|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1534
|
Posted - 2017.02.25 19:52:16 -
[1] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Mr Mieyli wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:hystereological Invented word detected Its an alternative word... Just like your facts as well.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1535
|
Posted - 2017.02.26 15:35:15 -
[2] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Its an invasive action ... So what?
"Invasive" isn't a criteria that triggers flags. It's whether it's an offensive module or not. The mechanics are pretty clear:
https://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/introducing-the-new-and-improved-crimewatch/
A cargo scanner is not an offensive module. No flag. As it should be.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1535
|
Posted - 2017.02.27 07:49:29 -
[3] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: B) Nerfs HS PvP. It does not. It increases it, as the scanning ship can be attacked post-change.
Scanning ships can already be attacked. Nothing prevents that now.
What you mean is you want people to be able to engage with no consequence. Increase the consequence for the ganker alts and remove all consequence from everyone else.
There is no reason to shift that balance.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1535
|
Posted - 2017.02.27 10:28:34 -
[4] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:... reducing consequence for the ganking alts in the group effort. Typical stupid Salvos 'logic'. I don't want to reduce anything.
Scanning ships can be ganked, just like any other. No change needed.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1535
|
Posted - 2017.02.27 10:54:10 -
[5] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:baltec1 wrote:Well in that case lets put the exact same punishments on anyone who shoots an NPC ship. After all, according to you its risk and punishment free. NPCs are not players, or capsuleers. A suspect timer is not a "punishment". Its a mechanic which enables NPC free player conflict, as a consequence of taking action against another player. So it should be ok if they get a suspect timer, since it is not a "punishment". After all he/she can still run missions. All it will do is increase player interaction, which is a good thing I hear. Yep, this seems like an equivalent argument, especially if missions involve shooting factions and not pirates.
After all, the flagging system is run by DED, who are an agreement between the races.
So if a player shoots a faction ship, they should go suspect at least. Surely it's 'logical' that the empires aren't going to be happy witht capsuleers that shoot their citizens.
It's not a punishment after all.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1535
|
Posted - 2017.02.27 10:57:34 -
[6] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:... reducing consequence for the ganking alts in the group effort. Typical stupid Salvos 'logic'. I don't want to reduce anything. Scanning ships can be ganked, just like any other. No change needed. All ships can be ganked. So what? The issue is that scanning ships incur no risk/cost for acquiring valuable data from a potential targets fit/cargo. So if there is no risk already, how would I even be wanting it to be reduced? How can you reduce risk to less than 0 in that case?
Your logic gets weirder every post.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
|
|
|