EVE Search - BoB's response to allegations of misconduct

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

BoB's response to allegations of misconduct

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 19:29:00 - [1] Should Sir Molle make an apology on behalf of the the boB alliance? It depends on wether you think that the leadership of BoB had any idea that T20 was a dev, that the BPO's were illegally (in game terms) aquirred, and wether they knew about the Cynonet account sharing. I think there is ample proof enough that Sir Molle knew about ALL of the above. Also there is the question of wether Sir Molle account should be suspended for revealing the real life identity of the whistleblower on these forums, albeit briefly before he edited the post. If the whistleblower had is account banned for exactly this "crime" why is Sir Molles account still active?. BoB are failing to take any responsibilty for thesse events/actions and CCP are taking a one sided approach to dealing with these EULA breaches. Either Sir Molle should be banned or Kugutsemen's accoumnts should be re-instated.
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 19:43:00 - [2] Quote: Another bitter small BoB hater that cant do anything against them instead spamming forums with ****load of crap. You don't like BoB? Its simple take ship and go shoot them, vent your frustration. I do.. and I die and go get another one and go out again, and will continue to do so. However unlike you my post is not full of meaningless vitriol but contains facts and questions that are pertinent.
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 19:58:00 - [3] Quote: 1 dev gave himself Bpo's Who then donated them to the allinace. BoB ran a cynonet allowing sharing of accounts in breach of the EULA Sir Molle revealed RL information on another player on the forums a breach of the EULA Why are CCP not addressing these issues?
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:03:00 - [4] Actualy we have to come clean here, S****dly is actually made up of WoW dev's who are **ed at losing out at this years awards to Eve and have decided to bring the game down from within.. This is all our fault T20 and the BoB leadership have in fact done nothing wrong at all,. and any confessions by T20 and the CCP CEO were forced out of them on pain of being hit with a big magic sword
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:12:00 - [5] Quote: You guys just admitted siding with a hacker and condoning illegal actions out of game for in game gain, you can step down from your high horse now. try reading comprension 101 again, you clearly failed first time. I havent condemned or condoned the methods used to gain any information. I have only stated the known facts about BoB's leaderships abuse of the EULA and T20's admission about the BPO's. Your posts would be noticed far more if you tried at least to address the issues.
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:15:00 - [6] Quote: This is a matter that CCP needed to sort out CCP have "sorted" it out. thay have banned the accounts of one player for revealing real life info about another player While totally ignoring the fact that Sir Molle did exactly the same, plus knew about account sharing for the BoB cynonet also against the EULA. One sided "sorting"
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:18:00 - [7] Reading comprension again.. I have made it very clear that it is BoBs leadership who knew about this EULA transgressions that should take responsibilty for them.
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:24:00 - [8] No because I went to a website that I had no knowledge about until all this started, and read the proof. Unlike you I make my mind up, not out of loyalty, or freindship but by reading the evidence presented and making my own judgement. Are you really niave enough to believe that if the whistleblower hadnt bought this out in to the open we would ever know about T20's illegal activities, about how the BoB leadership have breached the EULA, and how CCP have refused to take action over those EULA breaches?
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:28:00 - [9] Originally by: Adril Alatar Originally by: merc999 Edited by: merc999 on 11/02/2007 19:56:36 BoB ran a cynonet allowing sharing of accounts in breach of the EULA Sir Molle revealed RL information on another player on the forums a breach of the EULA Can i point you to this thread? http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=473490 Originally by: kieron If anyone has evidence of account sharing in a cynonet network on the part of players, submit a petition. The GM team will investigage the evidence in the petition and take appropriate action. as we cannot discuss petitions here I cant tell you that numerous petitions along with proof of EULA breaches have been submitted by various people Funny enough I cant tell you either that those seem to have been a bit slow in getting dealt with unlike the the petition that may or may not have been submitted against the whistleblowers banning
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 20:35:00 - [10] Or the part where CCP wre given proof of account sharing being known by BoB leadership, or the part where CCP knew about the revaeling of personal information about another player by Sir Molle. They managed to ban one player who revealed this information within hours, Sir molle's account is still active.. Strange that, maybe Sir Molle has friends in Iceland
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 21:03:00 - [11] No-one is pointing the finger at the Bob members, they play the game just like anyone else. It is the BoB leadership , who knew about the affair, and the other EULA breaches that should have the balls to do what T20 has done, and stand up and apologise for cheating. The rank and file BoB members have nothing, zero, zip to be ashamed about. I applaud there achievements and their abilities.
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 21:59:00 - [12] Quote: Honestly, what exactly are you claiming BoB have done wrong? BoB? .. no only the BoB leadership 1. operated shared accounts, organised on an alliance level (Cynonet) breach of EULA 2. revealed real life deatils on the forums of another member -breach of EULA 3.Knowingly accepted BPO's from a Dev who obtained them by out of game mechanics- cheating these are only what has been exposed, who knows what else may still be to come out
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 22:22:00 - [13] Dark Shakiri if you know of other alliances breaching the EULA have you got proof? and petitioned them? If not, why not, ? I only have seen proof of one that is breaching the EULA. Go to the website that cant be mentioned on here ( I guess you know which one) and see the discussions between Bob leadership, then tell me that the leadership did not know. Sir Molle should recieve a Temp ban? why should he be different from one other user who has recieved a permanent ban for the same offence?
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 22:38:00 - [14] again.. go to that website and read.. It is notable that BoB have not denied the content or claimed that the content reproduced on there is made up. probably because they know it has been saved to hard drives with details that can show their accuracy!! Although that could be their next tactic (screen shots this post with time and date for royalties) if they that silly and the message detailing the reason for the account banning is also on there.. guess what ? its for revealing personal info, exactly what Sir Molle has also done
merc999 Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2007.02.11 22:42:00 - [15] BTW.. lets be very clear here, there is no proof of any illegal "Hacking", there are ways to get access to private forums without using any illegal methods. any stating that a person "HAS" hacked without proof on a public forum can be very silly

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.