Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14565
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 19:45:24 -
[61] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote: Quit the rhetoric. I don't want it nerfed.
Quit the lies. Yes, you do.
Your entire post history is full of begging for nerfs. You've been on your knees for CCP to nerf PvP so many times you're on your third set of patches for your jeans.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
3295
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 19:50:12 -
[62] - Quote
No amount of restrictions, limitations and barriers to entry will make something meaningful. All that will ever do is marginalize the mechanic and push it out of the hands of the general populace and into the hands of specialized groups.
That is exactly what happened in Inferno and is what lead to the situation with large mercenary groups with hundreds of wars.
You can't hit something with a hammer until its broken and then expect to fit it by hitting it even more. |
Mag's
the united
20342
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:07:16 -
[63] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Mag's wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I'd just like to see it balanced. Ahh, so: "Just one more nerf and it will be balanced."? Quit the rhetoric. I don't want it nerfed. I want it meaningful. HS pvp can be a lot of fun. The biggest plus to HS pvp is no hot drops. That's a huge incentive for folks to use game mechanics to fight each other in HS. Being able to make some explosions knowing 100% that a super and a ton of support isn't going to land on your head and end you is pretty darn special. You can still get blobbed, sure, but with reasonable intel you can get around it. I'm not trying to nerf, I'm trying to balance. 100+ open deck turkey shoots aren't balanced. 100+ pilot alliances having 10,000 RANDOM war targets in HS isn't balanced. I just want it to be fun and meaingful again. Right now it isn't. I'm not the coroner trying to nail a coffin shut, I'm the EMT in the back of the ambulance charging up those paddle thingers trying to jolt some life back into a once great area of game play. There hasn't been an epic, notable, noteworthy anything out of empire pvp in a long time. Currently empire mercs are doing nothing of interest. The don't make the news (other than the occaisional high five over an officer fit mission boat). Things I like - space ship explosions Things I don't like - boring predictable meaningless pvp, sentries on ishtars, sentries on carriers, space magic that protects sov null assets from being taken by force No rhetoric, I'm merely trying to get past the normal BS. Posts like yours are full of rhetoric and they will most always contain something along the lines of "I like ganking, but." or "I like ships being violenced, but"
But it always boils down the same thing.
"Just one more nerf and it will be balanced."
Transparent, doesn't quite cover it.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:09:25 -
[64] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:No amount of restrictions, limitations and barriers to entry will make something meaningful. All that will ever do is marginalize the mechanic and push it out of the hands of the general populace and into the hands of specialized groups.
That is exactly what happened in Inferno and is what lead to the situation with large mercenary groups with hundreds of wars.
You can't hit something with a hammer until its broken and then expect to fit it by hitting it even more.
General populace - right... There is a handful of alliances dedicated to wardeccing every possible corp/alliance in hi-sec. This is already catered into their hands. The general populace with one-time wardecs is irrelevant here. It's the killboard addicts trying to maximize the number of frigs/industrials killed by rendering the hi-sec security restrictions useless that are the problem. |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14567
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:11:07 -
[65] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:It's the killboard addicts trying to maximize the number of frigs/industrials killed by rendering the hi-sec security restrictions useless that are the problem.
That's not a problem. In fact it's an intended use of the mechanic.
Wars are intended to be used for any reason, or none at all. That's what player freedom is, that's what makes it a sandbox. All you're doing is demonstrating that you are playing the wrong game.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Mag's
the united
20342
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:14:09 -
[66] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:Mag's wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I'd just like to see it balanced. Ahh, so: "Just one more nerf and it will be balanced."? It's not a nerf. It's a correction of a previously introduced behavior that is abused. While ever you try and accuse players of abuse and suggest they should join FW in low sec, you will not be taken seriously.
Stop the emotional crap and you may get somewhere. You won't of course, because you have already shown a failure to be objective.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:18:05 -
[67] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:David Asanari wrote:It's the killboard addicts trying to maximize the number of frigs/industrials killed by rendering the hi-sec security restrictions useless that are the problem. That's not a problem. In fact it's an intended use of the mechanic. Wars are intended to be used for any reason, or none at all. That's what player freedom is, that's what makes it a sandbox. All you're doing is demonstrating that you are playing the wrong game.
I'm playing the game I choose to play and it's not your business how I choose to play it. I never asked for your advice. This is a public place for discussing suggestions. You are not suggesting anything besides "let's leave as it is". Your are used to the comforts of the current mechanic and that's your problem. The game evolves by changing. Changes can be new content/behavior or a change/removal of existing ones.
Deal with it or choose a different game to play. |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1416
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:21:02 -
[68] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:But what you're proposing isn't a correction. It's an additional limitation where none previously existed.
Prior to inferno alliances had no limitation on he number of wars they could declare, after inferno they still have no limitation, but for some reason now they declare a lot more wars.
You should try and identify the reason why that has happened and seek to address the actual cause, rather than crying for another nerf because the last set of nerfs didn't work.
A lot of things have changed since inferno. Before that the number of decs were limited by the rapid ramping up of additional war decs. In isk terms of that day the ramp was pretty severe. Folks didn't have billions or trillions in their wallets back them.
Privateers got to the point where they were decing most of HS. Their actions caused CCP to install a rather harsh ramp up for concurrent war decs. I clearly remember the last 2 weeks of the Privateer stuff. Back then the mym had a BS tank, drones and autocannons. There were 2 of them on almost every gate in HS. Null folks dropped what they were doing and swelled the ranks of Pivateers for those 2 weeks and it was glorious empire carnage. The end of an age and a brilliant glorious end at that.
The short age of the ramp followed. After the 5th active dec, few corps had the isk to cover the dec fee for mercs, so it was normal for there to be a line 2 or 3 weeks out of clients waiting for the fees to drop. Clients were in a que so to speak. A lot of merc corps sprung up overnight to cash in on the isk. A lot of them were crap corps that did crap work, but there was plenty of work so it persisted.
Then inferno changed it to what it is today. Not at first. But over time it became obvious that the way to succeed as a merc corp was to grow big and fat and offer assistance on every dec that is made. It's rediculous.
I had an alt in a POCO bashing corp for a while. Was a decent way to generate some limited HS pvp. Here's the thing that got me understanding just how broken the current merc meta is. We'd occaisionally get decced for waht we wer doing and within the hour of getting the dec the mails would start rolling in. Offers to assist that ranged anywhere from free to 10 mil isk. It was then that I understood - it wasn't about anything but maximizing target count. 'merc' outfits no longer needed to maintain a good reputation and compete for their empire pvp - they just needed some ninny to scan the decs and spam the involved parties as war decs were created.
I would just like to have the mechanics changed to where merc groups were again in competition and where reputation and ability drive the contract price. This current meta of large target counts and low to zero value in a war dec is crazy.
Summary: There was an isk ramp limit on the number of decs you could have. There was not an assist option in the game. Assist was added and the ramp was removed and now we have a crap meta. I don't see value in removing the assist feature - it's good stuff. I don't see value in returning to the isk ramp (pay to win and too much isk presently in the game). I do see value in a limit in the number of acts of agression (decs + assists) - my opinion is that this will put meaning back into both war decs in general and the 'merc market' in specific. I picked 10 as a starting limit - I based that on we used to cary 5 -7 contracts and that was plenty of action for a healthy merc corp of the time so I sort of doubled it for a starting point) I would prefer to 100 ten man merc outfits competing than to see 10 hundred man merc outfits shooting fish in a barrel.
Don't nerf empire pvp - make it fun again. |
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1715
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:21:51 -
[69] - Quote
David Asanari wrote: I'm playing the game I choose to play and it's not your business how I choose to play it. I never asked for your advice. This is a public place for discussing suggestions. You are not suggesting anything besides "let's leave as it is". Your are used to the comforts of the current mechanic and that's your problem. The game evolves by changing. Changes can be new content/behavior or a change/removal of existing ones..
You are not suggesting anything but "remove the mercenary playstyle because I don't like it".
Again, how would this make this make the game better? What problem are you trying to solve? |
David Asanari
WH of rage
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:23:11 -
[70] - Quote
Mag's wrote:David Asanari wrote:Mag's wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:I'd just like to see it balanced. Ahh, so: "Just one more nerf and it will be balanced."? It's not a nerf. It's a correction of a previously introduced behavior that is abused. While ever you try and accuse players of abuse and suggest they should join FW in low sec, you will not be taken seriously. Stop the emotional crap and you may get somewhere. You won't of course, because you have already shown a failure to be objective.
I don't need to be objective. Different people want different things. I'm the "weak carebear", so I'm asking CCP for a change. The game should make it difficult on you. "tough hi-sec pvp'ers". You are the ones that want "challenge" and "content". Several more people agree the mechanic needs some change. Only the lazy killboard addicts want to leave it unchanged. |
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14569
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:24:27 -
[71] - Quote
David Asanari wrote: I'm playing the game I choose to play and it's not your business how I choose to play it.
Please, justify more.
Right now, you aren't playing the game. You're trying to change the rules to favor yourself.
Quote: I never asked for your advice.
