Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
505
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 15:42:19 -
[121] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Oh we have always won regardless of unfavorable circumstances and will continue to win regardless of how hard butthurt carebears cry for more nerfs. by crying for buffs? Afaik CODE. never got any buffs, only nerfs so that highsec can become like Hello Kitty Online hasn't highsec always been hello kitty online? A long time ago it was a little dangerous :P Now it's numb
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gł+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|
Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
505
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 15:45:57 -
[122] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote: Hyperdunking is a banale offense. Bumping got nerfed (or is getting nerfed) to 3 minutes. And the rest of your points affect all the player base. Citadels are in lowsec too, and there are more -10.0 toons down there than is HS as well
None of the other points were requested by CODE. members but hey... nice try lmao Arguments invalidated. GG no re
Oh my god that was a funny reply Don't think I have the heart to pick that to pieces... Impress me with that epeen You should probably look at it directly, instead of looking at it in the mirror... Because objects in the mirror are smaller than they appear
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gł+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
994
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 16:00:13 -
[123] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Oh we have always won regardless of unfavorable circumstances and will continue to win regardless of how hard butthurt carebears cry for more nerfs. by crying for buffs?
If anything I'm crying for less severe nerfs...
What buffs have I requested?
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1770
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 16:23:25 -
[124] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Oh we have always won regardless of unfavorable circumstances and will continue to win regardless of how hard butthurt carebears cry for more nerfs. by crying for buffs? If anything I'm crying for less severe nerfs... What buffs have I requested?
Actually you are asking for the nerf to be diluted so that it has no real impact, as all you will need is a bumper and a second account made up of three suicide alts which can cover their use, meaning thst you can operate as you were before. We go from no consequences to meaningless consequences, even with the three minutes its still meaningless consequences, but you have to have three accounts to cover it.
So in fact you want your meaningless consequence method of pointing people indefinately.
If people like me can accept that the point re-sets the timer, you can accept to have to have one more account, or have more friends.
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7786
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 16:56:09 -
[125] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Lan Wang wrote:code are crying a lot these days They certainly are, they want to emulate their founder Show me on the barge where His Holiness James 315 touched you Actually I found it rather amusing that he was crying over can baiting... And the only holy thing about James315 is his vest, and Dom try not to use that child **** reference, its not very funny... EDIT: A little bird told me that the collateral scam is going to end with a collateral calculator which shows how far above the real value it is...
CODE has been nothing more than one big whine.
TEARS was all about singling out a miner or mission runner and aggressing that one person and then either killing their ship alone or bringing in RR too. It all depended on the situation. Then of course the "blame the victim" routine.
CCP approached that problem with a player solution. Crimewatch and loot abandonment. You see a lot of mission runners decided that they didn't need the loot anyway so they ignored the ninjas or took to shooting the wrecks.
Funny thing was, if you didn't bother with the ninja, that was tears because the nefarious nabobs would just as well assume it "Oh look they sooooo buttmad they didn't do anything I'm so leet!" or if they shot the wrecks "Oh look they so buttmad they shot the wrecks and lost ISK from modules and salvage I'm so leet!".
I read their posts and blogs. They were like that creepy cousin that would think every girl at the party wanted him, regardless of the interactions.
But ignoring them was not enough. I have seen the tactics. Get aggressed, line up with a target. CCP fixed that too with NPC AI improvements.
But the biggest insult was probably loot abandonment - a final proof that yes indeed the mission runner never wanted that loot anyway and all those tears of the past were null and void. Crimewatch was also painful for them: it meant that other PVPers could attack them. That was the last thing they wanted. It was all about using a PVP fit against a mission fit and still calling it PVP. It was also all about the joys of gaslighting and blaming the victims in forums and in local. Acting all coy about it, seeing what buttons they can push further and further and further. Meta jollies.
And they call these "nerfs" too.
The butthurt brigades would turn to suicide ganking. GMs said "Find a way to make this role-playing or game related or else" so they had to come up with mining permits. This has been admitted to numerous times.
But long before CODE. even old school suicide gankers (people have been doing it since 2003 BTW) said it was rather odd that you can get an insurance payout for a criminal act.
It was also rather odd that an industrial ship was made of paper. If you put 7 friends in a car armed with small rifles and attempted to take out a really huge truck you might damage it but you won't destroy it. The same was said about wreck HP and nobody cried. I would say the TEARS guys have been crying since the start of CODE. as CODE. is a monument towards it.
And CODE. does not always win. Things are not going well for CODE as we can see here, here, and here. and they even have to change how they do things "because of us" - do we get to say "ooooh they must be buttmad having to play the game differently!! I'm so leet! Notice me Senpai!!!"
I'm curious. As CODE. find themselves not the only "PVPers" in highsec and AG learns to gank and bump, what will the next endeavor be? Where will they all go next? I assumed they would resort to highsec deccing but there are already merc players, apt to deal with targets that do fight back, already scratching and clawing for that content, with the CEOs constantly under the challenge of "keeping the members interested", a situation made worse by removal of watch lists.
But... but.... miner bumping is not ganking! And was bumping freighters. And has been said before: bumping a freighter may or may not be involved with ganking it, but freighters have been bumped for over an hour at times. And it was possible to bump a freighter all day without consequences. That was bad mechanic. Just like all wrecks having 500 HP (something I was taking advantage of and getting some very salty CODE. tears from BTW), just like insurance payouts for criminal acts.
Maybe Emperium is hiring.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
505
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 17:01:05 -
[126] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:tears more tears alot of tears even more tears
do you post stuff that's actually not tears about CODE. being better at making content than you? at this point I don't think anyone bothers reading your posts as they always end up in "grr CODE. they do better than me so I has to try and make them look bad"
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gł+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7786
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 17:02:39 -
[127] - Quote
Dom Arkaral wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:tears more tears alot of tears even more tears
do you post stuff that's actually not tears about CODE. being better at making content than you? at this point I don't think anyone bothers reading your posts as they always end up in "grr CODE. they do better than me so I has to try and make them look bad"
I expected you to go full creepy cousin.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
505
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 17:05:44 -
[128] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:tears more tears alot of tears even more tears
do you post stuff that's actually not tears about CODE. being better at making content than you? at this point I don't think anyone bothers reading your posts as they always end up in "grr CODE. they do better than me so I has to try and make them look bad" I expected you to go full creepy cousin. Expect the unexpected That's the only thing you can or can't expect from me
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gł+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
996
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 20:01:08 -
[129] - Quote
"The butthurt brigades would turn to suicide ganking. GMs said "Find a way to make this role-playing or game related or else" so they had to come up with mining permits. This has been admitted to numerous times. ".
This is soooooo false! Why do people still think this crap?
You do not need any kind of reason or justification to shoot another person's spaceship in this spaceship-shooting game. Why can't people get this through their skulls?!
Ask a GM, please!
A suicide gank does not needs to be profitable in any way, and it most certainly doesn't have to be "role-playing or game related" (whatever that means).
I hear this all the time from the carebears I kill: "all this New Order stuff is just an excuse to gank people!!1"
Trust me folks, we don't need an excuse to kill your retriever, we have plenty of good reasons to kill retrievers, but we don't need a single one of them.
If you wanna kill a retriever for lols or because you're in a bad mood today and a pretty explosion would cheer you up, go for it!
I say again: It is not against the rules to blow up spaceships in this spaceship blowing-up game.
Herzog, one would think that as much as you like to post about EVE on forums, that you'd actually take the time to learn what you're talking about. Please educate yourself about the rules of EVE Online and stop misinforming people, thank you.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7789
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 20:26:49 -
[130] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:"The butthurt brigades would turn to suicide ganking. GMs said "Find a way to make this role-playing or game related or else" so they had to come up with mining permits. This has been admitted to numerous times. ".
This is soooooo false! Why do people still think this crap?
You do not need any kind of reason or justification to shoot another person's spaceship in this spaceship-shooting game. Why can't people get this through their skulls?!
Ask a GM, please!
A suicide gank does not needs to be profitable in any way, and it most certainly doesn't have to be "role-playing or game related" (whatever that means).
I hear this all the time from the carebears I kill: "all this New Order stuff is just an excuse to gank people!!1"
Trust me folks, we don't need an excuse to kill your retriever, we have plenty of good reasons to kill retrievers, but we don't need a single one of them.
If you wanna kill a retriever for lols or because you're in a bad mood today and a pretty explosion would cheer you up, go for it!
I say again: It is not against the rules to blow up spaceships in this spaceship blowing-up game.
Herzog, one would think that as much as you like to post about EVE on forums, that you'd actually take the time to learn what you're talking about. Please educate yourself about the rules of EVE Online and stop misinforming people, thank you.
Osmon LOCAL June 3rd 2016:
Quote:
62.[07:01:06] Liek DarZ > We would prefer not havnig to demand the 10m, but GMs told us to. 63.[07:01:10] Liek DarZ > We comply, of course 64.[07:01:24] guigui lechat > GMs told you to ? 65.[07:01:35] Polarchewbacca Wookie > careful the guy never lies 66.[07:01:38] Liek DarZ > GMs back then asked us to demand some monetary gains in addition to just following our set of rules. So we ask for the low amount of 10m, stable for years now already. That should show we do not have money in mind really, right? 67.[07:01:52] Liek DarZ > not me personally, but yes, James 315 was told back then. 68.[07:01:56] Church Lady > Hmmm. That IS special 69.[07:02:03] Liek DarZ > so he had to charge for his permits now 70.[07:02:15] Church Lady > Did you even have permits before that? 71.[07:02:19] guigui lechat > 10M is a lot for noobies 72.[07:02:22] Liek DarZ > James 315 did 73.[07:02:36] Liek DarZ > The Knights of the New Order followed later 74.[07:02:50] Liek DarZ > And here we are.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
|
Crinnfika
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 20:26:59 -
[131] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:Sarah Flynt wrote:I really don't get why you think you're entitled to an aggression free tackle mechanism for a certain ship class when all other forms of piracy simply accept the fact that they can't do certain things when having a security status below -5. I never said I was. But the balancing of the massive EHP against the binary nature of the CONCORD mechanic is problematic. It is the exact reason that the other capital ships are not allowed into highsec - the EHP is just too high for a DPS race game mechanic to be feasible and thus they would be invulnerable.
The reason capitals are not allowed in highsec has nothing to do with EHP vs concord. You could totally highsec gank capitals. You'd just need something bigger than a gang of cheap fit catalysts.
Captials are not allowed in highsec because CCP doesn't want highsec to become a giant staging ground for nullsec alliances, which is what would happen if capitals where allowed in highsec. |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
997
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 21:37:45 -
[132] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:"The butthurt brigades would turn to suicide ganking. GMs said "Find a way to make this role-playing or game related or else" so they had to come up with mining permits. This has been admitted to numerous times. ".
This is soooooo false! Why do people still think this crap?
You do not need any kind of reason or justification to shoot another person's spaceship in this spaceship-shooting game. Why can't people get this through their skulls?!
Ask a GM, please!
A suicide gank does not needs to be profitable in any way, and it most certainly doesn't have to be "role-playing or game related" (whatever that means).
I hear this all the time from the carebears I kill: "all this New Order stuff is just an excuse to gank people!!1"
Trust me folks, we don't need an excuse to kill your retriever, we have plenty of good reasons to kill retrievers, but we don't need a single one of them.
If you wanna kill a retriever for lols or because you're in a bad mood today and a pretty explosion would cheer you up, go for it!
I say again: It is not against the rules to blow up spaceships in this spaceship blowing-up game.
Herzog, one would think that as much as you like to post about EVE on forums, that you'd actually take the time to learn what you're talking about. Please educate yourself about the rules of EVE Online and stop misinforming people, thank you. Osmon LOCAL June 3rd 2016: Quote:
[07:01:06] Liek DarZ > We would prefer not havnig to demand the 10m, but GMs told us to. [07:01:10] Liek DarZ > We comply, of course [07:01:24] guigui lechat > GMs told you to ? [07:01:35] Polarchewbacca Wookie > careful the guy never lies [07:01:38] Liek DarZ > GMs back then asked us to demand some monetary gains in addition to just following our set of rules. So we ask for the low amount of 10m, stable for years now already. That should show we do not have money in mind really, right? [07:01:52] Liek DarZ > not me personally, but yes, James 315 was told back then. [07:01:56] Church Lady > Hmmm. That IS special [07:02:03] Liek DarZ > so he had to charge for his permits now [07:02:15] Church Lady > Did you even have permits before that? [07:02:19] guigui lechat > 10M is a lot for noobies [07:02:22] Liek DarZ > James 315 did [07:02:36] Liek DarZ > The Knights of the New Order followed later [07:02:50] Liek DarZ > And here we are.
I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7790
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:04:48 -
[133] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?
The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason.
Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3179
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:09:39 -
[134] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:"The butthurt brigades would turn to suicide ganking. GMs said "Find a way to make this role-playing or game related or else" so they had to come up with mining permits. This has been admitted to numerous times. ".
This is soooooo false! Why do people still think this crap?
You do not need any kind of reason or justification to shoot another person's spaceship in this spaceship-shooting game. Why can't people get this through their skulls?!
Ask a GM, please!
A suicide gank does not needs to be profitable in any way, and it most certainly doesn't have to be "role-playing or game related" (whatever that means).
I hear this all the time from the carebears I kill: "all this New Order stuff is just an excuse to gank people!!1"
Trust me folks, we don't need an excuse to kill your retriever, we have plenty of good reasons to kill retrievers, but we don't need a single one of them.
If you wanna kill a retriever for lols or because you're in a bad mood today and a pretty explosion would cheer you up, go for it!
I say again: It is not against the rules to blow up spaceships in this spaceship blowing-up game.
Herzog, one would think that as much as you like to post about EVE on forums, that you'd actually take the time to learn what you're talking about. Please educate yourself about the rules of EVE Online and stop misinforming people, thank you. Osmon LOCAL June 3rd 2016: Quote:
[07:01:06] Liek DarZ > We would prefer not havnig to demand the 10m, but GMs told us to. [07:01:10] Liek DarZ > We comply, of course [07:01:24] guigui lechat > GMs told you to ? [07:01:35] Polarchewbacca Wookie > careful the guy never lies [07:01:38] Liek DarZ > GMs back then asked us to demand some monetary gains in addition to just following our set of rules. So we ask for the low amount of 10m, stable for years now already. That should show we do not have money in mind really, right? [07:01:52] Liek DarZ > not me personally, but yes, James 315 was told back then. [07:01:56] Church Lady > Hmmm. That IS special [07:02:03] Liek DarZ > so he had to charge for his permits now [07:02:15] Church Lady > Did you even have permits before that? [07:02:19] guigui lechat > 10M is a lot for noobies [07:02:22] Liek DarZ > James 315 did [07:02:36] Liek DarZ > The Knights of the New Order followed later [07:02:50] Liek DarZ > And here we are.
I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect. I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game. GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING. I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game. I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game. Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
who is james 315 and why do we never see him or hear from him apart from these silly soundclouds he does. where is he?
ps. you sound really angry
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1776
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:12:37 -
[135] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun.
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|
Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3180
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:21:33 -
[136] - Quote
your asking for the op because code is dying and you cant get the numbers anymore, everything relevant on your killboard is all goons and 1 code.
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|
Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
507
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:22:12 -
[137] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
[07:01:06] Liek DarZ > We would prefer not havnig to demand the 10m, but GMs told us to. [07:01:10] Liek DarZ > We comply, of course [07:01:24] guigui lechat > GMs told you to ? [07:01:35] Polarchewbacca Wookie > careful the guy never lies [07:01:38] Liek DarZ > GMs back then asked us to demand some monetary gains in addition to just following our set of rules. So we ask for the low amount of 10m, stable for years now already. That should show we do not have money in mind really, right? [07:01:52] Liek DarZ > not me personally, but yes, James 315 was told back then. [07:01:56] Church Lady > Hmmm. That IS special [07:02:03] Liek DarZ > so he had to charge for his permits now [07:02:15] Church Lady > Did you even have permits before that? [07:02:19] guigui lechat > 10M is a lot for noobies [07:02:22] Liek DarZ > James 315 did [07:02:36] Liek DarZ > The Knights of the New Order followed later [07:02:50] Liek DarZ > And here we are.
Aren't chatlogs forbidden unless they're in the Pirate Story thread? With names omitted?
Quote:35. Posting of chat logs outside the Crime & Punishment forum channel is prohibited.
The posting of chat logs between player parties is prohibited on all forum channels of the EVE Online forums, with the exception of the Crime & Punishment Channel where they can be posted as part of stories in the Pirate Story Thread.
Specific rules regarding the omission of pilot names apply in this instance. Further details can be found in the rules stickies in the Crime & Punishment forum channel.
Read the rules lmao
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gł+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gł+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
998
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:44:45 -
[138] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun.
Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
998
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:52:07 -
[139] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?
The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason. Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me.
So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you?
No attempt to justify your nonsense?
Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3180
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 22:58:25 -
[140] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?
The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason. Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me. So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you? No attempt to justify your nonsense? Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming.
where do you and all your friends live?
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|
|
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
333
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 23:02:37 -
[141] - Quote
Ahahahaha LOOOL
DEAL WITH IT.
You don't need 3 minutes. You need 28 bombers and 25 seconds. Get gud or get out. |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
998
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 23:05:35 -
[142] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?
The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason. Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me. So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you? No attempt to justify your nonsense? Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming. where do you and all your friends live?
Tulsa, Oklahoma?
If you're ever in town drop me a line and we'll have a pint m8! :D
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7790
|
Posted - 2016.06.17 23:27:23 -
[143] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in?
The one you are desperately projecting on people you hate for no reason. Whatever happened to you IRL, I'm glad it didn't happen to me. So you're officially copping-out of the argument now because I've cornered you? No attempt to justify your nonsense? Please stop making things up and splerging them all over EVE -O, there are literally dozens of people on this forum you could be misinforming.
You feel cornered and now will make the charge of me being cornered. I already proved you wrong. See how you project? CODE. is one big projection. You are in highsec for the same reason your prey is. Only you are the butthurt one.
Sorry your feelings got hurt there. But you need to learn how to deal with that.
I see you guys are already moving to bombers and citadel jump offs. But don't be in the forums in a month after the change saying "SEE we adapted CODE wins again! HURF BLURF". We predicted the same day this change was announced but I'm sure you'll project something regardless.
EDIT: Tulsa. LOL. No wonder.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
999
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 01:05:58 -
[144] - Quote
Lol I love how in carebear world "Liek Darz said it, so it must be true."
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1000
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 02:42:14 -
[145] - Quote
Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone*
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
335
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 04:38:09 -
[146] - Quote
I concur. You are most certainly keeping us entertained. The Order emerges victorious once again, providing much needed content for the mindless hordes of forumbears! |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1777
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 07:35:25 -
[147] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun. Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it.
No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer which is obviously not about just ganking...
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|
Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3184
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 08:27:02 -
[148] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone*
You didnt answer my question, where is this james 315 that you all worship
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|
eddie valvetino
Snuff Box Snuffed Out
211
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 12:40:45 -
[149] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:I realize that CCP aims to nerf highsec freighter ganking, but do they intend to end it all-together?
When the nerf to Awoxing was on the horizon, a desperate plea was made by the players and CCP had the good judgement to implement the toggle-switch, thus saving awoxing from total death.
Now, a nerf to freighter suicide ganking comes in the form of a 3-minute warp timer, and we need to try and reason with CCP to allow us more than just 3 measly minutes.
Just making it 5 minutes would make a world of difference.
I implore you, noble Devs, reconsider the practicality of recently proposed mechanics changes to bumping/warping.
Thank you.
Perhaps if you weren't playing Eve PvP on easy mode, you would have more friends and there for more ships and more dps..
just saying
Also, if you are no grid for longer than 3 mins... why can you not fit scrams?
Perhaps your base level of "PvP" as yet to come across this most basic of offensive mods |
Rogwar Toralen
EVE University Ivy League
22
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 17:12:47 -
[150] - Quote
Have they implemented that 3 minute thing yet? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |