| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2174
   |
Posted - 2015.04.27 13:39:45 -
[1] - Quote
2Sonas1Cup wrote:Or drastically drop their payouts not the point of killing them but to a more balanced level compared to other highsec activities.
Highsec Incursions payout WAY too much for the risk and time you take.
I often dream of how the hisec community would self-solve problems like this, if CCP locked people out of NPC corps after 60 days and closed the drop-corp wardec dodging exploit.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2186
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 13:37:48 -
[2] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I have never taken part in an incursion, nor do I wish to, but I am just so jealous that some folk make more isk per hour than me.
CCP please stop folk doing anything that allows them to me make more isk per hour than I do.
Thank you.
It's about risk vs. reward. If drifters started randomly appearing on incursion grids and occasionally doomsday'd a carebears pinata then perhaps it could stay as is. If incursion runners couldn't dodge wardecs by just dropping to an NPC corp then perhaps it could stay as is. But as is today incursions are a huge risk-free ISK faucet that are being farmed. Dank ISK should come from null or WH's, with losec in the middle; more risk, more reward...
CCP has nerfed the hell out of hisec agression mechanics in recent years, time to bring balance back by nerfing this ridiculous ISK faucet also. The little carebears shouldn't get their cake and eat it too.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2201
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 15:03:04 -
[3] - Quote
Inquisitor Tyr wrote:Hey guys!
...
Stop complaining about systems that effectively put isk in your wallets. Or would you like CCP to make something more interesting again ?
Confirming drifters should regularly show up in incursions and doomsday carebear loot piniata's. This would be an acceptable risk offset to how incursions are simply being farmed right now. Truly, why bother going to null when all that delicious ISK is just waiting for you to hop into an incursion channel in hisec...
Nerf incursions.
That is all.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2204
|
Posted - 2015.05.08 16:47:07 -
[4] - Quote
Lew Dicrous wrote:Just add a PVP mechanic to contesting sites.
...But if you just want to kill off hisec incursions, then just make the system control drop the security rating to 0.1. No runners will go near them.
Lew you might have hit on something magical there...
What if when an incursion starts in a system its sec level did drop to losec 0.4 level, for the duration of the incursion?
Talk about a meaningful mechanic and good counter-balance to the farming going on today! You would have carebears evaccing, glorious gate camps and delicious temporary anarchy. It would be...GLORIOUS!
Hell, incursions would even then actually mean something to non-incursion runners transitting system, beyond just frakking up their screen color pallette (and splooging an annoying chat window in face...)
Naysayers can't say this wouldn't work, just remember the battle of Luminaire a while back when CONCORD was suspended in there for a day or so. It was dynamic CONTENT, in an often content-void hisec.
CCP, DO THIS. Do it NAOW.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Carpe Noctem.
Pandemic Legion
2623
|
Posted - 2015.11.24 18:03:29 -
[5] - Quote
So long as CCP in general insists on prioritizing the sale of salads to vegans, who spend their days sitting on plush bean bag chairs in hipster coffee houses in hisec, EvE will never reach critical mass based on what actually generates buzz and sells EvE.
CCP has already spent the last few years trying to make hisec safer and more content-rich, while kicking their bread-and-butter hype machine in nullsec di-rectly in the ballsack...and do they now wonder in amazement why a massive migration and land-grab from the other regions into the new nullsec hasn't happened while hisec remains a content and ISK rich land of milk and honey?
Here's a hint...
BR-5's, 6-VDT's and large scale battles sell eve. A dank mining, incursion running or industry video from hisec comparatively does not.
CCP was bold with nullsec changes. Time to be bold again.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Carpe Noctem.
Pandemic Legion
2624
|
Posted - 2015.11.24 18:56:25 -
[6] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
I agree with most of what you say and always tend to agree. But I disagree completely with you ship insurance idea. People don't refrain from pvp because they don't like losing ships (and EVE is so flush with ways of making isk, losses don't count much either). people don't pvp because (amongst other reasons) they don't like to lose, period. Nothing you do, not free ships, not removing kill mails, nothing you can do will change that. Ever.
Well one example from personal experience is how we sat outside Brave's HQ with only 8-10 megathrons and they wouldn't come out to fight until an FC who could authorize SRP logged on first. Groups like that are brave and will bring a fight, IF they have SRP or readily replaceable ships...
Thus my opinion, that if thunderdome is ever to happen in EvE the pain of ship loss needs to be transferred from ships to structures (or something else) instead, because ships are the very fuel we burn for content. Heresy I know, but for many not as EvE-wealthy as vets its the hard truth. We want content, we have to make ships the cheap fuel for content they are.
F
Would you like to know more?
|
| |
|