirazz
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:14:00 -
[80]
im feeling slightly noobsh lol
Er i may be mistaken but.... Tux: I've been replying to the forums today. I'm just gonna list some of the smaller tweaks and changes here.
That implies bigger changes are being made? You gonna tell anyone what tux?
|
|
Tasty Burger
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:15:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Zixxa
Originally by: MECTO first. BC agility is freaking great. second. Nighthawk now inline with Astarte/Eos/Absolution/Sleipnir IMO
w8g for more info!!
Are you joking? With one damage bonus? Now Nighthawk is inline with Cerberus.
Do you guys EVER stop complaining?
The nighthawk is EASILY the best tank of the battlecruisers (yes, it is better than the absolution).
|
Hakera
Anari Higard
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:19:00 -
[82]
fair changes tbh, cant complain.
any eta on assualt missiles and any CCP consensus on cloak production issues?
|
SavageThrash
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:20:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Tasty Burger
Originally by: Zixxa
Originally by: MECTO first. BC agility is freaking great. second. Nighthawk now inline with Astarte/Eos/Absolution/Sleipnir IMO
w8g for more info!!
Are you joking? With one damage bonus? Now Nighthawk is inline with Cerberus.
Do you guys EVER stop complaining?
The nighthawk is EASILY the best tank of the battlecruisers (yes, it is better than the absolution).
Depends on your price range, to get a nh to tank about the same as a t2 absol u need to put a fair penny into it. If u went all faction on an absol it would tank better for sure. But a nh with faction and absol with t2 the nh will out tank it. t2 nh and t2 absol = absol 4tw :)
*snip* Please do not discuss moderation in your signature -Eldo
Woah^^^
|
MECTO
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:21:00 -
[84]
Edited by: MECTO on 11/10/2006 17:22:24
Originally by: Zixxa
Originally by: MECTO first. BC agility is freaking great. second. Nighthawk now inline with Astarte/Eos/Absolution/Sleipnir IMO
w8g for more info!!
Are you joking? With one damage bonus? Now Nighthawk is inline with Cerberus.
noob, 5% to kinetic dmg 5% to rof, read topic.
P.S> 5% bonus to heavy missile precision per level is what Tux mentioned i bet.
|
Acerus Malum
Encina Technologies Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:21:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Tuxford Modules Inertia stabilizers give decrease in mass as well as agility and give a penalty to signature radius
Not to be nitpicky or anything, but you've got Inertia Stabs and Nanofibers mixed up in what they do. Nanofibers replace heavy metal with lighter nanofiber material, reducing structure strength and mass (what you've slated Inertia Stabs to do). Inertia Stabs, on the other hand, modify the ship's inertia modifier directly, which is what Nanofibers currently do.
|
DrakeStone
Celestial Horizon Corp. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:21:00 -
[86]
Edited by: DrakeStone on 11/10/2006 17:24:00 Edited by: DrakeStone on 11/10/2006 17:22:12
Originally by: Tuxford I've been replying to the forums today. I'm just gonna list some of the smaller tweaks and changes here. Nighthawk's explosion velocity changed to launcher rate of fire bonus
Nighthawk:
Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 10% bonus to heavy missile target navigation prediction and 5% bonus to all shield resistances per level
Command Ships Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to heavy missile Kinetic damage and 5% bonus to heavy missile precision per level Role Bonus: 99% reduction in Warfare Link module CPU need
I take it the bolded text is what will be replaced with the 5% ROF ?
|
|
Tuxford
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:25:00 -
[87]
To be totally clear then its the target navigation prediction bonus, that is the one that reduces explosion velocity of the missile that is being replaced by launcher rate of fire bonus on the nighthawk. _______________ |
|
Idara
Caldari Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:43:00 -
[88]
Edited by: Idara on 11/10/2006 17:43:53
Originally by: Tuxford To be totally clear then its the target navigation prediction bonus, that is the one that reduces explosion velocity of the missile that is being replaced by launcher rate of fire bonus on the nighthawk.
So...
Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 10% bonus to heavy missile target navigation prediction and 5% bonus to all shield resistances per level
Command Ships Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to heavy missile Kinetic damage and 5% bonus to missile rate of fire
Role Bonus: 99% reduction in Warfare Link module CPU need
Will be the new bonuses?
|
|
Tuxford
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 17:46:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Idara Edited by: Idara on 11/10/2006 17:43:53
Originally by: Tuxford To be totally clear then its the target navigation prediction bonus, that is the one that reduces explosion velocity of the missile that is being replaced by launcher rate of fire bonus on the nighthawk.
So...
Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 10% bonus to heavy missile target navigation prediction and 5% bonus to all shield resistances per level
Command Ships Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to heavy missile Kinetic damage and 5% bonus to missile rate of fire
Role Bonus: 99% reduction in Warfare Link module CPU need
Will be the new bonuses?
no
Battlecruiser Skill Bonus: 5% launcher rate of fire and 5% bonus to all shield resistances per level
Command Ships Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to heavy missile Kinetic damage and 5% heavy missile precision
_______________ |
|
Nir
|
Posted - 2006.10.11 18:01:00 -
[90]
100 base PG and 30 Tf is nice on paper but.. will it really make a difference? The Sac is a totally different ship from the Deimos or Muninn - unlike those ships it never really suffer from fitting problems.
Personally i'd rather see something like -700 base shield HP, +750 base armor HP and maybe 50 PG/20 Tf.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |