|
EVE General Discussion Announcement:Gunjack Discussion Thread» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page | |
| Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
 Crasniya Strange Energy The Bastion 571    |
Posted - 2015.08.04 12:37:35 -
[61] - Quote Cypherous wrote: Crasniya wrote: I I probably won't be owning it, since I won't be owning another Android (security on the platform is becoming more and more comical each month, nobody should own an Android at this point if they value their data), much less a Samsung. But the Gear VR shares a lot of tech with the Oculus, and I'm hopeful that at some point CCP will let Oculus users play it. Android isn't really any more of a privacy issue than iOS and Win10 mobile these days so thats just some android hate right there, i'll give you partial points for the samsung rant, i owned the S3 and it was a glorious device, i got an S6 and i'm less happy with that, there were some initial teething issues that could only be resolved by rooting the device and ever since day 1 i've had "lag" on the device using the pin based lock screen so while the phone is gorgeous and performs great for the most part, there are some issues which is why you get partial points for the samsung hate :P It's really not. When a vulnerability for iOS or Windows is released, it can be patched by Apple or Microsoft inside a week. Most of the major vulnerabilities over the last year will never be patched on Android for most customers. Like 70% of all Android owners never got patches released for Heartbleed. The Android security lead only believes he's responsible for patching devices for 18 months, while Microsoft still patches Windows Vista. Anyways, back on topic, but yeah. No. Definitely less secure than iOS and Win10 mobile. Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - [email protected] |
Crasniya Strange Energy The Bastion 571 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 12:40:02 -
[62] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: These are already 2 things more than CCP was able to handle in the past. And now they want to develop yet another game. This is going to be very interesting.  Again, this is super small. Not the sort of development scale of any of their other titles. Soraya Xel - Council of Planetary Management 1 - [email protected] |
 D'Kmal Variables Unlimited Chained Reactions 7 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 12:44:54 -
[63] - Quote You know how Dust 514 was limited to one platform, the PS3, and that was a really bad idea? I really hope Gunjack won't be limited to just one platform, the Samsung Gear VR, as that's a really bad idea. Other than that, looks absolutely incredible, can't wait. Might head along to the next EVE_NT and try it out if I can make it. |
 Anthar Thebess 1251 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 12:50:56 -
[64] - Quote It was stated that this game will be very portable. Capital Remote AID Rebalance Way to solve important nullsec issue. CSM members do your work. |
 Rei Lithium Undead Dragons Dragon Knights Inc 1 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 13:49:32 -
[65] - Quote If this gets ported to the Rift, then I can see myself using it. As a purely mobile thing.. not interested. Unless I can somehow run it on a normal android. then I might try it. Is this an indication that there will be guns on the new Mining Rigs and other new structures other then Citadels? I could see if this became popular, players being able to boot a game like this up to operate structure defenses if they wanted to. |
 Mina Sebiestar Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate 926 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 14:24:02 -
[66] - Quote Shoot duck's with a gun on relic computer once got whooping 10 min out of it,but with a VR il spend countess hours totally immersed. |
 Tiberius Heth Say No to Features 58 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 14:31:29 -
[67] - Quote At first I thought it was some ****** indie game with stolen artwork. Generally not a good sign. |
 Kuronaga Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 382 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 14:58:58 -
[68] - Quote Tiberius Heth wrote: At first I thought it was some ****** indie game with stolen artwork. Generally not a good sign. Generally not, no. I remember when CCP used to sue people for putting out crap like this. If Shanghai wanted to make a practical buck they should've just released the sidescroller instead. That would've had broader appeal on a variety of devices without needing to tron yourself up in expensive gear that nobody will ever purchase. But this game? It's going to flop harder than Free Willy's final jump on the directors cut. |
 DaReaper Net 7 2454 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 18:07:34 -
[69] - Quote Aeon Amadii wrote: DaReaper wrote: Chamile Eonic wrote: Aliventi wrote: I'mma let you finish, but we have been wanting a PC post of DUST for a few years now. Legion isn't happening. Its possible they may decide to throw a bucket load of money at it to do a total redevelopment but as it stands the game is massively dated now. Unless they rebuild it from the ground up then I can't see people really playing it. CCP are currently going balls deep into VR. If VR turns out to be a big thing they will make a load of cash, if not then its back to milking the Eve player base for cash to 'invest' in their next project there is no evidence to support the claim that legion is 'not happening' there is also no evidence to support the claim that it is. However, reminding ccp that people want it might make them make it if they are on the fence. Kinda like WiS, people want it so they will keep remindning people they want it. *shrugs* And i would not say they are 'balls deep' into vr actually. From my understanding, the VR labs group is not that big, but meh. More money for ccp is good In his defense, there's nothing to suggest Legion -is- happening, either. The last we heard about Legion was 337 days ago. After that, CCP went dark and the only sliver of evidence we have that CCP Rattati isn't the only one alive at CCP Shanghai is a few developer spotlights and... well, Gunjack. I know, i said that in my second line. This still is nto evidence that lkegion is dead, i have zero idea what ccp is doing, and cancling a trademark doenst mean anything, if you take into accunt the rouge wedding prolly killed any momentum ccp had to make legion. Remember, when they announced valk the fan base wnated it so much they just made it. they registered legion just in case, but the responce was the opposit, so why keep it? When it can just become EVE Dust514 on pc. But who knows. OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining! Yes i am optimistic about eve.. i'm giving it till dec 31st 2016 before i doom n gloom |
DaReaper Net 7 2454 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 18:08:34 -
[70] - Quote Tavin Aikisen wrote: Aeon Amadii wrote: DaReaper wrote: Chamile Eonic wrote: Aliventi wrote: I'mma let you finish, but we have been wanting a PC post of DUST for a few years now. Legion isn't happening. Its possible they may decide to throw a bucket load of money at it to do a total redevelopment but as it stands the game is massively dated now. Unless they rebuild it from the ground up then I can't see people really playing it. CCP are currently going balls deep into VR. If VR turns out to be a big thing they will make a load of cash, if not then its back to milking the Eve player base for cash to 'invest' in their next project there is no evidence to support the claim that legion is 'not happening' there is also no evidence to support the claim that it is. However, reminding ccp that people want it might make them make it if they are on the fence. Kinda like WiS, people want it so they will keep remindning people they want it. *shrugs* And i would not say they are 'balls deep' into vr actually. From my understanding, the VR labs group is not that big, but meh. More money for ccp is good In his defense, there's nothing to suggest Legion -is- happening, either. The last we heard about Legion was 337 days ago. After that, CCP went dark and the only sliver of evidence we have that CCP Rattati isn't the only one alive at CCP Shanghai is a few developer spotlights and... well, Gunjack. Actually there is plenty to say nothing is happening. CCP no longer hold the trademark for "EVE Legion". Source: http://www.trademarkia.com/eve-legion-86233018.html As i just said, this doenslt prove much of anything. Just a name change OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining! Yes i am optimistic about eve.. i'm giving it till dec 31st 2016 before i doom n gloom |
DaReaper Net 7 2454 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 18:12:57 -
[71] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: I find this announcement particularly interesting. CCP cannot even manage to maintain EVE properly (going to vacation after the most profound game change in years? Really?) and have failed to maintain and advance DUST properly. Even these 2 projects (ignoring WOD as it's already dead) were too much for CCP to handle. Now they want to turn DUST into Legion and make that go totally awesome for sure, and attempt to develop Valkyrie. These are already 2 things more than CCP was able to handle in the past. And now they want to develop yet another game. This is going to be very interesting. its a simple game, did not take much resources form it seem seems like. My guess is its using some scrapped valk code. If it was cheap to make, and a few devs did it as a side project then who cares. If it makes money, then it means more money for ccp, and thats a GOOD thing. CCP needs more games or they go under if eve goes under. OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining! Yes i am optimistic about eve.. i'm giving it till dec 31st 2016 before i doom n gloom |
 Thead Enco Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 274 |
Posted - 2015.08.04 18:54:12 -
[72] - Quote DaReaper wrote: Rivr Luzade wrote: I find this announcement particularly interesting. CCP cannot even manage to maintain EVE properly (going to vacation after the most profound game change in years? Really?) and have failed to maintain and advance DUST properly. Even these 2 projects (ignoring WOD as it's already dead) were too much for CCP to handle. Now they want to turn DUST into Legion and make that go totally awesome for sure, and attempt to develop Valkyrie. These are already 2 things more than CCP was able to handle in the past. And now they want to develop yet another game. This is going to be very interesting. its a simple game, did not take much resources form it seem seems like. My guess is its using some scrapped valk code. If it was cheap to make, and a few devs did it as a side project then who cares. If it makes money, then it means more money for ccp, and thats a GOOD thing. CCP needs to release more unfinished games or they go under if eve goes under. Fixed A Lannister always pays his debts Tyrion Lannister |
 d0cTeR9 Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance 212 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 03:34:55 -
[73] - Quote CCP Falcon wrote: DaReaper wrote: why would this effect that? this was made by the dust team, not eve team Because HUURRR DDURRR DUDUD DRRRR HRRRHHHHHHURRRR, apparently.  /Thread Everyone back to hot dropping supers on TQ. Been around since the beginning. |
 Webvan All Kill No Skill 12077 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 04:22:26 -
[74] - Quote Anthar Thebess wrote: It was stated that this game will be very portable. So was dust. Had been waiting for news since dust was announced and the 1yr contract with sony was understood. After the year and a few months Legion (dust port) was finally announced, and got some PR release for a time. It's been a year now, the TM dropped and thought maybe renamed with this new TM. Not the case, so still just wondering.... Not even upset if they dropped it, just want to know. If it's dropped, would seem irritating not to bother to let people know, more the issue. As for Gunjack, just got a new Samsung Galaxy last month, like it lots, but it's not that model. Out of lucks again  I'm in it for the money Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12 |
Kuronaga Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback 384 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 07:41:39 -
[75] - Quote DaReaper wrote: Aeon Amadii wrote: DaReaper wrote: Chamile Eonic wrote: Aliventi wrote: I'mma let you finish, but we have been wanting a PC post of DUST for a few years now. Legion isn't happening. Its possible they may decide to throw a bucket load of money at it to do a total redevelopment but as it stands the game is massively dated now. Unless they rebuild it from the ground up then I can't see people really playing it. CCP are currently going balls deep into VR. If VR turns out to be a big thing they will make a load of cash, if not then its back to milking the Eve player base for cash to 'invest' in their next project there is no evidence to support the claim that legion is 'not happening' there is also no evidence to support the claim that it is. However, reminding ccp that people want it might make them make it if they are on the fence. Kinda like WiS, people want it so they will keep remindning people they want it. *shrugs* And i would not say they are 'balls deep' into vr actually. From my understanding, the VR labs group is not that big, but meh. More money for ccp is good In his defense, there's nothing to suggest Legion -is- happening, either. The last we heard about Legion was 337 days ago. After that, CCP went dark and the only sliver of evidence we have that CCP Rattati isn't the only one alive at CCP Shanghai is a few developer spotlights and... well, Gunjack. I know, i said that in my second line. This still is nto evidence that lkegion is dead, i have zero idea what ccp is doing, and cancling a trademark doenst mean anything, if you take into accunt the rouge wedding prolly killed any momentum ccp had to make legion. Remember, when they announced valk the fan base wnated it so much they just made it. they registered legion just in case, but the responce was the opposit, so why keep it? When it can just become EVE Dust514 on pc. But who knows. Very few people actually want Dust on PC. Most (not necessarily on this forum specifically) want PS4. In addition to all the technical hurdles of dealing with the hackers (or not dealing, as is the CCP way) it would also cut off the core audience who is primarily responsible for the games survival thus far. For PC, there is no guarantee it would replicate even that much of a following. PC is the land of varied FPS, but on PC it is a fact that most FPS die faster than its console counterparts. It's a risky move with a lot of negatives and a few minor gains, mostly being power and presentation. |
 Arkady Vachon Aliastra Gallente Federation 1401 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 10:14:16 -
[76] - Quote This is like a blast back to my coin-op arcade junkie past, with Unreal 4 graphics and VR tech... I love the idea. :D Are you somehow able to update it with new enemy and boss types (Sansha, Drifters, Rogue Drones) or will those be in at launch? Nothing Personal - Just Business... Chaos Creates Content |
Arkady Vachon Aliastra Gallente Federation 1401 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 10:18:03 -
[77] - Quote Lykouleon wrote: My morning commute just got equally more entertaining and potentially embarrassing. Maybe CCP should put a warning on the game box/manual. Do Not GUNJACK AND DRIVE. ;) Nothing Personal - Just Business... Chaos Creates Content |
DaReaper Net 7 2457 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 15:44:52 -
[78] - Quote Kuronaga wrote: DaReaper wrote: Aeon Amadii wrote: DaReaper wrote: Chamile Eonic wrote: Legion isn't happening. Its possible they may decide to throw a bucket load of money at it to do a total redevelopment but as it stands the game is massively dated now. Unless they rebuild it from the ground up then I can't see people really playing it. CCP are currently going balls deep into VR. If VR turns out to be a big thing they will make a load of cash, if not then its back to milking the Eve player base for cash to 'invest' in their next project there is no evidence to support the claim that legion is 'not happening' there is also no evidence to support the claim that it is. However, reminding ccp that people want it might make them make it if they are on the fence. Kinda like WiS, people want it so they will keep remindning people they want it. *shrugs* And i would not say they are 'balls deep' into vr actually. From my understanding, the VR labs group is not that big, but meh. More money for ccp is good In his defense, there's nothing to suggest Legion -is- happening, either. The last we heard about Legion was 337 days ago. After that, CCP went dark and the only sliver of evidence we have that CCP Rattati isn't the only one alive at CCP Shanghai is a few developer spotlights and... well, Gunjack. I know, i said that in my second line. This still is nto evidence that lkegion is dead, i have zero idea what ccp is doing, and cancling a trademark doenst mean anything, if you take into accunt the rouge wedding prolly killed any momentum ccp had to make legion. Remember, when they announced valk the fan base wnated it so much they just made it. they registered legion just in case, but the responce was the opposit, so why keep it? When it can just become EVE Dust514 on pc. But who knows. Very few people actually want Dust on PC. Most (not necessarily on this forum specifically) want PS4. In addition to all the technical hurdles of dealing with the hackers (or not dealing, as is the CCP way) it would also cut off the core audience who is primarily responsible for the games survival thus far. For PC, there is no guarantee it would replicate even that much of a following. PC is the land of varied FPS, but on PC it is a fact that most FPS die faster than its console counterparts. It's a risky move with a lot of negatives and a few minor gains, mostly being power and presentation. Except there core audience is actually on the pc. But you ment as in the current dust player base. So im splitting hairs. I just believe in the 2014 vision, all eve game son pc. But i realize that a simple and easy to make game, that could net some profit may come and not be on pc. But we will see. OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining! Yes i am optimistic about eve.. i'm giving it till dec 31st 2016 before i doom n gloom |
 Nicolai Serkanner Jebediah Kerman's Junkyard and Spaceship Parts Co. Brave Collective 450 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 18:15:01 -
[79] - Quote Not my type of game, but it looks great. |
 Jevatoxa Amandla Legion 13 |
Posted - 2015.08.05 20:21:47 -
[80] - Quote Webvan wrote: Then if this isn't the new name for Legion, what happened to Legion? You know, the PC game?  To be fair, I hear CCP have performed a miracle with DUST and 1) turned it profitable and 2) made it worth playing. I can't verify the latter until I try it myself, but I've added a PS3 to my wedding anniversary wishlist (2nd week of September). I would love it if they did port it to PC of course, as the PS3 isn't going to last forever. The original plan was, I believe, to transfer the DUST toons to Legion. More info on this required please CCP or else I might end up with a lawnmower for my anniversary  |
 Ranger 1 Ranger Corp Vae. Victis. 6300 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 00:31:40 -
[81] - Quote Jevatoxa wrote: Webvan wrote: Then if this isn't the new name for Legion, what happened to Legion? You know, the PC game? To be fair, I hear CCP have performed a miracle with DUST and 1) turned it profitable and 2) made it worth playing. I can't verify the latter until I try it myself, but I've added a PS3 to my wedding anniversary wishlist (2nd week of September). I would love it if they did port it to PC of course, as the PS3 isn't going to last forever. The original plan was, I believe, to transfer the DUST toons to Legion. More info on this required please CCP or else I might end up with a lawnmower for my anniversary This is correct, despite all of the nay saying and misinformation Dust is alive and doing rather well. I'm not sure why people would be surprised about them giving up the Legion name... they said up front that Legion was merely the in house "code name" for the project. It was never intended to be the final release name of the game. That's not to say they haven't decided to let DUST continue as is, now that it has it's second wind, but the Legion trademark issue is literally meaningless. View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms. |
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp Vae. Victis. 6300 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 00:33:03 -
[82] - Quote d0cTeR9 wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: DaReaper wrote: why would this effect that? this was made by the dust team, not eve team Because HUURRR DDURRR DUDUD DRRRR HRRRHHHHHHURRRR, apparently. /Thread Everyone back to hot dropping supers on TQ. I KNOW RIGHT?!? I had to go log into the forum specifically to give that post a thumbs up.  View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms. |
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp Vae. Victis. 6300 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 00:35:26 -
[83] - Quote Masaaq wrote: Looks all right. Much Pew. Abaddon was pronounced incorrectly though tehe. SO glad you posted that link before this had a chance to become a "thing". View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms. |
 Dersen Lowery Scanners Live in Vain 1718 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 02:50:51 -
[84] - Quote So much rage in this thread. DUST is actually doing well. It is portable--it's built on UNREAL--but there's not a lick of good in porting it before they have the shipping version where they want it. They already made that mistake, remember? CCP is not going to hype, or even worry about, integration with the EVE Universe until the game is solid. They made that mistake too, with DUST. Remember? This looks like a good little game. I don't have an Android, so I'm not in the target market, but it looks polished and fun in small doses, which looks about right for a phone game. Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. I voted in CSM X! |
 Nana Skalski Poseidaon 557 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 08:47:29 -
[85] - Quote I prefer original http://screenshots.en.sftcdn.net/en/scrn/53000/53456/space-invaders-13.jpg  ( -á° -ƒ-û -í°) |
 Rivr Luzade Exclusion Cartel The Kadeshi 1746 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 11:09:25 -
[86] - Quote DaReaper wrote: its a simple game, did not take much resources form it seem seems like. My guess is its using some scrapped valk code. If it was cheap to make, and a few devs did it as a side project then who cares. If it makes money, then it means more money for ccp, and thats a GOOD thing. CCP needs more games or they go under if eve goes under. It absolutely does not matter whether it is a small game with little effort or time involved. CCP cannot handle several projects. And this fact does not change if 2 large projects, which have outgrown their capabilities, are replaced by loads of small projects, which require even more granular expertise and attention. It's going to be fun for me to see them ruin it again. I also wholeheartedly agree with Thead Enco' correction of your post. |
Dersen Lowery Scanners Live in Vain 1721 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 17:38:49 -
[87] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: It absolutely does not matter whether it is a small game with little effort or time involved. CCP cannot handle several projects. If you're right, they'll need to learn how--the hard way, if necessary--because being a publisher of one game with no presence on any of the long-since-established portable platforms--never mind the current generation of consoles--is neither safe nor sustainable. One way or another, the pony has to learn more tricks. I have more hope for these games than I did for the other ones just because they have small development teams, known and limited scopes, and a minimal amount of hype. After this and Valkyrie ship, CCP will be a frontline developer on two VR platforms, and they'll have a team with expertise developing on Android. Done right, they'll be able to reach people that EVE has never been able to reach, and get them familiar and comfortable with aspects of EVE's universe (Abaddon = imminent sunburn from a broadside). There are still plenty of ways that this could go wrong. There always are. But they have to try. Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables. I voted in CSM X! |
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp Vae. Victis. 6301 |
Posted - 2015.08.06 21:50:05 -
[88] - Quote Rivr Luzade wrote: DaReaper wrote: its a simple game, did not take much resources form it seem seems like. My guess is its using some scrapped valk code. If it was cheap to make, and a few devs did it as a side project then who cares. If it makes money, then it means more money for ccp, and thats a GOOD thing. CCP needs more games or they go under if eve goes under. It absolutely does not matter whether it is a small game with little effort or time involved. CCP cannot handle several projects. And this fact does not change if 2 large projects, which have outgrown their capabilities, are replaced by loads of small projects, which require even more granular expertise and attention. It's going to be fun for me to see them ruin it again. I also wholeheartedly agree with Thead Enco' correction of your post. The rest of your highly amusing post aside, you've overlooked one critical point. It's already done. View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms. |
 Crimson Draufgange Extreme Overkill Inc. Mordus Angels 666 |
Posted - 2015.08.07 04:28:09 -
[89] - Quote Hey CCP, When will you be making a FAQ for Gunjack? Subtle rhyme intended.
|
Webvan All Kill No Skill 12183 |
Posted - 2015.08.07 07:23:47 -
[90] - Quote Ranger 1 wrote: Well it's not just that, I think we've totally lost any clue where CCP is going with all this. The bond from 2012 paid back, by a new investor? ..calling the shots? Everything seems to have gone hidden (financial reports etc). Developing into platforms hardly anyone uses. If Gunjack is a Shanghai project as Legion was being developed, then likely Legion is scrapped for a year now, unless they say otherwise. But no word in a year one way or the other, sooo... seems really odd, ya know? Trying not to draw conclusions, but it is all rather hidden away now. Have seen other developers do that with bad results, dunno.I'm not sure why people would be surprised about them giving up the Legion name... they said up front that Legion was merely the in house "code name" for the project. It was never intended to be the final release name of the game. I'm in it for the money Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12 |
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page | |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page | |
| Copyright © 2006-2024, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20240424/2326 EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP. bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF |
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website. |