|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
159Pinky
Under Heavy Fire Mordus Angels
24
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 20:18:29 -
[1] - Quote
So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled |
159Pinky
Under Heavy Fire Mordus Angels
24
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 20:28:20 -
[2] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled The "timer" on a bubbled stargate already exists, and is directly linked to the DPS output of the ship you're trying to get through it.
The "timer" on entosis also exists already: it's called: undocking and doing something for your space. But CCP "fixed" that one, so maybe this one might get fixed as well. |
159Pinky
Under Heavy Fire Mordus Angels
24
|
Posted - 2015.09.11 20:32:56 -
[3] - Quote
Dreiden Kisada wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:xttz wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Reserved for FAQ Will there be a 'self-destruct' option for outposts that puts them into freeport mode? Something like a 'Abandon ownership' option? We don't have anything like that planned, but it is an interesting idea. What sort of situation would you see this being used for? If we want to give a station to someone. Or just want to give up the space to whoever because defending it is too annoying. Same reasons we would want to self destruct a sov structure.
Or to transfer it to renters more easily?
|
159Pinky
Under Heavy Fire Mordus Angels
26
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 07:33:12 -
[4] - Quote
Casandra Elise McIntire wrote:Ravcharas wrote:159Pinky wrote:So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled interdiction nullifier subsystems m8 That would mean flying a T3, which some groups are unwilling to risk. Some groups, feel that trolling in interceptors are the only option they have to ensure positive KB stats and receive funding for said trolling.
Or some groups feel, that if they bring this the other side will just drop more and more ships. Right now they already drop supers and titans on bomber and cormorrant fleet. Why on earth would I bring a T3 entosis ship? |
159Pinky
Under Heavy Fire Mordus Angels
28
|
Posted - 2015.09.12 14:25:10 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:159Pinky wrote:
Or some groups feel, that if they bring this the other side will just drop more and more ships. Right now they already drop supers and titans on bomber and cormorrant fleet. Why on earth would I bring a T3 entosis ship?
Ask your leadership who have banned you from anything bigger than interceptors, bombers and t1 destroyers.
Good trolling, I fly what I want, when I want to. But I don't see the need to bring anything bigger/more expensive when something smaller does the trick as good.
@ Scatim Helicon : I have no dissilusion as to CFC getting anyone a fair fight. That's not your modus operandi. Your FC's rely on big toys to win/suppress a fight. Which in the end is a valid tactical solution ( until super - titans changes come .... )
|
|
|
|