Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mallick
Northern Intelligence SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:33:00 -
[1]
So why do I CTD after 5min on the server? And then have to wait another 3 hours for the #561 que seems stupid to me...
|
Marjelle
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:42:00 -
[2]
Becouse your not testing it your "playing" around.
|
Sleepkevert
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:43:00 -
[3]
thats what it is all about, it is a TEST build.. don't expect it to be stable.. Also you don't have to wait... if you want less ctd's and quicker logins, why not go to the normal server . __________________________________________________ This shall be the one thread, the one thread to rule them all, and in the Spamness bind them. - Ductoris |
aydal
Gallente Tiny Incorporated.
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Marjelle Becouse your not testing it your "playing" around.
how can you be testing if you drop after 5 min ...
|
Revenant Shadow
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:47:00 -
[5]
Marjelle, you can't test if you CTD after 5 minutes, and whether you CTD or not has nothing to do with it. If you're going to be a self-righteous *****, at least be intelligent about it.
|
Marjelle
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 21:58:00 -
[6]
ok let me say this in a different way.
97% of the people who want to get on and are on the forums right now saying they "crash" or "can't logon" doesnt want to log in to "test" no matter what they say. They want to log in to play with new toys, and tools. YOUR the reason why its going to take 2 months of testing for kali to hit.
Stay off the server, go back to "mission running", and grow up.
Test servers is there for us few who are there to really test it but can't becosue you kids are on there playing.
Here is a in kiddy talk, SAY OFF AND IT WILL GET ON TQ FASTER. Test servers right now is for TESTERS!
|
Revenant Shadow
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 22:03:00 -
[7]
You know, condescension's a GREAT way to get people to listen to your point of view! I'll make a note of that in the future.
Back to the point: Shark himself has said that this patch is broken. The CTDs don't have anything to do with the length of the queue. I'll admit, I have a desire to see the new features and use them... and in doing so, TEST them. Don't even try to say you don't feel the same way.
|
Marjelle
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 22:05:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Marjelle on 24/10/2006 22:06:19 no I dont fell the same way, why becouse of everyone who wants to "see the new stuff" will say off and let real testesrs (who file reports) on and do there job that they like to do, we will get kali faster.
No I'm not a testers, and your never see me on the test server. I know how to wait for the tools and new toys to hit TQ.
|
Jin Steele
Fatalix Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 22:05:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Marjelle ok let me say this in a different way.
97% of the people who want to get on and are on the forums right now saying they "crash" or "can't logon" doesnt want to log in to "test" no matter what they say. They want to log in to play with new toys, and tools. YOUR the reason why its going to take 2 months of testing for kali to hit.
Stay off the server, go back to "mission running", and grow up.
Test servers is there for us few who are there to really test it but can't becosue you kids are on there playing.
Here is a in kiddy talk, SAY OFF AND IT WILL GET ON TQ FASTER. Test servers right now is for TESTERS!
honestly, stfu. What do you plan to test, if you are truly a "TESTER"? Fatalix IS RECRUITING!
|
Aliosis II
CALDARI NAVY 'Wolf Pack' 5th Squadron Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 22:52:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Aliosis II on 24/10/2006 22:54:06 Marjelle do you know how to test a game?
the best way to test a game is by playing it there is no substitute for that. Regardless of what people are doing on the server aslong as they are not afk and they are looking around the game they are testing...
How do you know if the are or are not fileing bug reports?
I suggest you get off your high horse and go troll somwhere else...
|
|
Ferocious FeAr
Sha Kharn Corp Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 22:59:00 -
[11]
apparently the man is a professional "tester"
HELLO MY NAME IS COMMON SENSE.
Playing with the new toys is testing!!!!!!!!
Do you understand that? I hope to god you do. __________________________________ Don't hate me, learn to love me. |
Revenant Shadow
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 23:05:00 -
[12]
I know how to file reports, I WILL file reports, and I have a great deal of testing experience, both beta and test server, from many other games. Does this make me qualified enough?
Don't hop on the high horse if you don't know how to ride it.
|
maGz
The Priory Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.10.24 23:10:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Marjelle Edited by: Marjelle on 24/10/2006 22:06:19 no I dont fell the same way, why becouse of everyone who wants to "see the new stuff" will say off and let real testesrs (who file reports) on and do there job that they like to do, we will get kali faster.
No I'm not a testers, and your never see me on the test server. I know how to wait for the tools and new toys to hit TQ.
you're fun, don't stop ____________
The Priory Killboard |
DeODokktor
Caldari Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 00:21:00 -
[14]
Hi Mallick
Did you support a bug report with logserver logs to show where the error was?
Thanks. deo
|
Revenant Shadow
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 00:35:00 -
[15]
The bug reporting page got taken down. Probaby flooded. I was going to report my own, lol...
Logged in fine after a 6 hour wait. Was a little slow, but it worked. I was in Jita, and headed 3 jumps out to grab myself a Rukh to fly while I checked the new features out. I jumped into Maurasi fine, but I got a traffic advisory on the Itamo gate, then jumped a second later. CTD. I think it's got something to do with the advisory, but I could be wrong. Got my DxDiag file saved, and my crashlog, but I stupidly didn't have logserver running at the time. Won't happen again.
Currently #425 in the queue
|
Cygnet Lythanea
Ninjitsu Heavy Industries Black Sun Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 04:04:00 -
[16]
WEll.. *I've* been a beta tester on MMOs before... though I'm not ISD. I think that I might be able to help, because I want it bug free when it comes time to pwn someone with it on Tranq....
and I'm still at 310...
She's hunting you, pirate scum...
|
Mallick
Northern Intelligence SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 05:12:00 -
[17]
Kali is in a state where EVERYTHING gets tested, even podkilling. That is what a DEV said in local, and with all the small bugs discovered so far in the Bugs channel, it is needed.
So no, I am not just "playing around" like some of you insist on. Infact, I am trying to do my part, but due to these CTD's I get only 5 minutes every 4 hours. :P
|
Queen Hades
|
Posted - 2006.10.25 10:19:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Queen Hades on 25/10/2006 10:20:02
Originally by: Marjelle ok let me say this in a different way.
97% of the people who want to get on and are on the forums right now saying they "crash" or "can't logon" doesnt want to log in to "test" no matter what they say. They want to log in to play with new toys, and tools. YOUR the reason why its going to take 2 months of testing for kali to hit.
Stay off the server, go back to "mission running", and grow up.
Test servers is there for us few who are there to really test it but can't becosue you kids are on there playing.
Here is a in kiddy talk, SAY OFF AND IT WILL GET ON TQ FASTER. Test servers right now is for TESTERS!
I agree with you, Marjelle. To be honest I don't have the nerves atm for testing and although it would be tempting to play around with the new tools I keep away from SISI.
Please, everybody, make it easier for CCP. Test on SISI or stay on Tranquility. That way we will get Eve: Revelations a lot faster.
Maybe CCP should start banning people from SISI who do not contribute. Just my 2 cents.
Why not limit SISI to ISD and well known, trustworthy people for the moment? Remember: "Testserver" means "for testing the game", not "for checking what the future brings".
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |