Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
BABARR
PARABELUM-Project
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:30:00 -
[1]
I start to be REALLY bored of gate camper in low sec in mother ship, we can't SCRAMBLE that ******* ship in low sec system !
CCP can you PLEASE take it in consideration and remove this ******* big flying WCS !
What is the utility to a mothership to be imune to the warp scramble ?
Lamer get out of 0,0 and come camp in low sec cause they simply now they can't be killed.
...
"Si vis pacem, parabellum" |
kessah
Blood Corsair's The Red Skull
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:46:00 -
[2]
man CCP know the issue by now - trust those boffins up in iceland, they will fix this problem.
-------------------------------------------------------- [Video] Forever Pirate 3
|
PauZotoh Zhaan
Teylas Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:50:00 -
[3]
Originally by: BABARR I start to be REALLY bored of gate camper in low sec in mother ship, we can't SCRAMBLE that ******* ship in low sec system !
CCP can you PLEASE take it in consideration and remove this ******* big flying WCS !
What is the utility to a mothership to be imune to the warp scramble ?
Lamer get out of 0,0 and come camp in low sec cause they simply now they can't be killed.
LOL, you are soo noob:) you say you cant kill MS in low sec? they you doing something wrong period.
|
NoNah
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:51:00 -
[4]
Originally by: PauZotoh Zhaan
LOL, you are soo noob:) you say you cant kill MS in low sec? they you doing something wrong period.
Not that I don't believe you, but I don't suppose you mind pasting me some killmails of motherships?
Postcount: 889817
|
BABARR
PARABELUM-Project
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:53:00 -
[5]
Quote: they you doing something wrong period
oO ...
"Si vis pacem, parabellum" |
Wardog 1
Infinitus Odium The Church.
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 21:56:00 -
[6]
Guys, if you want people to LISTEN to you, its IMPORTANT that every so often you CAPITALIZE a word, for EMPHASIS of course, its common sense these days that CAPITALIZATION makes you COOL, but don't overdo it.
Seriously though, short of an extreme desync, epicly horrendous lag, reccuring ctd's, or if a really bad P.E.B.C.A.C (see, extreme ******ation), its not realistically feasable to kill a mothership in lowsec.
|
Hyuuga Veralis
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:02:00 -
[7]
Originally by: PauZotoh Zhaan
Originally by: BABARR I start to be REALLY bored of gate camper in low sec in mother ship, we can't SCRAMBLE that ******* ship in low sec system !
CCP can you PLEASE take it in consideration and remove this ******* big flying WCS !
What is the utility to a mothership to be imune to the warp scramble ?
Lamer get out of 0,0 and come camp in low sec cause they simply now they can't be killed.
LOL, you are soo noob:) you say you cant kill MS in low sec? they you doing something wrong period.
Is this going to be one of those 'nos the ca and bump it till you kill it' tactics that don't have a snowball's chance in hell of working in lowsec?
Or will it rely on a MS desync? -------------- Fulfilling 0.0 Ammo needs since 2 days after being made. |
NoNah
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:04:00 -
[8]
Infiltrate their corp, offer to give him a cyno to the nextdoor lowsec system, but which actually leads into a traped 0.0!
Or impersonate the cynoalt, I bet they'll fall for it.
Or bring enough dreads to alpha it/kill it before it aligns.(See the last time tyrrax ms was in hull)
Postcount: 851979
|
Neo Providence
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:08:00 -
[9]
warp scramblers? man your really a noob, but everyone knows that bubbles is the way to go against cap ships.
|
NoNah
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:10:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Neo Providence warp scramblers? man your really a noob, but everyone knows that bubbles is the way to go against cap ships.
Way to go old sir. Not sure if its your ignorance that made you fail to understand that this is in the part of eve where bubbles can't be used? Or that you were unaware that bubbles can't be used in lowsec? Or a combination of the two?
Newbies flaming spammers <3
Postcount: 845565
|
|
Chronus26
Gallente Team Laser Explosion Molotov Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:31:00 -
[11]
For retail cost of a MS I could buy say 200+ T2 fitted BS and be just as untouchable in lowsec. I don't see your issue here. You can pick of individual BS but the entity as a whole survives, and no way you can keep all 200 of those BS held in place in lowsec.
Apply this to your MS: You can pick off individual Drones and Fighters but the MS still survives, and there is no way you can hold it in place.
If you want rid of it I suggest you take on a different approach. The last thing the Mothership wants is a huge bill for a drone bay full of new drones, so gang up, fit a few smartbombs and remote reps and go cost him a fortune. All the better if he's using fighters, even one wave costs a small fortune! I'd reckon if you cost him enough he'll move on. A little outside-the-box thinking goes a long way ya'know. -----
|
F90OEX
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:33:00 -
[12]
Sounds like he's talking about the gate camping NYX in the 0.3 system
|
NoNah
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:38:00 -
[13]
Thing is 200 battleships - means 200 pilots, which is an effort in itself. And as you say, you can pick of single battleships. Do that 200 times and guess what? 200 BS's can and will not move as a group, you can take down 200 battleships in a small ganksquad of vagas or inties - given some time. And don't even get me started on the work of organizing and motivating this gang EVERY time a pilot wants to?
You can never calculate on isk efficiency like that, as it would mean that the velator is best - all cases - all scenarios. How many velators can you field for 30b?
Thing is, you've got a single player, playing with smartbombs in a perfectly safe enviroment. Yes, he can throw fighters at smartbombing ships, or heck, he can self-destruct, but unless he wants to - he's perfectly safe and can stroll around smartbomb as he like. Making an income just popping haulers and the occasional soloship he manages to scram. And yes, I find something wrong about that.
Postcount: 170934
|
Aceoil
Murder-Death-Kill
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:54:00 -
[14]
So instead of trying to figure out a way to be the first to kill a mothership in lowsec, or guerrilla attacking the MS till he leaves. You just come onto the forums and whine that the older player who invested 25billion in a MS cannot be killed in lowsec.
Meebee adapt or die?
|
BABARR
PARABELUM-Project
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 22:55:00 -
[15]
Quote: warp scramblers? man your really a noob, but everyone knows that bubbles is the way to go against cap ships.
LOL, the problem is in low sec you can't launch buble, if you come flame when you don't know what we are speaking about, go to bed.
And the problem of 200 BS is : it's a bit funny if you need so much ppl to kill a lonly ship, and whith 200 BS your MS in low sec is still untackled and always can cyno out or warpout. ...
"Si vis pacem, parabellum" |
BABARR
PARABELUM-Project
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 23:02:00 -
[16]
Quote: So instead of trying to figure out a way to be the first to kill a mothership in lowsec, or guerrilla attacking the MS till he leaves. You just come onto the forums and whine that the older player who invested 25billion in a MS cannot be killed in lowsec.
Beacause the fact to pay a ship 25 billion give you the right to be in god-mode in low sec and not in 0,0 ? Do you think CCP make the mother ship to camp low sec systeme? actually MS pilote come camping in low sec instead fight in 0,0 cause they know they can't loss their ship. When i buy expensive ship i'am always ready to loss it against T1 crappy ship, cause i don't think EVE is a game where it's the one who got more money and bigger ship can kill everyone. ...
"Si vis pacem, parabellum" |
Reem Fairchild
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 23:38:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Reem Fairchild on 12/09/2007 23:41:02
Originally by: Chronus26 For retail cost of a MS I could buy say 200+ T2 fitted BS and be just as untouchable in lowsec. I don't see your issue here. You can pick of individual BS but the entity as a whole survives, and no way you can keep all 200 of those BS held in place in lowsec.
Apply this to your MS: You can pick off individual Drones and Fighters but the MS still survives, and there is no way you can hold it in place.
If you want rid of it I suggest you take on a different approach. The last thing the Mothership wants is a huge bill for a drone bay full of new drones, so gang up, fit a few smartbombs and remote reps and go cost him a fortune. All the better if he's using fighters, even one wave costs a small fortune! I'd reckon if you cost him enough he'll move on. A little outside-the-box thinking goes a long way ya'know.
And for the price of a battleship (not to mention its fittings) I can put together an armada of at least 200 frigates with fittings. Does that mean that it should be as difficult to kill a single battleship as it is to kill 200 frigates?
Incidentally, it only takes about 10 tech 1 fitted tech 1 frigates (20 if you want to be certain, 30 for overkill) to kill a battleship.
|
Sokratesz
Paradox v2.0 Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.09.13 07:43:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Chronus26 For retail cost of a MS I could buy say 200+ T2 fitted BS and be just as untouchable in lowsec. I don't see your issue here. You can pick of individual BS but the entity as a whole survives, and no way you can keep all 200 of those BS held in place in lowsec.
Apply this to your MS: You can pick off individual Drones and Fighters but the MS still survives, and there is no way you can hold it in place.
If you want rid of it I suggest you take on a different approach. The last thing the Mothership wants is a huge bill for a drone bay full of new drones, so gang up, fit a few smartbombs and remote reps and go cost him a fortune. All the better if he's using fighters, even one wave costs a small fortune! I'd reckon if you cost him enough he'll move on. A little outside-the-box thinking goes a long way ya'know.
Blablabla.
Mothership = 1 pilot.
Fleet = 200 pilots.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |