Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Nathanial Victor
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:45:00 -
[1]
Concord missions?
Everything has been in place for a long time (right up their w/ lvl 5+ missions). Are we waiting on factional warfare?
Just curious, i doubt i'll run em if/when they come out, but if those bs's become available i can buy the bpc from a mission runner
I'm bored at work... but not so bored that I wanna comb through blog after blog and figured someone here might be able to shed some light?
|
RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:48:00 -
[2]
Yeah.
|
Asimov Andies
Gallente Red Blade Industries
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:55:00 -
[3]
Originally by: RedFall Yeah.
can I have your sig? -=#=- Angry beer bottles make Kaemonn a sad panda
NO It's Been Touched |
Dal Rath
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:57:00 -
[4]
concord missions were removed some time ago, since concord standing is essentially the same as sec status. I don't want to see them come back, but I have to admit it would be cool to have some other way to get one of those ships. Maybe killing a lot of -10 standing players... |
Nathanial Victor
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:58:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Nathanial Victor on 12/04/2007 21:56:18 /me looks up
wtf? you ppl just reply for teh sake of replying?
i mean, i appreciate the bump and all guys, but if your gonna reply, atleast actually post something pertaining to the topic
Originally by: Dal Rath concord missions were removed some time ago, since concord standing is essentially the same as sec status. I don't want to see them come back, but I have to admit it would be cool to have some other way to get one of those ships. Maybe killing a lot of -10 standing players...
hmmm..... well it cant be that hard to seperate security status and standings towards a concord faction?
and what if not? why would it be an issue if they left it the same? or to say, why wouldn't you want to see them come back?
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Dal Rath concord missions were removed some time ago, since concord standing is essentially the same as sec status. I don't want to see them come back, but I have to admit it would be cool to have some other way to get one of those ships. Maybe killing a lot of -10 standing players...
CONCORD Loyalty Points for killing low-sec players? That's genius! Have a cookie! --------
|
RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 21:59:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor /me looks up
wtf? you ppl just reply for teh sake of replying?
i mean, i appreciate the bump and all guys, but if your gonna reply, atleast actually post something pertaining to the topic
Okay.
|
Nathanial Victor
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:01:00 -
[8]
Originally by: RedFall
Okay.
you make god very angry
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:02:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor
Originally by: RedFall
Okay.
you make god very angry
QFT.
--------
|
RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:06:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor
Originally by: RedFall
Okay.
you make god very angry
Sorry, I'm not married.
|
|
Dal Rath
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:12:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor
[quote=Dal Rath concord missions were removed some time ago, since concord standing is essentially the same as sec status. I don't want to see them come back, but I have to admit it would be cool to have some other way to get one of those ships. Maybe killing a lot of -10 standing players...
why would it be an issue if they left it the same? or to say, why wouldn't you want to see them come back?
Because grinding concord missions gives pirates and griefers a (very) fast way of raising their sec status, which in my view creates a game balance issue. Maybe all concord missions should be non-combat, that would fix it. Then the bad boys would have to choose the slow killing NPC's in belts method of raising standing or the quick but embarrassing flying around in a hauler doing delivery missions method. |
Dal Rath
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:15:00 -
[12]
another thought...
If the agent system is set to become more LP-store based, then perhaps you should be able to put LP based bounties on pirates rather than isk bounties. The person who kills the wanted player earns the LP bounty, spendable at a concord store... |
Nathanial Victor
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 22:18:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Dal Rath
Because grinding concord missions gives pirates and griefers a (very) fast way of raising their sec status, which in my view creates a game balance issue. Maybe all concord missions should be non-combat, that would fix it. Then the bad boys would have to choose the slow killing NPC's in belts method of raising standing or the quick but embarrassing flying around in a hauler doing delivery missions method.
well, if the agents were restricted to 1.0 systems....
|
Tolomea
Gallente 5th Front enterprises New Eve Order
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 23:32:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor
Originally by: Dal Rath
Because grinding concord missions gives pirates and griefers a (very) fast way of raising their sec status, which in my view creates a game balance issue. Maybe all concord missions should be non-combat, that would fix it. Then the bad boys would have to choose the slow killing NPC's in belts method of raising standing or the quick but embarrassing flying around in a hauler doing delivery missions method.
well, if the agents were restricted to 1.0 systems....
That's good, but it's also evil, it's like dangling a bottle of water just out of reach of a person dying of thirst.
|
Phoenix Lord
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 23:36:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Nathanial Victor
Originally by: Dal Rath
Because grinding concord missions gives pirates and griefers a (very) fast way of raising their sec status, which in my view creates a game balance issue. Maybe all concord missions should be non-combat, that would fix it. Then the bad boys would have to choose the slow killing NPC's in belts method of raising standing or the quick but embarrassing flying around in a hauler doing delivery missions method.
well, if the agents were restricted to 1.0 systems....
We dont need anymore high level agents in high sec.
Arrow Capital Ship Sales |
|
lordharold
Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 01:12:00 -
[16]
Off-topic posts removed, please keep this on-topic.
-Lord Harold
|
|
Phoenix Lord
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 01:19:00 -
[17]
What the...
*takes scissors away from lord harold*
Dont run with scissors! D:
Arrow Capital Ship Sales |
Dao 2
Suicidal-Kushan-Pirates
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 01:51:00 -
[18]
sitting in beta is where it is ;p ------------------------------------------------ NEWLY ADDED ON 1/19 (though applies to all posts before ;p)
the usual "I don't represent my corp or alliance" and stuffs like that
My blog abou |
Alski
Gallente Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 02:12:00 -
[19]
ISD lordharold wins this thread
-
|
Demented Fury
Jita Garbage Collection LTD
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 02:36:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Phoenix Lord What the...
*takes scissors away from lord harold*
Dont run with scissors! D:
wtf? earth AT?
|
|
Phoenix Lord
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 02:45:00 -
[21]
earth AT? what are you talking about.
Arrow Capital Ship Sales |
ElrondMD
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 02:58:00 -
[22]
Would be funny if he was talking about Alliance Talk from Earth2025 :P
|
Phoenix Lord
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 04:09:00 -
[23]
Sucks, i wasnt in arrow when it was in earth :(
Arrow Capital Ship Sales |
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 10:23:00 -
[24]
^^^ You guys are just being defiant now --------
|
|
Huitzilopochtli Tlaloc
Forum Moderator Interstellar Services Department
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 10:33:00 -
[25]
thread has gone off topic - im not as nice as lordharold
click.
- Thanks Hutch. ____
forum rules | [email protected] | ME
They call me Hutch. I have forgoten why |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |