Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Olleg
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 08:27:59 -
[1] - Quote
I remember old days when the ships warped to the gates at 15 km distance, manually and by autopilot. It gave some distance and time for the space road. But the smart pilots began place bookmarks on 15 km after the gate. The bookmaks were raised incredibly and EVE change the warping to battle this. Now on manual flight ship warp exactly to the gate, but by autopilot still 15 km before the gate. As for me this is illogical, no mater who click on the warp command - a pilot or an autopilot, but why is so huge difference? And galaxy become smaller, no one need of the service of the local traders because anyone can quickly fly to the Jita.
What I suggest. The warping must be into a random point inside 15 km sphere with center of the target of the warping for both manual and autopilot. It will return original sence of the warping but stil will prevent for bookmarks growth. The travling wth auopilot will be quicker then before, with manual - slower then before, but both will have the same speed. In case of manual acceleration with mickrodrive/afterburner the manual flight still will be faster then uncontrolled autopilot. Space travel become longer, more depended on the speed of ship, the galaxy will become "large". As for me this is looking much more logical. |
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1787
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 08:44:23 -
[2] - Quote
You say logical, I say needless tedium. |
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3713
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 09:52:45 -
[3] - Quote
But I don't want to have to use warp to zero bookmarks on literally every gate anywhere...
Also, it's miserable enough trying to use a battleship, why do you want to make it worse? |
Samillian
Angry Mustellid The Periphery
925
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 10:08:05 -
[4] - Quote
As far as I can see this proposal would hugely increase travel times and tedium for no real gain in gameplay. You would be making the creation or purchase of warp to bookmarks for every gate in multiple regions compulsory for anyone serious about playing.
Not supported.
NBSI shall be the whole of the Law
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
56
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 14:04:39 -
[5] - Quote
why? |
FireFrenzy
SUPREME MATHEMATICS A Band Apart.
558
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 18:04:11 -
[6] - Quote
"i want to make eve much more annoying and dumb"
Also yes i remember 0BMs for everything AND IT WAS ****... |
Xe'Cara'eos
A Big Enough Lever
334
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 21:50:30 -
[7] - Quote
guy's the OP is suggesting you land anywhere within a 15km radius of the gate, so warp to 0 bm's could well put you 30 km ahead of the gate here.....
that said - more tedium - no thank you!
For posting an idea into F&I:
come up with idea, try and think how people could abuse this, try to fix your idea - loop the process until you can't see how it could be abused, then post to the forums to let us figure out how to abuse it.....
If your idea can be abused, it [u]WILL[/u] be.
|
To mare
Advanced Technology
425
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 22:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote:But I don't want to have to use warp to zero bookmarks on literally every gate anywhere...
Also, it's miserable enough trying to use a battleship, why do you want to make it worse?
i think they should remove warp to 0 AND make it impossible to land closer than 15km radius to objetcs like gates or stations no matters what bookmarks you got |
Discomanco
We pooped on your lawn Resonance.
137
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 23:03:24 -
[9] - Quote
I think they should just remove warps altogether to make slower traveling, because that is totally what you want, ey?
/sarcasm |
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3721
|
Posted - 2015.08.12 23:16:34 -
[10] - Quote
To mare wrote:Danika Princip wrote:But I don't want to have to use warp to zero bookmarks on literally every gate anywhere...
Also, it's miserable enough trying to use a battleship, why do you want to make it worse? i think they should remove warp to 0 AND make it impossible to land closer than 15km radius to objetcs like gates or stations no matters what bookmarks you got
Why? Do you honestly never want to see anything bigger than a cruiser again? |
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24648
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 02:10:52 -
[11] - Quote
Yeah but no. Using AP is a choice, why should someone who can't be bothered to do something get exactly the same result as somebody who can be bothered?
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2552
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 03:52:21 -
[12] - Quote
Landing at 15km on autopilot is so that you have to be present in order to safely warp a shuttle through lowsec.
Pirate ship Nightmare, can you fathom
Larger but with smaller spikes than Phantasm
The Succubus looks meaner
But the Revenant cleaner
Seems as they get bigger, the smaller spikes they has'm
|
Olleg
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.27 16:08:48 -
[13] - Quote
Nope, I mean that the any warp, to bookmarks or to stations or gate will be into random point inside 15 km sphere. It may be closer then 15 km to the target, but no more. |
Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
267
|
Posted - 2015.08.27 23:15:56 -
[14] - Quote
Olleg wrote:Nope, I mean that the any warp, to bookmarks or to stations or gate will be into random point inside 15 km sphere. It may be closer then 15 km to the target, but no more. The current system is 2.5km sphere from the point you warp to (look at a fleet warp, people land in a sphere).
I don't see this being very difficult to implement.
But as people have pointed out, this is a nerf to non-AP travelling.
I could see the case for warp-precision improving with ship size - so that battleships land where you tell them to, but frigates drift while in warp. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |