Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Taggah Kil'Jama
Spatial Distortions
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 17:25:45 -
[1] - Quote
Looking for advice on my hurricane fit. Active armor tank for sites. Tanks a little over 200dps (hard to tell, no exact values from the Anciliary armor rep on EVE droid). ~20km falloff with various ammos so damage projection is fine at about 10km. I've envisioned it as a sort of pseudo-brawler for pvp that orbits at 8km and keeps em lockd up. Was thinking about switching the battery for another web. Don't want to bring a bunch of booster charges into the WH so I'm using a cap battery. Might carry a mobile depot with a nos and another web to switch out after ive probed down a WH. Slapped this together on eve droid, cpu and powergrid are pretty tight. Any suggestions besides "fly another ship" are appreciated!
220mm Vulcan II 220mm Vulcan II 220mm Vulcan II 220mm Vulcan II 220mm Vulcan II 220mm Vulcan II Core Probe Launcher 1
50mn MWD II Warp Scram II Stasis Web II Med Cap Battery II
DCU II Med Armor Rep II Med Anc Armor Rep Gyro II Gyro II Tracking Enhancer II
Medium Ambit II Med Collision Accelerator I Anti Explosive Pump I |
Taggah Kil'Jama
Spatial Distortions
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 18:16:19 -
[2] - Quote
oops, meant Large Cap Battery II. Not a tight fit with just a Med hehe |
Traejun DiSanctis
Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance
149
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 18:21:09 -
[3] - Quote
its unclear what you're trying to do with this. Is this for ganking WH divers or running the sites? I'm assuming the former, since you have point. If so you'll want an Expanded Core Probe Launcher - for combat probes. You CAN just probe down the sites themselves and hope someone is in there, but you'll often find yourself way off the target - allow them to cloak or get away. It's better to scan down the actual ship and warp right on top of them. |
Taggah Kil'Jama
Spatial Distortions
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 18:33:01 -
[4] - Quote
Thanks for the advice. Was kind of planning on running c1 sites and pvping if the opportunity presents itself (ie not a t3 or faction cruiser)- to fit an expanded probe i'd need to lose the cap battery or put on a CPU mod instead of my tracking enhancer. Ignoring the probe launcher for now, would it be better to do a cap battery or get a nos and another web? i feel like the nos would sustain my tank for sites and allow me to brawl a bit better |
RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
1074
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 18:54:47 -
[5] - Quote
I'd drop the tracking enhancer for an EANM. 220's track fine as it is.
I'd drop the cap battery for a long point. In many of my Minnie ships, I like a long point short point web MWD Could just be me, but I fit like that. |
Odithia
Rondass
79
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 08:47:26 -
[6] - Quote
With the current state of the Hurricane, a Brutix would probably perform better at this job. |
HoruSeth
Republic University Minmatar Republic
788
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 09:27:29 -
[7] - Quote
RavenPaine wrote:I'd drop the tracking enhancer for an EANM. 220's track fine as it is.
I'd drop the cap battery for a long point. In many of my Minnie ships, I like a long point short point web MWD Could just be me, but I fit like that.
Would not sustain in the easiest site in a C1! Even the standardfitting has not enough tank, nor enough cap, if he is running both reppers.
I agree, that running a PvP Cane in C1/C2 is a bad idea.
Take a look on the Svipul ;) It can tank and do even C2 anoms (though they take a while of course) in a simple PvP fit, if you know what to do and where the spawn come. C1 is anomalies is not a problem.
Totally agree with Expanded Probe Launcher for combat probes! You want them!
Keep Smile and Kill, You can not wave them all!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |