Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |
Matthias Ancaladron
Hedion University Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 23:20:17 -
[211] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote:Simplest way is to open the Agent Finder app in-game and search for a Sisters of EVE (corporation) agent. You can then see where their stations are.
I know a popular location is Arnon, where the Sisters of EVE Epic Arc starts, they have a station there. Gicodel, also, they have some agents there.
All you need is to find an SoE station, so you can click the LP Store button inside it. They have them in a bunch of places in high-sec, low-sec, and null.
EDIT: Also, the combat suits cannot be sold on the market, but they are available in the Contracts system for about 60 million ISK apiece, not bad. There's just a bug in their name that doesn't let you actually search the contracts interface for them; you have to set your Contract interface to show you Apparel, Outer Apparel, and then scroll down until you see the suits, male or female.
60 million ISK, as of yesterday. LP cost = 75,000 Project Discovery AK points + 37.5 million ISK. If you're starting Project Discovery from level 0, it'll take a while to get the AK points, as they are only rewarded as you level up, and only a few at a time. Yeah i thought they were more than that. Ill just keep it. i was looking around and i thought they were worth alot more. Ill just use the geno suit till i can get one for myself. And maybe a wirepoise facial implant. I think i like thst one the most from the previews ive seen on actual characters and not the silver heads. But i guess i could always trade it for another one if someone wants the one i have and i want a different one.
Ill look that up. I was looking up stations manually online and think the closest one I ound is 10-20 jumps away from where ive been hanging around. Dont remember how far off the top of my head. But im still a good ways off. I only have 15k ak at the momebt, i usually do them while im warping. |
Matthias Khenakhtre
Wrath of Angels Solitaire.
314
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 23:20:17 -
[212] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote:Simplest way is to open the Agent Finder app in-game and search for a Sisters of EVE (corporation) agent. You can then see where their stations are.
I know a popular location is Arnon, where the Sisters of EVE Epic Arc starts, they have a station there. Gicodel, also, they have some agents there.
All you need is to find an SoE station, so you can click the LP Store button inside it. They have them in a bunch of places in high-sec, low-sec, and null.
EDIT: Also, the combat suits cannot be sold on the market, but they are available in the Contracts system for about 60 million ISK apiece, not bad. There's just a bug in their name that doesn't let you actually search the contracts interface for them; you have to set your Contract interface to show you Apparel, Outer Apparel, and then scroll down until you see the suits, male or female.
60 million ISK, as of yesterday. LP cost = 75,000 Project Discovery AK points + 37.5 million ISK. If you're starting Project Discovery from level 0, it'll take a while to get the AK points, as they are only rewarded as you level up, and only a few at a time. Yeah i thought they were more than that. Ill just keep it. i was looking around and i thought they were worth alot more. Ill just use the geno suit till i can get one for myself. And maybe a wirepoise facial implant. I think i like thst one the most from the previews ive seen on actual characters and not the silver heads. But i guess i could always trade it for another one if someone wants the one i have and i want a different one.
Ill look that up. I was looking up stations manually online and think the closest one I ound is 10-20 jumps away from where ive been hanging around. Dont remember how far off the top of my head. But im still a good ways off. I only have 15k ak at the momebt, i usually do them while im warping. |
Memphis Baas
2378
|
Posted - 2016.12.01 14:38:31 -
[213] - Quote
Yeah there were lots of people who were really interested in helping out Project Discovery, much like everyone is into helping out Alphas right now. So they reached level 100+ and the AK rewards ramp up as you get higher level and higher accuracy. I got to about level 80 and that was 280,000 AK, almost 4 suits. So there's plenty of suits available, and anyone interested in the project can get the AK for more.
They also have that red-black "lab coat" outer, but like all outers of the same shape, it SUCKS because the character customization interface doesn't treat mini-dress + nylons/hosiery combinations as a sufficient replacement for pants. The lab coat is long enough for modesty, but the interface doesn't allow it.
I think that the white and red highlights on the SoE armor look better than the black tones of the Genolution suit, for women, especially given my (and the bleached white/blonde) hair colors that are accentuated by women's longer hair options. |
Rekalia
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.12.12 00:41:39 -
[214] - Quote
http://imgur.com/a/HP6dd
This one was pretty hard.
The one that is telling me is correct states about how it is at the edge of the blue areas.
However, these were in the center connected by a lot of red stringy bits. Was a little disappointed. But I'll keep it in mind if I come across it again. |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2998
|
Posted - 2016.12.26 07:41:57 -
[215] - Quote
I see a whole lot of samples with both cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, so it looks almost like there's a really even cytoplasm extending through the whole cell, even in the blue area.
I also was noticing the actual golgi apparatuses look nothing like the example, that's when I finally realized you can mouse over the example to see three alternative examples.
FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."
Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
|
Zack Zamricon
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.01.12 17:05:33 -
[216] - Quote
Pretty much all the samples are extremely difficult, mostly due to poor labeling of a lot of small buttons with inadequate examples to distinguish one from the other.
A redesign of the interface is reccomended. |
Mariones Moliko
DRUCKWELLE Evolution
1
|
Posted - 2017.01.13 18:58:29 -
[217] - Quote
When we get an Update for PD? |
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
24829
|
Posted - 2017.01.28 16:14:04 -
[218] - Quote
Its a very good atlas of a cell, where you can see different parts of it if you point them with mouse. I hope it will help some people understand what is in the project discovery images.
Every part of a game helps to tell a story =ƒôò
Where is Angry CONCORD guy when you need him
Osprey =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|
Raz Ohr
Beyond SpaceTime
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.27 17:05:11 -
[219] - Quote
Hi, it's not the first time but today I found what I think is an uncorrect classification and I want to post it to have feedbacks.
image
As highlighted there is also a cytokinetic bridge... I think this one need to be fixed
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
3031
|
Posted - 2017.02.28 08:05:41 -
[220] - Quote
Raz Ohr wrote:Hi, it's not the first time but today I found what I think is an uncorrect classification and I want to post it to have feedbacks. imageAs highlighted there is also a cytokinetic bridge... I think this one need to be fixed It's not definitely a cytokinetic bridge. It could just be a conglomeration of cytoplasm stains right in that spot. Note that it doesn't fan out at its ends.
I think it is a bridge, but it's an odd one alright.
FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."
Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
|
|
Lukka
15
|
Posted - 2017.03.01 21:19:26 -
[221] - Quote
Raz Ohr wrote:Hi, it's not the first time but today I found what I think is an uncorrect classification and I want to post it to have feedbacks. imageAs highlighted there is also a cytokinetic bridge... I think this one need to be fixed
There are a few for which classifications are incorrect. That is almost certainly marking a cytokinetic bridge, particularly as the tethered cytoplasm can be seen to be linking the cells at this spot.
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
3036
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 02:38:22 -
[222] - Quote
Here's a weird one for you guys: http://imgur.com/gallery/MBQsz
It looks like some of the cells were dissolving when the image was taken. Three of them show very little cytoplasm red staining outside their nucleus, however their nucleus is in several small pieces in a clump, with heavy green staining throughout the fragments. The rest of the cells are largely unstained with green; however one of them has a very strong vesicle stain which makes it stand out from other cells, despite its blue+red stains making it appear to match the other cells.
Scatch Domination wrote:So bridges can only happen in the red channel, "never ever" in the green?
Edit: I was also afraid of hitting "Abnormal Sample" for a sample that had scanlines in the red channel (it wasn't too impacting so i decided to not report it). Generally everything you're looking for is in the green channel. The red and blue are there to help you see where the green specks are located within the cell. If the red or blue channel show something highly abnormal, you should mark abnormal sample. That's what I did with the above sample.
FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."
Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
|
Yoshi Himomura
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.26 22:43:13 -
[223] - Quote
Just found this thread, and figured I should repost from https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6953050#post6953050
Essentially, I'm pretty sure that something is off on either how these are matched/graded, or how I'm understanding the exercise (despite being a generally sharp individual that has stained cells IRL before)
Images and greater explanation is in the original post. What does everyone think / what should I do? Am I just not understanding at all? |
Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
326
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 05:34:43 -
[224] - Quote
How can this fail ? Image: http://www.netsky.org/eve/AFailedPD13072017a1.png
it should be 100% correct.
|
S1dy
Aurora Tactical Solutions Synergy of Steel
45
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 11:18:01 -
[225] - Quote
That's a Pulsar. The troughs are the regular diminishing of the pulsing star, not by a transit. A transit would cause a more rapid decrease. |
Bones Prefect
Wormholers in Highsec Wormholes United
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 13:02:28 -
[226] - Quote
https://imgur.com/a/njahu
Maybe take another look at this one? Im okay with missing the yellow one, but dayum if thats not a transit.... |
Bones Prefect
Wormholers in Highsec Wormholes United
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 13:23:57 -
[227] - Quote
Oh.. come on!
https://imgur.com/a/CVTi6 |
Vanessa Celtis
Vanessa Atalanta
27
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 19:56:39 -
[228] - Quote
Yea, I got those too, probably exactly the same ones and also failed. The first one is hilarious ! |
Jon Greyburst
Grass Fed Cannibals The Bastion
4
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 19:59:21 -
[229] - Quote
For them to be making these sort of screw ups these had to be assigned by computer rather than hand, which means that they found the dips through actual analysis and calculation. You can look at some of these and tell a human being didn't do them, they are far too obviously screwed up. If this is the case then there is no reason we should be expected to be able to eyeball their harder graphs and see them. |
Vanessa Celtis
Vanessa Atalanta
27
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 20:01:28 -
[230] - Quote
Here is another good one !
http://imgur.com/a/1mYcv |
|
Raven Dallacort
Horde Vanguard. Pandemic Horde
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 06:37:18 -
[231] - Quote
Not sure how I failed this one. If I get the 1st, 3rd and 5th correct, how is it possible to get the 2nd and 4th wrong?
http://imgur.com/a/7tiZ8
ID: 200109146 |
Moros Chaput
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 18:14:33 -
[232] - Quote
Raven Dallacort wrote:Not sure how I failed this one. If I get the 1st, 3rd and 5th correct, how is it possible to get the 2nd and 4th wrong? http://imgur.com/a/7tiZ8 ID: 200109146 Might be because the star is orbited by two planets and not one, although how we're supposed to tell the two apart is beyond me. Here's a similar one I encountered.
Here are some other peculiar ones I got:
Actually got one right! This one was slightly more obvious. Close miss. It's so hard to match up the transits in noisy data. Folding isn't very useful here either. Looks as though there would be another planet with a wider orbit, but I guess not.
Here's one I thought was just plain odd. Look at the width of the band: the brightness fluctuates considerably, but at the same time there are no discernible dips and the graph is relatively smooth.
I have plenty more, but I think the pattern is pretty obvious here. I'm willing to wager the dev(s) accidentally implemented some tests that just can't be solved. I doubt the scientists who actually look at this data eyeball everything and the noisy data we see here probably isn't meant to be solved through simple observation.
Although the majority of the data reveals no transits (excluding the proficiency tests), I've come across ~3 tests that have had 90%+ detection rates by the players and where the transits were very noticeable, so that's neat. It can get pretty tedious spamming the "no transit" button over and over again. |
Vanessa Celtis
Vanessa Atalanta
27
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 18:46:30 -
[233] - Quote
My stats:
- Reached level 50 and it becomes almost as AFK and repetitive.
- Accuracy Rating: 62 - 72 %, it oscillates in between those two values. As soon as I reach 73%, crap samples come in and it brings me down to 62%, then back up to 72... round and round.
- At this % level, I spam the "No Transit" button 9 times out of 10. Each 10 samples a good one come in and I can accurately analyse it.
- 1/5 a good obvious sample is thrown at me by the algorithm as poorly analysed where in fact the algorithm is junk.
So basically that's it !... Exoplanet Discovery discovered. Good luck to everybody.
I am going back top Null ratting, its more interesting and more profitable. |
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement Limited Expectations
277
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 23:52:21 -
[234] - Quote
Vanessa Celtis wrote:As soon as I reach 73%, crap samples come in You mean crap evaluation samples? I got a slight suspicion some of them are thrown in for s..its and giggles, to see if lab rats can pick up on something in a 25-day sample it would normally take 2 years worth of data to find.
Vanessa Celtis wrote:Null ratting, its more interesting ee... nope.
Vanessa Celtis wrote:more profitable. Probably. Making 100k after looking at "wtf is that" for 20 minutes is not exactly good income.
Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
|
Raven Dallacort
Horde Vanguard. Pandemic Horde
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 05:04:15 -
[235] - Quote
Heres another interesting fail. I don't think it's technically possible to achieve over 90% accuracy in this program, unlike the previous cell staining one.
http://imgur.com/a/2kara
ID: 200077052 |
Raven Dallacort
Horde Vanguard. Pandemic Horde
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 05:20:39 -
[236] - Quote
Vanessa Celtis wrote: - Accuracy Rating: 62 - 72 %, it oscillates in between those two values. As soon as I reach 73%, crap samples come in and it brings me down to 62%, then back up to 72... round and round. Sometimes its good to let it drop on purpose so that you get interesting samples. The higher the percentage accuracy the more crap samples you get (those crap samples are either noise or non-identifiable with a human eye).
I've noticed the exact same thing. I get close to 70% and then I get tossed samples that I have no clue where the transit is, so i'm continually wrong until I get closer to 60% and then it gives me samples I can "accurately" mark. Definitely something very wrong with the algorithm - it shouldn't be punishing you for being more accurate, but that's what it seems to feel like.
|
Yueh Ferrda
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 06:27:23 -
[237] - Quote
It just a big SH**. They admit it during the live but do nothing for it. |
Kevin Forrest
Yumping Amok Dot Dot Dot
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 08:07:46 -
[238] - Quote
I think this thing needs another wipe, but at the same time they should place a system in where you only get certain samples during every 5/10 levels, im level 63 on this atm and id love to get samples which havent been touched by a level 2 player who has no clue on what he's looking for and somehow inputs a pattern on a straight line |
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement Limited Expectations
282
|
Posted - 2017.07.16 01:07:03 -
[239] - Quote
Yueh Ferrda wrote:It just a big SH**. They admit it during the live but do nothing for it. I've decided to falsify all data and go to 0.0% as CCP want. geez.... someone ran out of Caldari Navy Fluoxetine?
Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
|
Annika Inari
Unicorn Rampage
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.16 06:53:19 -
[240] - Quote
The most "interesting" thing about this project is the ridiculous level of incompetence of the people making the evaluation samples. Half of them are flat-out wrong. I'm tired of being penalized because of their carelessness. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |