Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Leto Aramaus
Grimm Hounds
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 16:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
From my own post on changing EVE's gameplay mechanics:
Quote:Standard ship propulsion = used to fly around solar systems, station to station, planet to planet
Warp Drives = used to fly to other systems or just far outside your current system into deep space (ONLY able to reach nearby stars in the same "cluster"/constellation)
Stargates/Jump Drives = used to jump to other constellations/clusters of close stars -so instead of every single system having a stargate, you would jump to a cluster and be in the first (most colonized?) system, then fly your ship to any nearby stars in the constellation with your warp drive
To go along with this, and my next biggest change, would be for our view/zoom-out-ability to encompass the entire system. So you could zoom all the way down to your ship the way we see it now, or zoom all the way out to see the solar system (fully created 3D planets, sun, moons...) and be able to ship spin, or planet spin, all in the same GUI/persistent world.
Then in turn, the game mechanics must change as such: -remove local (which needs done anyway) -ship sensors determine everything you can see (some ships see further than others, some have AU ranges, some have sensor ranges around the 400kms we have now
|
Gerrick Palivorn
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
175
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 00:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Miss Whippy wrote:Cloaking is fine. If you're scared by cloakers, don't leave high-sec.
While I agree with your sentiment, this thread is for open discussion of mechanics that CCP is looking into changing. Much like the changes to probing in Apocrypha. The probing changes were deemed unnecessary at first and there was resistance from the older population of Eve. This time we get an advanced warning, the CSM conference in December says that the Dev's are looking at the dynamics of local chat and cloaking.
We now have the chance to state what we would like to see if change is required. That is the reason I created this thread, if you wish to make comments like this that is fine, there are many threads in F&I where it would be appropriate (I do it myself too). There are many good idea's here and I wouldn't want them to become devalued by trivial comments from people who didn't even bother to read the OP. |
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 03:09:00 -
[63] - Quote
Gerrick Palivorn wrote:There are many good idea's here and I wouldn't want them to become devalued by trivial comments from people who didn't even bother to read the OP
Yeah this is the thread for serious discussion on cloaking and Local changes. It's also a shame we have other posters that insist on creating new threads to talk about cloak hunting like it's something that hasn't been discussed before. Well I guess most of them are just venting due to AFK cloakers and their inability to deal with something so trivial.
Also amusing how people refer to CCP mentioning cloaking hunting in the CSM minutes but then completely skimming over that CCP also mentioned changes to Local Chat in the same CSM minutes. It really can't be said often enough, no balanced cloak detection can occur before Local Chat Intel is first removed.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |