Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
108
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 12:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
Smodab Ongalot wrote:Bumblefck wrote: That in itself is a pretty big assumption
Not really. The mere fact that game mechanics permit us to perform high sec ganks in the first place would imply that the game designers did not intend empire space to have absolute security. If indeed absolute security was the intent, the game would simply prevent my guns from firing in the first place. Duh.
Hi sec is not meant to be safer (it can't), but just to bring punishment on those who make it unsafe.
In fact the above "exercise of destruction" would be just fine except if you are using ways to circumvent game mechanics.
I.e. if it works, I find it fishy at best to take Concord away, it's staying was meant to implement diminishing returns into a freshly suicide ganked area.
Also, if this "farm way" of grinding dozens ships in short time goes mainstream, expect some nerf. Don't overdo it, else it'll probably be taken away. |
Smodab Ongalot
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 13:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: In fact the above "exercise of destruction" would be just fine except if you are using ways to circumvent game mechanics.
I.e. if it works, I find it fishy at best to take Concord away, it's staying was meant to implement diminishing returns into a freshly suicide ganked area.
Also, if this "farm way" of grinding dozens ships in short time goes mainstream, expect some nerf. Don't overdo it, else it'll probably be taken away.
We aren't doing anything that Goons, or any other ganker that used a tower or Orca to supply ships in space, hadn't done or posted instructions about before.
The only difference is that we are much better at it!
|
Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
914
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 18:32:00 -
[33] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Smodab Ongalot wrote:Bumblefck wrote: That in itself is a pretty big assumption
Not really. The mere fact that game mechanics permit us to perform high sec ganks in the first place would imply that the game designers did not intend empire space to have absolute security. If indeed absolute security was the intent, the game would simply prevent my guns from firing in the first place. Duh. Hi sec is not meant to be safer (it can't), but just to bring punishment on those who make it unsafe. In fact the above "exercise of destruction" would be just fine except if you are using ways to circumvent game mechanics. I.e. if it works, I find it fishy at best to take Concord away, it's staying was meant to implement diminishing returns into a freshly suicide ganked area. Also, if this "farm way" of grinding dozens ships in short time goes mainstream, expect some nerf. Don't overdo it, else it'll probably be taken away.
By this logic, smartbombs would have been outlawed in hisec years ago. |
foxnod
BOAE INC GIANTSBANE.
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 01:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
There you have it. Proof that 90% of ice miners are bots. |
Kara Books
Hedion University Amarr Empire
83
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 09:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
first thoughts that come to mind:
Booster Tech 2 ammo boosters |
Smodab Ongalot
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 15:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kara Books wrote: also notable to mention that different systems with different security status in highsec have different concord intervention times.
If you can get 3 people and t1 fit catalysts, nothing else matters. You can happily destroy mackinaws all day long while ignoring your GCC. The newly buffed catalyst does soooo much damage, it is in a league of it's own.
A whole new era of industrial terrorism is upon us.
|
Jeicam Mmis
Nyan-straction Extract.
37
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 23:05:00 -
[37] - Quote
inspiring. Best I can do is 6/hr but you've given me some ideas here. +1 :) |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |