Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
maGz
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:01:00 -
[271]
Originally by: Connector Edited by: Connector on 21/12/2006 21:44:51
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
Rather hard to bring it on when you've logged out at a POS.
Thanks for brining in the lowest form of gameplay to an otherwise enjoyable fight.
So having carriers & motherships sitting in safety behind POS-shields with fighters assigned is an enjoyable fight? ____________
The Priory Killboard |
GO MaZ
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:05:00 -
[272]
Originally by: maGz So having carriers & motherships sitting in safety behind POS-shields with fighters assigned is an enjoyable fight?
Not as enjoyable as mining in your moros or carrier and docking up when 1 hostile in an interceptor enters local
Lacks eve related content. Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) Lacks pretty pink text. MaZ ([email protected]) |
Connector
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:05:00 -
[273]
Originally by: maGz
Originally by: Connector Edited by: Connector on 21/12/2006 21:44:51
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
Rather hard to bring it on when you've logged out at a POS.
Thanks for brining in the lowest form of gameplay to an otherwise enjoyable fight.
So having carriers & motherships sitting in safety behind POS-shields with fighters assigned is an enjoyable fight?
So blobbing NPCers and haulers in total safety and ganking them is an enjoyable fight?
You are hopeless.
|
GO MaZ
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:07:00 -
[274]
Originally by: Connector So blobbing NPCers and haulers in total safety and ganking them is an enjoyable fight?
You are hopeless.
If blobbing means a 4:1 ratio in local against us, then yes, it's enjoyable
Lacks eve related content. Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) Lacks pretty pink text. MaZ ([email protected]) |
nickky01
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:08:00 -
[275]
Originally by: maGz
Originally by: Connector Edited by: Connector on 21/12/2006 21:44:51
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
Rather hard to bring it on when you've logged out at a POS.
Thanks for brining in the lowest form of gameplay to an otherwise enjoyable fight.
So having carriers & motherships sitting in safety behind POS-shields with fighters assigned is an enjoyable fight?
ZING
|
Connector
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:08:00 -
[276]
Originally by: GO MaZ
Originally by: Connector So blobbing NPCers and haulers in total safety and ganking them is an enjoyable fight?
You are hopeless.
If blobbing means a 4:1 ratio in local against us, then yes, it's enjoyable
Wapring into belts and ganking miners and NPCers when no-one is fitted for PvP is SOOOO difficuly.
You are truly uber and all your fights are fair and true
|
maGz
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:09:00 -
[277]
Originally by: Connector
Originally by: maGz
Originally by: Connector Edited by: Connector on 21/12/2006 21:44:51
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
Rather hard to bring it on when you've logged out at a POS.
Thanks for brining in the lowest form of gameplay to an otherwise enjoyable fight.
So having carriers & motherships sitting in safety behind POS-shields with fighters assigned is an enjoyable fight?
So blobbing NPCers and haulers in total safety and ganking them is an enjoyable fight?
You are hopeless.
What are you on about?
Seems to be ISS and co. who are doing the blobbing of NPC'ers and haulers (I'm going by the claims that 80% of IAC are industrialists as said by some LV).
If you check the size of Priory we are not capable of blobbing... Furthermore we don't need a blob to fight, and last but not least blobbing is boring. ____________
The Priory Killboard |
DiuxDium
Casting Shadows
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:13:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Kaylana Syi People keep blaming the current IAC leadership for this. We have only been in office one week and we didn't start this war.
I'm glad you're not in a position of power in my corp. Or that this post is some kind of off-color humour.
|
GO MaZ
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:17:00 -
[279]
By the way connector, you may want to fix your corp / alliance visibility or your posts will be nuked (they should be anyway )
It sounds to me like we killed you. You dont happen to be one of those people who sits in a system, doesnt pay attention to local and gets ganked for being stupid are you?
Lacks eve related content. Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) Lacks pretty pink text. MaZ ([email protected]) |
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:30:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
AAA and IAC?
OMG and I thought FIX and LV in the same gang was a shock.
|
|
Halafian
The Graduates
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:32:00 -
[281]
Edited by: Halafian on 21/12/2006 22:38:31
Originally by: Silvestri I look forward to future MC contracts as well...no matter who you are contracted against....IAC will back up your opposition...I hope future employers think of that when hiring you...no matter who they want dead we'll be there too. drunkan swarms ftw...
It's funny. I was in E-Uni when MC was contracted against the Big Blue. I had just started playing, and really had no idea what was going on. My first pvp experience was the first big fight at BWF gate camp when MC arrived. I had a vague notion that I was supposed to tackle someone, but no idea really what that meant. Still I rolled into the MC fleet and targeted someone. Then I lagged out, and came back in a pod. The MC killboard still shows that, as well as a few more frigates and pods (and a noobie ship in Josameto! tsk tsk) in subsequent "engagements" (ie, them killing us -- though we did have one or two pretty successful fights, with Silentbrick leading).
Anyway, boy was I mad at MC. I thought TBB was very great, and while flawed, it *was* great. Eve University is completely awesome. I felt that mercs should bear more responsibility for their contracts or at least suffer consequences for attacking people like that. In short, I felt a lot like Silvestri. (Though, I might point out, with a lot more cause -- TBB didn't invade any neighbors.)
That all goes away eventually. TBB made some mistakes. MC had a job. Now I'm grouped with MC, listening in on TS and having fun. I generally hate pvp, but it's definitely an education watching these guys work. I'm back on the MC killboard, but in a better way. They're very impressive. Same with the FIX and LV people -- all extremely competent people.
Anyway, this anti-MC sentiment is silly and will wear off soon enough. You're about to lose something important to you and you're ****ed, but hopefully IAC will come out of this a better, more responsible alliance.
Just my 0.02 isk -- I'm a complete nobody here.
|
Crucifier
The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:33:00 -
[282]
Originally by: James Lyrus
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
AAA and IAC?
OMG and I thought FIX and LV in the same gang was a shock.
You know what they say, AAA owns. ------ Your signature is too large. Please see the Forum Rules for the limits - Serathu ([email protected])
|
GO MaZ
The Priory Shroud Of Darkness
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:33:00 -
[283]
Edited by: GO MaZ on 21/12/2006 22:44:22 Edited by: GO MaZ on 21/12/2006 22:43:05
Originally by: James Lyrus
Originally by: Evil Thug Stfu already. We are now in jby6 and we are waiting for you. Bring it on
AAA and IAC?
OMG and I thought FIX and LV in the same gang was a shock.
It's not _that_ unprecedented, they did afterall get temp-blue status so that IAC could help -A- trying to pop FIX's outpost egg... as for whether they were in the same gang this time, I have no idea
Originally by: Halafian
Apparently some people in IAC really did think they could beat ISS knowing MC would likely join, and completely disrespected MC. Some IAC leaders really thought MC left last time because they couldn't handle IAC or something, instead of for the reasons they actually gave. *Those* are the people you should be angry at. Their poor judgment let your alliance down.
Some people like a challenge. "And if they lay us down to rest, tell our moms we done our best." and all that stuff.
IAC definitely had a chance against ISS / MC, if you take into account SOD the numbers were relatively even, still in favour of ISS / MC capitals wise no doubt, but a much better chance than with the blobbage that ocurred with the bandwagoneers. Maybe it was a mistake on the part of IAC not expecting alliances such as LV to step in, or maybe they just wanted to set a ******* fire going and watch what happens, even if losing their own stations is the result.
As for blame... I wouldn't blame anyone in IAC tbh. Hindsight is a wonderful thing; it's not like the decision to attack ISS was something simply thought up by the leadership. You stand behind your leaders, in times of good or bad, even if decisions they make drop you in the ****. If you dont, then you have to ask yourself whether the alliance is better off without you
Lacks eve related content. Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) Lacks pretty pink text. MaZ ([email protected]) |
Arian Snow
Minmatar The Nest Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:48:00 -
[284]
Just because we like to hug and have hearts embroidered on our shirts doesn't mean we are carebears! Its christmas...
I have still to hear someone in the IAC sing 'the Roof is on Fire'. I believe our current leadership is very capable. Its getting a bit annoying that people who is not IAC presume to know what we are about and what our intentions are. Its tiresome to hear that single sentence from a midcrisis convo repeated over and over again. While I realise its all part of the progapanda machine thats set in motion, there must be other things which weigh into the decision to mess up F4 well and good (iskies)! Something our current leadership has done... something relevant!
So ISS set the propaganda machine still until it gets some new oil, please its killing my virtual eardrums. I dont remember I dont recall I dont have memory of anything at all! |
Clipparius
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 22:59:00 -
[285]
While it might be annoying to hear that snippet repeated endlessly, it does set the tone.
If IAC had said there was no chance of POS shooting, then the response wouldn't have been like it is.
You threaten our stations, then expect a response like this. It's not hard.
|
Halafian
The Graduates
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 23:13:00 -
[286]
It wasn't a single snippet. There were multiple conversations with multiple leaders, and the same message was delivered every single time. The Tyrrax-Count thing is particularly striking and therefore useful to quote, especially given the Count's words and subsequent events, but it's certainly not the only snippet.
|
Algey
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 23:13:00 -
[287]
Originally by: Arian Snow Just because we like to hug and have hearts embroidered on our shirts doesn't mean we are carebears! Its christmas...
I have still to hear someone in the IAC sing 'the Roof is on Fire'. I believe our current leadership is very capable. Its getting a bit annoying that people who is not IAC presume to know what we are about and what our intentions are. Its tiresome to hear that single sentence from a midcrisis convo repeated over and over again. While I realise its all part of the progapanda machine thats set in motion, there must be other things which weigh into the decision to mess up F4 well and good (iskies)! Something our current leadership has done... something relevant!
So ISS set the propaganda machine still until it gets some new oil, please its killing my virtual eardrums.
If you read the forus you will see frequent references that you may attack our stations if you wish, and not a single post from your leadership saying that you definately will not.
|
Arian Snow
Minmatar The Nest Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.12.21 23:52:00 -
[288]
Edited by: Arian Snow on 21/12/2006 23:53:53 The way the ISS play the game of thrones is impressive I agree to that. The snippet in the convo is the only substancial argument you have brought fourth so far, its nolonger relevant as you dont defend anymore thats long over roles have changed. ISS have one goal now and thats expansion! So come out of the closet I will respect you for it! I dont remember I dont recall I dont have memory of anything at all! |
Xander Magnus
Caldari Wolf Enterprises
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 00:13:00 -
[289]
Originally by: Arian Snow Edited by: Arian Snow on 21/12/2006 23:53:53 The way the ISS play the game of thrones is impressive I agree to that. The snippet in the convo is the only substancial argument you have brought fourth so far, its nolonger relevant as you dont defend anymore thats long over roles have changed. ISS have one goal now and thats expansion! So come out of the closet I will respect you for it!
Didn't you read all the quotes I so painfully had to look up for you guys on the forums? And that snippet happens to be from a VERY important political convo between two politicians from both corps. It's like saying: 'the only substancial argument you have is the president of country A says country B can be afraid of being nuked.'.
A well, it is the only straw you have left now that you are loosing your stations, trying to paint ISS black. What else are they supposed to do? Give you your stations back? Sure... And don't forget ISS isn't the only one attacking you.
|
DubanFP
Caldari Four Rings Myriad Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 00:31:00 -
[290]
Edited by: DubanFP on 22/12/2006 00:31:51 Just have to ask, why do you guys keep arguing with IAC? Wouldn't banging your head against the wall be more productive? __________________________ Why babelfish is bad mmm k "which the night do not expect that it calls the primary education before becoming deformed inside" |
|
xh'duality
Caldari Caldari Luftwaffe Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 00:39:00 -
[291]
Edited by: xh''duality on 22/12/2006 00:40:10 I have been reading all this bull for the past wile now. ISS still isent able to show hard prove about that we where a treat to the outpost. Yea some chat log's about maybe. Maybe you you stop being a noob and start thinking smart. Word's are no action. And there where absulutly no action's planed or taken to show hostility toward's ISS pos's or station's. ISS simply see's a opertunete to take a nother free station since LV lost one and need a new one. Trying to blame it then on IAC with just chat log's is kinda sad. Guess that's the only way ISS realy think's they can make it. Well msg to ISS you think your gonna win this WAR YOure wrong. You might win this battle but youre never gonna win this WAR. MC and LV are not always gonna be there to stop us of killing You and uou know that. Start thinking about your future or ull be losing alot very soon once MC is gone. And if you think taking our station's will make us fall apart well think Twice. So far only none combate pilot's left IAC wich dosent change the Fact We are still here and we will have our fun with you for the rest of our EVE courrier.
PS.: Sory about me bad english Id rather would have typed in in german.
--------------------------------------------------- It take's 10 finger's for to smacktalk and ONLY ONE TO WIN [The all mighty "I WIN BOTTON"] |
Xander Magnus
Caldari Wolf Enterprises
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 00:41:00 -
[292]
Originally by: DubanFP Edited by: DubanFP on 22/12/2006 00:31:51 Just have to ask, why do you guys keep arguing with IAC? Wouldn't banging your head against the wall be more productive?
You're absolutely right. Let me just state that I really hope you guys can find a peaceful resolution after all, even though the chances of that are getting worse by the day. Good luck to both alliances and try to keep it nice and mature, there's already enough smack on the forums.
|
Lilan Kahn
Amarr ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 00:42:00 -
[293]
Originally by: xh'duality Edited by: xh''duality on 22/12/2006 00:40:10 I have been reading all this bull for the past wile now. ISS still isent able to show hard prove about that we where a treat to the outpost. Yea some chat log's about maybe. Maybe you you stop being a noob and start thinking smart. Word's are no action. And there where absulutly no action's planed or taken to show hostility toward's ISS pos's or station's. ISS simply see's a opertunete to take a nother free station since LV lost one and need a new one. Trying to blame it then on IAC with just chat log's is kinda sad. Guess that's the only way ISS realy think's they can make it. Well msg to ISS you think your gonna win this WAR YOure wrong. You might win this battle but youre never gonna win this WAR. MC and LV are not always gonna be there to stop us of killing You and uou know that. Start thinking about your future or ull be losing alot very soon once MC is gone. And if you think taking our station's will make us fall apart well think Twice. So far only none combate pilot's left IAC wich dosent change the Fact We are still here and we will have our fun with you for the rest of our EVE courrier.
PS.: Sory about me bad english Id rather would have typed in in german.
Yap yap
Originally by: Eris Discordia
We break after X amount of threads, then we go wild and then we get our medication.
http://www.sloganizer.net/en/style7,Smashing.png Signature dimensions exceeds max 400x120 dimensions allowed. Mail us if you have any questions -Eldo |
Nyphur
Pillowsoft Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 01:46:00 -
[294]
Quick question to IAC: If your old leadership started a war that your new leadership doesn't condone (and which is costing you your outposts), why are your old leaders still in your alliance? Why have they not been removed for causing these problems? Does your new leadership support the decisions made by your old leadership, which at this point are universally considered very bad choices?
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
n sx
The Tidemark Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 01:54:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Nyphur Quick question to IAC: If your old leadership started a war that your new leadership doesn't condone (and which is costing you your outposts), why are your old leaders still in your alliance? Why have they not been removed for causing these problems? Does your new leadership support the decisions made by your old leadership, which at this point are universally considered very bad choices?
Ill answer this one.
At the time IAC leadership agreed, that based on intel and the fact ISS' leadership refused to work with IAC nor address us respectfully that ISS should be shot at.
The minority in the the alliance that wasn't sure at the time, are now.
When you get it through your thick skulls, that losing outposts isn't going to break IAC you might decide to stop wasting ammo. You're essentially motivating an enemy, and proving to the rest of EVE what we've always known.
Good times ahead.
|
Great Infiltrator
Amarr The Bothan Network
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 02:01:00 -
[296]
Edited by: Great Infiltrator on 22/12/2006 02:01:57
Originally by: n sx
Originally by: Nyphur Quick question to IAC: If your old leadership started a war that your new leadership doesn't condone (and which is costing you your outposts), why are your old leaders still in your alliance? Why have they not been removed for causing these problems? Does your new leadership support the decisions made by your old leadership, which at this point are universally considered very bad choices?
Ill answer this one.
At the time IAC leadership agreed, that based on intel and the fact ISS' leadership refused to work with IAC nor address us respectfully that ISS should be shot at.
The minority in the the alliance that wasn't sure at the time, are now.
When you get it through your thick skulls, that losing outposts isn't going to break IAC you might decide to stop wasting ammo. You're essentially motivating an enemy, and proving to the rest of EVE what we've always known.
Good times ahead.
Then wtf do you want them to do? Give you their stations? You fool, IAC are the ones who wanted to expand. I also doubt the coalition will just give up after they take your stations. They will most likely defend iss when needed.
|
lazyb22
M. Corp Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 02:03:00 -
[297]
Edited by: lazyb22 on 22/12/2006 02:03:31
Originally by: xh'duality Edited by: xh''duality on 22/12/2006 00:40:10 Maybe you you stop being a noob and start thinking smart. Word's are no action. ISS simply see's a opertunete to take a nother free station since LV lost one and need a new one. Trying to blame it then on IAC with just chat log's is kinda sad.
I fail to see where LV has lost any stations owned by us. Yes some allies have lost stations but I have not heard about any of LV owned stations falling?? Can someone help me here and maybe refresh my memory??
Lazyb22
|
Crucifier
The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 02:04:00 -
[298]
Edited by: Crucifier on 22/12/2006 02:04:16
Originally by: lazyb22 Edited by: lazyb22 on 22/12/2006 02:03:31
Originally by: xh'duality Edited by: xh''duality on 22/12/2006 00:40:10 Maybe you you stop being a noob and start thinking smart. Word's are no action. ISS simply see's a opertunete to take a nother free station since LV lost one and need a new one. Trying to blame it then on IAC with just chat log's is kinda sad.
I fail to see where LV has lost any stations owned by us. Yes some allies have lost stations but I have not heard about any of LV owned stations falling?? Can someone help me here and maybe refresh my memory??
Lazyb22
Soon the only stations you will live in are the ones in empire. ------ Your signature is too large. Please see the Forum Rules for the limits - Serathu ([email protected])
|
IntegralHellsing
Gallente The Raven Warriors
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 02:08:00 -
[299]
so... ISS + MC + FIX + LV + Veto. + @ vs IAC + SOD + AAA + @?
w00t, alliance politics drive me into insanity!
ps. good luck to both parties. oh... and have fun hunting! ------------------------------
|
Elmar Solderi
Gallente N4S
|
Posted - 2006.12.22 02:10:00 -
[300]
Originally by: IntegralHellsing so... ISS + MC + FIX + LV + Veto. + @ vs IAC + SOD + AAA + @?
w00t, alliance politics drive me into insanity!
ps. good luck to both parties. oh... and have fun hunting!
You forgot goon TCF and imp.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |