|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cyril Nethrad
Yawm ad-Din
8
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 07:12:36 -
[1] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:This is in incredibly poor taste, especially considering the subject objects to having her image used this way, and has not given her permission for her likeness to be reproduced.
Isn't it a nice feeling getting completely objectified by someone else without being asked for permission? I'd hate it, too!
And now think about slavery...
|
Cyril Nethrad
Yawm ad-Din
8
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 07:26:08 -
[2] - Quote
Satja Askariin wrote:Cyril Nethrad wrote:Arrendis wrote:This is in incredibly poor taste, especially considering the subject objects to having her image used this way, and has not given her permission for her likeness to be reproduced. Isn't it a nice feeling getting completely objectified by someone else without being asked for permission? I'd hate it, too! And now think about slavery... Because clearly the best way to make a meaningful point about the nature of slavery is to objectify a respectable woman who was herself a slave and does not practice the institution, not being of sufficient rank to personally own slaves herself.
That's not what I said and as you can see I did not answer to Miss Kernher. What I wanted to point out is the double moral standards of those bigots in this thread, who do not oppose slavery when it's about my people, but are outraged about someone "of their chosen kind" to be objectified without consent. |
Cyril Nethrad
Yawm ad-Din
8
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 08:08:35 -
[3] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Cyril Nethrad wrote:Satja Askariin wrote:Cyril Nethrad wrote:Arrendis wrote:This is in incredibly poor taste, especially considering the subject objects to having her image used this way, and has not given her permission for her likeness to be reproduced. Isn't it a nice feeling getting completely objectified by someone else without being asked for permission? I'd hate it, too! And now think about slavery... Because clearly the best way to make a meaningful point about the nature of slavery is to objectify a respectable woman who was herself a slave and does not practice the institution, not being of sufficient rank to personally own slaves herself. That's not what I said and as you can see I did not answer to Miss Kernher. What I wanted to point out is the double moral standards of those bigots in this thread, who do not oppose slavery when it's about my people, but are outraged about someone " of their chosen kind" to be objectified without consent. No, you answered to me. You leveled your initial bit of ironicly holier-than-thou venom at a Matari Goon? Seriously? Someone who doesn't believe in slavery, and whose organization has thrown its support behind Maximilian Singularity's campaign to end slavery in the Empire by any means necessary? What's next, lecturing Mizhara on why she should support the Republic?
Okay, granted! I shouldn't have answered to anyone directly. I apologize for pointing at you, Miss Arrendis. I was angry and that was a bad move.
But this doesn't change the fact that this thread is full of slaver bigotry - I just picked the wrong example to make my point. |
Cyril Nethrad
Yawm ad-Din
8
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 08:10:55 -
[4] - Quote
Lord Kailethre wrote:You can't debate with fanatics, either of the religious or the freedumbs variety. Don't waste your letters.
Maybe you should at least try to debate with me before telling everybody it would be a waste of time? |
Cyril Nethrad
Yawm ad-Din
8
|
Posted - 2015.08.13 08:52:23 -
[5] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:Cyril Nethrad wrote:Satja Askariin wrote:Cyril Nethrad wrote:Arrendis wrote:This is in incredibly poor taste, especially considering the subject objects to having her image used this way, and has not given her permission for her likeness to be reproduced. Isn't it a nice feeling getting completely objectified by someone else without being asked for permission? I'd hate it, too! And now think about slavery... Because clearly the best way to make a meaningful point about the nature of slavery is to objectify a respectable woman who was herself a slave and does not practice the institution, not being of sufficient rank to personally own slaves herself. That's not what I said and as you can see I did not answer to Miss Kernher. What I wanted to point out is the double moral standards of those bigots in this thread, who do not oppose slavery when it's about my people, but are outraged about someone " of their chosen kind" to be objectified without consent. It works both ways then, no ? I am pretty sure some Matari just defended this... thing... under the guise of satire. Disgusting pigs.
You're right, but that doesn't make it any better and can in no way be an excuse for anything! |
|
|
|