Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Menaiya Zamayid
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
11
|
Posted - 2016.10.15 16:21:47 -
[1] - Quote
Is it intentional that Command ships can only fit one command burst module period? I can understand if I can only have one effect, but the description is badly out of date then.
Will tech I battlecruisers be able to fit a single command burst?
If this is the case then the only reason to go for a command ship (Which requires a massive amount more training) is the resist profile.
Thank you CCP and ISD. |
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory Peoples United Republic Empire
207
|
Posted - 2016.10.15 18:02:49 -
[2] - Quote
single command burst - all battlecruisers t1 and faction . gnosis aswell if you fit command processors you can use more links on t1 or faction battlecruiser and gnosis command destroyers can fit multiple command bursts. |
Aldran Gentlharp
I Maicar Mordo Invictum.
18
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 10:05:20 -
[3] - Quote
right now you can fit only 1 mining foreman command burst to an rorqual as well |
Chan'aar
State War Academy Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 12:21:08 -
[4] - Quote
I suspect they have not authored all the command type ships to accept more than one of the new command bursts. The command bursts will be a new module type not a direct one-for-one replacement of the ganglink modules.
Hence the ship bonus's will need updating. |
Arronicus
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Badfellas Inc.
1534
|
Posted - 2016.10.17 00:26:22 -
[5] - Quote
Command ships and rorqs will be able to fit more than one, ccp is just fixing things.
It's also worth noting that ccp has said that command processors are going into the garbage, and we'll be getting rigs to replace them. We'll have to see how terrible the rigs are, CCP could really shaft everyone hard by putting 350 calibration on them, but at least now your shield command ships wont have a ****-poor tank compared to armor, especially when you consider how unfairly slaves boost armor command ship hp compared to shield commands. |
Aldran Gentlharp
I Maicar Mordo Invictum.
18
|
Posted - 2016.10.17 07:28:09 -
[6] - Quote
The problem is more that we can't test the changes properly while the patch on sissi is incomplete. |
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
18659
|
Posted - 2016.10.17 08:44:46 -
[7] - Quote
Aldran Gentlharp wrote:The problem is more that we can't test the changes properly while the patch on sissi is incomplete. sure you can.
CCP: go try a thing, is it ****ed?
you: k its ****ed. is this thing supposed to be ****ed?
CCP: depends, how is it ****ed?
you : quite ****ed
CCP *pinches nose*
Praposal:Un-F**k Locator Agents
Praposal:Un-F**k NPC Corps
=]|[=
|
|
CCP Habakuk
C C P C C P Alliance
1631
|
Posted - 2016.10.17 08:54:02 -
[8] - Quote
So yeah, this is indeed still work in progress, but I hope that this will be fixed with the one of the next two patches on Singularity.
CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)
Bug reporting | Mass Testing
|
|
Darkblad
1291
|
Posted - 2016.10.17 09:17:26 -
[9] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:It's also worth noting that ccp has said that command processors are going into the garbage, and we'll be getting rigs to replace them. We'll have to see how terrible the rigs are, CCP could really shaft everyone hard by putting 350 calibration on them, [...] The rigs exist (on sisi and chaos), but they don't have any attributes yet. So that's another thing to wait for
http://playground.schildwall.info/basics/types/types.php?name=Large%20Command%20Processor%20I
NPE-ISD-Übersetzt!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |