|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nachshon
Caldari Tyrfing Securities
|
Posted - 2006.11.10 05:13:00 -
[1]
I, for one, have no love for Veto. During their time as a pirate corporation Veto waged an undeclared war against Tyrfing Securities, ultimately expelling us from our former headquarters in Resbroko (which we now avoid like the plague). It seems to me that Veto has merely engaged in piracy on behalf of others rather than on their own initiative. Would Veto be willing to accept a contract to destroy the mercenary corporation known as Veto?
|
Nachshon
Caldari Tyrfing Securities
|
Posted - 2006.11.16 01:00:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Nachshon on 16/11/2006 01:02:04 Verone, I just did some research on your corporation. Your corporation seems to be the same one that launched pirate attacks on us. However, a further search finds that the specific Veto pirate that attacked us is no longer flying. His name was Mao Zedong, or some corruption thereof. Do you remember him at all?
|
Nachshon
Caldari Tyrfing Securities
|
Posted - 2006.11.22 03:00:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Verone He is still on our roster, and goes by the name of Mao TseTung. He is also a valued and loyal pilot.
Such claims of hostility seem bizzare, as I still cannot see a single registered encounter anywhere in our corporate records even after searching extensively for the name of your corporation.
Interesting.
Very interesting, especially given that my CEO, Piuro (who will be retiring soon), placed a 2-million ISK bounty on Mao's head. I should note that Tyrfing Securities and Veto were never at war. This may be why our corporation is not listed in your records. Also, I am unsure as to the details of the attack, which I was not present for. It may have been that Mao attacked Piuro, and Piuro withdrew, and survived. Anyway, I retract my earlier comments. After all, you made the decision to cease piracy, which is certainly admirable. Mercenaries, at least, have some values (keeping the identity of your client secret under great duress shows honesty).
|
Nachshon
Caldari Tyrfing Securities
|
Posted - 2006.11.29 18:18:00 -
[4]
I just had a real funny question: Only two organizations know the identity of VETO's client: the client, and VETO. However, could an organization (ie, the Federal Navy) set up a contract with VETO to destroy VETO's former client, without knowing the client's identity?
That would actually be a clever way to retaliate against VETO's client - pay VETO to kill them, then check up on who VETO attacks.
|
|
|
|