Nor did I give any. If I were, it would be to uninstall EVE Online, and go play something more suited to your temperament, like Farmville, NeoPets, Hello Kitty Online, or something else where no one is ever allowed to lose so they don't feel bad.
Quote: This is a public place for discussing suggestions. You are not suggesting anything besides "let's leave as it is".
No, I'm here discussing your terrible, self serving, awful suggestion.
Quote: Deal with it or choose a different game to play.
This won't change. As you put it, deal with it, or choose a different game to play. You don't belong here anyway, you've made that pretty clear by now.
Also, I find it pretty damning of carebears in general that you people can't even wait a year after the deletion of awoxing to start clamoring for wars and ganking to go away too. You're so transparent in your disgusting goals that it's almost embarrassing.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
0
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:28:14 -
[72] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:David Asanari wrote: I'm playing the game I choose to play and it's not your business how I choose to play it. I never asked for your advice. This is a public place for discussing suggestions. You are not suggesting anything besides "let's leave as it is". Your are used to the comforts of the current mechanic and that's your problem. The game evolves by changing. Changes can be new content/behavior or a change/removal of existing ones..
You are not suggesting anything but "remove the mercenary playstyle because I don't like it". Again, how would this make this make the game better? What problem are you trying to solve?
I'm in a small hi-sec corp with an average online of 4-5 people. We make most ISK from hi-sec PVE and occasional WH runs. Being wardecced for 3 weeks in a row by 3 different alliances makes it impossible to play. Losing a ship higher than a cruiser means losing half the assets for some of us. And no we cannot stand up and fight against T3+command ship+inty gangs simply because we don't have the ships and large enough fleet to do it. |
Christopher Multsanti
Bluestar Airlines
12
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:28:45 -
[73] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:Hi
War declaration is a mechanism allowing for PvP interaction in empire space without facing CONCORD punishment or security status penalties. It allows you to hassle or get even with someone. You can even hire mercenaries to do the dirty job for you and they can use the wardec mechanism. And that's fine, it's part of the game, part of what makes it fun.
War declaration mechanism is abused. For some corps/alliance is it simply a way to circumvent the hi-sec security mechanisms, basically turning it into a big, highly populated null-sec zone.
Here are some real-time examples:
PIRAT alliance - 162 active wars and 53 pending wars Guardians of the Galaxy - 110 active wars Public Enemy - 12 active and 31 pending wars
There are others like Bad Neighbours, Forsaken Asylum, Marmite Collective and such. I'm positive there are more examples of this behavior.
I'm pretty sure that wasn't the original idea behind this feature. I think it's wrong and needs to be dealt with.
My suggestion is to limit the allowed number of CONCURRENT war declarations or active wars for a corp/alliance to a single digit number, like 3 or 5.
Thank you
Wow just no, if they wan't to pay for wars then let them. More targets the better.
Pirating in 2005
ER Advert for the Alliance Tournament in 2006
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14569
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:30:14 -
[74] - Quote
David Asanari wrote: Being wardecced for 3 weeks in a row by 3 different alliances makes it impossible to play.
And of course, we come to the genesis of his self serving nerfs thinly hidden as a "suggestion".
3 weeks, and his little carebear corp hasn't figured out how to watch local yet.
Quote: Losing a ship higher than a cruiser means losing half the assets for some of us. And no we cannot stand up and fight against T3+command ship+inty gangs simply because we don't have the ships and large enough fleet to do it.
I wonder if he's going to figure out that he doesn't belong in a player corp?
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:37:14 -
[75] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Please, justify more.
Right now, you aren't playing the game. You're trying to change the rules to favor yourself.
And you don't want them changed because they favor you.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Nor did I give any. If I were, it would be to uninstall EVE Online, and go play something more suited to your temperament, like Farmville, NeoPets, Hello Kitty Online, or something else where no one is ever allowed to lose so they don't feel bad.
I don't know any of these games. You are the expert on them, as I see.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
No, I'm here discussing your terrible, self serving, awful suggestion.
You're not discussing. You are making assumptions and abusing someone suggesting a change you don't agree with.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
This won't change. As you put it, deal with it, or choose a different game to play. You don't belong here anyway, you've made that pretty clear by now.
Stop telling me what to do and I won't tell you where to go. |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14569
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:45:06 -
[76] - Quote
David Asanari wrote: And you don't want them changed because they favor you.
They don't favor me at all. Wars grant a huge mechanical advantage to the defender, nevermind being basically voluntary.
Quote: I don't know any of these games.
You should get more familiar with Farmville. It's what you carebears want out of EVE, anyway. Push a few button sequences and get virtual carrot, repeat until die of boredom.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14569
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:46:57 -
[77] - Quote
Oh, and I love the part where you claimed that disagreeing with you is "abusing" you. First of all, if you are so emotionally fragile as to actually believe that, then my advice is to quit this game and never look back.
Secondly, if you are so intellectually dishonest as to try and make the claim that disagreement equates to abuse, then you're not only a fool but also a hypocrite, since you're the one disagreeing with how the game is supposed to be played in the first place.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1200
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 20:54:35 -
[78] - Quote
it was better when the limitation was 3 decs, now any new corp just gets insta decced by the main culprits and that new corp ends up being disbanded before it ever got going which in the long term just reduces potential targets that could have fought back and gave you a decent fight.
T3's need to be versatile not have T2 resists, OP dps and tank obsoleting T2 ships entirely.
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name, remove drone assist, nerf sentries, -3 highslots for droneboats
Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
|
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1716
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:01:00 -
[79] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:Black Pedro wrote:David Asanari wrote: I'm playing the game I choose to play and it's not your business how I choose to play it. I never asked for your advice. This is a public place for discussing suggestions. You are not suggesting anything besides "let's leave as it is". Your are used to the comforts of the current mechanic and that's your problem. The game evolves by changing. Changes can be new content/behavior or a change/removal of existing ones..
You are not suggesting anything but "remove the mercenary playstyle because I don't like it". Again, how would this make this make the game better? What problem are you trying to solve? I'm in a small hi-sec corp with an average online of 4-5 people. We make most ISK from hi-sec PVE and occasional WH runs. Being wardecced for 3 weeks in a row by 3 different alliances makes it impossible to play. Losing a ship higher than a cruiser means losing half the assets for some of us. And no we cannot stand up and fight against T3+command ship+inty gangs simply because we don't have the ships and large enough fleet to do it. See, the thing is you are not entitled to make ISK without risk in this game. You are asking for your corp to be made invulnerable to other corps so you can grind resources and affect the shared economy without opposition. The same economy that provides you with ISK for the goods you grind from highsec PvE. That cannot happen. That is just how the game has been designed right down to the core.
If you cannot fight, then you have options. You can join with others, move out of highsec, or join the NPC corporation and organize with your friends in a shared chat channel. Perhaps there should be more social tools for those not wishing to compete, but fundamentally the economy that gives your activities meaning is only possible by the continual conflict in New Eden. No one would want your goods if nothing was ever lost so risk of attack is something you are always going to have to deal with.
CCP is never going to limit wars or make your corp invulnerable to them although for sure wars could be tweaked to be improved. Hopefully they will add a social corporation or something similar to the game for small groups like yours, but wars will always be necessary to remove structures in highsec, and mercenaries are an intended profession in this game. Until then, the best is just to drop to the NPC Corp and use a chat channel to coordinate your activities until if and when you are ready and able to defend your corporation from those of us who are actually competing for dominance in this PvP game. |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14572
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:01:13 -
[80] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:it was better when the limitation was 3 decs, now any new corp just gets insta decced by the main culprits and that new corp ends up being disbanded before it ever got going which in the long term just reduces potential targets that could have fought back and gave you a decent fight.
If that's true, then why do I see all these corps running around highsec with basically no war histories? Hell, I've been sitting in Amarr for hours, scanning people for fun, and so very few deaths.
Sounds like you're just bullshitting to me.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:02:13 -
[81] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Oh, and I love the part where you claimed that disagreeing with you is "abusing" you. First of all, if you are so emotionally fragile as to actually believe that, then my advice is to quit this game and never look back.
Secondly, if you are so intellectually dishonest as to try and make the claim that disagreement equates to abuse, then you're not only a fool but also a hypocrite, since you're the one disagreeing with how the game is supposed to be played in the first place.
You called me names multiple times in this thread and also said things like "You have no right to do anything" and you constantly insist on telling me to leave the game.
If this is your way of having a discussion or disagreeing with someone then you are the one that doesn't belong here on the forums.
I'm not fragile, but that doesn't mean that you're not being abusive. There is a good chance you acted this way against people who were fragile perhaps and that this is your "style" of discussion. I also highly doubt you behave the same IRL hence the need for the online aggression. |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1417
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:05:42 -
[82] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Oh, and I love the part where you claimed that disagreeing with you is "abusing" you. First of all, if you are so emotionally fragile as to actually believe that, then my advice is to quit this game and never look back.
Secondly, if you are so intellectually dishonest as to try and make the claim that disagreement equates to abuse, then you're not only a fool but also a hypocrite, since you're the one disagreeing with how the game is supposed to be played in the first place. You called me names multiple times in this thread and also said things like "You have no right to do anything" and you constantly insist on telling me to leave the game. If this is your way of having a discussion or disagreeing with someone then you are the one that doesn't belong here on the forums. I'm not fragile, but that doesn't mean that you're not being abusive. There is a good chance you acted this way against people who were fragile perhaps and that this is your "style" of discussion. I also highly doubt you behave the same IRL hence the need for the online aggression.
You're a ninny. I mean that in the sincerest possible way.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14572
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:07:20 -
[83] - Quote
David Asanari wrote: You called me names
And you claimed that hundreds of players are abusing game mechanics, something that is factually not happening.
You're sitting here calling people from a dozen or more alliances names, and you get mad when I call you carebear slime? You can dish it out, but you can't take it?
Cry more.
Forgive me if I don't believe you. Especially not since you made this tear filled thread after you got decced for three measly weeks. Some of us have lived under a dec for six months or more, and ran missions the whole time.
Quote: I also highly doubt you behave the same IRL hence the need for the online aggression.
Funny part about that overused trope? It's not really true at all. It's mostly just people like you posturing, trying to make a callout against people whom you have no clue about.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
12196
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:16:09 -
[84] - Quote
I can confirm that karrous is as obnoxious on comms as his posting would imply.
In a charming sort of way.
I have also been told I am in fact considerably drunker on comms than I my posting would imply.
In a hilariously incompetent sort of way.
Also +1 for the use of "ninny" , I haven't heard that said in a long time...spat tea on myself giggling at it.
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
David Asanari
WH of rage
1
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:17:50 -
[85] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And you claimed that hundreds of players are abusing game mechanics, something that is factually not happening.
I am and that's true. You are one of them, hence your tirade in this thread.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Forgive me if I don't believe you. Especially not since you made this tear filled thread after you got decced for three measly weeks. Some of us have lived under a dec for six months or more, and ran missions the whole time.
Of course you did... Did you get a medal for that too? What a load of bollocks.
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote: I also highly doubt you behave the same IRL hence the need for the online aggression.
Funny part about that overused trope? It's not really true at all. It's mostly just people like you posturing, trying to make a callout against people whom you have no clue about. Funny part is you making assumptions about me during the entire thread and lose it the second I say that calling CODE ganking a "PvP activity" is like calling masturbation an "intercourse" or similar.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
14573
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:18:37 -
[86] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:I can confirm that karrous is as obnoxious on comms as his posting would imply.
In a charming sort of way.
I have also been told I am in fact considerably drunker on comms than I my posting would imply.
In a hilariously incompetent sort of way.
Also +1 for the use of "ninny" , I haven't heard that said in a long time...spat tea on myself giggling at it.
I am indeed the life of the party. And you type considerably well for someone whose BAH hasn't been below 0.1 in a couple of months, not that I'm one to judge lately. :P
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Thron Legacy
White Zulu Scorpion Federation
21
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 21:35:46 -
[87] - Quote
what if we tell him that eve is a sandbox MMO ?? |
Mag's
the united
20349
|
Posted - 2015.10.02 22:08:40 -
[88] - Quote
David Asanari wrote:I don't need to be objective. You do when asking for changes to game mechanics, that have balance requirements. If you don't, you will inevitably end up with a ill informed idea, that has no merit. Rather like this.
Destination SkillQueue:-
It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
|
ISD Buldath
ISD STAR
186
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 00:41:55 -
[89] - Quote
Quote: 7. Discussion of real life religion and politics is prohibited.
Discussion of real life religion and politics is strictly prohibited on the EVE Online forums. Discussions of this nature often creates animosity between forum users due to real life political or military conflicts. CCP promotes the growth of a gaming community where equality is at the forefront. Nationalist, religious or political affiliations are not part of EVE Online, and should not be part of discussion on the EVE Online forums.
Offending Posts and those quoting it have been removed.
~ISD Buldath
Interstellar Services Department
Support, Training and Resources Division
Lt. Commander
|
Marech Bhayanaka
Misfits United I N G L O R I O U S
58
|
Posted - 2015.10.03 02:07:36 -
[90] - Quote
>PIRAT alliance - 162 active wars and 53 pending wars > Guardians of the Galaxy - 110 active wars
Now if each of those wardeced corps contributed just one or two PVPers to a fleet, wouldn't that be a fine thing?
BTW, repeatedly calling legal use of a mechanic abuse does not make it so. Dealing with wardecs is meant to be part of highsec life. Best figure out how to do that.
Marech. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |