Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jin Tylena
|
Posted - 2006.11.24 23:58:00 -
[1]
Cormorant: Structure: 677 Armor: 625 Shield: 782 Powergrid: 55
Flycather: Structure: 651 Armor: 600 Shield: 751 Powergrid: 54 10% more Thermal Resist on shield and armor...
Tell me these are not the final numbers... why the t2 version has less hps? 
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Worms Corp
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 00:25:00 -
[2]
Tech 2 is getting less of an HP bonus because of its innate resists, better firepower.
|

Jin Loe
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 00:44:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Jin Loe on 25/11/2006 00:49:35
|

Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 01:20:00 -
[4]
When you remeber that resists are % based, the fact they're getting a 25% smaller HP boost (or whatever the final numbers are) doesn't mean theyre getting 25% less boost.
I'm no maths wizzard, but, roughly speaking, 25% HP at 85% resistance is worth, equivalently, 20% more than 25% at 65% resistance. In fact, you could even say its worth 45% total increase (equivalent).
So if they'd increased T2 HP by the same amount as T1, they'd have ben giving them quite quite a considerable boost, making them pull even futher away from their T1 equiavlents.
See? Ish? -----------------------------------------------
|

Hoshi
DAB RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 01:31:00 -
[5]
That would be true if it really had hac like resists but it doesn't. Just 10% more on 2 resists.
|

Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 01:44:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Patch86 on 25/11/2006 01:44:10 This is true, I am thinking of HACs...........
I dunno then. Nerfing interdictors would be bad, seeing as they're pretty well balanced ATM. -----------------------------------------------
|

Audri Fisher
Caldari The Keep THE R0CK
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 02:00:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker Tech 2 is getting less of an HP bonus because of its innate resists, better firepower.
a flycatcher has better firepower than a cormorat? what version of eve are you playing?
|

Dred'Pirate Jesus
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 02:03:00 -
[8]
Dictors aint ment to fight just to drop a bubble and get the feck away.. Unless of course your killing newbs in shuttles and t1 frigs..  KALI:Revelations.. Putting the Waaaa back in Piwat.. |

Jin Tylena
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 02:24:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Jin Tylena on 25/11/2006 02:27:40
Originally by: Dred'Pirate Jesus Dictors aint ment to fight just to drop a bubble and get the feck away.. Unless of course your killing newbs in shuttles and t1 frigs.. 
Well... Covert Ops aint meant to fight and have more HPs than their T1 version, way more...
Heron: Structure: 226 Armor: 258 Shield: 274
Buzzard: Structure: 316 Armor: 316 Shield: 528
Rest of interdictors:
Coercer: Structure: 730 Armor: 782 Shield: 625
Heretic: Structure: 700 Armor: 751 Shield: 600
Catalyst: Structure: 782 Armor: 730 Shield: 677
Eris: Structure: 751 Armor: 700 Shield: 651
Thraser: Structure: 625 Armor: 677 Shield: 730
Sabre: Structure: 600 Armor: 651 Shield: 700
|

Marlenus
Caldari Ironfleet Towing And Salvage
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 02:31:00 -
[10]
If I recall, the stats on the Tech I versus Tech II destroyers aren't all that different pre-patch, either. I remember doing a close comparison about a month ago and being surprised at how similar the base armor, shields, etc. were. Yeah, there was a Tech II upgrade, but way smaller than in other ship classes.
One big difference not mentioned here is that the Tech II destroyers are almost twice as fast as the Tech Is.
Lemme look in the database. Yup, currently:
Thrasher: Shield: 438 Armor: 406 Speed: 240m/s
Sabre: Shield 525 Armor 488 Speed: 455m/s
|
|

Dred'Pirate Jesus
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 02:35:00 -
[11]
Cov ops have to be able to withstand a bit of fire after they uncloak to tackle a ship for the gang to kill.. Rare but it happens.. Dictors on the other hand are designed to just shoot a bubble 'n scoot.. If I was a dictor pilot I would leave all weapons off and maximize the speed and tank.. KALI:Revelations.. Putting the Waaaa back in Piwat.. |

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Worms Corp
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 04:17:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Patch86 Edited by: Patch86 on 25/11/2006 01:44:10 This is true, I am thinking of HACs...........
I dunno then. Nerfing interdictors would be bad, seeing as they're pretty well balanced ATM.
i wouldnt call destroyers having more HP then dictors a nerf though, Destroyers needed love anyway.
|

Dred'Pirate Jesus
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 04:24:00 -
[13]
Indeed.. and with the near cruiser sig they need near cruiser hp.. Still a ways to go I think.. Even after Rev dessys are kinda thin hp wise.. How about dropping the tracking bonus for a hp per level and bigger optimal bonus? Dessys are all long range so a tracking bonus is kinda redundant.. Especially for frig guns.. KALI:Revelations.. Putting the Waaaa back in Piwat.. |

Aphotic Raven
Gallente Spectral Armada Eternal Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 11:39:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Dred'Pirate Jesus Dictors aint ment to fight just to drop a bubble and get the feck away.. Unless of course your killing newbs in shuttles and t1 frigs.. 
Exactly, the "new" form of pvp in eve is only for people who pay for 2 accounts so that they can have a dictor.. that and people in 20 man gank packs. Hurray for nerfing solo pvp. (oh im sure interceptors will get plenty of fights.. but they are ****.. no one wants to use them exclusively =/ )
Quote: Melicien Tetro: I tried to fight a shark with a pistol underwater once, and I'll be ****ed if he didn't laugh at me and eat me. Sharks need a ******* nerf. True story
|

Rafein
Eye of God Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.25 11:45:00 -
[15]
It's more of a role design, I would think.
Destroyers are made to actually fight, they are supposed to be anti-frigate support ships, and not have the HP to actually outlast a frig.
Dictors are not made to fly with the fleet, and slug it out with other ships. They are made to drop in, bubble, and get out.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |