Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Iain Curtis
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 11:33:00 -
[1]
System: Atlulle Region: Essence Sec. Level: 0.4
Ship Type/s: Nos Domi, Raven, Crow, 'Ranis |
Iain Curtis
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 11:50:00 -
[2]
What's this, 10 'views' so far and no-one else has been jumped? lol.....how embarrassing for me |
Ezra
Gallente Calista Industries
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 13:27:00 -
[3]
Probably because no one cares. I don't see why you're posting this other than whining. The ease of scanprobing mission runners has been known since day one of Revelations. If you run missions in lowsec, you're likely to get ganked. Simple as that, with a simple solution: Don't run missions in lowsec.
It's unknown whether today's patch will make scanning mission runners hard enough to make lowsec missions worthwhile. ------------ Ezra Cornell pe0n, Calista Industries |
Iain Curtis
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 13:57:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ezra Probably because no one cares...
fair enough, you may be right.
Quote: ...I don't see why you're posting this other than whining...
Lol, why is it that whenever someone replies to a post that they don't understand, rather than ask for a clearer definition, they jump to the conclusion that the OP is whining?
No Ezra mate, I'm not whining. I have run many, many missions and am very au fait with the pro's and con's of lo-sec/hi-sec. But thanks for the information anyway.
I probably haven't explained myself properly. I just started this to see where others have been attacked and if there is any form of patterning towards specific security systems. Some people may feel that they are more safe running missions in 0.4 than 0.1. I was hoping that if a few people saw this [with a lot more posts than my single one, lol] they may be more vigilant.
Remember, we're not all long-term mission runners and a few new mission runners may have found this useful. You never know!
Quote: It's unknown whether today's patch will make scanning mission runners hard enough to make lowsec missions worthwhile...
Aye, I'm waiting on this too. One of those 'How long is a piece of string' situations. Personally since I got jumped in 0.4 [managed to get away] I have parked my ship and am playing my second character until after the patch.
Ezra, have you been attacked on a mission at all?
|
Leandro Salazar
Aeon Industries Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 14:07:00 -
[5]
The sec status really makes no difference, 0.4 is exactly the same as 0.1 as far as PvP is concerned. What makes a difference is the geographical location, systems closer to the hubs are more frequented, as are those on certain routes into 0.0 and probably the multi-L4Q20-agent hubs.
--------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
|
Iain Curtis
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 14:10:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar The sec status really makes no difference, 0.4 is exactly the same as 0.1 as far as PvP is concerned. What makes a difference is the geographical location, systems closer to the hubs are more frequented, as are those on certain routes into 0.0 and probably the multi-L4Q20-agent hubs.
Cool, thanks for that Leandro. Interesting about the hubs too.
|
Hamfast
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.12.13 15:28:00 -
[7]
I was targeted, Webbed and Scrambled a couple of days ago by a Caracal... I do not know if they got a shot off or not...
it was at the gate of a 1.0 sec system and they were dead before I even realised it had happened...
Noob in training...
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |