| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
   |
Posted - 2007.05.13 13:28:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Solusar on 13/05/2007 13:29:27
What could of been a nice fight at the gate ended up with none of the CVA forces even loading the grid *yay*. That would explain how you took next to no loses jumping into a bubbled gate. I believe the only part of our fleet that loaded the grid was a small number of IAC vessels. Local was at 158 when you guys first jumped in, ill go see if I can find some screenshots. Local topped out at around 250-260 so that suggests you brought less than 50 people if your numbers are accurate? Our gang was 135 when we engaged your fleet at your POS, not 200+. At that point there was 220 people in local, so again if we were 200+ you had less than 20 people in local.
After that point we were on the defensive, as Hardin has pointed out we waited for you to attack a POS with defenses, you didnt, you left/routed. We secured the system.
Job done.
The war rolls on.
|
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 13:56:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Solusar on 13/05/2007 13:56:01
 Originally by: Butter Dog
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne
your forces decided to attack the least defended pos first.
Hello, anyone home?
We only came in to kill your Capital Shipyard. Based on this mission objective, can you guess why we might have attacked that POS?
Changing your objectives when your borrowed muscle leaves doesnt do anything to improve your situation. Maggot has already stated he knew along with the rest of you that the ship yard was empty.
All this has shown is you are not willing to take the risks necessary to take an outpost system.
The war rolls on.
|
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 17:13:00 -
[3]
Hmm, where are CVA pilots getting "all wound up?"
UK are pawning this off as a major victory in terms of the war when in reality it changes nothing. That is all we are pointing out I believe. Congratulations on killing the POS ofcourse, but it is not some sort of strategic victory.
Karishals Folly is still in CVA hands.
All of the POS deployed by UK in CVA systems have been destroyed.
CVA still maintains POS in 9UY and system superiority for the majority of the time.
The majority of the fighting is being done by outbreak/evoke/chaos incarnate. No one is complaining about this, just pointing this out.
We lost 1, yes shock horror, ONE POS. The sky is surely falling. We will now pack up and go home  UK continue to attack CVA POS at times when our numbers are low, they come out at times when our numbers are high and are recharged. This has been happening repeatedly.
I suggest the "bragging" stops until the dust settles.
Nice to see all the smack is coming from one organisation as usual. *Waves to butters*
|
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 17:19:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Maggot
Originally by: Vantras
If only this fight had anything to do with UK and the CVA itd be far more interesting.
Nothing is more entertaining then watching the UK pilots coming here with some sort of feeling of pride in their posts while 100's and 100's of pirates and gankers fight on thier behalf. Times they certainly are a changing....
Maybe you should have done a non-CVA count when QR was invaded or maybe checked the non-CVA capital ship numbers in the battle when U'K lost 6 capital ships due to issues that 'cannot be detected server side'.
Times have changed indeed.
What gives me pride is working with such quality allies and seeing a 100% turnout of active pilots within U'K.
I just did a quick count to amuse myself. Of the capitals that killed yours during that fight, there were 12 CVA and 5 Severence, so the majority of the fleet was CVA capitals.
The fleet that attacked our capitals contained 5 capitals, 2 of those belonged to Ushra'Khan. The fleet also contained 70 battleships. 10 of those were Ushra'Khan battleships.
|
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 22:14:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Sapphrine
Originally by: Abn Matar
Originally by: Lilan Kahn
mommy IAC
Bitter much?
CVA i'll take a bit of flak from, they at least know how to fight. How many cap ships did you lose today again? Just as well you guys weren't meant to be helping CVA tonight... god only knows what you'd have been able to send the way you seem to be getting pasted.
Taking lessons from Butters now? Smacking people about fights that you wernt involved in?
|
Solusar
Amarr
Auctoritan Syndicate
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.13 22:17:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Mangold
Originally by: Solusar
I just did a quick count to amuse myself. Of the capitals that killed yours during that fight, there were 12 CVA and 5 Severence, so the majority of the fleet was CVA capitals.
The fleet that attacked our capitals contained 5 capitals, 2 of those belonged to Ushra'Khan. The fleet also contained 70 battleships. 10 of those were Ushra'Khan battleships.
Quit whining. I saw plenty of IAC in X-R3 too.
For the record, we had more than 10 BS and from what I can tell from our killboard CVA had 17. And that's not counting NOS, VV, Pie et al.
I am deeply displeased on how CVA handles this.
Your deeply dissapointed at how CVA has handled this? Every CVA post here is a reply to a claim by either butters or one of your own members. Id suggest talking to them before pointing fingers.
|
| |
|