|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
SirMolly
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 13:05:00 -
[1]
Good change. It was a wise the decision from CCP to transfer you to the game design team. The lag those fighters and drones are causing is unbelievable.
|
SirMolly
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 18:50:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Icome4u
Originally by: CCP Abathur Edited by: CCP Abathur on 23/10/2007 18:40:56
Ladies and Gentlemen, this has to do with the upcoming drone and fighter bandwidth and is not related to the delegation idea. The test server gets updated daily and as Trinity gets closer to release you will likely see a lot of things happening there. We are also working on an updated new dev blog to outline our concerns and plans for carriers. Please do not jump to conclusions and be patient. Thank you.
Not good enough. All 3 cancelation still pending. Ball is in your court CCP, you have A LOT of angry customers.
And a lot of customers that are actually satisfied with the comming change. "Capital Ships Online" ftl.
|
SirMolly
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 19:08:00 -
[3]
Edited by: SirMolly on 23/10/2007 19:08:38
Originally by: Icome4u
Originally by: SirMolly
Originally by: Icome4u
Originally by: CCP Abathur Edited by: CCP Abathur on 23/10/2007 18:40:56
Ladies and Gentlemen, this has to do with the upcoming drone and fighter bandwidth and is not related to the delegation idea. The test server gets updated daily and as Trinity gets closer to release you will likely see a lot of things happening there. We are also working on an updated new dev blog to outline our concerns and plans for carriers. Please do not jump to conclusions and be patient. Thank you.
Not good enough. All 3 cancelation still pending. Ball is in your court CCP, you have A LOT of angry customers.
And a lot of customers that are actually satisfied with the comming change. "Capital Ships Online" ftl.
Well if they want the minority (someone stated it was 0.5% or 5% of the community that want this to happen) to be happy then good for you. CCP will lose a couple thousand players and probably end up like SWG (that would be dead fyi).
And where do you get those numbers from ?
|
SirMolly
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 19:43:00 -
[4]
Don't get soft CCP, otherwise there will be endless amount of whineage every nerf. You know what's best for your game.
|
SirMolly
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 20:48:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Khes Edited by: Khes on 23/10/2007 20:43:20 I think this change is a good thing.
I see it like this: Fighter wielding capital ships is not suppose to be the main weapon in a fleet. It is suppose to give the other ships in the fleet an edge by adding to their DPS with its fighters.
In other words, the fleets reason to exist should not be to aid the capital, the capitals reason to exist should be to aid the fleet and give it an edge.
Qft. Carriers/MS MUST be nerfed. There is no space for solopwnmobiles in EVE. Especially not when there are >70 solopwnmobiles in one system at once and you can't do anything against them (spider tanking, fighter lag).
|
|
|
|