Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Etel Ri Fletta
Ghosts of Doomheim Rate My Ticks
0
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 23:19:01 -
[1] - Quote
CCP you kill all idea booty of ore on any other ship except RORQ!
A price on minerals falls at a speed of light!
what sense is in training any Exhumers except RORQ?
Any Rorqual can save dron's when use Mobile Depo if he tackled.. And he lose only 3b when die And he mine 200+ kk ish per H. You can use 2-4-8-10 Rorqual and mine 400kk \ 800kk \ 1.6b or 2b per H! You mine in afk, just look in alts nearby systems and compression ORE.
Successful attempt to bring down a game!
Look to Goon's he mine in 40 rorq in one system and nobody nothing can do them. |
Scipio Artelius
Savage Moon Society
46818
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 23:25:16 -
[2] - Quote
Before changes:
Wah Wah, CCP there will never be any reason to use a Rorqual out of a POS
After changes:
Wah wah, CCP there is no reason to use anything but a Rorqual for mining now.
CCP -->. |
2Sonas1Cup
211
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 23:30:22 -
[3] - Quote
Yaya video games are srs businez |
Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji.
1971
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 23:31:39 -
[4] - Quote
Etel Ri Fletta wrote:
Look to Goon's he mine in 40 rorq in one system and nobody nothing can do them.
That's why you bring a fleet. Of supercaps. You're just mad because you can't kill them with your Tengu anymore. |
Kosomot
Poseidon Energy and Industrial
55
|
Posted - 2017.02.09 23:48:29 -
[5] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Etel Ri Fletta wrote:
Look to Goon's he mine in 40 rorq in one system and nobody nothing can do them.
That's why you bring a fleet. Of supercaps. You're just mad because you can't kill them with your Tengu anymore.
Well I have a Legion will that work now?
on this note.
Too many tenguz why CCP u kill game and allow all tenguz to be good...i see i in fleets tooo mannnyyyy tenguzzz
please nerf so my legion haz moar sex appeal.
that is all.
carry on.
I am a miner, mission runner, and explorer...
or as EVE Online would have it...
A Carebear!!
|
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
5427
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 00:25:29 -
[6] - Quote
Damned if you buff... damned if you nerf.
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
2537
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 00:39:29 -
[7] - Quote
you have to put a 3b ship in belt and siege it, well it better be better than a 300m barge.
@ChainsawPlankto
|
Boozbaz
Brutor Clan
43
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 00:49:31 -
[8] - Quote
You can't stop the Rorq. Can't stop the Rorq. |
Matthias Ancaladron
Wrath of Angels
103
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 01:51:40 -
[9] - Quote
What is the cooldown on the panic button? Is there some sort of fatigue that stops say ...100 rorq from fleeting up and just using each button in succession when the last one expires? |
Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
2540
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 02:19:06 -
[10] - Quote
Matthias Ancaladron wrote:What is the cooldown on the panic button? Is there some sort of fatigue that stops say ...100 rorq from fleeting up and just using each button in succession when the last one expires? I didn't know so I looked at the description.
This module burns out completely after a single activation and will need to be repaired to be used in the future.
The effect from this module applies to subcapital mining and hauling ships in the same fleet as the activating Rorqual. Does not apply to other Rorquals.
@ChainsawPlankto
|
|
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
5432
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 02:25:05 -
[11] - Quote
You all were thinking this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GHN1Mu6VG0
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Hir Miriel
Elves In Space
296
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 02:50:59 -
[12] - Quote
Rorq me Rorq me Give me the Rorqing all night long
~
~~
Thinking inside Schrodinger's sandbox.
~~
~
|
Neuntausend
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1457
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 03:47:03 -
[13] - Quote
Can't be the Rorq that crashes the prices. Nullsec is way too scary to mine there. |
P3ps1 Max
Hedion University Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 03:56:48 -
[14] - Quote
Remove the "no risk" button they currently have. |
Aiwha
Infinite Point Test Alliance Please Ignore
1218
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 04:07:19 -
[15] - Quote
Its exactly like carrier ratting vs. battleship ratting. Rorqs are fine.(for mining, jump hics are pretty bullshit)
Sanity is fun leaving the body.
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3761
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 05:38:44 -
[16] - Quote
Aiwha wrote:Its exactly like carrier ratting vs. battleship ratting. Rorqs are fine.(for mining, jump hics are pretty bullshit)
yeah the ~750 mill/hr is totally balanced
BLOPS Hauler
|
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
5433
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 06:11:38 -
[17] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:yeah the ~750 mill/hr is totally balanced Didn't they already nerf the Excavator drones once?
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
March rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
2059
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 06:36:50 -
[18] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Aiwha wrote:Its exactly like carrier ratting vs. battleship ratting. Rorqs are fine.(for mining, jump hics are pretty bullshit) yeah the ~750 mill/hr is totally balanced High-sec incursions are totally off the balance talking risk/reward. And nobody asks for nerf it. Why rorqual?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
Shallanna Yassavi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
482
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 06:40:14 -
[19] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:you have to put a 3b ship in belt and siege it, well it better be better than a 300m barge. So what's the point of the barge again?
A signature :o
|
Scipio Artelius
Savage Moon Society
46831
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 06:59:14 -
[20] - Quote
Shallanna Yassavi wrote:Chainsaw Plankton wrote:you have to put a 3b ship in belt and siege it, well it better be better than a 300m barge. So what's the point of the barge again? Mercoxit mining and mining in highsec and jspace (and if anyone mines in lowsec).
Exhumers are still worth having. |
|
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
5436
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 07:52:39 -
[21] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:High-sec incursions are totally off the balance talking risk/reward. And nobody asks for nerf it. Why rorqual? I make 250m+ ISK/hour in high-sec just missioning - Incursions are not out of whack. Considering what you have to drop on a Rorqual along with fitting it out and the risk it entails - it's not out of line.
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Gregorius Goldstein
Ze One Man Show
1901
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 09:30:02 -
[22] - Quote
If you have a big enough Alliance living in a small enough area and fast responding fleets you can risk high amounts of ISK and still be relatively safe. Like the Goons mining with a lot of Roquals that are together worth over a hundred Billions. Spread you Alliance over to much space and you will lose stuff, be to slow when your ships get tackled and you will lose stuff, donGÇÖt bring the numbers and you will lose stuff. Simple as that. Roquals are just a nice tool to make a good use of territory superiority. If you didnGÇÖt secure your space like that you are better of mining in anything less expensive. |
Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat Snuffed Out
3909
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 10:12:28 -
[23] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Aiwha wrote:Its exactly like carrier ratting vs. battleship ratting. Rorqs are fine.(for mining, jump hics are pretty bullshit) yeah the ~750 mill/hr is totally balanced High-sec incursions are totally off the balance talking risk/reward. And nobody asks for nerf it. Why rorqual?
people are always shouting to nerf incursions
Alliance Logo Design Service
--
Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel
|
Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji.
1971
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 12:47:17 -
[24] - Quote
Shallanna Yassavi wrote:Chainsaw Plankton wrote:you have to put a 3b ship in belt and siege it, well it better be better than a 300m barge. So what's the point of the barge again?
The barge is something to do while skilling up for a Rorqual. It takes quite a few months to train all the necessary skills. |
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3434
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 13:48:35 -
[25] - Quote
Don't touch the Rorqual's insane output, but make them more vulnerable to destruction. There should be many Rorquals in belts and many of them shall be destroyed ... this would make me happy.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Keno Skir
1261
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 14:17:38 -
[26] - Quote
Shallanna Yassavi wrote:Chainsaw Plankton wrote:you have to put a 3b ship in belt and siege it, well it better be better than a 300m barge. So what's the point of the barge again?
Quite obviously the point of a Barge is for situations where a Rorq isn't a good idea. For your education i'll list a few situations, and i'm sure you can think of a few more really
Gùï In Hisec where Rorq is not allowed to operate. Gùï In dangerous space where heavy reinforcements are not available to defend said Rorq. Gùï When you don't have the SP for a Rorq. Gùï When your corp cannot secure it's space reasonably from aggressors. Gùï When you or your corp do not have billions to drop on a mining ship / fleet of mining ships.
Your question implies there is no point in anything except the biggest version of whatever ship, which is so short sighted i'm pretty sure you didn't think through your post at all.
<Gùï> 250,000 Bonus SP when you start an Alpha Clone HERE <Gùï>
<Gùï> Contact me regarding my trusted Alliance Creation Service <Gùï>
|
March rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
2061
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 15:00:51 -
[27] - Quote
P3ps1 Max wrote:Remove the "no risk" button they currently have. Once we roamed around and found brave Rorq pilot. He with his friends (couple subcaps + super) forced our small nano gang to leave.
But then we returned with 70 alliance mates Panic button delayed death of first Rorq while we were busy killing another one (he tried to help his mate against our tacklers). Then both Rorqs transformed to killmails + l00t.
That's 'no risk' button....
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
Salvos Rhoska
2079
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 15:05:46 -
[28] - Quote
TLDR: -Rorqs with sufficient defense support allows for vast material generation.
Impact: -A large NS entity that fields them en-mass, can accrue absolutely insane amounts of materials. -A smaller NS entity, even if previously defeated, can commensurately rapidly rebuild its capacity/relevance, if they redirect/incentivize those materials to that purpose.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
2543
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 15:32:12 -
[29] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:Aiwha wrote:Its exactly like carrier ratting vs. battleship ratting. Rorqs are fine.(for mining, jump hics are pretty bullshit) yeah the ~750 mill/hr is totally balanced according to pyfa the yield/hr for a max rorq is 816,800m3/hr and fuzzwork has ark as the top ore at 473 isk/m3 giving a yield of 386mil/hr. That seems kinda reasonable to me.
@ChainsawPlankto
|
Salvos Rhoska
2079
|
Posted - 2017.02.10 15:40:40 -
[30] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:giving a yield of 386mil/hr. That seems kinda reasonable to me.
You find 386mil/hr for shooting at rocks, reasonable?
Really?
As I said above, the real problem here is when this enormous mineral generation in the most lucrative sectors of space saturates its own market demand and begins to flood into HS markets.
386mil/hr is an insane rate specific to a certain sector and certain hull. Invariably, this WILL collapse the mineral market, and by extension, all other markets that involve minerals.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |