|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Official Winners Of Takeshi's Castle
228
|
Posted - 2016.03.13 09:09:06 -
[1] - Quote
I think the 3 cap max is a good limit. But i think you guys are forgetting the changes in the capitals mods. The capital plates will have some weight as the subcap version does. So if i read between the lines correctly it is more of a problem of added mass to some capitals. Imagine if you can only fit 2 armor caps through a hole wich would otherwise fit 3 shield capitals. Or because of the changes to carrier/fax/dread the number would change with each type. The problem is we don't know what the added mass will be and what mass difference there will be between fax , carrier and dread.
Lets say the mass allows 3 armor fitted caps, but allows 4 shield fitted caps what will be the consequences? Lets say FAX-mass is between carrier mass and dread mass, what is the effect then? Is there a possibility to just count the number of caps before a hole dies and not the mass?
THese things can change the meta of wh-capital battles quite a lot. We do not have engough data, probably CCP is also not sure about where to land all this.
Is there a possibility to just count the number of caps before a hole dies and not the mass?
No local in null sec would fix everything!
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Official Winners Of Takeshi's Castle
234
|
Posted - 2016.04.09 16:40:50 -
[2] - Quote
Well i did some math with todays weight numbers on sisi. Bringing 3 armor caps won't be possible if you have an new hole that is of the minimum variance. That is if you keep the current wh size of 3 bil.
No local in null sec would fix everything!
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Official Winners Of Takeshi's Castle
234
|
Posted - 2016.04.26 10:59:35 -
[3] - Quote
Any news on what CCP is going to do? Are they changing wh mass and or capital mass?
No local in null sec would fix everything!
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Official Winners Of Takeshi's Castle
234
|
Posted - 2016.04.26 11:54:47 -
[4] - Quote
2 amarr faux with each one t2 plate on it have a mass of 2.796 , a minimum variance hole is 3 bil-10% 2.7 bil . So if they do not change the mass of wormhole's ,then tommorow less caps fit trough a wh.
No local in null sec would fix everything!
|
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Official Winners Of Takeshi's Castle
234
|
Posted - 2016.04.26 17:35:20 -
[5] - Quote
Well good to know that no one cares that we got nerfed one capital through each wh .... . Use of battleships will go down even more yaay... . Worse case the difference is only 450 mil mass we can get less through the wormholes thanks to this.
Quote:Send 1 fax in first, send subcap fleet in 2nd, send 2nd fax in to close the hole. Send dread, subcaps, fax 2 then 3. Hell offline the plate and online it on the otherside...
Well instead of first carrier, subcap fleet, 2 capital, and 3rd capital we only get to send in your fleet you mentioned. One capital less will not make any difference will it? And sure offline plates when there is a hostile fleet on the other sides wich likely have a few neuts ships.... .
That is if the current mass figures on wh's don't change.
No local in null sec would fix everything!
|
|
|
|