|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
RogueHunteer
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:06:12 -
[1] - Quote
looks niCE! |
RogueHunteer
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:09:33 -
[2] - Quote
Angry Mustache wrote:Allright guys, since they literally have an AFK cloaker in every one of our systems, we can't rat/min to build indicies.
directorbot: RATTING/MINING CTA @ 2100, Ishtars>tengus>ravens>skiffs
*** This was a broadcast from the_mittani to all-all at 2014-10-25 04:55:57.479999 EVE, replies are not monitored ****
I understand your feeling on this topic, and point is their no risk for cloaking any were! and no reward here and needs to be address. I'm sure ccp will find away to address this like everything else in the game. Person will have to keep warping every 5 minutes or face to be found type thing. No idea but in do time. |
RogueHunteer
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 16:28:17 -
[3] - Quote
Must say this new systems looks nice and new sov system will make lot of have fun pew pew! nice job ccp! Few things I would like to maybe change on this idea is fact you place to much on IHUB and not lot of the TCU.
I was hoping the TCU would effect the strategic index levels. Since you place the 25% fuel saving with the TCU. Let TCU control the strategic index levels for the STARBASES. Let the IHUB control the upgrades for system. Station is worth on it's own!
|
RogueHunteer
Perkone Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 11:46:21 -
[4] - Quote
Emmy Mnemonic wrote:Let SOV control the yield of tthe R64/32 moons.
CCP Fozzie has snowed in completely on nullsec ratting as the major ISK faucet.
CCP has forgotten they themselves sprinkled a LOT of REALLY valuable moons around EVE space. And they have forgotten they added some 275 new moons not too long ago (as they nerfed Technetium). In low sec, where there is no sov, every R64 is owned by a powerbloc. Every. Single. One.
How come it is like that CCP?
These R64/32 and also R16 moons are what drives conflict! Not sovereignity! These R64/32 are what the power blocks fight for! Alliances will not fight for stupid ratting space for their grunts! That's not how it works, CCP!
Make SOV control the yield of the R64/32 moons so that: - no SOV brings really crappy yield - SOV brings better yield - upgrades in iHubs can generate better yield than we have today
This would also nerf the lowsec R64/32s and make them viable to own for smaller entities, but not so important for the power blocs. Nullsec R64/32s would be much more attractive and even MORE important to get hold of AND it would give a large incentive to own SOV in the systems where the valuable moons are! It would make SOV worth fighting for!
It will generate a lot of fights over both SOV and valuable moons. And moons don't move around, ratting can be moved or done in alternative ways, it's just time for ISK. If you want moon-income you have to live there! And moon-goo is an income that can be handled by fewer people, that generates a LOT of income, and that is needed to produce T2 ships and will have an impact on the ecomony of the power blocs and on EVE much more than sov will!
Leaders will fight over moons! Leaders will not fight for ratting!
CCP Fozzie - have a look at the moons, will you!
Moons mining needs to be removed and bring ring mining in to the game! Goodbye passive income.... hello miners :)
|
RogueHunteer
Perkone Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2015.03.08 13:58:05 -
[5] - Quote
STOP FAILING - AS THEIR ARE STILL SOME STUFF WE STILL WOULD LIKE TO SEE!
THE SOV CHANGES ARE GOOD!
TCU NEEDS A BIT MORE TO FIGHT FOR HERE - WHY CAN'T WE LINK LOCAL TO IT FOR OWNERS ONLY! MAKE THE ATTACKERS WORK BIT HARDER WITH NO LOCAL. AND MAKE A LOCAL FREE-PORT SYSTEM.
CLAM OWNERS SEE LOCAL AND SET BLUES!
BRING ****RING MINING****** IN TOO THE GAME PLEASE THANKS END PASSIVE INCOME! |
|
|
|