| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
DeadDuck
Amarr
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
   |
Posted - 2007.10.21 11:34:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Law Enforcer
Edited by: Law Enforcer on 21/10/2007 11:32:53
instead of making them useless like you made titans.
|
DeadDuck
Amarr
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:12:00 -
[2]
Well the lag in fleet fights will go down by a lot ... so go for it 
|
DeadDuck
Amarr
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:36:00 -
[3]
My only concern is the lag the actual Carrier/Mom system causes...
I dont mind if CCP increases fighter damage for a big percentage and in return reduces the amount of drones carriers they can carry and deploy at a time...
I just dont want to see the clouds of drones that more and more populate fleet fights.
I think this solution would be good, to keep all the ones that trained for carriers/moms happy and on the same time everybody happy with the lag reduction that this solution would bring.
|
DeadDuck
Amarr
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 11:11:00 -
[4]
About 1 week ago we were hitting a pos with conventional fleet... a certain alliance cynoed in 6 Motherships and 26 carriers with minimal support... thats where the present status drove things in 0 space... Very nice indeed... we packed things and walk away, they packed things and walk away... lots of fun for bioth sides 
|
DeadDuck
Amarr
Amarr Border Defense Consortium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 11:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Gamesguy
Originally by: Mr Funkadelic
Originally by: DeadDuck
About 1 week ago we were hitting a pos with conventional fleet... a certain alliance cynoed in 6 Motherships and 26 carriers with minimal support... thats where the present status drove things in 0 space... Very nice indeed... we packed things and walk away, they packed things and walk away... lots of fun for bioth sides
And they spent atleast 50 times the amount of isk on ther fleet than you did - Why should they not be sucessful in defending the pos?
Exactly, Thats like complaining your "conventional fleet" of t1 cruisers got "blobbed" by a fleet of hacs and command ships and promptly pwned.
As for support, POS tend to make pretty good support when there is lag involved.
No just saying that we didnĘt engage our Capital fleet there cause we knew it could happen what happened.. Drop a entire cap fleet on top of our Capitals in siege mode.
ThaT fleet didnt have any support and was capable of fielding +400 fighter drones... Now imagine that we had engaged a fleet with similar magnitude. ThatĘs + 1000 drones fighting in a POS + hundreds of ships in system. Capitals Online turned into Lag Online... Dam great...
Then we could all post the usual "CCP FIX THE DAM GAME" BLA, BLA, BLA, BLA....
|
| |
|