|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 19:35:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Aki Yamato on 15/11/2006 19:41:22
Originally by: Tuxford
Originally by: HankMurphy [Now, onto the Caldari drake. You said...
Originally by: Tuxford Drake is a monster as well, although filling the med slots with shield mods, and the low slots with ganking gets you a bit skewed image on how good it is.
..skewed image? Hmm... so then we are going to assume that that particular setup is rediculous and NOT how ppl are actually gonna kit it out? lol, just lol....
No what I mean is don't fit a Drake with just gank and tank and then compare it to battlecruiser with guns/tackling/tank. Its not fair. But even so, I'd still say Drake is pretty much pwnage, even when splitting its medslots between tank and tackling.
So witch way are you going to harm him ? Reduce CPU ? Decrease medslots ? Replace rezist bonus to missile speed bonus ? Increase shield recharge time ? Decrease powergrid ? (I prefer this, just behind making rest ships same great) Replace RoF bonus to kinetic dmg ?
Everyone wants nerf drake an yea it great ship (finaly after 3 crappy caldari BC class ships), but how to make bit less great without making it another pice of flying junk.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 20:16:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Aramendel
Personally I would say: 6 launchers. The nighthawk has only 6, too, after all.
So we dont need another NH right? An come on we dont want any speedles, large signature, tanking ship without recent dmg, we already have ferox for this purpose.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 21:33:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Aki Yamato on 15/11/2006 21:39:03 Edited by: Aki Yamato on 15/11/2006 21:38:15 Edited by: Aki Yamato on 15/11/2006 21:35:53 So questions for drake nerf whiners, what is most problematic setup on drake ?
exp: 6x HAM 3x Large shield extender 3x Invul field 4x PDU
Imo problem with drake is not drake itself but HAM as they are now.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.15 21:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: haq aan Drake : Drop 1 launcher , modify PG slightly.
Why do wee need cheaper version of NH ?
My suggestion is to decrease PG, to make pilots choose between HAM, shield extenders and DMG mods.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.16 23:17:00 -
[5]
Today we came here to say last goodbye to our fellow drake. He will join his ancestors in haven of worst BC class ships in eve.
Rest in peace.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 11:15:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Aki Yamato on 17/11/2006 11:21:10 I realy love argument like " This ship is cheaper so it cant beat more expansive one" Yea so I wont to my cerberus beat my cerberus 2,5 BS in one time
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 12:03:00 -
[7]
Right fix hams, and return RoF to drake and this ship will be just fine.
Siply i hate price comparation point of view.. more expensive = better. I alway thing how many manhours must be spend to build and put in duty battleship, and how it is unfait that this battleship can be sunked by single man in cheap dive bomber sorry for OT.
I have just found out i have 135% capacitor recharge time "bonus" nad 25% speed reduction on my cerberus using 5 HAM chers witch T2 ammo. Is it a Bug or new/old plague hit ?
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.17 21:12:00 -
[8]
I propose replace Night Hawk hull with drakes hull, it would be pitty to not use such nice graphic ship design.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.18 08:12:00 -
[9]
OT: I thind the most famous British BC HMS Hood have 15" guns same as all other BS until HMS Vanguard.
BTW it wont be worthless reclassificate presen BC to Heavy cruisers and add new BC class line with BS weponary :)
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.18 16:41:00 -
[10]
Can someone explain me purpose of BC ? Old BC are to big and to slow to flight in cruser gangs and have to low firepower to serve in fleet battles. New BC should change this, but it looks the will remain as mid platform between BB and CL, witch worth to be trained only becose CS.
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
|
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 15:44:00 -
[11]
You always must choose between ofence and defence..
Drake is now very strong ship, but not overpowered, not overnerfed. Adventage of NH above Drake is greater CPU witch allows fit launcher rigs easily (witch is bit difficult on drake).
BTW I agree with 7th turret on Hurry
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
Aki Yamato
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 16:48:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Nalshiga Dshoayo
Originally by: Aki Yamato You always must choose between ofence and defence..
Drake is now very strong ship, but not overpowered, not overnerfed. Adventage of NH above Drake is greater CPU witch allows fit launcher rigs easily (witch is bit difficult on drake).
BTW I agree with 7th turret on Hurry
I have no problems fitting the drake with 7 tech II launchers. and that 30 more cpu dont make up for the 140(!) more powergrid and 1 more rig slot.
You saw a New NH ? You are compering ald and broken ship (with 90% firepower of cerberus). So lets wait for new NH and then we can compare ....
BIG GUN BIG FUTURE |
|
|
|