|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 06:09:00 -
[1]
I agree that carriers/MSs should, at the very least, be left the way they are. Fighters need more love, not less.
In addition, I also request the individual or individuals that came up with this epitome of idiocity be prohibited from ever getting near anything related to eve. Banish them to the janitors closet to keep the floor mops from getting lonely.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 06:25:00 -
[2]
If the quantity of accounts is a factor i have about ten so add my 'signed' ten times.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 20:18:00 -
[3]
Originally by: R3dSh1ft NOT signed - this petition makes all the carrier pilots look like TOOLS.
The proposed changes may not be perfect, but its a damn sight better than what we have now. As a carrier pilot myself - I have never found the carrier to be useful as a solo PvP ship. About the only thing its good at in pvp is tanking itself and other ships.
Now, just imagine the battlefield of 2 years in the future - each alliance has 50-100 motherships, and launches 25 fighters each. In a typical alliance vs. alliance fight, what would it be like? Theres no reason currently not to use them as they provide a massive tank, damage dealing ability, logistics and remote rep to one another, not to mention the remote ECM burst.
Motherships online? I don't want to play that game - battleships should be where the fight is, and capital ships are overused.
Allegedly the devs had the intention that BSs were to be uncommonly used ships when they first came out. The capital ships of the then new Eve. Look at where they are now. Players will automatically fly the best ship they possibly can.
Stop being a bump on the log and cave to peer pressure...sign.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 20:23:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tillek
What role shift? Carriers were designed as, have been, and will continue to be logistics ships. If you're referring to the changes which are designed to make them fit their role instead of being the primary combatant in an engagement, that is INDEED balance.
I think it's laughable that so many people have trained hard for a logistics/support ship, and when suddenly it's really going to be a logistics/support ship, there's massive outcry, dozens of petition threads, rampant flaming, threats of leaving the game, long term implausible senseless predictions about combat in eve ...
And this is before the change is even tested!
TEH SKY IS FALLING!!111
QFTW to all you childish whiners out there
Please edit your post to read 'I know nothing about carriers or their application in the overall scheme of the Eve community but will sign this petition anyway because that is what everyone else is doing.'
k?thx.have a lovely day.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.27 12:31:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Danjira Ryuujin
Originally by: Earnol Carrier and mother ship is supposed to be like it is now. And yes, i do not have carrier, so i just protecting nature of the game.
If carriers at present were fulfilling their intended role, there would be no need for changes. So clearly you're wrong, and they are not fine.
Carriers are fine and there is no need to change them.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 17:43:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Naria 'Nemuria Heh, it's easy to whine and throw empty threats about leaving, I'd love to see how many of you would really do that.
PS. Wouldn't you find it strange if a government would decide to raise taxes of rich people and those rich people wouldn't whine about it even if it would make things better for the rest of the people? ...thought so.
Grow up for a change. It's easy to whine, but it requires a lot more to present constructive criticism and alternative solutions to problems.
Your rich-people analogy sucks almost as badly as your meaningless opinion. The only problem here is the intention of the devs to needlessly eliminate a very good ship class from the game. That and you making BS posts with an alt. Youre brave. Have my babies.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.31 20:02:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Cyan Nuevo
Originally by: mythrindar Wow, if ccp go on and do this change with carriers/motherships with almost a 60 page petition, then they really do not give a $*** about its players :)
already /signed tho :)
If every post in here was from a different account, that would be under 2000 accounts, which is a drop in the bucket compared to the current subscriber count.
The loss of 2000 accounts at $15/month is $30,000 less per month income. How would you feel about losing $30k income per month.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.31 21:54:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Tao Han
Originally by: La5eR /signed
This nerf is game-breaking and just stupid. What happens to all those ppl that train up carrier and adv drone int to V?
They will need to make some friends?
Carriers/Moms need to change in some way or another, seems like CCP has choosen another way. But I hope for the love of everything thats holy that they will not cave in to threats from the playerbase, thats not good at all.
And most of these threats are hollow aswell and you know it.
The players are the ones that keep this game going with their monthly subscription. In the real world, which you have no grasp on, exchanging money for a service is what keeps said service financially viable.
No hollow threats coming from here.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 20:11:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Trelaine Edited by: Trelaine on 14/11/2007 03:48:18 /signed
FIX the lag issue on the Server side, carriers are not teh issue.
Signed.
And on that note, stop effing up things that arent broken and focus on more pressing issues. Such as Jita being lagged so badly that logging in to the system is not possible. That is ridiculous.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.11.22 15:18:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Kate Nexus Not signed. I think CCP knows what they are doing.
Considering the upcoming across the board nerfs it makes me wonder how many kilos of the white stuff you snorted before making this post.
|
|
|
|
|